Media Search:



Mining the Depths of Wikipedia on Instagram – The New York Times

Did you know that theres a Swiss political party dedicated to opposing the use of PowerPoint? That some people believe Avril Lavigne died in 2003 and was replaced by a look-alike? Or that theres a stone in a museum in Taiwan that uncannily resembles a slab of meat?

Probably not unless, that is, youre one of the hundreds of thousands of people who follow @depthsofwikipedia. The Instagram account shares bizarre and surprising snippets from the vast, crowdsourced online encyclopedia, including amusing images (a chicken literally crossing a road) and minor moments in history (Mitt Romney driving several hours with his dog atop his car). Some posts are wholesome such as Hatsuyume, the Japanese word for ones first dream of the year while others are not safe for work (say, panda pornography).

Annie Rauwerda, 22, started the account in the early days of the pandemic, when others were baking sourdough bread and learning how to knit. Everyone was starting projects, and this was my project, she said.

At the time, she was a sophomore at the University of Michigan. Students are often discouraged from using Wikipedia as a source in academic work, because most of its pages can be edited by anyone and may contain inaccurate information. But for Ms. Rauwerda, the site was always more about entertainment: spending hours clicking on one link after another, getting lost in rabbit holes.

Wikipedia is the best thing on the internet, Ms. Rauwerda said in a phone interview. Its what the internet was supposed to be. It has this hacker ethos of working together and making something.

At first, only her friends were following the account. But it received a wave of attention when Ms. Rauwerda posted about the influencer Caroline Calloway, who was upset that the post featured an old version of her Wikipedia page that said her occupation was nothing. Ms. Rauwerda apologized, and Ms. Calloway later boosted the account on her Instagram.

Ms. Rauwerda has since expanded @depthsofwikipedia to Twitter and TikTok. She sells merchandise (such as a coffee mug emblazoned with an image from the Wikipedia entry for bisexual lighting) and has hosted a live show in Manhattan, featuring trivia and stand-up.

Her followers often pitch her Wikipedia pages to feature, but these days its hard to find an entry that will impress Ms. Rauwerda. If its a fun fact thats been on the Reddit home page, Im definitely not going to repost it, she said. For example, there are only 25 blimps in the world. Ive known about that for a long time, and it went around Twitter a couple days ago. I was shocked. I was like, Everyone knows this.

She is choosy in large part because many of her followers rely on @depthsofwikipedia for unearthing the hidden gems of the internet.

I just love to learn stuff, especially these strange photos and things I could never find on my own, said Gabe Hockett, 15, a high school student in Minneapolis. He said his favorite posts from the account include The Most Unwanted Song and the Dave Matthews Band Chicago River incident.

Jen Fox, 22, said that trading posts from the account with her boyfriend is a special, nerdy love language. Its also been a litmus test for friendships. When Ms. Fox, a copywriter, moved to San Francisco in February, she would mention the account to new people she met. If they were familiar with it, she said, we would start DM-ing each other and sharing our favorite posts, which felt like we were really solidifying a concrete friendship. Ms. Fox even attended a @depthsofwikipedia meet-up at a local brewery. Theres such a community behind it, she said.

Its not new for lovers of Wikipedia to rally around their passion for the platform. A Facebook group called Cool Freaks Wikipedia Club, founded eight years ago, has nearly 50,000 members who actively trade links.

Ms. Rauwerdas account makes the internet feel smaller, said Heather Woods, an assistant professor of rhetoric and technology at Kansas State University. It shortcuts the rabbit-hole phenomenon by offering attractive or sometimes hilariously unattractive entry points to internet culture.

Zachary McCune, the brand director for the Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, said that @depthsofwikipedia is an extension of the sites participatory ethos. Its a place where Wikipedia comes to life, like an after-hours tour of the best of Wikipedia, Mr. McCune said.

And because Wikipedia has more than 55 million articles, having a guide like Ms. Rauwerda is helpful. She hopes that visitors to her page walk away with new shared knowledge. I want you to see something that makes you pause and go, Hmm, thats interesting, Ms. Rauwerda said. Something that makes you rethink the world a little bit.

See original here:
Mining the Depths of Wikipedia on Instagram - The New York Times

TechScape: When Wikipedia fiction becomes real life fact – The Guardian

Heres a fun fact: the guy on the front of a Pringles can has a name Julius Pringles.

Heres an even funner fact: Pringles only started using that name in 2013, after Kelloggs acquired the company and trademarked it before using it in a half-hearted social media push involving Jimmy Fallon and then sort of forgetting about it for a bit.

Heres the funnest fact of all: the first fun fact began as a lie, until one day it became the truth.

Sign up for our weekly technology newsletter, TechScape.

Julius Pringles began his existence not in a marketing brainstorming session at Kelloggs HQ in 2013, but in a college dorm room in 2006, when two freshmen quietly inserted the name into the Pringles Wikipedia page as an element of lighthearted vandalism:

The Pringles logo is a stylized cartoon caricature of the head of a male figure (commonly known as Julius Pringles) designed by Louis R Dixon.

Unlike most Wikipedia vandalism, it had a bit more effort behind it than simply whacking the edit button and dropping in a lie. One of the pair, Justin Shillock, was already a Wikipedia moderator with a fairly solid reputation, and the two immediately made a Facebook group Who knew he was named Julius Pringles? to help embed the claim further. After it was removed once, it was re-added, in a different format further up the page.

After a while, the name ended up just sticking around on the Wikipedia page, never quite getting enough attention to garner a citation needed tag, and eventually becoming such a longstanding claim on the page, only a total redraft by a dedicated editor would have had a chance of dislodging it.

Fake news travels fast

Such falsehoods havent been uncommon, particularly in the early days of Wikipedia. As much as the site has now outgrown its reputation among educators and experts as an untrustworthy den of calumny, its worth acknowledging that its reputation didnt come from nowhere.

And while Wikipedias systems, both formal and informal, do generally work to expel low-effort vandalism, falsehoods can stick around if they start to interact with the world outside the site. Almost a decade ago, the webcomic XKCD coined the phrase citogenesis to describe the process whereby a fake fact on Wikipedia is copied by a rushed journalist into an article, which is itself used as a source to prove the truth of the fact.

For instance: a friend, whose anonymity Ill preserve, once decided to add a fictional biographical detail to the page for Belarusian writer Svetlana Alexivitch that she briefly worked on Belarus first carp-fishing magazine. The claim was live for barely 15 minutes before an eagle-eyed editor pulled it, but that was still long enough for the claim to make it into a Deutsche Welle profile of the author.

But this is the first example Ive heard of something that goes beyond mere citogenesis. Here, a piece of Wikipedia vandalism managed to weave a true fact into reality, where it lay dormant until a viral tweet earlier this week.

It shows, I think, the inadequacy of so much conventional discussion around misinformation on the internet. Sometimes there really is such a thing as fake news: the claim that the pope endorsed Donald Trump for president really is, simply, false. But the internet isnt distinct from the wider world, and sometimes it can do more than simply reflect reality. It can alter it, too.

Thats not to say that enough people believing in the Ghost of Kyiv will suddenly summon a fighter ace into the sky above Ukraine. But if enough people believe plucky tractor drivers are taking on Russian tanks and winning well, that might be the sort of fact that begins as propaganda and blossoms into something else.

If you want to read the complete version of the newsletter please subscribe to receive TechScape in your inbox every Wednesday.

Go here to see the original:
TechScape: When Wikipedia fiction becomes real life fact - The Guardian

Gentleman who paid $537,084 for a Pepe the Frog NFT files …

Halston Thayer thought he'd made a wise investment when he paid over a half-million dollars for an absolutely magnificent illustration of a nude Pepe the Frog bathing in a pond. After all, a one-of-a-kind Pepe NFT had recently sold at Sotheby's for $3.6 million

Pepe's creator Matt Furie, who issued the bathing Pepe NFT, implied in his advertisement for the sale that the NFT would be the only one sold through Furie's PegzDAO: "500 cards issued, 400burned, 99 will remain in the PegzDAO, and ONE is being auctioned here."

After Thayer bought the NFT, though, Furie allegedly gave away 46 identical cards for free. Now Thayer is suing Matt Furie and PegzDAO for "unfair, deceptive, untrue, and misleading advertising and wrongful actions."

The lawsuit claims that shortly after Thayer paid $537,084 (150 ETH) for the "rare Pepe" and "unique asset," Furie "released 46 of the 99 remaining Pepe NFTs, significantly devaluing Plaintiff's Pepe NFT to less than $30,000.00, hundreds of thousands of dollars less than what he paid for this purportedly 'unique asset.' Upon information and belief, those 46 NFTs were given away for free."

Furie hasn't commented about the lawsuit on Twitter but continues to advertise Pepe-themed NFTs there.

Read the original:
Gentleman who paid $537,084 for a Pepe the Frog NFT files ...

Guests on Sunday Talk Shows Hillary Clinton Meet the Press – Los Angeles Times

CBS News Sunday Morning Jon Batiste and Suleika Jaouad. (N) 6 a.m. KCBS; 10 a.m. KCAL

Good Morning America (N) 6 a.m. KABC

State of the Union Secretary of State Antony Blinken; NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg; Gov. Larry Hogan (R-Md.). Panel: David Urban; Jane Harman; Amanda Carpenter; Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Fremont). (N) 6 and 9 a.m. CNN

Fareed Zakaria GPS Sanctions against Russia: Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Russias invasion of Ukraine: Author Adm. James Stavridis (U.S. Navy, retired) (To Risk It All: Nine Conflicts and the Crucible of Decision). The Grammys: Musician Jon Batiste. (N) 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. CNN

Sunday Morning Futures With Maria Bartiromo Petro Poroshenko, former president of Ukraine; Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.); Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.); Atty. Gen. Patrick Morrisey (R-W.Va.). (N) 7 a.m. and noon Fox News

The Sunday Show With Jonathan Capehart Former deputy commander of the U.S. European Command Lt. Gen. Stephen Twitty (U.S. Army, retired); Rep. Charlie Crist (D-Fla.); Jonathan Capeharts aunt Gloria Avent-Kindred; Nina Totenberg, NPR; Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank); Ned Price, Department of State. (N) 7 a.m. MSNBC

Face the Nation Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. New York City Mayor Eric Adams; Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.); Fiona Hill. (N) 7:30 a.m. and Monday, 3:05 a.m. KCBS

Meet the Press Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Panel: Cornell Belcher; Leigh Ann Caldwell; Brad Todd; Amy Walter. (N) 8 a.m. and 1:30 a.m. KNBC

This Week With George Stephanopoulos White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain; Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). Panel: Chris Christie; Donna Brazile; Astead Herndon, New York Times; Ruth Marcus, Washington Post. (N) 8 a.m. and 2 a.m. KABC

Fox News Sunday Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas); Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.); Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby. Panel: Ben Domenech; Susan Page; Juan Williams. Martha MacCallum hosts. (N) 8 a.m. KTTV; 11 a.m. and 11 p.m. Fox News

Reliable Sources With Brian Stelter Journalists ambushed while covering war in Ukraine: Stuart Ramsay and Dominique van Heerden, Sky News. Coverage of the war in Ukraine: Julia Ioffe, Puck; Ivan Kolpakov, Meduza. Media stories: Natasha Alford; David Zurawik. (N) 8 a.m. CNN

MediaBuzz Jason Chaffetz; Harold Ford Jr.; Griff Jenkins; Kat Timpf; Susan Ferrechio, Washington Times; Laura Fink, Rebelle Communications. (N) 8 a.m. Fox News

60 Minutes The International Medical Corps delivers supplies, training and resources into Ukraine; Russian billionaires and Great Britain; artist Laurie Anderson. (N) 4 p.m. KCBS

Frank Buckley Interviews Author Peter S. Goodman (Davos Man: How the Billionaires Devoured the World). 4:30 p.m. and 12:35 a.m. KTLA

The Circus: Inside the Greatest Political Show on Earth The Home Front. The Jan. 6 Select Committee investigation: Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.); Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank). President Trumps Jan. 6 phone logs: Bob Woodward, Washington Post; Robert Costa, CBS. The evolution of the Jan. 6 investigations: Conservative attorney George Conway. (N) 8 p.m. Showtime

The rest is here:
Guests on Sunday Talk Shows Hillary Clinton Meet the Press - Los Angeles Times

Why Trump is suing Hillary Clinton: Weaponizing the law is his favorite tactic – Salon

Donald Trump filed a lawsuit on March 24 in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Florida charging Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee, former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and various other people with attempting to rig the 2016 election by tying his campaign to Russian meddling.

Among multiple grandiose claims, the suit alleges both "racketeering" and "conspiracy" to commit injurious untruths: "Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty." Trump seeks both compensatory and punitive damages, and claims he incurred expenses of at least $24 million "in the form of defense costs, legal fees, and related expenses."

This comes straight out of the Trump playbook of suing and countersuing, and references a long list of grievances that Trump has been repeatedly airing since he was elected in 2016, not to mention his continued false claims that his 2020 defeat was the product of widespread fraud and conspiracy.

RELATED:Trump stole the Watergate playbook

Ordinary people who get caught up in lengthy legal battles, on whatever side of the conflict, generally find the experience to be costly to their pocketbooks, reputations and mental wellness. As someone who has been involved in more than 4,000 legal battles since 1973, Trump is clearly an exception to the rule.

He loves litigation as much as his cans of Diet Coke or boxes of fast food burgers or 36 holes of golf twice weekly. As a real estate tycoon, entrepreneur, entertainer and politician, Trump boasts: "I've taken advantage of the laws. And frankly, so has everybody else in my position."

Trump's modus operandi, whether in politics or litigation, has always been about "the pot calling the kettle black" or perhaps, in psychological terms, about projection. Here we have a situation where the actual racketeer and conspirator who has escaped two impeachments, the latter for having unsuccessfully conspired to steal the 2020 election, is predictably alleging racketeering, conspiracy and victimization by his opponents.

For Trump, litigation as a weapon has always been about attracting attention, exercising economic pressure, wearing down opponents and letting everyone know not to mess with the Donald. It's rarely about the facts or the law.

As litigator in chief, Donald Trump has been in a league of his own. In some 60 percent of 3,500 lawsuits, Trump has been the suing plaintiff rather than the sued defendant. His win-loss record is undeniably impressive: He has won 451 times and lost only 38.

As a defendant, Trump has persuaded judges to dismiss some 500 plaintiffs' cases against him. Hundreds of other cases have ended with unclear legal resolutions, according to available public records.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Trump has sued and been sued by personal assistants, celebrities, mental patients, prisoners, unions, rival businesspeople and his own family members.

Since the 1970s, he has been sued for race and sex discrimination, sexual harassment, fraud, breaches of trust, money laundering, defamation, stiffing creditors and defaulting on loans.

In turn, plaintiff Trump has sued people for fraud, breach of trust, breach of contract, violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, for government favoritism, and for misappropriation or adulteration of the Trump name.

Once again, it seems that Trump's weaponization of the law ispaying off. It now appears almost certain that neither the district attorney in Manhattan nor the U.S. attorney general will ever criminally charge Trump for his crimes of racketeering or insurrection.

Roy Cohn, who was the first of Trump's personal attorneys and "fixers" to be disbarred or suspended for lawless conduct followed by Michael Cohen and Rudy Giuliani taught Trump the art of the linguistic lie as a way of moving through life, business, politics and the law.

Trump's primer on the law included Cohn's three rules of litigation: Never settle, never surrender; counterattack immediately; no matter the outcome, always claim victory. Over the course of his litigious life, Trump was better at adhering to the latter two rules than the first, because the social reality of legal facts often dictates settling.

Cohn also taught Trump other related lessons, including but not limited to focusing on short-term victories, employing any unscrupulous means necessary to achieve them, doing end-runs around the judicial system, fixing disputed outcomes and the value of always defending yourself by going on the offensive.

As Cohn's apprentice, Trump would eventually take the art of his the lie to an even higher (or lower) level than Cohn himself or Trump's father, Fred Trump Sr., who was also a serial fabricator of the truth, could possibly have imagined.

Read more from Salon on the previous president:

More:
Why Trump is suing Hillary Clinton: Weaponizing the law is his favorite tactic - Salon