Media Search:



Is the Espionage Act Outdated?

Weekends on All Things Considered host Jacki Lyden speaks with Benjamin Wittes of the Brookings Institution about the Espionage Act. This Word War I-era legislation has been used more frequently in recent times to prosecute government employees who leak information to the press, but the limits set by the act are poorly defined for our modern age.

Copyright 2013 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

JACKI LYDEN, HOST:

This week, members of the press and the public are up in arms over what they see as a possible violation of First Amendment rights. The Department of Justice investigated phone and email records of Fox News reporter James Rosen, who published information leaked by a government employee. The Justice Department is pursuing the leak under the Espionage Act, a law that dates back to World War I and was used to stop national defense secrets getting into enemy hands.

But more recently, the government has used the Espionage Act to pursue whistle-blowers and federal employees who leak classified information to the press. And all this buzz made us wonder, what exactly is this old law?

To help fill us in, we have Benjamin Wittes with us. He's a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution. Benjamin Wittes, welcome to the program.

BENJAMIN WITTES: Thanks for having me.

LYDEN: What was the original intent of the Espionage Act?

WITTES: Well, the Espionage Act is a World War I era statute that prevents people from giving national defense information to foreign governments, but also to people domestically who are not authorized to have it. It not only forbids the original transmission by the authorized person to the unauthorized person, but that it also purports to forbid secondary transmissions by unauthorized people to each other.

So to give you an example of that, if somebody leaks information to NPR and NPR then turns around and publishes that information or broadcasts it on the radio, NPR itself may be in violation of it.

Continued here:
Is the Espionage Act Outdated?

Internet Marketing Consultant – Best Internet Marketing Training Course Online – Video


Internet Marketing Consultant - Best Internet Marketing Training Course Online
http://www.InstantCustomersForLife.com / info@matthewbehdjou.com Internet Marketing Consultant - Best Internet Marketing Training Course Online Matthew Behdj...

By: ezinternetpaydays

Go here to see the original:
Internet Marketing Consultant - Best Internet Marketing Training Course Online - Video

Social marketing – Marketing – Part 1 – Video


Social marketing - Marketing - Part 1
http://www.resumesanta.com... Social marketing - Marketing - Part 1. Social marketing is the systematic application of marketing, along with other concepts and techniques, to achieve specific...

By: Career Travel by ResumeSanta.com

See more here:
Social marketing - Marketing - Part 1 - Video

Censorship! Video Removed In Less Than 24 Hours! – Video


Censorship! Video Removed In Less Than 24 Hours!
Wow I made this clip on family guy and it got taken down within hours! It is not surprising, but still makes me mad. Oh well they censoring YT soon anyway so you better learn what you can now!

By: JC Ishtruth

The rest is here:
Censorship! Video Removed In Less Than 24 Hours! - Video

Photographers withdraw from Vivid over censorship claims

Two international photographers have withdrawn their works from an exhibition in Sydney in protest over what one has described as censorship.

The photographers' works are being displayed on a screen near the Museum of Contemporary Art as part of the annual Vivid festival.

But several photographers say they have been asked to restrict the use of some images.

They have told the ABC that Vivid organisers said several photos were considered inappropriate and should not be displayed.

Photographer Jodi Beiber is one of them.

Ms Beiber is known for her photo of an Afghan woman with her nose cut off, which featured on the cover of Time magazine.

She says one of her photos of a bare-breasted woman was removed from the exhibition and she has decided to withdraw her feature in protest.

"If I look at all the photographs that are not allowed to be shown, I feel that there's a huge censorship," she said.

"I come from South Africa which is a country that's not perfect.

"But when you have such protection of a society, how are your children going to be when they go out into the real world, if they're not allowed to experience or see or make up their own mind about what happens in the world?"

Read the original:
Photographers withdraw from Vivid over censorship claims