Archive for April, 2017

The Raptors take control in social media trolling war with the Bucks – GiveMeSport

The Toronto Raptors evened up their first-round playoff series with the Milwaukee Bucks at 2-2 after a hard fought 87-76 win on the road last night.

The Raptors and star DeMar DeRozan, in particular, bounced back from a horrible performance in game three to reclaim home court advantage.

DeRozan put up 33 points on 12-22 shooting and was back to his usual self after going 0-8 in the previous contest.

The series may be tied, but the Raptors took the lead over the Bucks in their social media trolling war after the win.

Milwaukee should've expected a comeback from Toronto after their numerous trolling tactics which began with playing the Barney theme tune during the Raptors' player introductions prior to game three.

On Saturday, Bango, the Bucks mascot, created a Snapchat riddle that read:What do the Toronto Raptors and Possums have in common?

Both play dead at home and get killed on the road, was the answer.

The clowning would continue at half-time when a young fan kicked an inflated raptor at half-court before dunking a basketball, much to the delight of the home crowd.

Of course, the Raps won the game so they were always going to have the last laugh.

Following the victory in Wisconsin, the team's official Twitter account posted a GIF of Bambi with a simple tweet that said, "Ball game. Raps win!"

It was all clean fun and humour that we love to see and stayed within the guidelines set by the NBA recently regarding inter-team internet battles.

It's certainly nice to see NBA social media teams still managing to clown one another and providing fans with interesting sub-plots.

The serious matter was handled on the court, however, and the Raptors are once again proving that they don't do things easily in the playoffs.

Fans in Canada must be wishing that one day they can watch a Toronto series with no anxiety and can progress with ease. But as head coach Dwane Casey admitted, they play their best basketball in the face of adversity.

"I've always said we play better with our backs against the wall," Casey said. "It's a tough way to live, but I love our team's resilience and personality."

DeRozan's bounce back game was huge for the team and Casey will need his All-Star backcourt firing on all cylinders if they are to overcome a plucky and well-coached Bucks team led by a true superstar in the making in GiannisAntetokounmpo.

Continue reading here:
The Raptors take control in social media trolling war with the Bucks - GiveMeSport

Prince Harry story is new twist in the saga of the media and the royals – The Guardian

Prince Harry, who decided to talk about his mothers death and its impact on his mental health. Photograph: Getty Images

Before 11am last Tuesday, there was one story set to dominate the weeks news agenda: Prince Harry and his decision to talk about his mothers death and its impact on his mental health. On the day the prime minister rushed on to Downing Street to announce a snap election, every national newspaper featured the scoop by the Telegraphs Bryony Gordon on their front pages.

For someone so well known to open up about their own mental health, still stigmatised and starved of funding, is news enough. Add to that the memories of his mother, a woman believed to have softened the stiff upper lips of a nation in the first place and the public interest in both senses is pretty clear. Mental health charity Mind reported an increase in calls of almost 40% a day following the podcast, Mad World.

The interview was also a new twist in the long-running but often toxic saga of the media and the royals, particularly the younger generation who not only hold the media partly responsible for their mothers death but were then among the victims of phone hacking.

Despite the interview providing evidence that the younger royals are still prepared to use the traditional media to promote their causes, the podcast underlines their desire to keep control of their own public image. Rather than being a straightforward rapprochement for Harry, the latest intervention simply marks the latest development in the ongoing power struggle with the press that has waged particularly strongly with the younger generation.

In recent years, the Royal family has come down hard on invasions of privacy or inaccuracy by attempting to go straight to the public via social media. Last November, Harry published a highly emotive attack on the media which effectively accused them of hounding his new girlfriend Meghan Markle in the way they hounded his mother, but with racial undertones, too. The letter was posted on the familys Facebook page, where it was viewed millions of times.

Social media is not just used for complaints the royals feel may not be welcomed by the press but for pro-active promotion, too. When Harry sought to act on behalf of HIV charities last summer, he eschewed the televised visits adopted by his mother and livestreamed his subsequent blood test, again on the royal familys Facebook page.

But it is in complaining about press misbehaviour that the younger royals have marked a changing of the guard. Not for them simply relying on the back channels and relationships to sort out the rules of engagement. In three significant instances, they have used social media to go straight to the public.

The first direct appeal to public sympathy was used by Prince William when the Palace publicised pictures of his then girlfriend Kate being hounded by the paparazzi when trying to get to work. The public initially saw images of a beautiful woman looking a bit harried on the way to work, but were then shown her surrounded by huge numbers of men sticking long lenses in her face. William, the royal who is most committed to living as normal a family life as possible when you live in great luxury courtesy of the taxpayer, is particularly adamant that he will not have unauthorised pictures of his children used for commercial gain by the media. In 2015, Kensington Palace issued an unprecedented warning to the media, with vivid descriptions of the lengths photographers would go to to get pictures of George and Charlotte.

Each of these warnings led to comparisons with Diana, called the most hunted person of the modern age by her brother after she was killed in a car crash while being chased by paparazzi in Paris in 1997. Since her death and the subsequent public outrage, British news organisations are meant not to publish paparazzi pictures obtained using any kind of pursuit.

The comparison infuriates much of the British newspaper industry, with tabloid editors in particular moaning that the entitled younger royals are not fulfilling their part of the deal: public support and sympathy in return for access, which leads to popular and therefore profitable content. Royal correspondents, still going strong on most papers despite the impact of the phone-hacking scandal, complain that access is more strictly controlled even though all royal palaces have dedicated and highly professional press teams.

Yet what the press cannot control is the use of social media itself. With more than 3m likes for the joint family account on Facebook (almost twice the circulation of the Sun), 1.7 million followers on Instagram and 850,000 followers on Twitter, some could argue that the younger royals no longer need the support of the press, with its declining print circulation.

This generation are the first Facebook royals: they share seemingly intimate family snaps taken by and curated by themselves, not newspaper editors. Pictures credited to the Duchess of Cambridge, such as those of a toddler George kissing his new baby sister, are just like the ones we all take and share with our friends and family, though typically without the services of a palace press team.

Despite all this, the younger princes still know how important the press can be. Witness the series of attacks in the Sun and Mail over the work-shy William and Kate based on the number of engagements carried out in 2015 and after the press had been warned off snaps of George.

Jason Knauf, the 30-something director of communications for the princes, says that 80% of the inquiries dealt with by his team come from British newspapers. Knauf, criticised in parts of the media for being both American and having worked for the Royal Bank of Scotland, adds: We are still very reliant on traditional media to get our message across.

The princes have only to look at the treatment of their often faintly ridiculed father to see what impact the press can have. Prince Charles himself, lothe ever to complain publicly, knows he needs support from the media for his upcoming 70th birthday in 2018.

Yet while the aggressive complaints may have satisfied the royal household Things changed significantly for the better, said one former courtier it increased the antagonism felt by the press. The Suns veteran royal photographer Arthur Edwards complained about William and Harry to the FT [paywall] last year. Kensington Palace thinks they can control it all themselves. They want to ignore newspapers but the newspapers arent going anywhere. Well still be here when Twitters finished.

As if to reassert control, the Mail filled Thursdays page three with two huge pictures of the Duchess of Cambridge and Meghan Markle with a piece based on the similarities of their hair. Amid huge political turmoil, the relationship between a monarchy and fourth estate will always be symbiotic. After all, they need each other to survive.

Another media story last week where succession issues loom large was the ousting by the Murdoch-owned Fox News of its most successful chat show host Bill OReilly.

The sacking over sexual harassment allegations is ironic: the sexist and misogynist presenter brought low by the reporting of a paper he loathed, the New York Times. Rupert Murdoch was said to be against removing the primetime linchpin simply because it looked like the Times had won.

The radical Fox management overhaul ironic itself given the election of the channels biggest fan to the White House is important for showing the younger Murdochs flexing their executive muscle. In the tense negotiations over OReillys removal, it was the Fox chief executive and youngest Murdoch son James who argued most forcefully for his removal.

Some close to the Murdochs argue that the controversy shows the more liberal-minded characters of the younger men, neither said to be fans of the overt racism and sexism on the channel. Yet, as ever for an executive who argued that the only marker of good business was profit, there is a business rationale.

OReilly might have been the top-rated presenter on Fox but advertisers had started to desert the channel. And then of course there is the Murdochs planned $14bn takeover of pay-TV group Sky. The deadline for media regulator Ofcom to issue its judgment on whether the Murdochs are fit and proper to own the whole of Sky was extended on Friday until 20 June, more than enough time the Murdochs hope for the memories of Roger Ailes and OReilly to be just that.

British broadcasters will have to decide this week what to do about leaders debates in the run-up to the 8 June general election if they are to have time to plan security, format and more besides. The only problem is that the prime minister is refusing to take part and no one seems able to convince her otherwise.

Twice since 2010, the leaders debates have proved useful to the electorate, particularly to a younger generation less likely to watch TV news or read newspapers. With such obvious public interest, why dont we insist on an independent body that can sort the tedious negotiations out just as the US does with the commission on presidential debates?

Partly because no one seems to want it, not even the broadcasters, who rail against any straitjacket and would rather leave it to last-minute voluntary agreements. So in the UK, as ever, its we the media and political people and not we the people at all.

This is the second of a monthly column.

Go here to see the original:
Prince Harry story is new twist in the saga of the media and the royals - The Guardian

LinkedIn hits 500M member milestone for its social network for the … – TechCrunch


TechCrunch

Continued here:
LinkedIn hits 500M member milestone for its social network for the ... - TechCrunch

Silver Has Been Launched To Revolutionize Mature Social … – PRUnderground (press release)

Renowned Social Networking App Developer has announced the release of their all new Elite & Mature DatingApp called Silver. The app is available for download on iTunes and it is absolutely free of cost. The app can be used on iPhone, iPad and iPod touch and is compatible with iOS 8 or higher. The app has arrived as a great news for those hot singles who seek their perfect sugar daddyor a cougar of their dreams.

We have developed this app for senior datingwhere singles can find their perfect mature partner without any trouble. Said the spokesperson of Silver. Lovely single women will be able to find their right sugar daddy and young stallions will find the right cougar for them through this app. The spokesperson added. For dating, hook up, chat and fun, Silver is going to be the one stop solution for many people around the world.

Silver is the right place to find love and fun for everyone. Most social networking apps are designed for younger people, ignoring mature men and women and they felt left out. However, they can now find love like never before with this amazing app that will change many lives. The app is designed for adults and people from the age of 17 and above can join it, making it the perfect place to find mature love and fun for both genders.

User reviews and testimonials received by Silver have been phenomenal and everyone who has used the app has been satisfied with their experience. The interface of this app is user friendly and that makes it much convenient for the seniors to log in and have fun. To download this amazing app today, please visit the iTunes page of Silver on the link below:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/senior-dating-elite-mature-singles-meet-chat/id1120019455?l=zh&ls=1&mt=8

About Silver

Read the rest here:
Silver Has Been Launched To Revolutionize Mature Social ... - PRUnderground (press release)

Social media constructs, destructs – Philippine Star

Dont believe everything you read in media.

Such a pity that those words are being taken to heart and mind, as they are the opposite of what was drummed into our heads by our mentors, i.e., journalism is the purveyor of truth and possible transformation.

Not even pictures described as saying a thousand words can be believed, as editors cut and paste as they do words, to eliminate bulges in a subjects chin, erase creases from ones forehead, or add a flourish or two to make him/her look picture-pretty.

Electoral campaigns, whether abroad or here, are characterized by awful lies to downgrade opponents and make them look terribly unfit for positions they aspire for. In past Philippine presidential elections, the art of destruction was so intense it left a bad taste in the mouth. Some of the accusations were true, but most of them were simply speculative and false. On television today, one can see saliva dripping from the corners of critics mouths, or the satanic fierceness in their eyes as they demolish the target of their assassination. There is a term for todayshead-hunting bloggers:bastos.

The truthful journalists weapon against charges of false and malicious reporting was and possibly continues to be libel. One must be proven without a doubt that he was out to malign the subject, and a sane court, analyzing the facts of the case and finds the respondent not guilty, will throw the petition out of the window.

Such is the case with social media. It can be used to prop up or destroy an individual and/or commercial product.And who is to distinguish the truth and falsehood of social media reporting?

Opinion ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1

Imtiaz Ali of TechMead writes of the positive effects of social media, mainly that social networks helping businesses in a variety of ways.

Traditional marketing mediums such as the radio, TV commercials and print ads are completely obsolete now and demand for thousands of dollars, he writes. However, with social media the businesses can connect with their targeted customers for free, the only cost is energy and time. Through Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn or any other social site you can lower your marketing cost to a significant level.

The increasing popularity of social sites like Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn, social networks has gained attention as the most viable communication choice for the bloggers, article writers and content creators.

These social networking sites have opened the opportunity for all the writers and bloggers to connect with their tech savvy clients to share your expertise and articles. Your audience will further share your articles, blog or expertise in their social circle which further enhance your networks of the followers.

Social networks have removed all the communication and interaction barriers, and now one can communicate his/her perception and thoughts over a variety of topics. Students and experts are able to share and communicate with like-minded people and can ask for the input and opinion on a particular topic.

Another positive impact of social networking sites is to unite people on a huge platform for the achievement of some specific objective. This is very important to bring the positive change in society.

On the other hand, one of the negative effectsof social media or network is it leads to addiction. Spending countless hours on the social sites can divert the focus and attention from a particular task. It lowers the motivational level of the people, especially of the teenagers and students. They mainly rely on technology and the internet instead of learning the practical knowledge and expertise of the everyday life.

Kids can be greatly affected by these social networking sites if they are allowed to use them. The reason is that sometimes people share photos on social media that contains violence and sex, which can damage the behavior of kids and teenagers. It puts the negative impact on overall society as these kids and teenagers involve themselves in crime -related activities.

Karen Fraxier, public relations specialist, writes that social media has changed the way people interact. In many ways, social media has led to positive changes in the way people communicate and share information; however, it has a dark side, as well. Social networking can sometimes result in negative outcomes, some with long-term consequences.

Karen cites a 2010 Case Western Reserve School of Medicinestudy that showed hyper-networking (more than three hours on social networks per day) and hyper texting (more than 120 text messages per day) correlated with unhealthy behaviors in teens, including drinking, smoking and sexual activity. Hyper-networking was also associated with depression, substance abuse, poor sleep patterns, suicide and poor academic performance.

While on the surface it appears social networking brings people together across the Internet, Karen writes that in a larger sense it may create social isolation, according to aBBC News report. As people spend increasing amounts of time on social networks, they experience less face-to-face interaction. Scientists have evaluated social isolation in many studies, and have determined that it can lead to a host of mental, psychological, emotional and physical problems including depression, anxiety, somatic complaints and many others.

Some of the harmful effects people suggest social networking has are: encouraging poor grammar, usage, and spelling, allowing information that may be perceived as fact even in light of evidence to the contrary, exposing children to online predators, creating a culture in which a single mistake such as a racy picture or poorly thought-out comment can cause irreparable harm to your reputation, decreasing productivity as workers habitually check social networking sites while they should be working.

It is inherent on the individual to use social networking constructively, and parents must be especially careful to monitor their children's use of social networking to minimize the potential for negative outcomes.

* * *

With the traffic jams making it impossible to interact on a person-to-person basis, friends have relied on the Facebook to be connected with one another. One of my favorite FB pals is Deedee Siytangco, former press undersecretary, and Manila Bulletin columnist whose son, David, is myinaanak.

My family and I spent one weekend in her resthouse in Tagaytay. True to its name, Bella Vista has a beautiful view of Taal lake, and the very cool air allows million flowers and yellow bells to bloom in abundance in her garden. On Easter Sunday, the place teemed with children from the Mother Teresa Spenellis House of Treasures run by the Augustinian Sisters, to hunt for Easter eggs, and have a lunch of spaghetti and hotdogs. This treat is repeated year after year, and gladdens Deedee, whose late husband Sonny loved Bella Vista so much.

Another blessing endowed on Deedee is her daughter, Sandee who, with her husband columnist and entrepreneur Andrew Masigan, have been running a chain of restaurants called Advent Manila, the same group behind XO46 Heritage Bistro.

The latest Masigan offering is Arroz Ecija, which puts delicious traditional Filipino food in your plate with recipes inspired by life in the 1930s in Nueva Ecija. Attention and taste grabbers are Binghe sa Sari-saring Lamandagat and Seafood paella. There are Cordillera-grown rice, Ilocos bagnet (deep fried pork belly) and Chorizo de Vigan. The desserts are worth trying: kakanin, Ube brownie, sapn-sapin, puto.

Arroz Ecija is on the first floor of Arya Residences, McKinley Parkway Hills, Bonifacio Global City, Taguig City. Telephone number of 02 800 1166.

* * *

Email: dominitorrevillas@gmail.com

Go here to read the rest:
Social media constructs, destructs - Philippine Star