| Media Search: |
What #39;s Rand Paul Thinking? (w/ Katie Glueck)
Subscribe to The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow for more: http://bit.ly/TheZeroHour If you liked this clip of The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow, please share it with your...
By: The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow
Go here to read the rest:
Rand Paul: Intelligent? Likeable? (w/ Katie Glueck)
Subscribe to The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow for more: http://bit.ly/TheZeroHour If you liked this clip of The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow, please share it with your...
By: The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow
Go here to read the rest:
An Evening With Rand Paul- Exclusive Video
This Exclusive video is from Rand Paul #39;s visit to Maryland on 3-26-14.
By: James Madison
Read the rest here:
Katie Glueck On Rand Paul, Ted Cruz the NSA (Full Interview)
Subscribe to The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow for more: http://bit.ly/TheZeroHour If you liked this clip of The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow, please share it with your...
By: The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow
Read the original:
Katie Glueck On Rand Paul, Ted Cruz & the NSA (Full Interview) - Video
If Rand Paul - the Libertarian-leaning, conservative senator from Kentucky - chooses to run for president in 2016, expect to hear a lot about a single-rate flat tax system.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)
The blunt-spoken, Libertarian-leaning senator from Kentucky, who won the 2016 presidential straw poll among leading conservatives, favors a flat tax: a one-rate income tax system with a minimum of tax breaks for individuals and businesses.
But Paul hasn't settled on what that rate should be.
He has publicly discussed 17%. An aide said if Paul does make a formal proposal, the rate would not be higher than 17% and could be lower.
Much would depend on which tax breaks Paul chooses to keep. Two would definitely remain: the standard deduction and personal exemptions. But both would be considerably larger than they are under today's code.
The Paul aide said the senator might also consider preserving in some form the tax breaks for mortgage interest and charitable contributions.
Paul hasn't ruled out other types of tax reform if they "eliminate" complexity and regulation. But he has sketched out his views on a flat tax over the past few years.
"What you'd have is an attrition if not an outright elimination of the IRS because it would be so simple that people would comply, and it would be very simple to know whether they complied or not," Paul told Fox News last year.
Under a Paul flat tax, an individual would owe taxes on his wages, salaries and pension payments. But fringe benefits at work would remain tax free to workers, as they are today. One example of that is the contribution employers make to pay for workers' health insurance.
The rest is here: