Mediaboss Marketing

Last week brought a refresher course in late-1990s politics, thanks to Monica Lewinsky. Those lessons might be useful to Republicans embarking on their Benghazi investigation.

Are House Republicans in danger of making the same mistake on Benghazi that House Republicans made on President Clinton's impeachment 16 years ago?

Staff writer

Mark is deputy national news editor for the Monitor.

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of The Christian Science Monitor Weekly Digital Edition

There's a poignancy to Monica Lewinsky bringing the politics of the late-1990s back into focus the same week House Republicans voted to create a special panel to investigate Benghazi.

Today, Republicans want to discover if the White House knowingly misled America about the causes of the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, and then attempted to cover its tracks. In 1998, Republicans had more to sink their teeth into strong evidence that President Clinton had lied under oath about an affair with Ms. Lewinsky and they pushed it farther, actually impeaching Mr. Clinton.

But it blew up in their faces. Hoping to strengthen their House majority in the midterm elections that year, Republicans instead lost seats, forcing House Speaker Newt Gingrich to resign.

Much is different this time around. The American economy is nowhere near what it was in the Roaring '90s, and because of that, President Obama is nowhere near as popular as Clinton was in Year 6 of his presidency. Moreover, Benghazi is about the death of four Americans, including the ambassador; the Lewinsky scandal was about an affair.

Read the rest here:
What Monica Lewinsky can teach Republicans about Benghazi (+video)

With political indicators and historical cycles in their favor, Republicans are pushing the envelope to further energize their base with a full assault on the head of the opposition.

Parties that dont control the White House invariably gain in midterm elections. But the anti-Clinton drive energized Democrats in 1998. That year, Republicans failed to gain congressional seats in a midterm for the first time since 1934 and for the first time in a presidents second term since 1822.

In 2014, the Republicans risk a smaller-scale fiasco with the creation of a special committee to investigate the 2012 tragedy in Benghazi, Libya, where four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador, were killed. House Republicans see this as a political two-fer: an attack on President Barack Obama and on the Democrats presumptive 2016 nominee, Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state during the attack. This strategy is aimed at exciting the partys base and raising campaign cash.

Republican leaders say the purpose of the inquiry is to prove the administration initially tried to protect Obama in the middle of his re-election campaign by falsely claiming that the attack was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim video and not a carefully planned act of terrorism.

Republicans also aim to prove that the military response was inadequate and that there was a cover-up. They have seized on the White Houses failure to turn over a September 2012 memo from National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes that contains talking points on the tragedy. Rep. Trey Gowdy, the South Carolina Republican who was tapped to chair the special committee created after the House Oversight panel embarrassed the party with clumsy theatrics, has called the inquiry a trial.

The administration inflicted some of this pain on itself. The White House did try to spin the incident initially to protect the president, and the Rhodes document routine fare should have been turned over. But the real lesson of Benghazi is how dangerous the aftermath of the overthrow of a foreign dictator can be. After Iraq and Afghanistan, thats not a favorite Republican topic.

Furthermore, the details of Benghazi have been aired repeatedly, with more than a dozen congressional hearings, several committee reports, scores of interviews and 25,000 pages of documents turned over. A credible commission headed by respected diplomat Tom Pickering and Admiral Mike Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, faulted the State Department for systemic failures and management deficiencies in protecting American outposts. It just didnt provide the evidence of lies and cover-ups Republicans wanted.

Mullen and other military leaders say it wouldnt have been possible to send U.S. forces to Benghazi to save the ambassador. Gowdy, who in winning his congressional seat four years ago was a staunch supporter of the Iraq War, questions those assertions.

A comprehensive post-mortem of the tragedy by The New York Times, including eyewitness testimony, concluded that although there were warning signs before the attack, it wasnt, as some Republicans charge, directed by groups sympathetic to al-Qaida and there had been a spontaneous response to the video.

Some Republicans worry that with voters focusing on other issues, this inquiry could boomerang.

Excerpt from:
Albert R. Hunt: Benghazi investigation may backfire on Republicans

South-East chapter of the All Progressives Congress has dissociated itself from the Anambra State congress conducted by some aggrieved members of the party last Friday.

The aggrieved members, it was gathered, were led by Senator Ani Okonkwo and conducted their congress at the Women Development Centre, Awka.

However, spokesperson for the party in the zone, Mr. Osita Okechukwu, told our correspondent in Enugu, on Monday, that the South-East APC upheld its earlier Anambra State congress held on April 26 at the Alex Ekwueme Square, in Awka.

On the position of the Congress Appeal Report on Anambra State and the Abari Sub-committee, Okechukwu accused the organisers of the repeat congress of plotting to de-stabilise APC in Anambra and scuttle its case before the Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Awka.

He appealed to all APC members in the state to join hands with Senator Chris Ngige, who remains the leader of the party by virtue of his position as the highest APC political office holder in the state.

Ngige was the partys candidate in the 2013 Anambra State governorship election.

Okechukwu maintained that there is no faction in Anambra APC, describing the purported repeat congress as a gathering of disloyal politicians being used by external forces to destabilise the party.

He said, All one can say is that Senator Annie Okonkwo cannot in all honesty say he is a genuine member of the APC, having sabotaged the party during the Anambra State gubernatorial election late last year.

I am worried he may withdraw the APC suit at the tribunal if by mistake the leadership hand over the structure of the party to him. The late Chief Edwin Ume-Ezeoke did same to Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd).

See the original post here:
SEast APC dissociates self from Anambra repeat congress

between fanatics and liberals Arab
Shalom Gerusalemme vs corruzione Israele /watch?v=_gGt8R9jqDw my JHWH -- cosa sta dicendo di me, il mio prescelto fratello king SAUDI ARABIA? MOSSAD ---[ T...

By: 666GiudaicoMassonica

See the rest here:
between fanatics and liberals Arab - Video

Conservatives vs Liberals (feat. Jaclyn Glenn)
Experian Marketing Services conducted a rolling survey to determine whether there are any patterns in the politics of food customers. The survey scored fast food restaurants, restaurant chains,...

By: Rubin Report

More here:
Conservatives vs Liberals (feat. Jaclyn Glenn) - Video