Mediaboss Marketing

Research

57

References & Links

Arora, N. (2004). Trends in Online Publicity and Advertising. Publicity

and advertising Express.

Chaffey, D. (2002). Achieving marketing objectives through use of

electronic communications technology.

Chaston , I., & Mangles, T. (2003). Relationship Marketing in Online

Bbusiness-to-Business Markets: A Pilot Investigation of Small UK

Manufacturing Firms. European Journal of Marketing, 37(5/6), 753 -

773.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and User

Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in

Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 5190.

Hoge, S., & Cecil , C. (1993). The Electronic Marketing Manual. ABA

Journal, 22, 175-185.

Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1997). Consumer Reactions To Electronic

Shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic

Commerce, 2, 59-88.

Kalakota, R., & Robinson , M. (2009). e-Business 2.0. New Delhi: Pearson

Education Inc.

Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with

Website success in the context of electronic commerce. Info & Mng,

38(1), 23-33.

McCauley, D. (2013) Internet marketing vs traditional marketing - 3

key points for small businesses, retrieved from http://www.examiner.

com/article/internet-marketing-vs-traditional-marketing-3-key-

points-for-small-businesses

McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahed, F. M. (2002). The Measurement of Web-

Customrr Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach.

Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296-315.

Salehi, M., Mirzaei, H., & Aghaei, M. (2012). Dissimilarity of E-

marketing Vs. Traditional Marketing, International Journal of

Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 1,

ret rieved fro m ht tp://www. wnim.com/archive/issue29 04/

emarketing.htm.

Stuart, E. J. (2014). New Media: Debunking theMyths. Journal of

Business Strategy, 31(1), 56-58.

Tubar E, Lee J, King D and Chung H.M. (2000). Electronic Commerce,

Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Wixom, B.H., & Todd, P.A. (2005). A Theoretical Integration of User

Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance, Information Systems

Research, Vol.16, No.1, 85-102.

Yazdanifard, R., Venpin, M., Wan Yusoff, Wan F. & Rabiul Islam, M.

(2013). Enhanced Framework for Building Successful Website for

Informative Companies, International Conference on Software and

Computer Applications IPCSIT vol.9, Singapore, IACSIT Press,

Zingale, A., & Arndt, M. (2001). Emotion: Engaging Customer Passion

with e-CRM. England, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

compare to physical catalogs. Lastly, highest score goes to

internet as the most preferred way of purchasing than the

physical stores. So, online businesses will be having the

golden future in coming days specifically in Gujarat.

Dr. S anjay Bhayan i, M. Com, M.Phil., Ph.D., Professor

(Management) Department of Business Management, (MBA

Programme) Saurashtra University, Rajkot is a Gold Medalist in

B.Com. and M.Com. Exams. He has been in academics for more

than thirteen years. He has a number of independent empirical

research publication in reputed journals and presented papers

in national and international conferences. He has published six

books and authors a few cases. He is Chief Editor of Journal of Commerce and

Accounting Research, published by publishing India Group, Delhi and an

editor of Journal of Management Trends published by Department of

Business Management, Saurashtra University, Rajkot and also an advisory

editorial member in various reputed International and National Journals. His

current teaching and research interest include Capital Market, Finance and

Control. He has successfully guided several research scholars leading to award

of Ph.D. He has received six national awards for excellence in his research

work. He has completed three major research projects funded by UGC, AICTE

and ICSSR. He can be reached at sanjaybhayani@yahoo.com

Dr. Nishant Vachhani is Assistant Professor at M.B.A.

Department, Atmiya Institute of Technology & Science (AITS),

Rajkot. He did his B.Tech, in Electronics and Communication,

from S.S. Engineering College, Bhavnagar University, and MBA

in Marketing from Saurashtra University. Recently, he has

completed his Ph.D. in the area eMarketing from Saurashtra

University, Rajkot. He has more than 10 years of teaching experience in diverse

disciplines of management and engineering. He has published many

researcher papers in reputed journals; participated in several seminars,

conferences and workshops: state-level, national-level and international; and

has already authored three books. He has also conducted Faculty Development

Program (FTP), in collaboration with Gujarat Technological University,

Ahmedabad, One day national seminar on Writing Research Paper in

collaboration with Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad and Short-

Term Training Program (STTP) on Advance Research Statistics in

collaboration with Saurashtra University, Rajkot. He has been awarded as The

Best Researcher by Learning Resource Center (LRC), AITS, Rajkot. He can be

reached at nvvachhani@aits.edu.in

Authors Profile

63FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014

See original here:
(PDF) Internet Marketing vs Traditional Marketing: A ...

Seven years after its appearance, the concept of Web3 reached its peak in popularity in 2021, while still causing controversy among users of the global computer network. In recent days, a series of discussions about the very idea of Web3 questioning its feasibility have raged with some tech billionaires, such as Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, and former Twitter CEO Jack. Dorsey.

The concept, which was coined by the co-founder of cryptocurrency Ethereum, Gavin Wood, in 2014, points to the existence of two other eras of the Internet, Web 1.0 and Web 2.0Which will be replaced by the third generation due to its limitations, according to reveal Propio wood is wired.

Web 1.0, the original and most basic version of the Internet, allowed for little interaction, limiting most activity on the Internet to browsing and reading static pages. For its part, the current generation Web 2.0 has been translated into a more interactive and social Internet, marking the starting point of an era central With a small group of companies and tech giants owning most of the platforms and subject to a limited number of central government regulators.

Unlike its predecessors, Web3 or Web 3.0 promises to offer a file decentralized system Controlled by consumers and not by large corporations, users can interact and transfer data freely.

The concept of Web3 evokes a new generation of the Internet based on block chain, which is a structure consisting of elements containing encrypted data about each transaction, through which non-fungible tokens (NFTs) operate. This database would help keep the data free and distributed among peer-to-peer networks.

The concept depends, to a large extent, on Cryptocurrency, which would act as incentives for those who wish to participate in the creation and development of the new network, a fact that would help remove middlemen from the process.

Before it became a reality, the concept was the subject of severe criticism, due to the impossibility of its supposed application. This week, former Twitter chief Jack Dorsey, claimed That Web3 is actually a A central entity with a different name. You do not own Web3. The real ones are the venture capitalists and their limited partners. He will never escape your impulses, he said.

For his part, Elon Musk books On his Twitter account, Web3 appears to be nonsense, and currently, sound more like Marketing buzz of fact.

See the original post here:
Between "Marketing" and the Future of the Internet: Which Web 3 is causing the most controversy among tech giants? - Amico Hoops

The metaverse and Web3 are two trends supposedly set to revolutionize the digital world. But the richest man IRL, Elon Musk, is not keen on either. In a recent interview, the SpaceX and Tesla CEO said he couldnt see a compelling use-case for the VR-driven metaverse, and derided Web3 a nebulous concept in which internet services are rebuilt around blockchain and cryptocurrency as more marketing than reality, adding I dont get it.

Musk admitted that he might just be too old to understand these new technologies. Am I like one of those people who was dismissing the internet [in] 95 as some fad or something thats never going to amount to anything? he suggested, before noting that in 1995 he was very much one of the individuals who understood the potential of the internet.

Musks criticism of the metaverse focused on a lack of compelling use-cases and a disappointing experience for consumers. Sure you can put a TV on your nose. Im not sure that makes you in the metaverse, he said. I dont see someone strapping a frigging screen to their face all day and not wanting to ever leave. That seems no way. He later added: I currently am unable to see a compelling metaverse situation.

Right now, the metaverse is mostly an over-hyped branding exercise for a series of virtual worlds, some of which are dependent on VR headsets to access. Critics point out that weve basically tried all this technology before, with the failed VR boom of the 90s and the rise of spaces like Second Life in the early 2000s. What this current iteration mainly offers is improved hardware, a flashy new title, and billions of dollars of backing from giants like Facebook-owned Meta, keen to control what they see as the next big digital platform.

Web3 is another alternative vision for the future of the internet, with much boosterism driven by the idea that ordinary internet users will be able directly profit from their content and activity online (rather than having this value captured by a few behemoth internet companies). Musk didnt spend much time discussing Web3, but hes previously expressed skepticism about the project on Twitter, joining fellow tech CEO Jack Dorsey. (Dorseys criticism is that Web3 wont democratize anything, but will simply shift power from existing incumbents like Facebook to upstart venture capital funds like Andreessen Horowitz.)

Elsewhere in the interview with The Babylon Bee a conservative and Christian humor site Musk discussed climate change (Im not in the camp of super-alarmist global warming, he said, but added that negative effects like rising sea levels are not a wise risk to take), the existence of other life in the universe (If anyone would know about evidence of aliens it would be me, and Ive seen nothing) and said there should be a regulatory agency to oversee advanced AI that he thinks poses a threat to humanity.

In the beginning of the episode, Musk also took time to compare The Babylon Bee to The Onion, which he said had gotten too politically correct and leftist. (Its worth noting that Musk used to be a huge fan of The Onion but changed his mind when the publication made fun of him.) Musk said that The Onion had got the woke mind virus, which he later described as arguably one of the biggest threats to modern civilization.

See the original post here:
Elon Musk: metaverse isnt compelling and Web3 more marketing than reality - The Verge

Issued on: 24/12/2021 - 18:32

French company Doctolibs website and app allow users to book medical appointments through an online portal. They boomed in popularity during the Covid-19 pandemic allowing many to access both vaccinations and consultations with relative ease and the company now plans to expand to Italy and Germany. But the emergence of a private firm to fill a gap in Frances public health sector also highlights the countrys failure to modernise the medical services industry.

The French governments latest Covid-19 announcements are always followed by a mad rush to the Doctolib website and app, with people rapidly filling all available time slots. When it was first announced that a health pass would be required to access restaurants and public venues back in July, some 1.35 million peopleraced to book a vaccine appointment, crashingDoctolibs site.

In the 24 hours after Health Minister Olivier Vran announced that a third jab would be required for thehealth pass to continue being valid from January 15, more than 1.2 million peoplerushed to Doctolib to book a booster.

With 60 million users and an estimated turnover of between 150 million and 200 million in 2020, Doctolib has established itselfas a French tech success story.

This Frenchunicorn meaning a start-up whose valuation has exceeded $1 billion withoutgoing public has seen its payroll triple since it was set up in 2013. With more than 1,700 employees, the company has continued toexpand: It currently has morethan 250 job offers posted on its website forlocations in France,Germany and Italy. In October, it acquired an Italian company performing the sameservice,Dottori.it.

Doctolib has become a key player in vaccination in France ever sinceCovid-19 emerged, offering access tonearly 90 percent of French Covid vaccination centres, according toLe Monde.

Competitors have emerged including Maija, Allodocteur and Vitodoc but Doctolibs rapid development and its continuing position as a near monopoly in the online medical appointments field raises some difficult questions.

Healthcare is a sensitive area of the economy because of the personal data recorded; and storing this data safely is an essential public service, said Frdric Bizard, an economist specialised in public health, to FRANCE 24.

Doctor and patient associations raised some of the issues relating to Doctolib at Frances highest court for administrative law, the Council of State, in March. They argued that because Doctolib was storing patient data on Amazon Web Services the cloud computing arm of the US behemoth then Amazon, as a US company,would be required to comply with any demands for information made by US intelligence agencies.

The court ruled in Doctolibs favour, saying that safeguards were already in place in case US authorities request French patient data from Amazon. Doctolib also noted that it encrypts its data.

But an investigation by France Inter radio in March found that Doctolibs data was not encrypted once it arrived in the Amazon Web Services cloud.Moreover, Doctolibs German branch found itself embroiled in controversy over data usage in June, when media outlets accused it of sending information about local users to Facebook and the Internet marketing company Outbrain. Information onsearches people performed on the Doctolib site had been sold to the two firms along with their IP addresses.

Doctolib immediately back-pedaled, deleting those cookies from its German version and promising never to sell such data again.

Above all, Doctolib is a private company whose aim is to make money and to expand quickly; the French government mustnt forget that, said Bizard.

The government had left a gap in public services that was then exploited by Doctolib, Bizard said, adding that the companys runaway success was due to Frances own failure to digitise the state health system.

The UK and Spain dont need an equivalent of Doctolib because they have succesfully digitised (the health sector), Bizard said. The UK put 3 billion into digitisation a decade ago whereas France invested a mere 150 millonback in 2005.

Frenchdoctors are also reluctant to use the digitaltools offered by the state social security system,Bizard said. They are much more willing to use Doctolib because it offers them assistance to make the technology very easy for them to use.

Doctolibs popularity has soared with doctors as well as patients as a result, withthe number ofhealthcareprofessionals registered on the site quadruplingfrom 75,000 to 300,000 over the past two years.

This article was translated from the original in French.

Read the rest here:
Success of online medical portal Doctolib highlights the French states failure to digitise - FRANCE 24 English

A command and control system is an operative architecture which includes software, hardware, computing procedures, specific standards, interface and applications that as a group supports connectivity across all levels of command. In mission critical applications, for instance, in military applications, command and control systems provide comprehensive, precise, and real-time information, thus enabling the military to carry out readiness assessment, situational awareness, support for intelligence, and force planning throughout mission critical operations. Command and control systems allow concerned agencies or commanders in the battlefield to effectively plan and execute critical operations. The global command & control system market is expected to witness continual growth over the forecast period 2018 2026.

Rising terror attacks across the globe is necessitating the modernization of existing military infrastructure, to limit terror attacks. Thus, military infrastructure modernization across the world is set to boost the global command and control systems market in the near future. Moreover, need for enhanced situational awareness (SA) to drive mission critical operations is poised to drive the market at a significant compound annual growth rate (CAGR) during 2018 2026. Furthermore, increasing need for interoperability between security devices/technology is creating demand traction for command and control systems, thereby propelling the global command and control market. However, high cost of development and maintenance of command and control systems and subsystems is obstructing the market growth. Further, security and reliability concerns such as cyber-attacks are expected to slow down the adoption of command and control systems, thus reducing the CAGR growth of the global command and control market globally.

Demand for integrated command and control systems in transportation, healthcare, and law enforcement sectors is anticipated to create a lucrative opportunity for players in the command and control systems market. Additionally, development of smart cities and smart infrastructure would also create significant revenue opportunity for command and control systems in the global market.

The global command and control systems market is broadly classified by platform, solution, and application. The global market is further analyzed by geographic region. Based on platform, the market is cross segmented as land command and control, maritime command and control, space command and control, and airborne command and control. The solution segment of the market is categorized into hardware, software, and services.

Planning to lay down future strategy? Perfect your plan with our report brochure here@ https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=43439

Hardware solutions comprises IT infrastructure and peripherals among others. Similarly, services solutions for command and control systems include system integration & engineering, simulation & training, and logistics & maintenance. The application segment of the market is segmented as defense and commercial applications. Defense applications include military applications and homeland security. Commercial applications is comprised of industrial, critical infrastructure, and transportation among others.

Based on geographic region, the global command and control systems market is categorized as North America (NA), Europe (EU), Asia Pacific (APAC), Middle East & Africa (MEA), and South America (SA). The command and control systems market in North America includes the U.S., Canada, and Rest of North America. Europe includes market analysis across the U.K., Germany, France, and Rest of Europe. Asia Pacific includes India, China, Japan, Australia, and Rest of Asia Pacific. Middle East & Africa includes market analysis across GCC countries, South Africa, and Rest of Middle East & Africa. Furthermore, the South America command and control systems market is analyzed among Brazil and Rest of South America.

Some of the major players in the global command and control systems market who provide advanced and scalable solutions in domestic and international markets include General Dynamics, Rockwell Collins, Lockheed Martin Corporation, BAE Systems, Thales Group, Leonardo SPA, Rolta India Limited, Elbit Systems Ltd., The Boeing Company, Northrop Grumman Corporation, CACI International Inc., Saab AB, and Siemens AG.

Get More Press Release by TMR@ https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/anti-sniper-detection-system-market-to-exceed-us-1-bn-by-2031-rise-in-use-of-ai-in-convoy-protection-applications-to-fuel-market-expansion-states-tmr-report-821079399.html

About us:

Transparency Market Research is a global market intelligence company providing global business information reports and services. Our exclusive blend of quantitative forecasting and trends analysis provides forward-looking insight for several decision makers. Our experienced team of analysts, researchers, and consultants use proprietary data sources and various tools and techniques to gather and analyze information.

Contact Us:

Rohit Bhisey

Head Internet Marketing

Tel: +1-415-520-1050

Website:https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/

The rest is here:
Command and Control Systems Market Trends Technology Innovation, Analysis Application 2026 - Digital Journal