Archive for April, 2017

MTHS Hawkeye wins First Amendment Press Freedom Award for fourth year in a row – MLT News

Photo courtesy the MTHS Hawkeye

For the fourth year in a row, the Mountlake Terrace High Schools student newspaper The Hawkeye has won the First Amendment Press Freedom Award from the Journalism Education Association (JEA) and National Scholastic Press Association (NSPA). The paper was given the award during an opening ceremony at a JEA/NSPA conference on Thursday night in Seattle.

The award recognizes free and responsible student media that thrive at the school. While members of the Hawkeye, it is also an accomplishment for the district and school administrators. Board Member Ann McMurray was also in attendance Thursday night to accept the award.

Its an award that is earned by having a community that believes in and values the principles of the First Amendment, a school administration that values and protects students rights, and thriving student media where students are in full control of editorial decisions, Hawkeye teacher adviser Vince DeMiero said. That starts at the community level, so this is as much an Edmonds School District award as it is an MTHS award or a Hawkeye award.

The award was given to ten other schools from across the country.

(I am) incredibly humbled, but also terribly sad that everypublic school in America isnt a First Amendment Press Freedom Award winner, DeMiero said.

Schools compete for the title by answering questionnaires submitted by an adviser and at least one editor. Publications that advanced to the next level were then asked to provide responses from the principal and all media advisers and student editors, indicating their support of the First Amendment. In addition, semifinalists submitted their printed policies.

Those who were selected showed a strong commitment to the First Amendment and student media.

Mountlake Terrace High School has won the award several times, and was among the first to win the award in 2000.

View original post here:
MTHS Hawkeye wins First Amendment Press Freedom Award for fourth year in a row - MLT News

Appeals Court Hears First Amendment Tattoo Case – Courthouse News Service

CHICAGO (CN) The Seventh Circuit heard oral arguments Friday about whether Chicago police officers tattoos are protected by the First Amendment or whether they can be required to cover them up.

In mid-2015, former police superintendant Gary McCarthy implemented a policy requiring Chicago police officers to cover up any visible tattoos while on duty. Tattooed officers were required to wear long sleeves, even during the hot summer, or wear cover-up tape.

Three officers filed a federal lawsuit challenging the policy on First Amendment grounds.

Lead plaintiff Officer Daniel Medici, an Iraq War veteran, has a wings-and-halo tattoo in remembrance of his fallen comrades. The two other plaintiffs, Officers John Kukielka and Dennis Leet, each have a religious tattoo of St. Michael, the patron saint of police.

At oral arguments Friday, U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Posner wanted to know, How does a halo with wings communicate something about people killed in combat?

The officers attorney Linda Friedman said, The symbol is one recognized in the military, but would not go so far as to say it would be readily recognized as a war memorial by a person on the street in Chicago.

The judges were skeptical that the officers could recover any monetary damages for emotional injuries allegedly caused by the policy, which was only enforced for nine months before an arbitrator found that it violated the police unions contract.

The Chicago Police Department scrapped the rules in September, citing the need to boost morale.

But the Seventh Circuit panel also questioned the citys stated interest in preserving the uniformity and professionalism of the force.

Dont you have to say why uniformity is important? Judge Kenneth Ripple asked city attorney Stephen Collins. Uniformity and professionalism we hear that a lot, and it strikes me like a buzzword. What does the city gain by making an officer wear long sleeves in the summer to cover up a halo with wings?

Posner proposed that perhaps a citizen, seeing an officers tattoo of St. Michael, might suppose they were being pulled over for violating the policemans religious sensibilities.

But that has to be in the record, Ripple said.

Judge Diane Sykes sought to compare the tattoo policy to a prohibition on jewelry with a religious connotation, such as a crucifix, but Collins was not familiar with the departments policy.

Judge Ripple said he would be concerned if he was pulled over by an officer wearing a Masonic ring.

In rebuttal, Friedman informed the panel that the uniform policies allow officers to wear up to three rings, and do not regulate the content of those rings.

So an officer could wear a KKK ring, but not a tattoo of St. Michael? Ripple asked.

That is correct, Friedman said.

She repeatedly told the judges that no citizen had ever complained about an officers tattoos, and the policy was simply a result of the former superintendants personal dislike of tattoos.

Friedman asked the panel to reverse the dismissal of the case on standing grounds and allow the officers a trial on the question of damages.

It is unclear when the Seventh Circuit will rule in the case.

Read the original here:
Appeals Court Hears First Amendment Tattoo Case - Courthouse News Service

Hillary Clinton says ‘misogyny played a role’ in her loss. Research suggests she might be right. – Washington Post

In her first interview since November about November, here's howHillary Clintondiagnosed her loss to Donald Trump: Certainly, misogyny played a role. I mean, that just has to be admitted. And why and what the underlying reasons were is what I'm trying to parse out myself.

Clinton was speaking Thursday night to the New York Times' Nicholas Kristof at the Women in the World Summitin New York.

We'll probably never know whether voters' prejudice against a female potential president contributed to Clinton's loss or if it did, to what degree. Butwe do know that research has clearly demonstrated that voters hold female politicians to a different standard (read: double) from their male counterparts.

As I wrote a month before the presidential election, research from the nonpartisan Barbara Lee Family Foundation, which studies women in politics, found that women can't just be themselves when they run for office. They constantly have to contemplatewhat theirlooks, clothes and smile (whether they smile) project to voters, in a way men don't.

Take for instance the foundation's research that voters care whether theirfemale politicians are likable, an attribute that is not something they need from their male political leaders. Among the suggestions the foundation put together for aspiring female politicians to navigate voters' sometimes-confusing expectations of public women:

More recent foundation research found that voters are also concerned about female politicians' personal lives specifically, they're concerned that female politicians will struggle to balance motherhood and their careers. Among the findings:

Time and again, we found that women candidates still bump up against the gender expectations voters have for the presidency, said Barbara Lee, citing work her foundation and the nonpartisan Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University put together and are expected to release this month. After all, for 228 years, the presidency has looked decidedly male.

Even before Clinton lost, she was hinting at the outsize role she thought her gender was playing in the election. Two months before the election, she remarked thatit's especially tricky for women to come across as both serious and likable.

Because there are a lot of serious things, Clinton toldJimmy Fallon on The Tonight Show. The other night, I was on a show and being asked about ISIS and Iran, she said, using the acronym for the Islamic State, and I was serious. These are important issues that the country needs to talk about. And the Republicans were saying: 'Oh, she looks so serious.'

Clinton continued: Well, you don't talk about ISIS with a big grin on your face. They're a barbaric, evil group that we have to defeat and wipe out. But it is a constant balancing act: How do you keep the energy and positive spirit while taking seriously what you need to?

That's the bad news for gender-parity politics. The good news? Despite the documented hurdles and double standards women face in politics, research also shows that women can win elections at the same rate as men.

And anecdotal evidence from partisan and nonpartisan women-in-politics organizations suggests that Clinton's loss isn't deterring women from jumping into the public sphere, as some female leaders feared it would. Women-only classes for how to run for office are packed.

Debbie Walsh, director of the Center for American Women in Politics, recently told The Fixthat itfeels as if women are getting involved politically in a way the nation hasn't seen since the feminism movement of the 1960s and '70s.

The morning after the 2016 election, I was concerned that women might crawl under the bedsheets and just try to recover, Walsh said. But here is this real sense that women can't sit on the sidelines. I think they've gotten in a different kind of way that elections have consequences and therefore they have to step up.

So did Clinton lose the presidency because she's a woman? I don't think that's something we'll ever able to objectively measure. But many researchers have been able to measure that, in 2017, womenwho want to run for office are held to different/higher/double standards in nearly all aspects of their lives compared with their male competitors.

See the article here:
Hillary Clinton says 'misogyny played a role' in her loss. Research suggests she might be right. - Washington Post

Hillary Clinton to Give Commencement Address at Medgar Evers … – New York Times


New York Times

Read the original:
Hillary Clinton to Give Commencement Address at Medgar Evers ... - New York Times

Hillary Clinton cheers ‘a great step for progressives’ with New York’s tuition-free college program – Washington Examiner

Hillary Clinton hailed "a great step for progressives" on Saturday after New York state leaders reached a budget agreement that includes tuition-free college.

"Let's celebrate New York State getting something important done that we wanted to do nationally. A great step for progressives," Clinton tweeted in reply to New York Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

Making public colleges and universities free to attend for all was a signature issue of Sen. Bernie Sanders' during the 2016 Democratic primary campaign, which Clinton scoffed at before adopting certain parts for her own plan during the general election campaign against President Trump.

Under New York's state budget agreement, tuition for the State University of New York system will be free for families earning less than $100,000 a year starting this fall, with eligibility expanding to $110,000- and $125,000-households in 2018 and 2019. Clinton also capped her national free college plan at $125,000 households.

Clinton was the U.S. senator to New York until former President Barack Obama made his 2008 presidential rival his secretary of state.

Read more from the original source:
Hillary Clinton cheers 'a great step for progressives' with New York's tuition-free college program - Washington Examiner