Archive for April, 2017

Michelle Obama: ‘I won’t run for office’ for my children – BBC News


BBC News
Michelle Obama: 'I won't run for office' for my children
BBC News
Former First Lady Michelle Obama appeared to rule out running for elected office during her first public remarks since leaving the White House. The Q&A at an architecture convention in Orlando came days after her husband made his first public comments ...
OBAMA: Here's what I miss most about the White HouseBusiness Insider
Michelle Obama dishes on White House life, says she won't run for officeUSA TODAY
Michelle Obama says she won't run for officeCNN
CBS News -AOL -Vogue.com -Orlando Sentinel
all 68 news articles »

Visit link:
Michelle Obama: 'I won't run for office' for my children - BBC News

Trump blames Obama for vetting of Flynn – The Hill

President Trump on Friday faulted former President Obamas administration for authorizing a security clearance for Michael Flynn, his former national security adviser.

But just remember, he was approved by the Obama administration at the highest level, Trumptold Fox News.

And when they say we didnt vet, well, Obama I guess didnt vet, because he was approved at the highest level of security by the Obama administration, Trump added.

Trump added he respects Flynns past military service and has sympathy for the retired Army lieutenant general.

I do feelbadlyfor him, he said. He served the country. He was a [lieutenant] general."

Flynn, who was forced out of Trump's White House after misleading officials about his conversation with the Russian ambassador, received a five-year renewal of his security clearance in January 2016.

The House Oversight Committee this week said Flynnmay have broken the lawby taking payments from Russia and Turkey without approval from the military and State Department.

Flynn was reportedly warned against taking such payments when he retired in 2014.

According to Rep. Elijah Cummings (Md.), the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee,Flynn applied to renew his security clearance using a Form SF-86 in January 2016, a month after he traveled to Moscow to give a paid speech.

Cummings said the committee had seen "no evidence" that Flynn disclosed that payment on the form or that he sought permission before taking the payment. He noted that knowingly falsifying or concealing a material fact on an SF-86 is a felony.

Flynn was fired as Obama's Defense Intelligence Agency chief in the spring of 2014 after less than two years leading the agency.

He was ousted after clashing with top Obama national security officials, including intelligence director James Clapper.

Flynn blamed his firing on his strong views on fighting Islamic extremist groups.

He later reemerged as close adviser to Trump, even getting a speaking slot at the Republican National Convention.

Trump named Flynn his national security adviser after winning the White House, but he was forced to resign just a few weeks into the administration.

Flynn has offered to testify before the House and Senate intelligence committees that are investigating Russian meddling in the election in return for immunity from prosecution.

The committees have so far not taken him up on the offer.

Updated at 2:25 p.m.

Go here to read the rest:
Trump blames Obama for vetting of Flynn - The Hill

Trump signs order looking to reverse Obama’s ban on off-shore drilling – CNN

The move, which comes months after Obama banned drilling in millions of acres in the Atlantic and Arctic oceans, is the latest step in the Trump administration's attempt to roll back the former presidents environmental record and comes as Trump is rushing to stack his first 100 days with as many accomplishments as possible, primarily through the use of executive actions.

Trump, before signing the executive order at the White House, bluntly said the plan "reverses the previous administration's Arctic leasing ban."

"The federal government has kept 94% of these offshore areas closed for exploration and production, and when they say closed, they mean closed," Trump said, adding that Obama's actions "deprived our country of potentially thousands and thousands of jobs."

Trump's order charges the Interior Department to work with the Commerce Department to "streamline a permitting approach for privately funded seismic data research and collection," Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said Thursday; that data helps the department assess the level of natural resources under the sea.

In turn, the Commerce Department will conduct a review of designations and expansions of national marine sanctuaries within 180 days and of all designations and expansions under the Antiquities Act of 1906, a law that gives the President the power to designate land for federal protection.

The order is Trump's 30th in his first 99 days in office, meaning the President who once decried Obama's use of executive orders has signed more in the first 100 days than any president in the last 72 years, dating all the way back to former President Harry Truman.

Zinke said he believes that reducing regulations, in combination with the President's March 28 order on energy independence, will "put us on track for American energy independence."

Environmental groups blasted the order.

"With this executive order, the Trump administration is threatening the 1,100 miles of California coastline that the citizens of California own, and that we have fought to protect from special interests," said Tom Steyer, a top Democratic donor and the president of NextGen Climate, an environmental advocacy group. "Going back to a dirty energy model is a huge mistake, and that mistake becomes more obvious every day."

Zinke said Thursday that the review won't be limited to drilling for oil or natural gas, but will include an opening for wind energy development, too.

That did not assuage environmentalists.

"No matter how much money it spends or how many lobbyists it places inside the Trump administration, 'Big Oil' can never nor will never drown out the voices of millions of Americans across the country who spoke out against dangerous offshore drilling," Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune said in a statement.

Zinke said he has recently heard concerns about offshore drilling in Santa Barbara, California, and promised that he will listen to local communities when it comes to authorizing drilling.

"That's a commitment that the President made on the campaign, and another promise he's fulfilling," he said.

The rest is here:
Trump signs order looking to reverse Obama's ban on off-shore drilling - CNN

Rand Paul: The US should not fund Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen – Rare.us

By Sen. Rand Paul

American-built planes with American bombs were used by the Saudis to bomb a funeral procession in Yemen. Over 100 people were killed, and 500 mourners were wounded. Active duty American pilots have been refueling the planes dropping bombs across Yemen.

Sounds like war to me.

But when did we declare war on Yemen? When did Congress vote to authorize military force in Yemen? Who is the enemy, and why are we fighting them?

Lets be clear: war was NOT declared by Congress, as the Constitution requires. Congress never authorized American participation in a war in Yemen. And yet, here we are, involved in yet another Middle East war.

We havean unfortunatehabit of arming foreign nations, only to discover that these supposed allies may be creating more enemies for America than they are killing.

Not only are we selling the bombs to Saudi Arabia that they are dropping on Yemen, the presidents first military act was to send a manned raid of Navy Seals into Yemen.

RELATED:Paul slams McCain and Graham on Syria: They have learned nothing from our history in the Middle East

Tragically, one of our Navy SEALs was killed, along with several women and children. I dont blame our soldiers they take orders. They do the best that they can under the circumstances. I do, however, blame the politicians who send our soldiers into impossible situations.

Confronted by civilians, sometimes women and children, firing weapons at them, our soldiers must return fire. But before putting our soldiers in that unenviable position, shouldnt Congress debate whether involving our nation in a war in Yemen is in our national security interest?

The raid killed al-Qaeda operatives who, while likely enemies of ours, were actually fighting the same people the Saudis are fighting: the Houthi rebels.

To emphasize, the Saudis and al-Qaeda are fighting a common enemy in the Houthi rebels. In essence, we sent Navy Seals into Yemen to kill people who actually were fighting a common enemy.

In a country where so many factions are fighting,it is nearly impossible to distinguish friend from foe.

Thousands of civilians have been killedby Saudi bombings in Yemen. The blowback from these civilian deaths will be generations of hatred and likely more terrorism.

It isalso possible our involvement in the Yemeni Civil war could allow a situation where the Saudis and the Houthis decimate each other, leaving a vacuum that al-Qaeda fills. Think it cant happen? Well its exactly what happened when America and Saudi-supported rebels pushed back Assad in Syria, leaving a power gap thatISISfilled.

In recent years, there hasnt been a military action taken in Yemen by Saudi Arabia that doesnt have Americas fingerprints all over it.

As my colleague Senator Chris Murphy said last year, If you talk to Yemenis, they will tell you that this is perceived inside Yemen as not a Saudi-led bombing campaign [] but as a U.S. bombing campaign or at best a U.S.-Saudi bombing campaign.

Obviously, none of this enhances U.S. national security. But how many Americans are even awarethat we are actively involved in a war in Yemen?

Last year I introduced abipartisanbillwith Sen. Murphyto stop a U.S. transfer of arms and dollars costing $1.15 billion in all to the Saudis. The Senate voted to allow the sale. The debate, however, prompted President Obama to reconsider and ultimately to cancel the sale of more bombs to Saudi Arabia.

Now, the Trump administration is considering going ahead with more missile sales to Saudi Arabia. This would be a serious mistake. If the sale is debated in Congress, I will reintroduce legislation to stop it.

Other reasons not to sell offensive arms to Saudi Arabia include their abysmal human rights record and lingering questions about that nations possible role in 9/11.

The families of 9/11 victims have an active legal case alleging Saudi culpability for 9/11. These are complaints that bear review, considering that 16 of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.

One of thememosdiscovered during the Hillary Clinton email leak stated, We need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligenceassetsto bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIS and other radical groups in the region.

RELATED:Ron and Rand Paul: Now is the time to pass Audit the Fed

A State Departmentcablereleased byWikileaksin 2009 revealed,Saudi Arabia remains a criticalfinancialsupport base for al-Qaeda [and] the Taliban []

Why dont we hear more about this?

President Trump promised to put America first again, precisely because so much of what we have done in our foreign policy in recent years has been to other countries benefitbut to the detriment of the U.S.

In the upcoming debate, I hope the president will seriously consider the unintended consequences of getting us mired in yet another Middle East war.

That would be a mistake. I think its high time we start learning from our mistakes.

More:
Rand Paul: The US should not fund Saudi Arabia's war on Yemen - Rare.us

Someone Please Sneak Me Into Rand Paul’s Class on ‘Dystopian Visions’ – Jezebel

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, quasi-Libertarian and former quasi-ophthalmologist, is teaching a class next semester at George Washington University called Dystopian Visions. Unfortunately, I am not a student at GW and registration is closed.

The class, according to the GW Hatchet, will focus on the history of dystopian attitudes and how they relate to current events and political debates.

When Senator Pauls office approached us about coming to campus to teach this course, we agreed that his unique voice as a sitting senator would provide an engaging backdrop for our students, Columbian College of Arts and Sciences Dean Ben Vinson told the Hatchet.

Sen. Paul, like many current members of the Republican party, is a glorious Picasso of contradictions. Hes advocated for criminal justice reform but recently voted to confirm Jeff Sessions as attorney general; he was a staunch opponent of the entire concept of executive orders when Obama was president but doesnt seem to have minded the steep mountain of em that Donald Trump has signed. Having once spent an entire day watching Rand Paul stomp around in a cotton mock-turtleneck on a livestream, nothing would please me more than to observe this manwho recently played a friendly game of golf with a kleptocrattry to explain the concept of dystopia to a bunch of undergrads.

Anyway, Im wondering if someone would be interested in giving me their spot? That would be great, thanks so much.

Original post:
Someone Please Sneak Me Into Rand Paul's Class on 'Dystopian Visions' - Jezebel