Media Search:



Finding a Home in This Overheated Market – The New York Times

So when Ms. Park was pricing a house in Millbrook, N.Y., that needed updating but sat on a quiet country road on five bucolic acres, she listed it at $287,000 and had 62 showings and 32 offers. The house is selling for way over asking price, she said, declining to give the figure because it hadnt closed yet. A comparable house in Millbrook, with far less acreage, was listed in May for $310,000, reduced in June to $299,999 and is still for sale.

For buyer clients, Ms. Park looks intensely at houses that have been sitting like lumps, including those for sale by their owners and even listings that have been withdrawn. If she spots a rough gem, she jumps in and offers a lower price before the seller makes a formal reduction online that triggers multiple bids. I just got a client into a deal for $35,000 under asking that very way, she said. Her clients call her Swoop Sandi.

When it comes to pricing, third-party websites like Zillow and Realtor offer useful transparency (to a point), but also contribute to the problems of sluggish properties, agents say. Buyers see a houses sales history and draw their own conclusions about why a price has been reduced. But sometimes the story is more complicated than a few stats suggest, and the agent may never get a chance to explain it. Zillows habit of reporting how many people look at or save a listing further shapes negative perceptions. If the numbers are skimpy, viewers might assume something is wrong and move on.

Then again, a house that isnt smothered with interest has its own charms. If enthusiasm for a home is dampened, Peggy Bellar in Margaretville said, it may be for no other reason than buyer fatigue. Lots of people have been in numerous competitive bidding situations and are gun shy at this point.

Ms. Bellar had one final explanation for a moribund listing: when everything has been done correctly (including the all-important pricing), then it may simply be a factor of the real estate market adjusting slightly.

For weekly email updates on residential real estate news, sign up here. Follow us on Twitter: @nytrealestate.

Go here to read the rest:
Finding a Home in This Overheated Market - The New York Times

How tree-lined streets and high-speed internet can help with a warming climate – Kitsap Sun

Kevin Walthall| Columnist

I hope yall are all staying cool out there. Heres some positive perspective: it could be worse.

Last week's "heat dome" weather reminds me of Texas, except in Texas we dont call it a heat dome, we just call it summer. Thankfully Kitsap has been spared the Texas humidity that turns the air into a sticky mosquito soup. That humid air doesnt get cool in the shade, and Texas breezes are just the state trying to suffocate you with a dank pillow. Add Dallas or Houston smog to the soup for subtle tasting notes of Exxon-Mobile byproduct. Yum.

Think you can escape the heat in a Texas lake like you can a Kitsap lake? For a good/terrible time, Google "cottonmouth snakes." Oralligator gar, a Cretaceous-era Satan-fish inexplicably still living in the tepid brown pools Texans call lakes.

So it isnt all bad. You can thank your lucky stars you arent in Texas.

With the heat wave giving a scary glimpse of our climate change future, it seems like a good time to think about streets built for heat waves and telecommuting.

Thats right. Another article about complete streets.

Complete streets are streets built for everyone. Wide sidewalks, bike lanes or shared lanes, bus pull-outs, and ADA ramps are common features of complete streets.

Theyre generally showcase streets, attractive boulevards with landscaping and public art. They arent just tools for getting from A to B, theyre pleasant places to be, destinations in their own right. They attract investment and redevelopment. They give people transportation options outside the car. Complete streets are beneficial to the people who live next to them.

The conventional wisdom for the last 50 years or so has been that streets are for moving as many cars as fast as possible, and nothing else. The result has been stroads, byways that dont know if theyre neighborhood streets or inter-city roads. Some stroads, like 11th Street through West Bremerton, actually handle a large volume of carsand legitimately need to be four lanes wide. Others, like 6th Street or Naval Avenue, dont. Stroads are dangerous and ugly concrete rivers that divide neighborhoods and suck the life (and property values) out of their surroundings with high speed traffic. Maybe that works for commuters who see Bremerton as an obstacle between themselves and work, but for the people who actually live with stroads and pay for them with their taxes, its not worth it. Transportation budgets are slowly becoming more about transporting people than transporting cars.

Sometimes, cities will call these road diets. I dont like that term. Complete streets are fun, diets arent. Sure, 6th Street is chonky, but I dont just want it to become slimmer, I want it to become an asset to the community. As Ive said before, I would like complete streets to be accompanied by some type of complete street zoning, which would create small-town Main Streets along complete streets, providing opportunities for employment and recreation within walking distance of neighborhoods, creating a non-motorized, low-emissions transportation network throughout the city and affordable market-rate housing based on that transportation network rather than expensive parking and parkings attendant traffic.

In light of Mondays scorching heat and the economic shifts from the pandemic, I think two aspects of complete streets need to come into focus: street trees and high-speed internet.

Perhaps by now weve all read about the effects of heat bubbles or heat islands in urban areas. Heat bubbles are caused by the suns heat being reflected off of roads, parking lots, and buildings. When all that asphalt and roofing heats up in a concentrated urban area, it creates pockets of extreme heat, as in the case of Seattle and Bremerton.

Theres no way to avoid having roads, parking lots, and rooftops in urban areas, but we can mitigate their effects to a degree with vegetation in various forms. Landscaping in parking lots helps with stormwater runoff, absorbing and purifying rainwater as it runs from oil-slicked parking lots into aquifers and seas. Trees extend their branches over asphalt, catching the suns rays and capturing its energy. We can even go so far as to have green roofs, which are specially designed to host moss and lichens, succulents, or grasses. Plants take the energy of the sun and pollution from cars and use it in photosynthesis to create the plants energy. Its the best deal in the history of deals.

The recent heat wave makes street trees seem like an essential component of complete streets. Street trees are pretty. Humans have a biological and neurological need to see trees and greenery. Trees improve property values. Trees are the Swiss Army Knife of urban improvement but theyre also essential to making Bremerton more resilient towards climate change. According to the U.S. Forest Service Center for Urban Forest Research, street trees can lower the temperature of streets by 6 to 10 degrees, mitigating the heat island effect. Street trees also absorb CO2 emissions, helping with the root causes of climate change. When planted in the right places, trees can even diminish home cooling costs by 30%, for those of you who have air conditioning already.

These can be trees planted in medians or by sidewalks, but if we want Bremerton to roll with the punches of climate change, we need to view trees as a necessity for combating the heat bubble effect. The good news is that trees are cheap, abundant, pretty, efficient, and easy to maintain. Deciduous trees shade us in the summer and let light in during winter. Its really quite a polite thing for Mother Nature to do, if you think about it.

Second, I want to update the notion of complete streets to include fiber optic cable for high speed internet. This has largely come across my radar since Covid due to the rise and apparent permanence of remote working. We should absolutely be jumping on this. Every major disruption is an opportunity to pivot faster than the competition, and Covid is no exception. We can come out of this thing on top if were willing to think outside the box and make lemonade out of these catastrophic lemons.

With so many working from home and daily commutes nixed, people are realizing they can live anywhere they want, so theyre moving. Theres an extremely silver lining to that reality: we no longer have to offer tax breaks to attract major employers in order to import wealth. Major marketing and tech companies now effectively have offices through coworking spaces in Bremerton (Spark Commons, Bremerton Workspace), Silverdale (Have-A-Space), Poulsbo (Vibe Coworks, The Creative Consortium), and Bainbridge Island (Knack Coworking). Quality, high-paying jobs are located practically everywhere.

The question now becomes is this the sort of place people with good jobs want to live? If Bremerton is awesome, people with high-paying jobs will stay and their salaries will circulate in the local economy. If Bremerton keeps betting that Sears Roebuck is making a comeback, theyll move on.

Being awesome has never made more fiscal sense than it does right now. And weve got a great start on that front, with miles of beautiful coastline, fantastic parks, a farmers market, craft breweries, and the upcoming Quincy Square. Add in some leafy pedestrian boulevards lined with townhomes and boutique shops and restaurants, and these are the things that attract the high earners of the new economy, who splurge on experiences.

I think were only going to see more co-working spaces, and their presence means any web-based employer can be in any neighborhood. All co-working spaces need to succeed is a building for commercial use and access to high speed internet hence I think high-speed fiber internet should become the next ingredient in any complete street.

If mayoral candidate Bill Broughton has one big idea to campaign on, its his proposal to make the City of Bremerton a provider of high-speed fiber optic internet in the mold of Chattanooga, Tennessee. He sees this as a way to attract traditional office-based employers downtown, but I think it also has the potential to open up new high-paying employment opportunities in outlying neighborhoods as well. Competition is always a good thing, and Im looking forward to seeing him compete with incumbent Mayor Greg Wheeler. I think the idea of using the City to spread high speed internet has legs.

While street trees are an important adaptation to climate change, bringing employers to employees has the potential to dramatically reduce auto emissions from commuters, which is the number one source of carbon emissions both nationally and in Washington. We need to be thinking now about a hotter future with more expensive resources.

Kevin Walthall is a Bremerton resident and a regular contributor tothe Kitsap Sun. He also writes for the blog Urban Bremerton. Contact him atkswalthall@gmail.com.

Read the original post:
How tree-lined streets and high-speed internet can help with a warming climate - Kitsap Sun

What Is a Libertarian? A Brief Summary of Their Beliefs

The fact is, America is a country fundamentally shaped by libertarian values and attitudes. Our libertarian values helped to create the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and those documents in turn shape our thinking about freedom and the limited powers of government. David Boaz, Who Killed Gun Control?

What is a libertarian? According to Wikipedia, libertarians wish to maximize autonomy and political freedom, emphasizing free association, freedom of choice, individualism and voluntary association. In essence, the libertarian is anyone who upholds liberty as their core guiding principle and wants to preserve their own rights as well as the rights of others.

Libertarians also want to limit state power, albeit to varying degrees. Anarcho-capitalists want only a night-watchman state, the purpose of which is limited to protecting people from aggression, enforcing private property, and a few other aspects of private life which the free market typically doesnt concern itself with. (This is not to be confused with anarchism, an ideology that usually rejects private property.) Consequentialist libertarians who believe free trade must benefit society as a whole may tolerate greater government power if it does genuine good rather than merely hinder individual autonomy.

People hearing about libertarianism for the first time might assume its some fringe ideology. You could argue that it is, but you would have to acknowledge a large reason why: Libertarians seek to take power away from the government and not give it to anyone else. Any powerful person or organization which owes their lofty position to the status quo has every incentive to marginalize libertarianism.

Summarizing a complete political and economic philosophy in a few paragraphs is a hefty task. It took Murray Rothbard (aka Mr. Libertarian) over 300 pages to do about as much when he penned For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto.

But lets set the books aside for a moment and briefly explain what libertarians believe, with the understanding that libertarians disagree on many things as well.

Libertarians believe everyone should enjoy total autonomy. Do as you please with your life. Spend it with whomever, doing whatever, wherever. Just dont forcibly interfere with anyone elses liberty and were all square.

Libertarians believe in entrepreneurialism and the free market. Innovation is wrought from passion and hard work, not duty. A government that taxes the industry is only stealing products to give to those who havent earned it. With less government control comes greater access to the free market, and more opportunity to create wealth for all.

Libertarians do not recognize official authority in most cases. The man in Washington, the man in Moscow, the man in the Vatican none of them can nullify your right to live free and independently. The libertarian rejects authoritys need to violate their rights for the greater good. To the libertarian, there is no greater good beyond the preservation of those very rights.

Why is the Libertarian Partys symbolic animal a porcupine? Because it bothers nobody and expects the same favor in return. But if you do decide to bother it, you may reasonably expect a snoot full of barbs.

No true libertarian country exists. One might argue the political ideology has a built-in kill switch, as the very people who value individualism and economic freedom seldom want to helm an organization which controls people and taxes them.

While conservatism and liberalism are espoused by Americas two dominant political parties, either of which proffers a very noisy presidential candidate every four years, libertarianism remains something of a question mark in most peoples minds.

What are the libertarian positions on the big issues? They are seldom publicly advised or officially implemented, so you have to examine them for yourself if you want greater insight into libertarian beliefs.

Democrats and Republicans both believe that a war is an awful, awful thing whenever the rival party has started one. In contrast, the libertarian is unequivocally opposed to war. At its very core libertarianism is a rejection of militarism, which by definition entails the implementation of violence to force others to do as the state wishes.

War breeds nationalism, an ideology diametrically at odds with individualism. It incentivizes corruption, as Smedley Butler elaborates in War Is a Racket, and ultimately poses a net loss to society as Ludwig von Mises explains in Nation, State, and Economy. The state at war demands its citizens to forfeit their rights and their own lives for the good of the collective. Although war invariably increases state power, its cessation almost never decreases it. And while this may go without saying, the natural rights of individuals do include not getting killed.

Libertarianism condemns war as a facet of foreign policy, yet it does not prescribe absolutist pacifism. You have every right to strike a man who is attacking you. The non-aggression principle forbids the initiation of force, not forceful defense. Likewise, many libertarians accept that war is a necessary evil in some cases. Few libertarians argue that the United States ought to have remained a British colony, and fewer still would prefer to ignore Kim Jong-un if he decided to glass San Francisco. Yet the staunchest libertarians may also advocate unwavering pacifism to the extent where war could never be an option. Whether their ideology is practicable in so hostile a world is a matter of speculation.

Most libertarians advocate for limited government not zero government as they agree some degree of official intervention is required to protect citizens from aggression, theft, and other transgressions against their private property and civil liberties.

Unfortunately, the current state of the American criminal justice system could hardly be described as limited. The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws, as Tacitus wrote, and indeed America currently has so many laws in place that most citizens would become felons if they were only formally arrested and convicted. As Hunter S. Thompson (who is not to be confused with Tacitus) once put it, In a closed society where everybodys guilty, the only crime is getting caught.

Libertarians would advocate several measures to fix the broken criminal justice system. Qualified immunity, which effectively permits government officials to violate individuals liberty, would have to go. (The Cato Institute better explains why.) So too would police unions, which make it nigh impossible to terminate terrible police officers. Libertarians also call for an immediate end to the war on drugs, as conservative libertarian Milton Friedman supported when he endorsed legalizing marijuana. (Hence why the Libertarian Party is occasionally referred to as the Dude Weed Party.)

A libertarian understands that their civil rights are not special permissions granted (or revokable) by their government. Rather, civil rights are intrinsic to humanity itself. To be born is to have the right to free speech, press, religion and so on. Certain civil rights only apply to those in special circumstances, such as the prisoners right to a speedy trial as protected by the Sixth Amendment (which is arguably violated when a criminal trial can last longer than five years).

A libertarian is soundly in favor of preserving existing civil rights as well as creating additional ones. For example, the Libertarian Party views government officials reading your emails as a very bad thing. A libertarian would also support the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, which would guarantee equal legal rights for all Americans regardless of their sex.

Equal rights are not to be mistaken for equal results, however. Friedrich Hayek explains how so in The Constitution of Liberty: From the fact that people are very different it follows that, if we treat them equally, the result must be inequality in their actual position, and that the only way to place them in an equal position would be to treat them differently. Equality before the law and material equality are therefore not only different but are in conflict with each other; and we can achieve either one or the other, but not both at the same time. The equality before the law which freedom requires leads to material inequality.

Gun ownership is the civil liberty which modern liberalism likes to conveniently forget. The Republican Party is friendlier to gun rights, but not nearly enough. Many GOP supporters were unhappy when President Trump instructed the ATF to treat bump stocks as machine guns, or when he said he would think about banning suppressors.

Ron Paul summed up the libertarian view on guns like so: Nobody should tell you you cant own a gun because it might be misused. And George Orwell, a socialist of all things, explained why: That rifle on the wall of the labourers cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.

One of the libertarian ideas people often struggle with is this: Any political party or form of government has the potential to turn tyrannical. More than 250 million people were killed by their governments during the 20th century alone. Guns preserve political freedom by equipping people to fight back against the only organization which is legally allowed to kill them. In a country where gun confiscation has quite literally concluded with democide, it is crucial to remember that guns arent simply fun toys for rednecks.

Just like it places a premium on property rights, libertarianism maintains that you have total autonomy over your own body. You have the right to accept or refuse any medical treatment you wish to, just as you have the right to take any recreational drug that you please. (But if you get drunk and do something foolish, the consequences are all yours to enjoy.)

Libertarianism rejects the welfare state, including the governments nationalization of healthcare. As Walter E. Williams put it, There is no moral argument that justifies using the coercive powers of government to force one person to bear the expense of taking care of another. Thomas Sowell completed the libertarian argument against nationalized healthcare: It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medication somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medication and a government bureaucracy to administer it.

Free-market healthcare is subject to competitive forces that continually improve medicine; government-controlled healthcare must only satisfy whichever criteria impassionate bureaucrats create for it. As is always the case, incentivizing innovation is the surest way toward progress not yoking it to government officials who are more concerned with polls than they are public health.

John Locke summed up the duty we have to children in Some Thoughts Concerning Education: Children are strangers to all we are acquainted with; and all the things they meet with, are at first unknown to them, as they once were to us: and happy are they who meet with civil people, that will comply with their ignorance, and help them to get out of it. (Not all of the libertarian movements preeminent thinkers get it quite so right. Murray Rothbards assertion that parents have no legal obligation to feed their kids can be considered frosty at best.)

The experience offered by public education suffers greatly for its dependence on tax revenue. When teachers must place the demands of government officials before the diverse needs of their students, and when the public education system indoctrinates children with whatever ideologies the dominant political party prescribes, we fail our children. Many libertarians wish to shield vulnerable children from politicians and their special interests by divorcing education from the government entirely.

You have likely noticed that we peppered this article with mentions of several people. These are the thinkers whose work you should explore if you want a firmer grasp of libertarianism. (You had better add Ayn Rand to the list while youre at it.) Keep learning, and one day soon you too may be able to bore your friends to tears with long-winded explanations as to why taxation is theft and the government should bugger off.

Follow this link:
What Is a Libertarian? A Brief Summary of Their Beliefs

Letter: Writer doesn’t know what the Tea Party was – INFORUM

Leland Jenson recently wrote a letter insulting his political opponents and spewing leftist buzzwords. He jumps all over the place trying to connect unrelated topics from completely different political camps. For example, he said, Our national democratic institutions are being undermined by Tea Party extremists (Vanilla Isis), trying to lump the Tea Party movement in with the January 6th capital riot. To understand how stupid this is, one must first understand what the Tea Party movement was.

Despite what the media would have you believe, Republicans and Libertarians dont actually get along very well. The Tea Party movement was an attempt to form a coalition between Libertarians and Republicans to focus on one single issue: government spending. The movement did manage to get a few hardline fiscal hawks elected to Congress, but it failed to give Ron Paul (now retired) the presidency.

For those who dont know, Ron Paul can be thought of as the libertarian version of Bernie Sanders. His son, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is one of the last remaining remnants of the Tea Party. The movement that got Trump elected in 2016 was completely different and unrelated. That movement was all about national populism, not government spending.

The Tea Party movement was very short lived and it functionally died after the 2012 election. The modern Republican party today arguably does not care about the national debt and how much of the annual budget goes to simply paying interest.

Secondly, Im at a loss for words at Jenson calling the tea party vanilla isis. ISIS is a theocratic movement whose goal is to create a Sunni Islamic state. The Shia muslims were treated just as badly as non-muslims, sometimes worse; they could either convert or be killed. The Sunni muslims under ISIS control were forced to follow the strictest Islamic protocols (sharia law), such as men not shaving their beards and women being forced to cover themselves; thats putting it lightly. Failure to comply could result in barbaric thousand-year-old styles of executions such as crucifixions and stoning, including women and children.

Jenson is concerned about bigotry, misogyny and equality or whatever. When the Tea Party was active, the gay marriage debate was in full swing; the Supreme Court did not settle that discussion until 2015, long after the Tea Party ended. Libertarians are generally supportive of gay marriage, Republicans were not. The coalition required them to put their differences aside. Similarly, Libertarians are generally far less religious than Republicans; even the ones that are religious arent authoritarian about it. You wouldnt find the Tea Party pushing for prayer in schools or the Ten Commandments in front of courthouses. Comparing the Tea Party to ISIS doesnt even make sense, not even as a vanilla version. The Tea Party was less theocratic than Republicans in general at the time.

In conclusion, Jenson doesnt know what hes talking about. The Tea Party was not conservative republican extremism.

P. S. Trickle-down economics is not a real thing. The only time you hear those words are when Democrats are attacking a strawman. You wont find academic proponents of it.

William Smith lives in Fargo.

This letter does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Forum's editorial board nor Forum ownership.

See the original post:
Letter: Writer doesn't know what the Tea Party was - INFORUM

Gov. DeSantis and the need for viewpoint diversity in higher education | Column – Tampa Bay Times

Floridas Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis recently signed a bill to protect against indoctrination in the states colleges and universities. The new law, which went into effect on July 1, requires Floridas public colleges and universities to conduct an annual survey measuring intellectual freedom and viewpoint diversity on their campuses. The laws goal is to assess the extent to which competing ideas and perspectives are presented and how free students, faculty, and staff feel to express their beliefs and viewpoints.

The Florida law does not specify what will be done with the survey results, but Gov. DeSantis suggested that budget cuts could result if universities and colleges are found to be indoctrinating students. It used to be thought that a university campus was a place where youd be exposed to a lot of different ideas, DeSantis said. Unfortunately, now the norm is really these are more intellectually repressive environments.

DeSantis is currently a frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. Indeed, he edged former President Donald Trump in a recent straw poll taken at the Western Conservative Summit. The problem DeSantis has identified is not unique to Florida Indianas Republican governor signed a similar bill last month and it traces directly to the political biases of the processes by which faculty are hired. Many of the same colleges and universities that tout tenure as a way to encourage free thought censor it by not allowing conservative and libertarian faculty candidates who think freely to get in the door.

I once suggested on the ConLawProf group email list that law schools need to hire more conservative and libertarian candidates (with more meaning, at a minimum, at least one). The reaction? One law professor posted that I was nuts to suggest such a thing. Libertarian law professor Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz quipped at a Federalist Society conference on intellectual diversity in the legal academy that his leftist colleagues at Georgetown felt that three conservatives on a law faculty of 120 was plenty and perhaps even one or two too many.

Anecdotes aside, Northwestern University law professor James Lindgren has published detailed statistical surveys that document that Republicans and Christians are the groups most under-represented in the law professoriate. If the small handful of right-leaning and Christian law schools is excluded from the dataset, the problem is actually worse. Additional studies demonstrate that lack of viewpoint diversity among faculty extends campus-wide. For example, according to research conducted last year by the National Association of Scholars, Democratic professors outnumber their Republican colleagues by a ratio of 8.5 to 1 on top college campuses.

Research since World War II has consistently found overwhelmingly left-oriented political attitudes and ideological self-identification among college and university faculty the report notes. The report also found that the most drastic differences in the ratio were among professors of English, at 26.8 to 1, sociology, at 27 to 1, and anthropology, 42.2 to 1. Less subjective majors such as mathematics (5.5 to 1), chemistry (4.6 to 1), and economics (3 to 1) were less politically biased.

Not surprisingly, DeSantis critics are throwing fits. Nikki Fried, the Florida agriculture commissioner who is challenging DeSantis for governor next year, compared the governors actions to what authoritarian regimes do. Charles P. Pierce wrote in Esquire that DeSantis is a wingnut who is as full of crap as the Christmas goose. Steven Benen toned it down a bit for MSNBC by merely opining that the new law is absurd.

What DeSantis critics fail to appreciate is that truth is most likely to emerge from the clash of ideas. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes famously referred to it as the marketplace of ideas, while John Stuart Mill expressed this same view in his classic book On Liberty. The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is that it is robbing the human race, Mill wrote. Posterity as well as the existing generation those who dissent from the opinion, still more those who hold it.

Gov. DeSantis received his undergraduate degree from Yale and his law degree from Harvard. He should be commended for recognizing that faculty need to start behaving like professors again.

Scott Douglas Gerber is a law professor at Ohio Northern University and an associated scholar at Brown Universitys Political Theory Project.

View original post here:
Gov. DeSantis and the need for viewpoint diversity in higher education | Column - Tampa Bay Times