Mediaboss Marketing

Numero Uno Web Solutions (NumeroUnoWeb.com), a fast-growing global Internet marketing firm that caters to small- and mid-sized business-to-consumer companies, is pleased to announce that it will be offering a new YouTube service to improve brand awareness and online authority, and will get sites to rank higher on search engine results pages (SERPs).

Toronto, Ontario (PRWEB) February 23, 2013

As the experts at Numero Uno Web Solutions explain, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have evolved from simple interaction tools to become one of the most influential marketing tools today. One area in the social media arena that is still largely untapped when it comes to content marketing for search engine optimization (SEO) is video. While creating a YouTube channel that promotes a brand takes effort, good video content can help a brand stand out.

The goal of an SEO campaign is to create content that grabs a visitors attention and gets people talking about it, says Nadia Iaboni, Digital Solutions Manager at Numero Uno Web Solutions. Google is the worlds most important search engine, and Google owns YouTubethe second-largest search engine with more than 800 million users. As a result, its safe to say Google isnt going to ignore the growing prominence video has on its own online community.

According to the Internet marketing experts, one way that small- and medium-sized businesses can keep visitors on their web sites longer is to create a personalized YouTube channel promoting the brand. Its important to meet customers where theyre at; and some would rather watch a video to learn about a brand than read about it.

That doesnt mean a successful SEO campaign has to revolve around a YouTube video, say the Numero Uno Web Solutions experts. What it does mean is that video can be an important part of an SEO marketing campaign. Taking advantage of a popular, under-employed feature that Google loveslike YouTube videoand coupling it with great SEO can help small- and medium-sized businesses stand out on the overcrowded Internet.

The SEO experts conclude that adding a strategic video component is a great way to make an SEO campaign more visual and engaging.

Numero Uno Web Solutions offers a comprehensive list of online video SEO services, including YouTube marketing and video production. To learn more about Numero Uno Web Solutions and how the companys video experts can help small- and medium-sized businesses launch a successful YouTube campaign visit the companys web site at http://numerounoweb.com/sitescore/.

Numero Uno Web Solutions is one of the top Internet marketing firms due to constant innovation and overall customer satisfaction. For more information on Numero Uno Web Solutions, and to discover how the company can help maximize your companys search engine optimization and online presence, visit http://numerounoweb.com/sitescore/. Or call Numero Uno Web Solutions toll-free at 1-855-SEO-XPRT (1-855-736-9778).

Nadia Iaboni Numero Uno Web Solutions, Inc 905-856-2012 Email Information

Read the rest here:
Top Toronto Internet Marketing Company Numero Uno Web Solutions Announces Strategic YouTube Service to Improve Brand ...

Unnecessary Censorship: Swamp People
Glenn and Mitchell get crazy in the swamp. Swamp People: Season 03. Episode 05.

By: Sagara Sanosuke

See more here:
Unnecessary Censorship: Swamp People - Video

Tomorrow in the House of Lords, ministers will try to excise from the Defamation Bill wrecking amendments inserted by peers who are determined to impose on newspapers a draconian version of Lord Justice Levesons proposals for press regulation. If they fail to expunge the amendments, the revised Bill will create in the UK a version of prior restraint censorship before publication that has not existed in this country for 300 years and that is explicitly outlawed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Not satisfied with prior-restraint alone, the wreckers also wish to punish newspapers that do not submit to state-sanctioned regulation by obliging them to pay exemplary damages if defeated in actions for libel or invasion of privacy. Like Sir Brian Leveson, they attach too little weight to the possibility that this might breach Article 10 of the ECHR.

Such restrictions of liberty might please victims of tabloid misbehaviour, such as Max Mosley and Hugh Grant, but it would give the Government no choice but to kill the Bill. This would be regrettable, because it is valuable. Its originator, Lord Lester, an eminent human-rights lawyer, describes it as a charter not for the press but for the public. In fact it is valuable to both groups, which is why it has the support of newspapers and campaigners who wish to open the libel courts to less affluent litigants.

Supporters of the contested clauses claim noble purpose. But, by attempting to hijack Lord Lesters work as a vehicle for state-sanctioned regulation, they have shown that, for them, ends justify means. Their actions reveal something more significant, too. Throughout the phone-hacking scandal, the Leveson Inquiry and the controversy spawned by the Leveson Report, supporters of state-sanctioned newspaper regulation have promoted the idea that they are virtuous servants of the public interest. Their abuse of the Defamation Bill has revealed a less wholesome reality.

The Hacked Off campaign and its supporters should take note: the antics in the Lords have revealed the presence in Parliament of opinions it suits them to pretend do not exist.

Vulnerable to the accusation that a press law, once enacted, might be strengthened rapidly, they say limited statutory backing for a new system of regulation would not be extended to impose tougher controls. They accuse Levesons opponents of imagining the slippery slope down which we believe Britains press laws would slide if his proposals were implemented. The use made of the Defamation Bill by Leveson-supporting peers, such as Lord Puttnam and Baroness Boothroyd, has exposed such views as misguided.

I hope this useful and progressive Bill can be rescued and enacted with the support of both Houses. But whether it lives or dies, it has already performed service to the causes of liberal democracy and press freedom. Britain needs self-regulating newspapers untrammelled by a statutory backstop because there are already in Parliament men and women who believe they are entitled to impose upon others their values and their ideology.

To believe that such well-intentioned meddlers will become less bold in future is wishful thinking. They exist and have made it plain that they could exploit a minimalist piece of legislation to neuter newspapers entirely. We have been warned. Any press regulator supervised or empowered by legislation would give politicians a tool to extend control over the press. Some of them have now shown us how willing they would be to use it.

They would not call it censorship. They would believe they were acting in the public interest. If they shared any of the hubris shown by the peers who amended the Defamation Bill, they might sincerely believe it. Those who consider press freedom and liberty inseparable should not trust them. They need only win once. If we are to preserve liberties that have endured for centuries and made this country a beacon of democracy, we must win every time.

The writer is professor of journalism at the University of Kent and author of the pamphlet Responsibility without Power: Lord Justice Levesons constitutional dilemma

Read this article:
Read between the lines: this is press censorship

Quill Writing ASMR
This is just a quick vid to wrap up the week with, i hope ya #39;ll enjoy it- omg i just used to work ya #39;ll. ~INSERT SOCIAL NETWORKING LINKS HERE~

By: NeonIndieGirl

See the rest here:
Quill Writing ASMR - Video

AZ Social Networking Gets a Name Change

By: Angel Marie Monachelli

See the original post here:
AZ Social Networking Gets a Name Change - Video