Media Search:



Apple pushes ahead with plans to launch streaming TV service despite balky content providers

Mar 02, 2012 - 05:30 PM EST AAPL: 545.18 (+0.71, +0.13%) | NASDAQ: 2976.19 (-12.78, -0.43%)

Friday, March 2, 2012 10:33 am 29 Comments

For months, Apples point man, Eddie Cue, has been leading talks with content providers, which have largely balked at the tech giants efforts to exert control over all aspects of the video service, including pricing, sources said, Atkinson reports. Apples negotiating stance can be summed up as we decide the price, we decide what content, according to one source familiar with the talks.

Apple is pitching the idea of offering channels as apps for its devices, including its Apple TV set-top box. Its unclear whether it would group the apps together and charge a fee similar to a cable-TV subscription or offer the channels on an a la carte basis, Atkinson reports. Apple hasnt given up, however, and is said to be pursuing deals with telecom companies such as Verizon and AT&T. It hopes to get traction with a single player in hopes of pulling the rest of them along. While Apple is also rumored to be working on its own actual TV set, sources believe its first priority is to bring a TV service to the market.

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take:

Content producers should get to work then on producing their own apps Well make a folder of them on our iOS devices and itll look and act just like the channel lineup in the cable companies iPad apps. MacDailyNews Take, April 11, 2011

[Thanks to MacDailyNews readers too numerous to mention individually for the heads up.]

Read more:
Apple pushes ahead with plans to launch streaming TV service despite balky content providers

Can Dog TV Make a Profit?

Gilad Neumann wants to be clear: He does not want to turn your dog into a couch potato. But if youre going out for a few hours, he hopes that soon youll leave your television on and tuned to his new cable channel, Dog TV, the first channel directly targeting canine viewers.

Veterinary associations like the Humane Society and the ASPCA have been recommending for dog owners to leave the TV or radio on when they leave their dog home alone for many hours, says Neumann, Dog TVs founder and chief executive officer. However, not every video that you leave your dog with is appropriate, he says. [Anything that contains] fireworks or gunfire could scare your dog and create more stress than no TV. Dog TVs programming, on the other hand, is meant to soothe your dogs abandonment anxietyand spare your furniturewhile he or she is alone.

Dog TV went live on Feb. 12 after four years of dog-market research and several hundred thousand dollars of pre-seed money (Neumann wont give a specific amount). For now, its available only to Time Warner Cable (TWC) and Cox Media customers in the dog-loving city of San Diego, a test market of about 1 million cable subscribers. Jasmine Group, the Israeli production company behind Dog TV, hopes to expand across the U.S. by the end of the year, and start charging a premium of $4.99 per month. The company believes this is a small price for absentee dog owners to pay to assuage their guiltespecially compared with doggy day-care rates, which can range from $40 to $50.

Watch a few minutes of Dog TVa beagle and a Pekingese cavorting in a field set to cheery Muzak, sayand youd be forgiven for confusing it with the Puppy Channel, the terminally cute, all-puppies-all-the-time experiment that hit its peak in the late 90s before becoming a casualty of the dot-com bubble and setting a daunting precedent for other dog-centric programming. But a lot has changed in the last decade, both in entertainment and in man-pet relations: There are an increasing number of pampering products and services that extend human comforts to dogs, from gourmet food to therapy. And Dog TV, after all, isnt for humans. For one thing, the colors will seem off, since theyve been calibrated to suit dogs limited vision. (Essentially color-blind, dogs can only see shades of blue and yellow.) Were constantly doing you can call them focus groups for groups for dogs, says Neumann. Weve noticed, for example, that dogs are not thrilled about barking on the channel, so weve removed almost all barking.

The content is relatively cheap to produce: Videos are shot largely in San Diego and Israel, canine actors dont need to be paid, there are no elaborate sets, and the veterinarian-approved music is written and performed in-house. Short segments play throughout the day and are designed to alternately soothe and stimulate the viewer.

There are, as yet, no plans to air dog sitcoms, dog procedurals, or any form of narrative content. Were not creating CSI for dogs, says Neumann. The reason, he says, is not so much that dogs wouldnt be able to follow a narrative show. On the contrary: Hes worried they would get hooked. Were not creating a TV channel for dogs so they sit there for eight hours a day. Dog TVs goal, he says, is simply to create a good environment for the dogs.

In a video on Dog TVs website, Nick Dodman, a Tufts University veterinarian who acts as an adviser to the channel, says, One thing that people shouldnt expect is for their dog to sit, as we do, in front of the TV and stare at the screen for hours and hours. Its more of a backdrop. If dogs are not expected to react to the screen, and owners arent around to see how the dogs behave in their absence, how can subscribers be sure theyre not just paying $4.99 a month for glorifiedand discoloredYouTube videos? A hundred percent of the time, [owners] get research-based content in which both music and video are completely appropriate for their dog, says Neumann. Theres nothing to irritate, stress, or scare your dog.

The channels creators are planning to attract advertising, but arent yet sure how to integrate it into the programming. The advertising is mostly going to be on our digital [platforms], because we know its difficult to advertise on the channel for the dogs because its not really effective.

If Dog TV is a success domestically, Jasmine Group hopes to expand internationally. Its an advantage of the channel that we can move the content to any country because the language is not significant, says Yossi Uzrad, president of Jasmine Group and a producer of films such as The Bands Visit, Israels official entry to the 2008 Oscars. Because Jasmine owns all the rights to the content, Uzrad foresees other growth opportunities. People can buy Dog TV music and put it in the car while theyre driving, for example, he says.

Read more here:
Can Dog TV Make a Profit?

Reykjavik to Discover the 'Dark Side' at 2012 Internet Marketing Event

REYKJAVIK, ICELAND--(Marketwire -03/01/12)- Attendees of the upcoming Reykjavik Internet Marketing Conference (RIMC) will discover the 'darker side' of internet marketing during this year's unique 'dark sessions' -- a first for the conference.

The 'dark sessions' are set to explore the 'darker side' of internet marketing and how the internet is being used as a marketing tool not always for good. This session is useful for all those who want to understand the depths of internet marketing, the possibilities that it holds, how to stray away from mistakes, and also how to utilise the strengths.

This one-of-a-kind session will feature Ralph "Fantomeister" Tegtmeier, Pleromatrix; Peter van der Graaf, SearchSpecialist.nl; and Mikkel DeMib, DeMib.com.

The Reykjavik Internet Marketing Conference (RIMC) is an essential networking tool for marketing and advertising people, web editors, sales and marketing managers, as well as directors of small and large businesses. The event is the result of an ambitious partnership between Nordic eMarketing, MBL.is, and others.

Now in its 9th year, the 2012 internet marketing event will be focusing on two tracks, mixing various topics in internet communication and marketing, best practice tips, and Social Media over one day.

Past RIMC events have received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with an average of 250 attendees in attendance per event.

Speakers confirmed for RIMC 2012 include: Bill Hunt, Back Azimuth; Ben Chapman, BBC; Barbara Coll, WebMama; Charles Dowd, Facebook; Brent D. Payne, Tribune/BaldSEO; Motoko Hunt, Adobe; Phil Greenwood, Microsoft; Ludvik Hegh-Krohn, OMG; and Matt Neal, BrightSparx.

For further information regarding the 2012 Reykjavik Internet Marketing Conference, visit http://www.rimc.is/en.

Read this article:
Reykjavik to Discover the 'Dark Side' at 2012 Internet Marketing Event

Internet voting systems too insecure, researcher warns

SAN FRANCISCO -- Internet voting systems are inherently insecure and should not be allowed in the upcoming general elections, a noted security researcher said at the RSA Conference 2012 being held here this week.

David Jefferson, a computer scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories and chairman of the election watchdog group Verified Voting, called on election officials around the country to drop plans to allow an estimated 3.5 million voters to cast their ballots over the Internet in this year's general elections.

In an interview with Computerworld on Wednesday, Jefferson warned that the systems that enable such voting are far too insecure to be trusted and should be jettisoned altogether.

Jefferson is scheduled to participate in a panel discussion on the topic at RSA on Thursday. Also on the panel are noted cryptographer and security guru Ron Rivest, who is the "R" in RSA, and Alex Halderman, an academic whose research on security vulnerabilities in e-voting systems prompted elections officials in Washington to drop plans to use an e-voting system in 2010.

"There's a wave of interest across the country, mostly among election officials and one agency of the [Department of Defense] to offer Internet voting," to overseas citizens and members of the military, Jefferson said. "From a security point of view, it is an insane thing to do."

A total of 33 states allow citizens to use the Internet to cast their ballots. In a majority of cases, those eligible to vote over the Internet receive their blank ballots over the Web, fill them in and submit their ballots via email as a PDF attachment. Some states, such as Arizona, have begun piloting projects that allow eligible voters to log into a web portal, authenticate themselves and submit their ballots via the portal.

The insecurity and the inability to audit such voting practices is unacceptable, Jefferson said.

Ballots sent via email for instance, are transmitted in the clear without encryption. That means any entity, such as an ISP or a malicious hacker that sits between the voter and the county where the vote is being cast, can view, filter, substitute or modify the ballot, he said.

Meanwhile, the e-voting Web portals that have been proposed for use in Arizona and are being tested in other states, are prone to all the security vulnerabilities and attacks that other sites face, he said.

As one example, he pointed to an attack crafted by Halderman , an assistant professor of computer science at the University of Michigan, in 2010 against a Digital Vote by Mail System that was proposed for use in Washington. The system was designed to be used by overseas voters and military personnel based in other countries.

See the original post here:
Internet voting systems too insecure, researcher warns

Global Internet Services Industry

NEW YORK, March 1, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

Global Internet Services Industry

http://www.reportlinker.com/p0152437/Global-Internet-Services-Industry.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Internet_

The global outlook series on Internet Services provides a collection of statistical anecdotes, market briefs, and concise summaries of research findings. The report offers a rudimentary overview of the industry with an on-the-fly focus on broadband services, and details trends such as, increased broadband penetration and growth in e-Commerce applications and online advertising. Additionally, issues such as, impact of the ongoing recession, commercialization, threat to user choice and increased user monitoring are also covered. The report identifies and discusses key regional markets, such as, the US, China, Japan, India, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain, the UK, China, India, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, and Brazil among others. The reader stands to gain macro-level insights into recent industry developments such as service introductions, mergers & acquisitions and other noteworthy strategic corporate developments. Also included is an indexed, easy-to-refer, fact-finder directory listing the addresses, and contact details of 159 companies worldwide.

1. GLOBAL INDUSTRY OVERVIEW 1

The Importance of Internet Services 1

Recession Fails to Suppress ISP Market 1

Asia Strengthens its Lead in Global Internet Subscriptions 2

Table 1: World Internet Usage (2010): Percentage Share

Breakdown by Top 10 Countries -China, US, Japan, India,

Originally posted here:
Global Internet Services Industry