Media Search:



Social and the grey market

Print

Posted 23 February 2012 10:30am by Steve Richards with 0 comments

It’s easy to assume social networking is the domain of the young.

Generation Y might have grown up with social, but there’s a growing number of people over 60 for whom social media is every bit as important.

People over the age of 55 are the fastest growing group joining Facebook, according to research from Nielsen - and a survey by Kantar Media’s TGI MobiLens claims that people over 50 are more likely to use social networks on their mobiles than people under 30.

The 'over 65' group spends a reported 42 hours online every month, more than any other group. 

Research from myvouchercodes also suggests that 20% of grandparents are on a social network, of which 71% are part of Facebook, mostly encouraged by younger members of their families. Let’s hope their grandchildren remember that when oversharing on their status updates.
  
To help older people get online, Age UK is running a series of ‘Myfriends online’ weeks (the next one is coming up on 19th to 25th March). It’s also encouraging Facebook fans to become a digital champion and help an older friend, relative or neighbour learn how to use new technology.

Social media channels designed specifically for an older audience are springing up, from the purely social online communities (like Southwark Circle a neighbourhood-based community that aims to connect older people who live close to each other) to the more commercially-led, such as Saga’s online network, where people can discuss anything, with a few pointers towards pensions, insurance and holidays. All things that Saga sells, incidentally.

Plus, social channels can aid social change: Grey Pride, the lobby group championing rights for older people, uses an online community, forums, Twitter and blogs to campaign for a minister for older people. Gransnet – the offshoot of Mumsnet but for grandmothers – launched in 2011 with support from Nintendo and Pearson; it too combines social networking with campaigning and political clout, reflecting the power that this market has, both in terms of spend and influence.

And don’t assume that apps are the domain of the young, either: in a move of pure brilliance, Saga has launched a teenage slang translator app called ‘Woteva’, to help work out what your grandchildren (or children for that matter) are talking about.

Clearly, age on its own is no barrier to technical ability, and social media and online communities can be an incredibly effective way to reach an older audience, often with high spending power. Our population is aging – 40% of the UK population will be over 50 by 2035, according to the ONS - and so social media use within this group will only increase. Ignore it at your peril.

Internships for the 60+? Why not?

Steve Richards is MD of social media agency Yomego and a guest blogger for Econsultancy.

Here is the original post:
Social and the grey market

Operators face SMS revenue dip due to social networking

By Jeremy Kirk
IDG News Service (Sydney Bureau)
February 23, 2012

SYDNEY - Mobile network operators are facing a decline in SMS (Short Message Service) revenue as their customers increasingly use apps for alternative messaging services such as Facebook or WhatsApp, according to a new study released on Wednesday by analyst Ovum.

Ovum estimated that operators worldwide saw a $13.9 billion decline in revenue last year due to the use of IP-based social messaging services, which amounts to about 9 percent of their total messaging revenue. In 2010, the decline was $8.7 billion, Ovum said.

SMS and MMS (Multimedia Messaging Service) are the most important non-voice revenue streams for operators right now, said Neha Dharia, a consumer analyst with Ovum based in India.

But consumers, particularly so-called early technology adopters, would rather use Blackberry Messenger than send an SMS, Dharia said.

“Messaging is a very key revenue stream that is being impacted,” Dharia said. “People have begun to reduce their SMS usage.”

Services such as Blackberry Messenger and WhatsApp use a device’s data channel or Wi-Fi to send the message. Smartphone users frequently have inclusive data plans, which means they can potentially avoid SMS charges by using those applications to communicate.

Operators have seen the problem coming for a long time, Dharia said. One solution is for those companies to offer their own messaging services, using the Rich Communication Suite (RCS). RCS is a set of specifications for enabling IP-based features such as instant messaging, video, file transfer and presence capabilities on mobile devices.

Efforts have been under way for years by operators to implement RCS, and it is starting to appear in the market, Dharia said. Operators need to introduce the technology quickly, she said. Operators will also look to replace lost SMS revenue from other growing sources, such as mobile broadband services, she said.

Possibly Related Posts:

 

 

Original post:
Operators face SMS revenue dip due to social networking

The Bill Press Hate Machine

Bill Press has a new book out called "The Obama Hate Machine." To read the blurbs, you might wonder if Press thinks no one should be allowed to criticize the president. Here's Nancy Pelosi touting the book: "In a poisoned political climate, negative personal attacks on President Obama must have no place in our public discourse."

What's next? A mandate forbidding inappropriate free speech? These tolerant liberals are out of control.

Press appeared on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" on Feb. 12 to plug his book, and he did say "there's legitimate criticism of any president, which I think is very healthy, and I welcome it, and I've been a part of it. Right?" But then he went off the rails.

"I don't know that anybody ever said that Ronald Reagan was a terrorist, or George W. Bush was a terrorist. Right? This isn't a slight difference. It's a huge difference, the level of attacks we've seen against President Obama."

It's proof positive that Bill Press knows very little. Just like in his last embarrassing book, "Toxic Talk," Press claims all the ugly rhetoric comes from conservatives. But this is — I'll be blunt — dishonest, and you don't even have to look back in history to prove Press wrong. The Daily Kos had an entry headlined "Ronald Reagan, Terrorist!" on Reagan's 100th birthday last year. Cindy Sheehan called George W. Bush a terrorist routinely. The term is used against conservatives of every stripe.

But let's turn the spotlight back around to Bill Press. How has he performed on the "hate machine" scale? Let's explore the record. Oh, yes, Press has a record, too.

1. On Jan. 13 — 18 days before his anti-hate book was first issued — Press called Newt Gingrich a terrorist on MSNBC's Al Sharpton program, "Politics Nation": "He's the suicide bomber of the Republican Party. ... He's in it to take down as many people as he can as he goes down, and he has that same silly grin on his face when he pulls the plug as a suicide bomber."

2. On his radio show on Aug. 6, 2011, in a funding dispute over the Federal Aviation Administration, Bill Press attacked the Republicans: "These guys are terrorists! I'm sorry; I'm sorry; you know, you know Joe Biden; they say he's getting in a little trouble 'cause he called them terrorists. That's exactly what they are!"

3. On June 16, 2010, Press complained that Glenn Beck was granted permission to have a rally at the Lincoln Memorial on the anniversary of Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech. "If you ask me, that's like granting al-Qaida permission to hold a rally on Sept. 11 — at ground zero."

4. How about death wishes? On his radio show on July 22, 2011, Press played a clip of Speaker John Boehner suggesting Obama "needs to step up and work with us on the spending cuts." He then replied: "You know, it's a wonder lightning just doesn't strike people dead on the spot when they say stuff like that."

5. Nazis? In an Aug. 6, 2009 column, Press slashed at Tea Partiers opposing Obamacare at town hall meetings: "Taking a page right out of a Nazi playbook, organizers bus in professional protestors and arm them with instructions on how to take over meetings, shut down discussion, shout over any pro-health care reform speakers and then post video of the resulting chaos on YouTube. It's mob rule, pure and simple."

6. On Oct. 10, 2008, Todd Palin's reported support for a secessionist party in Alaska drew this radio blast from Press: "What's the difference between a secessionist and a terrorist? Isn't a secessionist just another form of a terrorist? Ask Abraham Lincoln. ... Let's find out what the 'First Dude' was going to do in order to secede from the Union. I tell you it wasn't going to be peaceful."

7. And then there's the good old-fashioned insult. On July 25, 2006, Press declared who was the dumbest president ever: "George W. Bush, with his rock bottom IQ of 91: seven points lower than his Daddy. ... He's just plain dumb — the dumbest president in the last 50 years. And probably, the dumbest president ever!"

Press's alleged IQ information by the "Lovenstein Institute of Scranton, Pa." was a hoax, entirely made up, which underlined just who shouldn't be calling other people dummies.

8. But Bill Press really thinks American voters are also morons. On his radio show on Nov. 4, 2010, Press proclaimed: "Just once ... I would like to hear somebody say, 'The voters have spoken, the bastards.' Or, 'The voters have spoken. What a bunch of idiots.' 'The voters have spoken. God, they're dumb. Dumb as hell.'"

Most Americans won't be dumb enough to buy Bill Press's book or believe a word he says against other people building their "hate machines."

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at http://www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

Read the original:
The Bill Press Hate Machine

Saddle Brook Police Department looking to get word out on crime

Wednesday, February 22, 2012    Last updated: Thursday February 23, 2012, 1:57 AM

In an attempt to provide more information about crime and general police matters taking place in Saddle Brook, the Saddle Brook Police Department, headed by Chief of Police Robert Kugler and Deputy Chief of Police Robert White, is looking to provide more police information to local press outlets and residents. The department plans on doing this through the use of its website and by providing more daily information to local news outlets.

The police department announcement comes on the heels of a council meeting that saw many residents in attendance asking council members why they read more police news and crime stories in the newspaper about Elmwood Park than they do about Saddle Brook. During the meeting, which took place on Feb. 9, members of the council questioned and complained to Saddle Brook Mayor Karen Chamberlain, Saddle Brook Township Council President Anthony Halko and the rest of the council about what they deemed a lack of transparency and insignificant amount of police information being shared by the department with the public.

At the meeting Chamberlain and Halko both said they would look into the matter.

The police department recently set up an online blotter listing on its website, http://www.saddlebrookpd.com, entitled "The SBPD Briefing Room." The online portal acts as a destination for members of the department to post blotter updates, crime stories and all manners of police information. The portal went live on Jan. 12.

"The truth is we have heard what the public has to say and we are trying to do it on our end, trying to do a better job of getting information out there for public consumption," stated White. "The online briefing room will provide residents with an easy access point to police information which comes directly from members of the Saddle Brook Police Department."

White also stated the department will be working more diligently on a daily basis to provide local press outlets with a more constant flow of information about crimes taking place in town.

"They, as a township, have more crime," said White of Elmwood Park. "Elmwood Park is more closely situated to Paterson and has to deal with a little more than we do. They have more crime and have to focus on that more than we do."

Email: leibowitz@northjersey.com

Read more from the original source:
Saddle Brook Police Department looking to get word out on crime

Why Running For President Is a Great Career Move

The exhausting schedule. The prying press. The tedious scrutiny of every word you utter.

A lot of sane people wonder who in their right mind would run for president. But there can be one major upside, besides the thrill of hearing yourself talk: A big career boost, even if you don't win. Best of all, many presidential candidates are able to cash in on fame that's largely financed by billionaires and other campaign donors.

[See 3 numbers that will determine the next president.]

It's no secret that becoming famous can help boost book sales and speaking fees, while creating new types of business opportunities. Sarah Palin has a particular talent for capitalizing on political celebrity. Even though she lost in 2008--and merely ran for vice president--she quickly became a multimillionaire thanks to two bestselling books, a TV show, and speaking fees that reportedly eclipsed $100,000 per appearance.

Many of the recent presidential candidates--including some who have dropped out--have already profited from the free network air time, press coverage and other publicity that comes with running. Nearly all of the Republican candidates have written books, for instance, and most of those have logged sales over the last year or so that were sharply higher than they would have been without the high-profile platform a presidential campaign provides.

Ron Paul, author of End the Fed and several other titles, sold 72,000 books in 2011, according to Neilsen Bookscan, up from 33,000 in 2010. (Bookscan captures about 75 percent of all book sales, so total sales are somewhat higher.) Herman Cain's 2011 memoir This Is Herman Cain! sold 33,000 copies last year--10 times the sales of his 2001 book, CEO of Self. And Cain plans to publish a new book in April called 9-9-9 The Revolution, meant to reinvigorate the tax plan that became his signature campaign line.

Newt Gingrich sold about 86,000 books in 2011, according to Bookscan, which was a dropoff from 2010 when Gingrich published two bestsellers. But the former House Speaker still outsold every other presidential candidate except for Barack Obama, whose three titles sold 132,00 copies.

[See why Obama's budget doesn't matter.]

The only prominent author-candidate who didn't seem to benefit in 2011 was Mitt Romney, whose bookNo Apology logged sales of just 12,000, down from 96,000 in 2010, the year it was published. Those weak sales may reflect the wan enthusiasm voters in general have shown toward the on-and-off Republican front-runner.

Beyond books sales, running for president is a singular opportunity for once-obscure people to rapidly rise to prominence, as Herman Cain and Michele Bachmann have done. They can then profit from their celebrity through speaking gigs, media contracts and other such offers. Bachmann is proscribed from giving paid speeches and earning other types of side income while still a sitting member of Congress, but Cain is developing a portfolio of enterprises meant to capitalize on his popularity, including a nonprofit foundation and a "SuperPAC" that will raise funds to support candidates Cain supports. The former pizza-chain CEO hasn't given any paid speeches since withdrawing from the presidential race in December, according to spokesman Mark Block, but before that he reportedly pulled down $25,000 per speech--which he could do again.

[Check out U.S. News Weekly: An insider's guide to politics and policy.]

Candidates who are better-known when they begin a presidential bid have the opportunity to refresh or enhance their reputations. John McCain fit that role in 2008, and Newt Gingrich best exemplifies it in 2012. "Before the race, Newt was famous, but mainly for what he did in the 1990s," says Robert Shapiro, a senior fellow at Georgetown's McDonough School of Business who's been an economic advisor to many Democratic candidates. "Now he's famous for what he's doing now, which gives him much more commercial value." Gingrich, who reported $3.1 million in income in 2010, runs a Washington consulting firm, among other things, which ought to benefit from the visibility he's earned while campaigning--assuming he returns to private life.

While running for president can create a quick burst of celebrity, it doesn't guarantee that riches will rain down indefinitely. "Beyond the initial six to 12 months after the campaign, it won't necessarily matter if you've run for president," says Dan Sims, a principal with Worldwide Speakers Group in Alexandria, Va. "What will matter is whether you've stayed relevant and passionate on issues people care about."

Sarah Palin may be discovering the fleeting nature of celebrity. There was initially a bidding war for her TV show, Sarah Palin's Alaska, but after one season the winning network, TLC, decided not to renew it. And Palin has been unable to find a buyer for a new reality show she proposed, on the snowmobiling exploits of her husband Todd.

[See 3 myths about Mitt Romney and the rich.]

Gingrich, by contrast, seems to be particularly good at reinventing himself. Plus, the insider status that's been something of a liability for him as a candidate would be an asset if he were to hit the paid speaking circuit following the election. "Gingrich has certain insights and knowledge, and certain groups would love to hire him," says Stacy Tetschner, CEO of the National Speakers Association, which helps train and promote paid speakers. "Insider knowledge is the appeal of any politician."

Hermain Cain, says Tetschner, still has reasonably strong appeal as a speaker, despite the sexual-harassment allegations that drove him from the campaign. And Rick Santorum's presidential run has clearly enhanced his marketability to family-focused groups, especially since Santorum has taken time out from the race occasionally to be with his own family. "In terms of a speaking career, I'd say he's in a can't-lose position," says Tetschner.

[See why Herman Cain--and 9-9-9--are back.]

Since most presidential campaigns end in defeat, however, a candidate's future prospects depend to some extent on how he or she loses. "For people who suffer humiliating defeats, their value goes down," says Shapiro. That group may include Rick Perry, whose popularity fell consistently after he entered the presidential race last August, thanks in part to several prominent gaffes. John Kerry and Michael Dukakis were arguably diminished by presidential campaigns that made them seem like floundering also-rans.

The best way to lose, says Shapiro, is to recognize when you've been beaten, bow out with dignity and graciously toss your support to the next best candidate. Jon Huntsman essentially did that when he quit the race in January and endorsed Mitt Romney--then, less than a month later, accepted an appointment to the board of Ford Motor Co.

Should Mitt Romney lose, either in the primaries or the general election, it's not hard to imagine a similarly polite retreat into private life (though Romney, with a personal fortune of $500 million or so, certainly doesn't need the money from speaking fees or directorships).

The more combative Gingrich, if he loses, may not go as quietly. But Gingrich, who has already built a lucrative post-political career despite a prickly reputation, could end up even better off. "He will have formed a whole new set of business relationships in the course of campaigning that he can probably call on," says Shapiro. "I'm sure he'll do fine in business." It's a good bet that Gingrich himself is aware of that, too.

--See 6 things that will derail the economy.

--Boo Hoo: The GOP's 'Gloomy Gus' problem.

--Learn how Romney and Obama differ on the economy.

Rick Newman is the author of Rebounders: How Winners Pivot From Setback to Success, to be published in May. Follow him on Twitter: @rickjnewman

Read the original here:
Why Running For President Is a Great Career Move