Archive for April, 2017

Media owners being controlled by Modi govt, stories getting killed: Chidambaram – Hindustan Times

Congress leader P Chidambaram on Saturday alleged that there was a pervasive, systematic and infringed control over the owners of media by the Narendra Modi government.

Today, believe me, there is all pervasive, systematic infringed control over the owners of the media. You talk to any journalist in Delhi, they will tell you that. Stories are simply killed. This is a serious problem, he said in an interaction after the launch of his book Fearless in opposition - Power and Accountability in Bengaluru.

The former Union minister said there may have been control over media during Emergency, but that was an aberration.

The control over media today is unparalleled. Maybe the control was there during Emergency, but that was an aberration. We have admitted that aberration and also apologised, he said.

Read more

He claimed that it would be a straight fight between Congress and BJP in the next round of elections as there were no major regional parties in some states including Gujarat and Rajasthan.

In the next round of elections, there will be a straight fight between BJP and Congress in at least seven or eight states like Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh among others, as there are no major regional parties in these states.

All regional parties were defeated in the last state elections including Uttar Pradesh, he said.

Chidambaram, however, said he did not mean it was the end of regional parties.

The Congress leader said the next round of elections would be very crucial for both Congress and BJP and would decide the strength of these two parties.

The next round of elections is very crucial. This will decide whether the Congress party has increased its strength. It may not be number one, but a number two certainly becomes a strong number two. Whether BJP is going to run over the Congress, I wont know, he said.

See more here:
Media owners being controlled by Modi govt, stories getting killed: Chidambaram - Hindustan Times

Ladbrokes Coral takes full control of video content with bespoke iGame Media platform – SBC News

Eddie Mumtaz,

FTSE-listed bookmaker Ladbrokes Coral has claimed a world first technology by taking full end-to-end control of its licensed video content.

In partnership with iGame Media, Ladbrokes Coral has developed a new video streaming platform which merges the enterprises combined API video content providing users with a unified front-end experience using a single player across all digital outlets.

Updating the market, Ladbrokes Coral development team stated that the bespoke platform was a crucial leap forward in a changing strategy as the merged enterprise develops new co-synergies.

Boosting operational efficiencies, the video platform will reduce the Groups overall acquisition to delivery cycle down to a matter of days and will enhance market engagement and distribution of content.

iGame Media developed Ladbrokes Corals new streaming platform in such a way that they only require a single sportsbook integration API to map all video events and additionally connect with multiple rights holders as well.

This means video events from major third party rights owners are also mapped via this single API, drastically reducing the multiple resources to support sportsbook integrations.

This revolutionary technology, with the industrys first single platform video solution, allows unlimited rights holders or content aggregators to bring their offering via Ladbrokes Coral in a very short timeframe, said Ian Chuter, Chief Operating Officer Digital at Ladbrokes Coral Group.

It places Ladbrokes Coral in a unique place to stay abreast of technical changes and ahead of our competition. It also delivers a unified solution for our customers who can access a single player across any platform.

Eddie Mumtaz, Managing Director of iGame Media, commented on the platform We are very excited for Ladbrokes Coral Group; working with their technical teams and strategists over the last few months has been a fantastic journey for both us and them. Our single API video platform is the future, driving a lot of cost savings for the Ladbrokes Coral operation, and equally allowing a single team to manage all their video property, giving users a unified playback experience.

See more here:
Ladbrokes Coral takes full control of video content with bespoke iGame Media platform - SBC News

‘A force of nature’: Lynchburg native Jennifer Petticolas a staple of theater community – Lynchburg News and Advance

Theater is a reflection of life for Lynchburg native Jennifer Petticolas.

Her plays touch upon topics and themes that range from menopause to race to suicide.

My goal is not for you to be just solely entertained but to walk away with a little bit more than you came in with, she said.

Petticolas involvement in theater was a slow progression.

She wrote short stories as a student at the former Dunbar High School, and when she entered Livingstone College in Salisbury, North Carolina, she wanted to be a war correspondent, but the college lacked a journalism major.

Following graduation with a degree in English, Petticolas accepted a teaching position at a Baltimore junior high school. It would be a tough assignment even for an experienced teacher.

It was October when Petticolas stepped into the classroom and, by that time, three other teachers had been assigned to lead the class. One teacher was beaten by a student, she said.

These were kids who grew up in the projects of Baltimore, and who lacked the sheltered life Petticolas was accustomed to as a child.

These were kids who could look out their windows and see someone knifed or shot, or drug deals taking place or their moms prostituting themselves to pay the bills. I dont know why I was able to break through.

Petticolas said she commanded and received respect in her classroom.

I kept on going and really fell in love, she said.

It was during her time teaching in a different Baltimore junior high that the schools faculty needed someone to write a play. So, being an English teacher, Petticolas stepped forward.

The production focused on the history of music and dance, and that first play would feature the heavy research that goes into her current theatrical work.

Petticolas served 30 years in education, including time as an assistant principal at E.C. Glass High School and in the central administration office of Lynchburg City Schools.

Even during her educational career, theater wasnt far behind. Petticolas directed two school plays during her tenure at E.C. Glass. She also acted in local productions at the former Fine Arts Center, now the Academy Center of the Arts.

When Lynchburgs Black Theatre Ensemble of Virginia formed, Petticolas was among its founders.

But she said she wanted to have more control over the writing and production process, so she began her own company, JLP Productions, in 2010.

Petticolas said she doesnt write or perform for profit. Instead, the majority of revenue received by JLP Productions goes back into the community through donations to organizations like the Blue Ridge Area Food Bank, Gleaning for the World and the Jubilee Family Development Center.

Local venues where her work has been performed include the Academy Center of the Arts, the lounge in the downtown Holiday Inn on Main Street and the Glass House on Jefferson Street. Other venues include the D.C. Black Theatre & Arts Festival, Howard University and performances in Henrico County and Farmville.

Petticolas is a force of nature, said Tony Camm, general manager of the Holiday Inn on Main Street.

Camm said Petticolas roped him into the theater when he took his wife to an audition for a show Petticolas was directing. She asked Camm if he would like to try out for a part and, since then, he has acted in and directed several plays.

Petticolas lit that fire, the theatrical fire, Camm said. She roped me into the theater during that audition for my wife.

One recent JLP Productions performance was A Little Bit of Ray, an homage to the life of iconic musician Ray Charles, which was performed at the Academy Center of the Arts last summer around the anniversary of the performers death.

A piece that shes presented several times is Menopausal but Still Groovin, which will be performed again this weekend at the Holiday Inn downtown.

In February, JLP Productions presented Black Lives Matter at Mount Carmel Baptist Church in Lynchburg; it focused on the lives of five women, including Mary Turner, a pregnant black woman who was doused with gasoline, hung and shot by a white mob in 1918 after protesting the lynching of her husband a day earlier, and Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed Florida teen fatally shot by a neighborhood watch captain, George Zimmerman.

You have these mothers talking about their pain, and what its like losing a child and their child cant get justice, Petticolas said.

She said her goal is to spark conversation or for audience members to walk away with more knowledge of a subject than what they came in with.

Gloria Simon has known Petticolas for about 25 years and worked with her while both served in Lynchburg City Schools and Roanoke City Public Schools.

Simon portrayed Mamie Till-Mobley, the mother of Emmett Till, in Black Lives Matter. Emmett Till was a 14-year-old boy who was mutilated and shot in 1955 after Carolyn Bryant, a white woman, falsely accused Till of grabbing and whistling at her.

Work presented by JLP Productions will always be a teachable moment, Simon said.

You walk away from her productions knowing something you might not have known prior to her show. Through entertainment, theres always something teachable.

A piece performed about two years ago, Little Black Dress, was born from a local mothers desire to inform the public that help is available for depression after she lost her daughter to suicide. The performance included a discussion with mental health professionals.

The subject matter is heavy, but Little Black Dress is so worthwhile because we know we are reaching people who need to be able to talk, Petticolas said.

Menopausal but Still Groovin, which will be performed Friday and Saturday, is about seven women discussing their experience with life and menopause. After viewing the play, Petticolas said men sometimes approach her to express gratitude for gaining an understanding of what their wives experience during menopause.

Sometimes that happens in theater, Petticolas said. If you can see it onstage, you can relate it to your own life and deal with it a little better.

Life should be teaching you something, she said. You shouldnt be walking through life without learning something.

Petticolas theatrical team is made up of a core group of women, including Regina Phillips, the principal of Monelison Middle School in Amherst County. Phillips met Petticolas through the theater and has appeared in several of her productions. Now, her theatrical work mostly is backstage.

In a group of alpha females, she is our alpha female, Phillips said laughing.

Shes decisive. She always tells the truth, Phillips said. She was my mentor, she is my friend. If I want to know the truth, I want to call Jennifer because shes always going to tell me whats good for me. I may not want to hear it, but she always tells me whats good for me.

Petticolas said when she is approached by audience members about how one of her plays has touched them in some manner, it just makes me feel like I have accomplished my goal.

Theater to me is another way of teaching, Petticolas said. When you are teaching, you have to have a lesson plan and you have to have goals for your lesson. A way for you to know if you have reached your objective is, usually, you have a little quiz. I cant do that with my audience, but when an audience gives me that feedback, it lets me know I have reached my objective.

See the original post here:
'A force of nature': Lynchburg native Jennifer Petticolas a staple of theater community - Lynchburg News and Advance

World’s Most Annoying Social Network Wants You to Worry About Other Companies Selling Your Data – Heat Street

The worlds most spam-prone website LinkedIn has had a sudden change of heart: It now wants you to beconcerned aboutCongress recent decision to allow broadband providers to sell your private browsing data to advertisers.

On Monday, LinkedIn sent out an email sponsoring an article written by Anurag Harsh, LinkedIns #1 Voice in Technology, titled Your Browser History Could Be for Sale Soon. Are You Concerned?

The article warns of the potential dangers of letting broadband providers sell your browsing data to others. What can someone with access to that kind of information do?Harshasked.

Your service provider could sell your personal information to the highest bidder; and not just your demographics, but also your user behavior. That very information is the bedrock of personalized advertising. Its why companies like Amazon are so successful, headded.

The people who wrote Public Service Announcementclearly missed the irony. LinkedIn has long been the king of spam, bogging down email inboxeswith irrelevantsuggestions and sponsoredrecommendations. In 2015, the company had to pay out $13 million because of its fondness for spamming users.

ViaTIME Magazine:

The suit originated in California in 2013, when LinkedIn users sued the company claiming its Add Connections feature hurt their professional reputation by relentlessly messaging their email contacts with requests to connect on LinkedIn, Fortune reports. In the complaint, users described being embarrassed by the emails and complained that it was very difficult to stop LinkedIn from sending more emails once the barrage had begun. The settlement affects users who signed up for LinkedIns Add Connections feature between September 2011 and October 2014.

The ironyfor LinkedIn doesntend here. Back in 2014, according to a lawsuit, the social media network was accused of secretly selling usersprofessional datathe exact thing LinkedIn is now ringing the alarm about.

Via The Recorder and Gawker:

According to the suit, LinkedIn can mine the information provided by users of its professional networking website to find potential references for job applicants without the applicants knowledge. Searches yield a list of the names and current job titles for potential references, along with the common employer they share with the applicant and time worked together.

The complaint claims that these reference lists amount to a consumer report under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and that LinkedIn fails to abide by safeguards required under the law.

In essence, LinkedIn has created a marketplace in consumer employment information, where it sells employment information, that may or may not be accurate, and that it has obtained in part from unwitting members, and without complying with the FCRA, write the plaintiffs lawyers at Greenwald Davidson in Boca Raton, Fla., and the Law Offices Todd M. Friedman in Beverly Hills. Plaintiffs are asking for statutory damages for willful violation of the FCRA, which run from $100 to $1,000 per violation.

But thanks, LinkedIn, for taking some time out from spamming us to give us a heads-up on Internet privacy.

More:
World's Most Annoying Social Network Wants You to Worry About Other Companies Selling Your Data - Heat Street

The Bill of Rights at the Border: Fourth Amendment Limits on Searching Your Data and Devices – EFF

More than 325,000 people enter the United States via airports every day, with hundreds of thousands more crossing by land at the borders. Not only is that a lot of people, its also a lot of computers, smartphones, and tablets riding along in our pockets, bags, and trunks. Unfortunately, the Fourth Amendment protections we enjoy inside the U.S. for our devices arent always as strong when were crossing bordersand the Department of Homeland Security takes advantage of it. On the other hand, the border is not a Constitution-free zone. What are the limits to how and how much customs and immigrations officials can access our data?

To help answer those questions, were offering the second in our series of posts on the Constitution at the border, focusing this time on the Fourth Amendment. For Part 1 on the First Amendment, click here.

The Fourth Amendment forbids unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. In most circumstances, the Fourth Amendment requires that government agents obtain a warrant from a judge by presenting preliminary evidence establishing probable cause to believe that the thing to be searched or seized likely contains evidence of illegal activity before the officer is authorized to search.

Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has sanctioned a border search exception to the probable cause warrant requirement on the theory that the government has an interest in protecting the integrity of the border by enforcing the immigration and customs laws. As a result, routine searches at the border do not require a warrant or any individualized suspicion that the thing to be searched contains evidence of illegal activity.

But the border search exception is not without limits. As noted, this exception only applies to routine searches, such as those of luggage or bags presented at the border. Non-routine searches such as searches that are highly intrusive and impact the dignity and privacy interests of individuals, or are carried out in a particularly offensive manner must meet a higher standard: individualized reasonable suspicion. In a nutshell, that means border agents must have specific and articulable facts suggesting that a particular person may be involved in criminal activity.

For example, the Supreme Court held that disassembling a gas tank is routine and so a warrantless and suspicionless search is permitted. However, border agents cannot detain a traveler until they have defecated to see if they are smuggling drugs in their digestive tract unless the agents have a reasonable suspicion that the traveler is a drug mule.

How does this general framework apply to digital devices and data at the border? Border agents argue that the border search exception applies to digital searches. We think they are wrong. Given that digital devices like smartphones and laptops contain highly personal information and provide access to even more private information stored in the cloud, the border search exception should not apply.

As Chief Justice Roberts recognized in a 2014 case, Riley v. California:

Modern cell phones are not just another technological convenience. With all they contain and all they may reveal, they hold for many Americans the privacies of life.

Snooping into such privacies is extraordinarily intrusive, not routine. Thus, when the government asserted the so-called incident to arrest exception to justify searching a cell phone without a warrant during or immediately after an arrest, the Supreme Court called foul.

Why is the Riley decision important at the border? For one thing, the incident to arrest exception that the government tried to invoke is directly comparable to the border search exception, because both are considered categorical exemptions. Given that the intrusion is identical in both instances, the same privacy protections should apply.

Moreover, with the ubiquity of cloud computing, a digital device serves as a portal to highly sensitive data, where the privacy interests are even more significant. Following Riley, we believe that any border search of a digital device or data in the cloud is unlawful unless border agents first obtain a warrant by showing, to a judge, in advance, that they have probable cause to believe the device (or cloud account) likely contains evidence of illegal activity.

However, lower courts havent quite caught up with Riley. For example, the Ninth Circuit held that border agents only need reasonable suspicion of illegal activity before they could conduct a non-routine forensic search of a travelers laptop, aided by sophisticated software. Even worse, the Ninth Circuit also held that a manual search of a digital device is routine and so a warrantless and suspicionless search is still reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Some courts have been even less protective. Last year a court in the Eastern District of Michigan upheld a computer-aided border search of a travelers electronic devices that lasted several hours without reasonable suspicion.

EFF is working hard to persuade courts (and border agents) to adopt the limits set forth in the Riley decision for border searches of cellphones and other digital devices. In the meantime, what should you do to protect your digital privacy?

Much turns on your individual circumstances and personal risk assessment. The consequences for non-compliance with a command from a CBP agent to unlock a device will be different, for example, for a U.S. citizen versus a non-citizen. If you are a U.S. citizen, agents must let you enter the country eventually; they cannot detain you indefinitely. If you are a lawful permanent resident, agents might raise complicated questions about your continued status as a resident. If you are a foreign visitor, agents may deny you entry entirely.

We recommend that everyone conduct their own threat model to determine what course of action to take at the border. Our in depth Border Search Whitepaper offers you a spectrum of tools and practices that you may choose to use to protect your personal data from government intrusion. For a more general outline of potential practices, see our pocket guides to Knowing Your Rights and Protecting Your Data at the Border.

Were also collecting stories of border search abuses at: borders@eff.org

And join EFF in calling for stronger Constitutional protection for your digital information by contacting Congress on this issue today.

Continued here:
The Bill of Rights at the Border: Fourth Amendment Limits on Searching Your Data and Devices - EFF