Archive for April, 2017

United Kingdom Begins Formal Process To Exit The European Union – DOGOnews

Image Credit: Pixabay.Com CCO Public Domain

On June 23, 2016, the residents of the United Kingdom (UK) shocked the world by voting for the countrys exit from the European Union (EU), or Brexit. On March 29, almost nine months after the historic referendum, the countrys Prime Minister, Theresa May, began the official separation process with a letter to EU President Donald Tusk. It urged the remaining member states to allow the UK to leave in a fair and orderly manner, and with as little disruption as possible on each side.

The six-page document that outlines some of the countrys hopes and requirements during and after the separation, invoked Article 50 of the EU Agreement, which states: Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements. Officials from both sides will spend the next two years hashing out the details of this unprecedented break from the EU. The issues will range from imposing trade tariffs to migration policies, as well as deciding on new regulations to govern automobiles, agriculture, etc.

Both sides have a lot at stake as they begin the arduous process of unraveling the four-decade-long relationship. The UK, currently the worlds fifth-largest economy, has to tread carefully not to lose ground with its biggest trading partner. The EU, on the other hand, has to ensure that Britain does not get a better deal than it currently has. Thats because if the new treaty is even perceived as more favorable, other European nations will start to consider leaving the Union as well. Tusk has made it clear that the EU Councils priority, as it goes through the discussions, is to uphold the interests of the Unions remaining 440 million citizens.

The UKs negotiating power could also be weakened because a majority of Scotland and Northern Ireland, two of the four nations that make up the country, did not vote for Brexit. The residents are, therefore, unhappy with the current situation. On March 28, the Scottish Parliament authorized the Scottish Government to hold a referendum on the nations independence from the UK. The vote is scheduled to take place sometime between late 2018 and early 2019 after the Scottish people have some clarity on the consequences of the separation from the EU. Meanwhile, Irish nationalists are using Brexit as an excuse to rekindle their decades-long fight to make Ireland an independent nation.

There is going to be much uncertainty as the UK officials and members of the EU Council navigate through this uncharted territory over the next two years. However, both sides have promised to make the process as painless as possible for the residents. Hopefully, they will keep their word.

Resources: CNN.com, Guardian.co.uk, Wikipedia.org, The Verge.com

Excerpt from:
United Kingdom Begins Formal Process To Exit The European Union - DOGOnews

UK eyes trade agreement with Asean after it leaves European Union – Inquirer.net

Trade and Industry Secretary Ramon M. Lopez said that the United Kingdom (UK) has expressed interest to pursue a regional trade agreement with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), weeks after the European Union (EU) expressed intent to do the same.

Lopez told the Inquirer that UKs International Trade Secretary Liam Fox announced that they would like to have a free trade agreement with the Asean after Brexit, noting that the UK was not allowed to make any trade negotiations while its divorce from EU was ongoing.

Fox visited the Philippines last April 3 to 4, making the country the first Asean member that the cabinet official visited after UK formally notified EU of its plan to leave the economic bloc. Lopez said he was informed about this intent during the visit in his position as this years Asean chair.

UK said it can explore with Asean FTA as they Brexit, Lopez said in a text message yesterday.

He said that a regional trade deal would be more efficient to pursue because that would mean an FTA with 10 countries instead of one at a time.

UK and the EU, which will one day be divorced from each other, seem to have their eyes set on the Asean market, which has a combined economy of $2.6 trillion and a market of 600 million people.

In March, the Asean Economic Ministers, together with EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malstrm, announced that they would eventually go back to the negotiating table for a regional trade deal, years after the initiative was dropped to focus on bilateral FTAs.

It would still take time for details to be fleshed out of the regional deals, with EU and Asean in the midst of crafting the framework of the agreement while it would take at least two years for UK to leave the European bloc.

Prior to this, British Ambassador to Manila Asif A. Ahmad said that the UK was interested in having an FTA with the Philippines after Brexit. He said they would adopt the terms of the EU-PH FTA, should it be completed during the two-year period.

However, Lopez suggested that the bilateral trade deal between UK and the Philippines might have to be dropped since the Philippines would still be engaged in the proposed UK deal via the Asean.

Continued here:
UK eyes trade agreement with Asean after it leaves European Union - Inquirer.net

US Soldier Killed In Afghanistan – NPR

According to Reuters, U.S. officials say the Islamic State in Afghanistan is based overwhelmingly in Nangarhar and Kunar province. Rahim Faiez/AP hide caption

According to Reuters, U.S. officials say the Islamic State in Afghanistan is based overwhelmingly in Nangarhar and Kunar province.

An American soldier was killed in Afghanistan late Saturday, according to a statement posted on Twitter by the NATO-led Resolute Support mission.

A spokesman for U.S. Forces in Afghanistan said that the soldier was part of an operation against ISIS-Khorasan, a branch of the Islamic State operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The same spokesman confirmed to Reuters that the soldier was a special forces operator.

The U.S. and Afghanistan have been conducting special operations against ISIS-Khorasan for many months. In July of 2016 a U.S. drone strike killed the group's leader for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Hafiz Saeed Khan.

The statement released Saturday gave little detail about the circumstances of the soldier's death, but said that more information would be released "as appropriate."

Link:
US Soldier Killed In Afghanistan - NPR

US to deploy 1500 soldiers in Afghanistan to combat al-Qaeda – The Indian Express

By: ANI | Kabul | Published:April 8, 2017 8:33 pm An Afghan policeman stands at the site of yesterdays blast in Kabul, Afghanistan March 2, 2017. REUTERS/Omar Sobhani

The United States will deploy 1,500 soldiers from Alaska to Afghanistan later this year as part of a regular rotation of forces in support of Washingtons counter-terrorism operation against the remnants of al-Qaeda.

These soldiers train rigorously in a wide range of climates and environments. I am fully confident in their ability to excel and overcome any challenges they will face during this deployment, Maj. Gen. Bryan Owens, the commanding general of US Army Alaska, said in a statement. The deployment of the 4th Brigade Combat Team (Airborne), 25th Infantry Division, is part of a regular rotation of forces in support of Operation Freedoms Sentinel, reports Khaama Press.

US troops in Afghanistan are split between two missions NATOs Resolute Support mission to advise Afghan security forces and the Freedoms Sentinel, the US counter-terrorism operation against the remnants of al-Qaeda; an emerging offshoot of Daesh; and other terrorists groups. The US still has some 8,400 troops in Afghanistan.

The announcement came days after the Pentagon said it would deploy some 300 US Marines to the southern province of Helmand.

For all the latest World News, download Indian Express App now

Here is the original post:
US to deploy 1500 soldiers in Afghanistan to combat al-Qaeda - The Indian Express

East County author Lynn Vincent’s new book about war, betrayal in Afghanistan – The San Diego Union-Tribune

Lynn Vincents books are better known than she is, probably because her name on the covers has taken second billing to those whose stories shes telling. Several of those stories Heaven is for Real, Same Kind of Different and Going Rogue have been New York Times bestsellers.

Now the East County resident gets the top spot for Dog Company: A True Story of American Soldiers Abandoned by Their High Command, written with former Army Capt. Roger Hill. It recounts what happened to Hill when he felt forced to decide whether to follow military rules on the treatment of prisoners who were suspected Taliban spies, or do what he deemed necessary to get confessions that might protect his soldiers from deadly insider attacks.

Q: How did you first hear about this story?

A: I was a full-time staff writer at World magazine and I was contacted about this case involving this young commander and his first sergeant who were facing criminal charges in connection with battlefield activities. I wrote the story for the magazine in 2009.

Q: What was your reaction to what you learned?

A: As a veteran and someone who is very supportive of the military, it tapped into my sense of injustice. It felt like these guys were pushed up against a wall and left with few viable options and abandoned by their high command. And it felt like what they had done was certainly crossing the line in terms of military law, but also understandable given the corner they had been backed into.

Q: What made you decide it should be a book?

A: There was so much to it in terms of the human element. I absolutely fell in love with these guys from this company. They are the kind of warriors that movies should be made about. They are so colorful and diverse, and so loyal to one another.

Its not a policy book; its a narrative. But what emerges from it and I didnt know this at the time is that this case is just the tip of an iceberg of a new phenomenon we are experiencing as a result of this counter-insurgency war weve been fighting since 2001.

There were very, very few soldiers and Marines prosecuted in all of World War II, all of Korea, all of Vietnam. In the single or double digits. There is a statistic out there that says only seven. That seems low to me. What we do know is that more than 200 soldiers and Marines and airmen have been prosecuted for crimes on the battlefield since we entered this war on terror.

I would suggest to you that its not so much that our fighting men have changed but rather our rules of engagement and our view of warfare.

Q: Was it hard to get the soldiers to open up to you?

A: They really wanted to talk about what happened to them because they felt nobody in the military was listening. The investigators who were involved in this case would question them and then draw conclusions that may or may not have been based in reality.

When lawyers and investigators approach a case and Im not saying this is dishonest, its just the job they make an argument. They put together a case and they make an argument. And sometimes in these particular cases, when soldiers are prosecuted for crimes on the battlefield, the inconvenient facts are thrown out. Sometimes when they are asked questions they dont know the answers to, they are prosecuted for obstruction of justice.

So when they talked to me, not only were they talking about the case, they were talking about the loss of their brothers in Dog Company. And I felt like they really wanted to open up about that. I interviewed them between about 2011 and 2016. Hundreds of interviews.

Q: The book took eight years. Thats a long time for you.

A: It is a long time. Part of that was because I had undiagnosed late-stage Lyme disease. What happened is I had this incredible cognitive decline that occurred over a period of about three years. And it got to the point where I could only read and write for 20 minutes, twice a day.

In the fall of 2013, I walked away from the book. I called my editor and said, I have to stop working on this and figure out how to get well. And I dont know if Im going to be able to get well and finish the book. Rather than canceling the contract, (the publisher) Hachette stuck with me. I got some treatment and six months later I was able to return to the book.

Q: The opening sentence of your authors note says, What you hold in your hands is a book the government does not want you to read. How so?

A: The case is embarrassing to the Army and embarrassing to some of the officers involved because of the commands lack of support for these soldiers. And the case is also emblematic of a system in which the rules of engagement literally favor the enemy, and in which enemy spies and enemy fighters are released while young soldiers and officers trying to make the best decisions they can in the heat of the battlefield and with their lives on the line are prosecuted, kicked out of the Army and even thrown in prison.

Q: There are a lot of blacked-out sections in the book, redactions ordered by the military. (Hill had a top-secret security clearance that required him to show the book first to the Pentagon.) Tell me about the decision to include all those black-outs.

A: We submitted the manuscript to the Pentagon in 2015. When it came back, we were shocked at the number of redactions. I went through every one of them, and there were hundreds, and I documented where I got the information and I demonstrated that the information was public.

We submitted our appeal, and they came back and rejected it in full. We couldnt believe it. Some of the things that are redacted are completely benign terms that are used every day in the media, things like F-15 and Apache helicopter and Humvee. What that says to us is the Army didnt really want this book published.

Q: Did they think you would see the number of redactions and just throw up your hands and stop?

A: I cant really pretend to know their thinking, but thats a possibility. And so why did we choose to publish with the redactions still in it? Because we wanted the story out. Sure, we would like the book to do well, but even more important is to reverse this trend of prosecuting soldiers for doing their jobs.

Certainly Im not trying to say that every person in the infantry makes the right decision every time. But in the heat of battle, we have to give each soldier what an attorney told me is the super-benefit of the doubt. Its really easy to sit behind the wire or behind a desk or in a courtroom and second-guess an 18-year-old with an M4. But its a lot harder when the bullets are snapping past your head.

Dog Company: A True Story of American Soldiers Abandoned by Their High Command, by Lynn Vincent and Capt. Roger Hill, Center Street, 448 pages.

See the article here:
East County author Lynn Vincent's new book about war, betrayal in Afghanistan - The San Diego Union-Tribune