Archive for April, 2017

of Champagne Socialism – Roads and Kingdoms

In Yuriys story, Stalin plays the defining role in the creation of the winery, a narrative that has likely changed little since the autocrat was alive. Creating the winery in a massive former alabaster mine is just another of his mythic, Herculean labors. Here, Stalin created a five-year plan for champagne just as he created one for coal and steel production that also transformed eastern Ukraine.

As a Georgian, Stalin came from a part of the Russian Empire with a real wine culture, where wine is carefully cultivated and sipped rather than used as substitute for vodka. Here, Stalin took that tradition and recreated it on monstrous scale.

Yuriy rattles off more statistics. Within its first four years of opening, the factory produced 1.3 million bottles of what they labelled champagne, ignoring the French requirement that the term champagne only be applied to sparking wine from the Champagne region of France. In 1959, that number doubled to 2.7 million bottles and continued to grow. Stalins aim was to provide Soviet citizensafter years of wartime rationingwith a desirable consumer good that everyone could afford. That could only be achieved with production on a massive scale.

This abandoned alabaster mine was chosen because its huge size allowed it to accommodate wine making of the scale Stalin envisioned. But there were also clear drawbacks, as the steppe winters were far too cold for grapevines. As a result, grapes had to be brought in from the south: from Georgia, Crimea, Odessa, and Moldova. That tradition carries on today in many of the winerys reds, which still use Georgian saperavi grapes.

Yuriy tells me more stories as we drive deeper and deeper into the caverns. Every so often, we stop so I can take pictures of one of the surreal Soviet murals on the walls. There are smiling young women in folk costumes collecting grapes, birds getting drunk on red wine and starting fights, and bears smoking while enjoying a bottle of Soviet brut.

Mural of woman in folk costume collecting grapes.

The unimaginatively named Soviet Champagne was the winerys first wine and flagship brand. With its iconic black and silver logo, it was instantly recognizable and the champagne in the Soviet Union. Thats not to say its particularly good. Soviet Champagne is saccarine, too sweet for most Westerners; it is said it mirrors Stalins own tastes. But for people who grew up behind the Iron Curtain, it is the taste of youth, inextricably intertwined with memories of school graduations, holiday celebrations, and the best kind of long nights. Artwinery has worked hard to hold onto this nostalgia market. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, they changed the name of the wine to Artemovsk, after the Soviet name of the city where the winery is located, to keep the Soviet association.

But in 2015, de-communization laws, found in weaker forms in many post-communist states but absent in Ukraine until after the most recent hostilities began, forced the winery to re-brand once again, as the townnamed after a Russian Bolshevik in 1924re-adopted its pre-revolutionary name, Bakhmut. The winery has compromised, changing its name from the Artemovsk Factory of Champagne Wines to Artwinery, but they are fighting to keep the valuable Artemovsk brand for the wine itself.

There are ways of getting around such rules, of course, and some find it worthwhile for the uniquely associations of grandeur. At a recent communist functionary themed party I attended, twenty-something Ukrainians and ex-pats mixed on the top floor of one of Kievs elite Stalinist high rises in an apartment that has passed from the old Soviet elite to the new capitalist one. That night, as people looked down on the bright lights of Kievs main drag, there was no shortage of Soviet Champagne. Closer inspection, however, revealed that instead of the Russian Sovetsky or Soviet, they instead bore the nonsensical name Sovetovskoe, which, owing to its complete lack of meaning, skirts the new regulations.

I follow Yuriy past a giant bust of the the Roman god of wine, Bacchus, carved into the alabaster wall. Yuriy brings me a to a map of Artwinerys exports. In 2003, they produced over 12 million bottles of champagne, 58 percent of which was exported. Before the war, Russia was the largest foreign market, but now Russian-imposed trade restrictions have cut them off entirely. Now Germany, home to the largest Russian-speaking community in Europe outside the former Soviet Union, is the largest market. There, a bottle of one of Artwinerys wines goes for about 10 euro, far more than the $3 is usually costs in Ukraine.

Artemovsk, however, was not the only major brand. After Russian annexed Crimea in February 2014, many Ukrainians were surprised to still be able to find Crimea Champagne on store shelves, even as Crimean restaurants suddenly found themselves cut off from their supplies of Crimean wines. Not so for the Crimea Champagne, the grapes of which came from Crimea, but which was made deep within these caverns.

The loss of a vital market is not the only way in which the war has affected the winery. In 2014, separatists briefly took control of the town of Artemovsk. There was a shoot out with one of the security guards at the winery, but the rebels didnt enter the caverns. But it is the economic impact that has been most lasting. With most bottles taking three years to produce, the winery has drastically cut back production and is instead hoping to sell some of the millions of bottles still sitting, unsold, in the caverns.

Passing rows of bottles, Yuriy takes me to see how the bubbles are formed in the champagne. Row after row of wooden stands contain bottles full of wine that must have their elevation increased at pre-determined intervals to ensure proper development. It is the sort of time consuming work requiring huge supplies of laborers that was only possible in the Soviet Union. Since 2003, much of the work has been automatized with the staff of the winery reduced to some 500, who now screen bottles for impurities on conveyor belts and use French-made tilting machines rather than doing the work by hand.

Amidst the kitschy murals and whirling modern technology, however, the the caverns also have a darker side. In 1942, Nazis took control of the area. After a building caught fire in Artemovsk, they blamed the citys Jewish community. Nazi forces rounded up the local Jews and kept them in a basement for two days without food or water. Then they took them to these same mines and sealed all 3,000 of them in tunnel behind a fresh new brick wall. In their report, Sonderkommando 4b stated with this action, the district of Artemovsk was also freed of Jews.

When the Soviet army retook the city and opened the tunnel, they found only a few of the victims had gunshot wounds, presumably to force them into the tunnel. The rest were left to die. When the Soviet officers discovered the bodies, they were well preserved due to the same factors that later led Stalin to choose this site for his winery: dry air and even, low temperatures. The bodies were then brought out for relatives to identify.

We come up to the site of the tunnel in our golf cart. It is another regular stop on the wine tour. The Soviet monument denies these victims their religious identity, referring to them only as Soviet citizens who lost their lives. In the Soviet worldview, identity was determined by class, leaving no room for religious or ethnic minority identities. A newer plaque from the local Jewish community calls for God to remember the souls of Artemovsks Jews, and there are memorial sculptures and candles built into the wall.

After the memorial, Yuriy brings me to a tile area set against a pink cavern wall with 70s-style display cases, each holding one of their signature bottles of wine. Yuriy again talks about their famous brands, and it dawns on me that his spiel was designed to impress high ranking-party functionaries rather than tourists.

Yuriy leading the wine tasting.

Yuriy then takes me into a cavern with a long circular table and heavy, throne-like wooden chairs. This was where the real high-level functionaries came to party. Luminaries from First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine Petro Shelest to Ukraines second president Leonid Kuchma all made visits. Noticeably absent, however, has been current Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. With the winery partially owned by political opponents like oligarch Rinat Akhmetov, he is not expected to make a visit any time soon.

From the throne room, Yuriy takes me past a formal dinning area bedecked with statues of Poseidon and Athena to a private tasting room. Here, he puts on his white lab coat and begins to instruct me in the carefully scientific process of wine tasting. Each glass must be lifted to the light, carefully tasted, and described. Yuriy briefly remarks with sadness how after the Soviet Union collapsed, the French made them drop the word champagne from their bottles, but soon moves on.

I try a mixture of their sparkling wines: white, ros, and red. Most are too sweet for me, but there is one clear standout: the Krimart brut. It has a rich, dark-red color and smells of raspberries. Rather than the sweetness overpowering the red wine, the red wine gives substance to the effervescence.

From there, it is back into the golf cart and into the dark evening. The workers are leaving the premises of the winery as they would any other factory job. I walk with them, stepping out from Stalins subterranean technicolor winery, and back into the real world.

Excerpt from:
of Champagne Socialism - Roads and Kingdoms

With Venezuela’s Socialism Spiraling into Chaos, NY Times Blames the Mess on ‘Populism’ – Breitbart News

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

This mornings key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com

Venezuelan opposition lawmaker Juan Requesens after being bloodied by a Maduro supporter (AP)

A march on Monday by members of Venezuelas National Assembly who were opposed to president Nicols Maduros Socialist government was met by men with sticks and rocks by Socialist supporters.

On Tuesday, Venezuelan police attacked protesters with tear gas, water cannons, and pepper spray. The clashes began after the authorities closed subway stations, set up checkpoints and cordoned off a square where opponents had planned their latest protest against the Socialist government and a crippling economic crisis.

The protests were triggered by a decision last week by the Maduro-controlled Supreme Court to effectively dissolve the National Assembly and take over its legislative powers, effectively making Maduro a dictator.

Maduro is in control of the presidency, the army, the media, and the courts. The National Assembly was the only body that expressed any opposition to Maduro. Maduro has repeatedly used the courts to reverse any legislative decisions that he did not like, but this time he was going to eliminate the legislative branch completely.

Maduro has been jailing bakers because there is a bread shortage, and has been jailing factory workers because there is shortage of milk, rice, flour, ketchup, diapers, and toilet paper. It seemed that Maduro could get away with anything. So it was to everyones surprise that Maduros latest move generated worldwide outrage, even from some normally compliant mainstream media sources. Even Maduros attorney general Luisa Ortega Diaz was opposed to the latest move.

The international opposition caused Venezuelas Supreme Court to reverse the decision on Saturday, but the crisis has continued because it triggered violence in the streets. There were thousands of people on both sides, pro- and anti-Maduro, in a situation where anger is increasing between the haves supporting Maduro and the have-nots opposed to Maduro. Reuters and Washington Post and Venezuelanalysis

Related Articles

The Organization of American States (OAS) approved on Monday overwhelmingly approved a resolution demanding that Venezuela restore full constitutional authority to the National Assembly.

However, that decision came at the end of two days of extraordinary brinksmanship.

On April 1, Bolivia assumed the rotating Pro Tempore presidency of the OAS. A meeting had been previously scheduled to discuss the Venezuela situation, but Bolivia is one of the two closest allies to Venezuelas Socialist government, the other one being Ecuador. So the first action taken by the Bolivian representative was to cancel the meeting.

This infuriated other OAS members, led by Costa Rica and Mexico, so they conducted what is being called an institutional coup, and went ahead with the cancelled meeting. Bolivia protested the move and subsequently walked out of the meeting, joined by Venezuela, Nicaragua and Ecuador.

There were 21 remaining countries at the meeting, and 17 nations approved the resolution, with four abstentions: Dominican Republic, Bahamas, Belize and El Salvador.

According to the text of the resolution:

EXPRESSING our grave concern regarding the unconstitutional alteration of the democratic order in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and our continuous support for dialogue and negotiation to lead to a peaceful restoration of democratic order,

[The OAS] DECLARES that: The decisions of the Supreme Court of Venezuela to suspend the powers of the National Assembly and to arrogate them to itself are inconsistent with democratic practice and constitute an alteration of the constitutional order of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. Notwithstanding the recent revision of some elements of these decisions, it is essential that the Government of Venezuela ensures the full restoration of democratic order.

Pary Rodriguez, Bolivias OAS representative, said that the resolution is totally illegal and arbitrary and dont correspond to the norms of international law. Latin American Herald Tribune and Panama Post and TeleSur

Related Articles

In a lengthy article that doesnt anywhere contain any form of the world Socialism, the New York Times blamed Venezuelas massive economic crisis on populism, apparently to take a swipe at Donald Trump.

According to the article:

When Hugo Chvez took power in Venezuela nearly 20 years ago, the leftist populism he championed was supposed to save democracy. Instead, it has led to democracys implosion in the country, marked this past week by an attack on the independence of its Legislature.

Venezuelas fate stands as a warning: Populism is a path that, at its outset, can look and feel democratic. But, followed to its logical conclusion, it can lead to democratic backsliding or even outright authoritarianism.

This is really laughable. I remember, years ago, when I really admired the NY Times, but since the 1980s it has moved progressively leftist, and today no longer reports news.

Socialism has led to disaster every time it has been tried. There have been oceans of blood spilled in the name of Socialism in countries like the Soviet Union, Cuba, North Korea and China. In fact, Socialism has been such a disaster that every country has been forced to abandon it, including the Soviet Union, Cuba, China, East Germany, and so forth. North Korea has not abandoned it, and that whole country is a disaster. Venezuela is headed the same way.

How stupid to you have to be to believe in Socialism when it has failed spectacularly every time it has been tried, and has never been successful not even once?

Actually, as Ive written several times in the past, it is pretty easy to prove mathematically that Socialism always collapses.

In 1991, I visited a huge computer show in Hanover, Germany. It was a special occasion because the Berlin Wall had just fallen, and East Germans were visiting the show for the first time. Theyre in a state of shock, I was told. Theyre still using punched card equipment from the 1950s. Why had Communist East Germany gotten stuck in the 1950s?

The same with Cuba, which is still using automobiles from the 1950s.

In medieval times, a feudal estate with a couple of hundred tenants could be run on a Socialist basis, if the feudal lord desired. All hed need is one or two regulators to make sure that all prices were fixed and all transactions follow the law.

But as the population grows exponentially, the number of transactions grows exponentially faster, and so the number of regulators needed becomes a larger and larger percentage of the population. By the time you have a country with millions of people, every person would have to be a regulator to make it work, and obviously thats impossible. So thats why countries like East Germany, North Korea, Russia and Cuba all got stuck in the 1950s until they gave up Socialism. NY Times and News Busters

KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Venezuela, Nicols Maduro Moros, Organization of American States, OAS, Bolivia, Ecuador, Costa Rica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Dominican Republic, Bahamas, Belize, El Salvador, Pary Rodriguez, Russia, North Korea, Cuba, East Germany, China Permanent web link to this article Receive daily World View columns by e-mail

Read more here:
With Venezuela's Socialism Spiraling into Chaos, NY Times Blames the Mess on 'Populism' - Breitbart News

Tea party cheers GOP nuking of ‘partisan’ Gorsuch filibuster – WND.com

Judge Neil Gorsuch

Senate Republicans voted to end the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees Thursday after Democrats refused to advance the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to a final vote, a move grassroots conservatives say had to happen out of respect for the Constitution.

Republicans cited the precedent of Democrats from November 2013, when then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid led a rules change to kill the filibuster for lower-court judicial nominees and executive branch personnel requiring confirmation.

The move came after a 55-45 vote to end debate on Gorsuch, five votes short of the 60 votes needed. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell then moved to consider the Gorsuch nomination under the rule change instituted by Democrats. His motion was denied, but McConnell then appealed the ruling of the chair, and the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees was killed in a party-line vote.

While Democrats call the move an attack on democracy, Tea Party Patriots founder Jenny Beth Martin told WND and Radio America its the Democrats who took an extreme position with their filibuster.

When it comes to Supreme Court nominees, never in the history of our entire country have we had a partisan filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee. It just hasnt been done. What the Democrats are doing right now is breaking the tradition and the practice that weve had in this country for over 200 years, said Martin, whose group has been aligned with the Judicial Crisis Network in pushing for the confirmation of Gorsuch.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WNDs Email News Alerts!

The Tea Party Patriots isbest known for advocating smaller government and lower taxes, but Martin said the Supreme Court fight is very much in her organizations interest.

We understand it is critically important that if we want to have constitutionally limited government, then we have to have a Supreme Court that upholds the law and judges laws based on the Constitution, Martin said.

Listen to the WND/Radio America interview withTea Party Patriots founder Jenny Beth Martin:

She is convinced the Democrats dont really have a case against Gorsuch but are still bitter over 2016.

They are just frustrated that its not their person, that they lost the election in November, that it is President Trump who won the election and, therefore, won the ability to nominate Judge Gorsuch, Martin said. They are doing all they can to resist what President Trump was elected to do.

What do YOU think? Sound off in todays WND poll on Senate confirmation of Gorsuch to Supreme Court.

Martin said the public is engaged on this issue and overwhelmingly in support of Gorsuch, but she said Democrats arent listening to all of their constituents.

Democrat senators are listening to their base. Theyre not listening to the whole of the American people, but they are listening to their base, Martin said. So they are doing what they think their base wants them to do.

Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, Americas independent news network.

She believes the effort to filibuster Gorsuch will backfire on red-state Democrats like Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., in 2018.

She has said that this would be a very political maneuver if they filibustered Gorsuch. Thats what shes doing, and shes doing it out of pure politics, not out of whats best for the country, Martin said.

I know that it is a political job and they are going to look at things through the prism of politics, she said. Sometimes you need to do whats best for the country because you have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution.

And Martin is firmly convinced fidelity to the Constitution will be a hallmark of Gorsuchs time on the Supreme Court.

He looks at the law, and he respects the law as its written, she said. He doesnt intend to make law and create law out of whole cloth from the bench with his decisions, and he is going to look at the law through the prism of the Constitution.

See the original post here:
Tea party cheers GOP nuking of 'partisan' Gorsuch filibuster - WND.com

The House Tea Party Caucus is Mad as Hell, Weaker Than Ever – The Texas Observer

Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:22 am CST

House budget night typically doesnt get fun until the liquor emerges and the ghost of legislatures past comes out from Sam Rayburns old inkwell, but a few things happened during the daylight part of the session that bear some mention.

First, state Representative Abel Herreros successful bid, early in the day, to bar the use of state funds for private school tuition, which passed 103 to 44. The practical meaning of the amendment is negligible, but it sends the strongest message so far this session that Lieutenant Governor Dan Patricks school choice initiatives are dead. Importantly Republicans care about this stuff more members of the House GOP caucus voted for the amendment than voted against it, so no one can say this was simply the work of House Speaker Joe Straus and his Democratic cronies.

In the history of Herreros amendment, it is possible to discern a second message. Herrero offered a similar anti-voucher proposal during the debate on the House budget in 2013, where its passage was seen a somewhat surprising declaration of the Houses true feelings about vouchers an unlikely victory from the Democratic minority that passed 103 to 43. And one that put Republicans in a tough spot.

On House budget night in 2015, he intended to offer the same amendment. But a protracted series of behind-the-scenes negotiations prompted Herrero to pull it down. The word was that, though vouchers had no chance in the House, members felt it was better to make that plain in private, and not, perhaps, to enlist so many Republicans in poking Patrick in the eye.

This year there were no such qualms. The amendment appeared and passed by almost the same margin it did in 2013. For what its worth, this session, the House seems very willing to cut off further debate on Patricks education policy proposals, and they were willing to do it loudly.The other major source of daytime ruckus was a series of measures by the Houses tea party faction Observer favorites Jonathan Stickland, Briscoe Cain, Tony Tinderholt and others to muck up little parts of state government they dont like, to derail other members amendments, and to shame the cabal they say runs the House.

This is not a new dynamic in the House far from it. But it seems to get weirder every year, and its degenerating into a kind of sputtering rage thats transfixing to watch. Last year, Stickland in particular hinted darkly and repeatedly about the blood that would flow if the House didnt start listening to him and his friends. Nothing happened. This year, something did happen with Stickland, though Im still trying to figure out what it was. (He made his first-ever personal privilege speech more here scoring what is likely to remain the highest Stickland Number ever recorded.)

The House Freedom Caucus particularly its most colorful members are weaker than ever. But its unsurprising that theyre ineffective. Whats strange is that theyre so bad at messaging. Its possible to glimpse an alternative universe in which theyre driving an effective, visible opposition to Straus, but this is not it.

Part of the problem is the targets they pick. In one memorable episode last session, Stickland tried to kill an uncontroversial and uncontested bill that would have decreased the use of euthanasia at San Antonio animal shelters. Today, he tried mightily to end state funding for smoking cessation programs. He also has a fixation with defunding state programs to kill feral hogs. At one point, Briscoe Cain, pint-sized fighter of tyrants, rose to offer an amendment that would have eliminated a state advisory council on end-of-life care, which he termed a death panel. Then he accidentally called a rep John Zerwas, the chairman of the god-powered finance committee Mr., and the chamber swatted him down like a pesky gnat.In other words, theyre against puppies and hospice care and for cigarettes and hogs. Hogs everywhere. Instead of focusing on real examples of government corruption and incompetence, they putter around, doing nothing and getting repeatedly sonned. In a way theyre even helpful to their enemies, moderate Republicans, because they suck up oxygen and attention and are as formidable as a paper target.

Read more here:
The House Tea Party Caucus is Mad as Hell, Weaker Than Ever - The Texas Observer

Muslims in Birmingham defy EDL rally with ‘Best of British’ tea party – The Independent

Officials at a mosque have answered the "hatred and division" of an English Defence League (EDL) rally by hosting a "best of British" tea party.

The open-to-all gathering at Birmingham's Central Mosque, which saw the building decked out with Union Flag bunting, was organised in response to an EDL event being held on Saturday in the city centre.

Originally earmarked to take place in the East Midlands, the EDL demonstration was switched to Birmingham after the Westminster terror attack to highlight what the group describes as a "continued increase in Islamic terrorism" linked to the city.

The rally condemned by Birmingham's political leaders in a cross-party statementis also said by the EDL to be a reaction to the city's so-called Trojan Horse schools inquiry.

Speaking to more than 100 guests at the tea party, which started two hours before the EDL event, Birmingham Central Mosque's chairman Muhammed Afzal said local people would remain united irrespective of their religion or race.

In a Facebook message posted prior to the party, Mr Afzal said: "When the English Defence League is protesting and trying to divide the community, we are holding this party just to prove to them that Birmingham is a multicultural, multi-ethnic and multi-faith community.

"We are all united and they will not be able to divide us and create hatred."

The West Midlands' elected Police and Crime Commissioner, David Jamieson, also attended the party.

Claiming the EDL was bringing "little more than division" to the region, Mr Jamieson said: "We are here today to celebrate the things that Brummies and English people hold in common.

"The English Defence League are spreading a message of hatred. They have come from outside Birmingham and they don't understand our values."

Birmingham Hodge Hill MP Liam Byrne also addressed those who gathered to chat over cake, tea and coffee at the mosque.

The Labour MP told party-goers: "Today this is how we protest by celebrating the quiet miracle of a normal life and the things that we love most about our city and about our country.

"Getting together as friends, getting together as neighbours, breaking a bit of Victoria sponge and having a cup of tea. That is a potent, powerful message that we will send to those who seek to divide us."

View original post here:
Muslims in Birmingham defy EDL rally with 'Best of British' tea party - The Independent