Media Search:



U.S. judiciary can be sued over handling of sex harassment complaint – court – Reuters

Caryn Strickland, a former public defender in the Western District of North Carolina, testifies before a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives' Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C., on March 17, 2022. U.S. House of Representatives/Handout via REUTERS

Register

April 26 - A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that a former federal public defender in North Carolina could sue the judiciary for violating her constitutional rights by being deliberately indifferent to her complaints of sexual harassment.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals partly reversed a judge's dismissal of a 2020 lawsuit by Caryn Strickland, who alleged she was sexually harassed by a superior and stonewalled in her efforts to have the judiciary address her complaint.

The Federal Public Defender's Office in the Western District of North Carolina, like others nationally, is part of the judiciary. Because the 4th Circuit itself was a defendant to the lawsuit, three judges from other circuits court heard Strickland's case.

Register

U.S. Circuit Judge Mary Beck Briscoe of the 10th Circuit, writing for the three-judge panel, said the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment "secures a federal judiciary employee's right to be free from sexual harassment in the workplace."

The court rejected Strickland's argument that the internal employment dispute resolution process used by the 4th Circuit like other courts to handle misconduct complaints was unconstitutional and violated her due process rights.

But Briscoe said Strickland sufficiently alleged the process was unfair in her case because the top public defender in her office was not disqualified from representing it during the review of Strickland's claims despite being accused of retaliation.

"Todays decision is a major victory," Jeannie Suk Gersen, a professor at Harvard Law School who represents Strickland.

The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts in a statement said the judiciary has made "significant" improvements" to its workplace conduct policies and complaint procedures and "remains committed to promoting an exemplary workplace."

The decision came a month after Strickland testified before Congress in favor of greater legal protections for the judiciary's 30,000 employees, who unlike other workers are not protected against sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

She had alleged she was sexually harassed by a superior who was constantly "shadowing" her and implied she would be promoted if she acquiesced to his sexual advances.

Strickland said she was forced to quit her job and take a judicial clerkship after complaining about sexual harassment through a flawed and biased internal process the judiciary adopted.

Her appeal had garnered the support of other judicial employees and several members of Congress including Representative Jerrold Nadler, the Democratic chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives' Judiciary Committee.

Nadler in a statement called the decision "a major victory for the rule of the law and the rights of all judicial branch employees, but it is not enough," saying Congress must pass legislation to protect judicial employees.

The case is Strickland v. United States, 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 21-1346.

For Strickland: Jeannie Suk Gersen of Harvard Law School

For the Judicial Conference: H. Thomas Byron III of the U.S. Department of Justice

(NOTE: This story has been updated to correct the spelling of Representative Jerrold Nadler's name and to add a comment from the judiciary.)

Read more:

4th Circuit replaces federal public defender amid sexual bias lawsuit

Ex-judiciary employees describe harassment, discrimination to U.S. House panel

4th Circ. leery of challenge to federal courts' sex harassment policies

Federal judiciary defends internal sexual harassment review process

Fed court workers say judiciary mishandles bias, harassment complaints

Register

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Thomson Reuters

Nate Raymond reports on the federal judiciary and litigation. He can be reached at nate.raymond@thomsonreuters.com.

Follow this link:
U.S. judiciary can be sued over handling of sex harassment complaint - court - Reuters

Donald Trump hit with $10000 daily fines, held in contempt in New York probe – Daily O’Collegian

NEW YORK A Manhattan judge held former President Donald Trump in civil contempt Monday, slapping him with daily $10,000 fines for repeated delays and failures to comply with New York Attorney General Letitia James fraud investigation.Mr. Trump, I know you take your business seriously, and I take mine seriously. I hereby hold you in civil contempt and fine you $10,000 a day, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron said, addressing Trump, though the former president was not present for the hearing.The judge ruled the former president flouted a court-ordered March 31 deadline to turn over paperwork. The fines will continue until Engoron decides Trump has fully complied with James demands for documents.The judge concluded the hearing with a theatrical slam of the gavel.The AG says she has evidence Trumps family company engaged in fraudulent and misleading business practices by manipulating the value of its properties for financial gain, whether by inflating values to secure loans and insurance coverage or deflating them to reduce taxes. The investigation is winding down after almost three years.Today, justice prevailed, James said in a statement. For years, Donald Trump has tried to evade the law and stop our lawful investigation into him and his companys financial dealings. Todays ruling makes clear: No one is above the law.Trump lawyer Alina Habba vowed to immediately take steps to get the contempt order revoked.Before Engoron announced his decision, lawyers from James office likened obtaining crucial documents from Trump and the Trump Organization to pulling teeth.We are being deprived of evidence, said Assistant Attorney General Andrew Amer. We are being hampered in our efforts to have a complete understanding because we dont have evidence from the person who sits at the top of (the) organization.Amer said Trump has two personal cellphones. But Trump has not submitted a sworn statement he never uses them to text.The only way to know that is to have the phones imaged and searched, said Amer. We certainly know he tweets.Habba insisted the former president had handed over everything he had.President Trump does not email, he does not text message, and he has no work computer at home or anywhere else, Habba said in Manhattan Supreme Court.The New Jersey-based lawyer said Trump and his eponymous company had provided the AG with over 6 million documents connected to more than 100 Trump Organization entities. Habba said she flew to Mar-a-Lago to personally ask Trump if there was any possibility of evidence that hadnt been turned over.Donald Trump does not believe hes above the law. He sat with me, he went through the documents personally, said Habba. She later clarified that she misspoke and that Trump had authorized her to search for documents.My client is an honest person, much to the dismay of certain people in this room, Habba replied, insisting there was no more evidence to provide.Later Monday, Engoron ordered global real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield to comply by May 27 with the AGs subpoenas for information on its real estate services for the Trump Organization. The firm had previously refused to provide details on its appraisals of Trumps Seven Springs Estate in Westchester County, New York, Trump National Golf Club, Los Angeles, and 40 Wall St., according to the AG.James has alleged Trump habitually lied about the value of his properties. The falsehoods even allegedly extended to Trumps triplex penthouse in Trump Tower. Trump claimed in 2015 that the apartment was 30,000 square feet and worth $327 million, according to court papers. But the AG says that overestimates its value by about $200 million and that its closer to 10,966 feet.James says Trump, his company, and his adult children were closely involved in the valuations her office is investigating. The former president, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are appealing an order that they sit for depositions with the AGs office. Eric Trump sat for questioning under oath in 2020 and invoked his Fifth Amendment right at least 500 times.A criminal investigation by the Manhattan district attorney, running parallel to James probe, is examining much of the same alleged conduct. It led to an indictment against the Trump Organization and its long-serving chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, on Jun. 30, 2021. Both have denied engaging in a 15-year tax fraud scheme.The two prosecutors in charge of the DAs probe quit in February, with one writing in his resignation letter that he believed Trump was guilty of multiple felonies.DA Alvin Bragg has insisted the probe is ongoing and could still result in charges against Trump.Trump has called both investigations a witch hunt.

Link:
Donald Trump hit with $10000 daily fines, held in contempt in New York probe - Daily O'Collegian

How Sandy Hook lies and the Jan. 6 inquiry threaten to undo Alex Jones – KERA News

Editors note: This story contains explicit language.

Lenny Pozner doesnt understand why people are surprised to learn he used to be a regular listener of Alex Jones show.

Pozners 6-year-old son, Noah, was one of the 26 children and adults who were killed during the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. Soon after the tragedy, Jones began using his Austin-based media juggernaut to spread bogus claims that the shooting was a staged government conspiracy made up of crisis actors and fake personas.

Still, for Pozner one of the Sandy Hook parents involved in a series of defamation lawsuits that have turned into a fierce legal reckoning for Jones the fact that he used to tune into the right-wing conspiracists broadcasts during long car drives is less a twist of fate and more a reflection of something obvious and unremarkable: Jones has reach.

People repeat that as if it's a big deal. But what I've noticed is that a lot of people pretend they don't know who Alex Jones is, he said. That's bullshit. Everybody knows who Alex Jones is.

At the height of his influence in 2018, Jones boasted an audience of about 1.4 million daily visits to his websites and social media accounts, according to The New York Times. And from 2015-18, Jones Infowars store raked in more than $50 million annually, HuffPost reported.

But while Jones built his brand and fortune on a keen and brazen use of misinformation, he has been unable to distance himself from his Sandy Hook falsehoods and his role in a rally that preceded the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

Jones recently sought immunity from federal prosecutors investigating the Capitol riot and has been subpoenaed by the U.S. House committee investigating the attack.

In the past year, Jones has lost all the defamation lawsuits filed by 10 families of Sandy Hook victims, including Pozners. Juries in the cases still have to decide how much Jones must pay the victims, but on April 17, three of Jones companies Infowars, Prison Planet TV and IW Health filed for bankruptcy. The next day, Jones told his listeners he was totally maxed out financially.

While the Chapter 11 filings may be part of Jones legal strategy to obstruct court proceedings he used them to delay his Austin jury trial, and Sandy Hook parents pushed to dismiss them last week theyre also the latest development in Jones downswing from his spot at the top of far-right media. Along with a sweeping ban on social media, the loss of a fawning president and looming legal penalties, Jones troubles have weakened his once massive reach and influence. Close observers of his operations say the fate of the states most infamous misinformation peddler is more uncertain than ever.

Neither Jones nor his company Infowars responded to multiple requests for comment for this story.

The Walter Cronkite of misinformation

Jones has used Infowars his primary media company that airs shows he claims are syndicated on radio stations across the U.S. to share his conspiracy theories with his millions of followers. According to Jones, the U.S. government has meddled with water supplies and the weather, the COVID-19 pandemic was planned, and Bill Gates is a master eugenicist working to control world populations.

During the pandemic, Jones sold products like Nano Silver toothpaste and Superblue Silver Immune Gargle via his Infowars store, claiming they would fight COVID-19. He also sells doomsday prepper materials and dietary supplements, which he presents as antidotes to the false threats he drums up on his show.

His show usually features loud, energetic rants and appeals to save the country.

Alex Jones is unique; hes entertaining, Pozner said. A lot of people mistrust their government. People want a fresh perspective outside of the corporate media's version of news.

Jones got his start advancing bogus theories on Austin Community Access Television and local radio in the early 1990s. From those pulpits, he spread falsehoods like claiming that the 1993 siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco was a government conspiracy, that government authorities carried out the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, and that authorities in Austin used black helicopters to surveil the public.

A graduate of Austins Anderson High School and an Austin Community College dropout, Jones was removed from his local talk radio spot in 1999 after executives said his fringe views were unsavory for advertisers.

That year, Jones founded Infowars.com. In the early years of the platform, Jones claimed the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and helped produce a feature-length film purporting to expose the tragedy as a government plot.

About a decade and a half later, Jones had attracted millions of viewers, was grossing millions in annual revenue and had captured Donald Trumps attention.

Rachel Moran, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Washington's Center for an Informed Public who studies how disinformation and misinformation spread, said conspiracy theorists like Jones are able to build wide audiences in part because they provide their followers with a sense of community.

Jones is very good at building a community of people who think the same things as him and providing them with what they want, she said. I think it's easy for us when we don't like a figure to demonize them and pretend they are not good at what they do. Actually, Alex Jones is very good at what he does.

Moran said Jones is masterful when it comes to harnessing skepticism and deftly toes the line between information and misinformation. He often frames his bogus theories in a way that makes his viewers believe hes engaging in healthy questioning.

One of the things that I always hear from people who work in my field is they lament the lack of trusted news figures, Moran said. They always say, I wish we had Walter Cronkite during these times, and then people would trust the information. It's not that we don't have trusted figures. It's that in the internet age, we have trusted figures like Alex Jones.

From Sandy Hook to Trump

Trump received support from Jones during his 2016 presidential campaign.

Former Trump adviser and Republican strategist Roger Stone was a paid Infowars host in 2015, and Stone connected Jones with Trump for an Infowars interview in December that year in which the soon-to-be president lauded Jones.

Your reputation is amazing, Trump told Jones on his show.

Jones likely played an outsized role in Trumps election, according to Elizabeth Williamson, author of Sandy Hook: An American Tragedy and the Battle for Truth. The book investigates how the shooting warped into an attack on the truth from Jones and online conspiracy theorists.

Williamson said Jones was able to foresee how disaffected individuals who were also highly distrustful of the government could propel Trump to a primary victory.

He became something of a kingmaker in the race, and with that came a really high profile that he didn't understand completely, Williamson said. I think he's reaping the results of that.

All the while, Jones continued to advance conspiracy theories and misinformation to a growing audience.

Since the day of the Sandy Hook shooting, Jones has spread bogus claims about the massacre. Like many of his other conspiracy theories, Jones falsely claimed that the government was behind the shooting. But this time the lies were different.

In one 2015 show, Jones told his listeners, Sandy Hook is synthetic, completely fake, with actors, in my view, manufactured. In other episodes, he mocked Sandy Hook parents weeping over the deaths of their children. Jones even shared addresses, maps and personal information associated with the families of Sandy Hook victims, including revealing information about Pozner.

Only weeks after the 2012 shooting, Pozner remembers reaching out to Infowars by email to ask the outlet to stop labeling the shooting as a government hoax to take away Americans guns.

I called them out on it very early on, and I was very polite about it, Pozner said. I asked them to be more responsible with this particular tragedy that affects me personally. And of course, they responded and replied and said, No, no, were not denying the tragedy, and totally lied, and continued to do their thing.

Jones' Sandy Hook lies circulated online on platforms like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, and soon after, Infowars followers began harassing Pozner and other victims parents.

Pozner said he has had to move about a dozen times since the shooting to evade Jones' followers. In 2017, Infowars listener and Sandy Hook conspiracist Lucy Richards was sentenced to five months in prison for sending death threats to Pozner. Today, Pozner lives in hiding and goes to multiple post office boxes to receive his mail. Despite his efforts, individuals occasionally call and file false police reports on Pozner in attempts to get him in trouble with local law enforcement.

Courtesy: of Lenny Pozner

/

Jones' previous falsehoods are not harmless theories, but they did not single out individual vulnerable people the way he did with Sandy Hook. That was really crossing a rubicon, Williamson said.

In April 2018, after facing years of harassment from Jones fans, Pozner; Noahs mother, Veronique De La Rosa; and Neil Heslin, the father of 6-year-old victim Jesse Lewis, filed defamation lawsuits against Jones in Austin. A lawsuit from eight other families soon followed.

Legal troubles

Jones has attempted to slow or obstruct legal proceedings in the Sandy Hook defamation suits by refusing to follow court orders to turn over documents, filing late settlement offers and, in one instance, claiming that a medical problem that included vertigo prevented him from appearing in court. On April 15, Jones and his companies were ordered to pay more than $1 million in fines for his refusal to hand over pretrial information.

In September, a Travis County judge found Jones liable for defamation in lawsuits filed by two families of Sandy Hook victims. About one month later, Jones again lost in separate suits filed by the families of eight other victims. In both instances, the court found Jones liable by default for his unwillingness to cooperate with court orders.

Jones' legal troubles also include a federal investigation into his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Jones has suggested that inquiry could damage him more than the Sandy Hook defamation suits.

Jones, who has denied without evidence President Joe Bidens victory in the 2020 elections, helped obtain at least $650,000 from Julie Fancelli, an heiress to the Publix grocery chain and Infowars fan, to pay for a pro-Trump rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol. Of that money, $200,000 was deposited into one of Jones' business accounts, according to the U.S. Houses committee to investigate the Jan. 6 attack.

On his Infowars broadcast that day, Jones told his supporters, This is the most important call to action on domestic soil since Paul Revere and his ride in 1776. And at the Capitol, Jones used a bullhorn to excite crowds by chanting, Stop the steal!

He also has strong ties to individuals arrested in the attack on the Capitol, including Joe Biggs, a former Infowars staffer and a leader of the far-right group Proud Boys.

In late January this year, Jones told Infowars listeners he was questioned in front of the House committee and said he invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent almost 100 times.

Booted by social media

Williamson said the way Jones falsehoods propagate and turn into harassment in the real world speaks to his reach and influence.

He is a salesman, Williamson said. And when you have millions of people watching, it only takes a small fraction of those individuals to turn it into something that really travels and disrupts people's lives.

In 2014, Pozner founded the HONR Network, an organization that works to defend victims of tragedy from online harassment.

The group has lobbied for the removal of hundreds of thousands of pieces of harmful content on social media. It also played a role in removing Jones from many online platforms.

In July 2018, Pozner and De La Rosa wrote an open letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg calling on him to protect victims of tragedies online.

We are unable to properly grieve for our baby or move on with our lives because you, arguably the most powerful man on the planet, have deemed that the attacks on us are immaterial, that providing assistance in removing threats is too cumbersome, and that our lives are less important than providing a safe haven for hate, Noahs parents wrote.

A month later, Jones' content was removed from Facebook, Apple, YouTube and Spotify.

Jones Infowars.com saw a drop in web traffic after the bans, though the number of visitors he receives is back to early 2020 levels, an analysis for The Texas Tribune performed by digital intelligence platform SimilarWeb shows.

Pozner said his organization has also seen a significant decrease in the harassment of victims online after social media companies changed their policies to include victims of tragedies as a protected group. The platforms now seek to prevent online harassment of victims of mass casualty events and limit the use of their names and likenesses, Pozner said.

But appealing to technology companies may not do much to stop conspiracy theories from spreading, Moran said.

While social media companies have changed policies and banned harmful content like Jones to address the spread of misinformation, the platforms profit model fundamentally relies on user engagement and conspiracy theories, Moran said, are uniquely engaging.

You would go into a rabbit hole just reading about them because they're interesting, and that's the bread and butter of social media, she said.

Instead of targeting social media companies, the use of legal remedies to show how misinformation actually harms people's lives may be the best bet for holding those like Jones accountable, Moran said.

A lot of our conversation around the spread of misinformation has been on the platform side: What can and should Facebook and Instagram and Twitter be doing? she said. Actually, there's a lot more legal frameworks that we have in place that haven't necessarily been tested as avenues to remedy misinformation when it has actively harmed people in real life.

Jordan Vondehaar

/

The Texas Tribune

An audience still dedicated

How much damage the Sandy Hook lawsuits could do to Jones remains to be seen. Hes up against plaintiffs with a highly sympathetic story who are determined to hamstring his ability to spread misinformation. The lawsuits have drawn comparisons to the case that brought down Gawker Media, in which billionaire Peter Thiel funded Hulk Hogans lawsuit for invasion of privacy, earning Hogan $140 million in damages and essentially forcing the company to shut down.

But while Jones may be facing more difficulties today than at any point in his career, he has been known to use his lowest moments to rake in more money from supporters.

After his ban from social media, Jones presented himself as a martyr silenced by slanted technology companies for telling the truth. As the Sandy Hook defamation lawsuits have developed, Jones has directed fans to donate to a legal defense fund. And after filing for bankruptcy earlier this month, Jones hosted an Emergency Blowout Sale on his website.

Despite his diminished reach and prolonged legal battles, Jones' audience remains loyal, Williamson said.

The SimilarWeb analysis shows that since 2019, monthly web traffic to Jones Infowarsstore.com has soared from about 427,000 visitors in 2019 to nearly 834,000 in March. During the height of the pandemic, the store attracted even more viewers, with over 1 million visits in November 2020.

He has a dedicated audience, and they support him not only by buying Infowars merchandise, but by actually donating to him, Williamson said.

Pozner wonders if he would have been spared from the years of relentless harassment that followed Noahs murder if Jones had never amassed such a following, if social media didnt exist or if the two had not experienced a simultaneous surge in popularity.

We would have had more private lives, Pozner said. It was an intersection of a terrible tragedy and the expansion of the internet.

Disclosure: Apple, Facebook and The New York Times have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a completelist of them here.

See more here:
How Sandy Hook lies and the Jan. 6 inquiry threaten to undo Alex Jones - KERA News

We need Twitter guardrails that protect lives and free speech – Al Jazeera English

As one of the millions of Egyptians who took to the streets demanding Bread, Freedom, and Social Justice during the Arab Spring, I experienced firsthand the very best and the worst that Twitter has to offer.

When the government took control of the media, shut down the internet, and cracked down on dissent, we the people found refuge on Twitter to plan protests, notify protesters of changing routes and safe locations, and keep a record of people who were arrested or killed. But just as the government unleashed security forces to physically attack us in Tahrir Square, so too they came after us online, launching a coordinated wave of abuse and disinformation to intimidate and silence journalists and activists.

What we naively considered a safe space on Twitter turned into a nightmare of coordinated harassment and disinformation. The constant threat and the level of anxiety and fear dictatorial regimes inflict on anyone who opposes them lead many people to self-censor or leave the journalism profession.

Like so many journalists and human rights defenders, I am deeply concerned about Elon Musks potential takeover of Twitter. When Musk describes social media as a digital town square for public debate and asserts that Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, who could disagree? I have risked my life to freely express my demand for human rights and advocate for democracy. Today, as an exile in the United States, I work for the free speech advocacy organisation PEN America to keep writers and journalists safe online and off.

Musks understanding of free speech implies that the playing field is level and that we are all treated equally and safely online, which is why I can say with absolute certainty that getting rid of all guardrails on Twitter including meaningful content moderation policies and processes wilfully ignores the ways in which rampant online abuse chills free expression.

People are targeted not only for what they say online but often simply for being outspoken members of a particular group for their race, their faith, their gender identity, their sexual orientation, and their disability. If women and minorities, reporters and human rights defenders are pushed off digital platforms because of severe and constant abuse, then public debates are left to the most privileged few with the loudest voices. If Twitter is where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated, the question is who matters in these debates.

If Elon Musk is serious about making Twitter a safe haven for free speech for all, he needs to remember that social media is a critical tool used by journalists, dissidents, and activists around the world to speak truth to power. And those in power cynically deploy coordinated harassment and disinformation campaigns to undermine the free press and de-platform dissent.

Over the course of its history, Twitter has prioritised American and English-speaking users over the safety of Black and brown people and others from marginalised communities globally. The platform has been exceedingly slow to put meaningful policies and features in place to better protect its most vulnerable users. After a decade of tireless advocacy from civil society and activists, Twitter has finally started to make progress in recent years to address abuse and disinformation. But there is still much work to be done, including: giving people the option to filter the abusive content they receive so they can review and address it later, with the help of trusted allied individuals; making it easier to document online abuse; making it easier for people to separate their personal and professional identities online and allow them to control their privacy settings accordingly.

When voices are silenced and speech is chilled, public discourse suffers. Freedom of expression and user agency do not exist without safety and protection online. By reducing the harmful effect of online harassment, platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram can ensure that social media becomes more open and equitable for all users.

The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeeras editorial stance.

Excerpt from:
We need Twitter guardrails that protect lives and free speech - Al Jazeera English

Tesla’s MCU 2 will likely not be upgradeable to MCU 3 – Not a Tesla App

April 30, 2022

By Jorge Aguirre

Tesla hacker and Twitter user @greentheonly has speculated that it wont be possible to retrofit current MCU 2 (Media Control Unit) Teslas employing Intel chips with the new and improved Ryzen-based processor that is used in MCU 3.

In an up-close inspection of a new Model Ys internals Green stated that retrofit for intel cars definitely looks impossible - totally different power and other harness and thickness of the unit.

The news hasnt been confirmed nor denied by Tesla or its CEO, Elon Musk, but if proven to be accurate it would most certainly disappoint a great number of MCU2 vehicles owners, who were expecting to be offered the possibility of an upgrade, in the same way current MCU1 owners are able to upgrade their chips for a $2,000 (plus tax) fee.

MCU (Media Control Unit) is the computer controlling Teslas touchscreen, processors, RAM (short term memory), non-volatile memory (long-term memory), the audio subsystem, 5 amplifiers, WiFi, Cellular, Bluetooth, GPS, the Ethernet bridge, multiple CAN bus communications, the LIN bus, USB ports and many more.

It handles every software operation, excluding Full Self-Driving/Autopilot, which are unaffected by which MCU version a Tesla is equipped with. All Teslas built after November 2016 are capable of Full Self-Driving.

MCU2 came out in the spring of 2018 (fall of 2017 for Model 3) as an upgrade to the NVIDIAs Tegra 3 processor found in MCU1. All cars delivered after that point benefited from the improved responsiveness and extra features that came with the Intels Atom E8000 Series CPU.

From a technical standpoint, the two chips possessed entirely different architectures. The release of software update V10 highlighted the differences, as MCU1 owners were excluded from both Tesla Theater and Tesla Arcade. Effectively, MCU1 doesnt support Netflix, Hulu, YouTube, or any other streaming services that may be added in the future. It also doesnt support any of the games Tesla added. Additionally, the web browser on MCU2 is much quicker and more capable as its built on Googles Chromium platform.

In summer of 2021 Tesla released the redesigned Model S with a more powerful infotainment processor MCU. At the time no one was sure whether this was Tesla's next generation MCU or whether it would trickle down to other models.

Then in late 2021 the first news of a new Tesla MCU chip generation started to flood the web, with reports coming from China of a new AMD Ryzen-based computer being present in newly delivered Model Ys.

The new MCU is faster and brings noticeable improvements in responsiveness in the web browser, as well as while using video streaming services, such as Netflix and YouTube.

By Gabe Rodriguez Morrison

It looks like the new Model 3 and Model Y may be getting a secondary display soon. In a recent tweet from @greentheonly, it was discovered that new Model 3 and Model Y models with AMD processors have the capacities for a second display.

Connectors on the circuit board of the AMD powered Model 3/Y show that it has a connector to power a "2nd display". It is possible that the second display will be in the back of the car like the new Model S and Model X.

New Model 3 and Model Y vehicles have a circuit board thats similar to the ones in the Model S and Model X, but theyre not the same, so this isnt just the case of Tesla sharing parts between the two cars and letting the 2nd display port go unused.

According to Green, a similar situation occurred before, where the Model Y PCB had unused USB3 ports which were then populated in later revisions.

Its possible that Tesla will add a rear display to the Model 3 and Model Y because it becomes a big selling point for Tesla.

The rear display gives you convenient features such as the ability to turn on rear seat heaters, and adjust the cabin temperature. It also allows you to manage music in the vehicle as well as some additional entertainment options such as play games and stream movies from Netflix, Disney+ and more.

And while games and movies on the vehicles main screen can only be used while parked, on the rear display your passengers are welcome to watch movies on the way to their destination.

This is a compelling feature and itd actually cost Tesla little to add since the 8 display is powered by the same hardware as the center display.

Alternatively, it is possible, but unlikely that the second connector will be used for an instrument cluster display including speedometer, temperature, GPS, and battery information behind the steering wheel.

By Jorge Aguirre

Tesla has reportedly started testing a new feature for its fleet: the ability to connect to ISP provided Wi-Fi networks.

Connectivity is an integral part of the Tesla experience, enabling vehicles to receive software and navigation updates periodically, access entertainment options, as well as allowing the company to receive valuable data collection from the fleet, used to improve features such as Autopilot.

Although Tesla initially provided a free internet connection, as the fleet developed, the company began to require a new paid Premium Connectivity package for a monthly subscription in order to access some of the most data-intensive services, such as streaming music and video. Tesla owners have had to pick whether they want to pay $10 per month for premium connectivity since then.

Regardless of whether you pay for Premium Connectivity, almost all features are available for free on Wi-Fi.

The automaker has also continued to look for alternative solutions for their customers, including a recent software update that allows owners to use their phones' as hotspots while driving as a substitute to the connectivity package.

Now Tesla is reportedly working on a new option that involves utilizing internet providers' Wi-Fi networks. Analytic_ETH, a Twitter user, successfully enabled the new option in their vehicle:

New Upcoming #Tesla feature: Free access to public hotspots from, AT&T, Comcast, Orange, and more! Since late last year, there have been hints in the firmware that @Tesla was looking to support "Public Hotspots". I've been able to enable this feature, and confirm it works!

He continued to provide more information regarding the feature in subsequent tweets: First off - for this to work, Tesla needs to enable the feature on your car. Once enabled, your car generates a TPM-based private key for use on these Wi-Fi networks.

After that, you can just select the relevant network and the car will negotiate a connection! On the backend, the firmware refers to Tesla's Product Partners Issuing CA for authentication purposes, indicating that this feature stems from an upcoming partnership

According to Analytic, the current list of supported hotspot names includes XFINITY, xfinitywifi, CableWiFi, attwifi, att-wifi, AT&T Passpoint, ChinaUnicom, CMCC, ChinaNet, KPN, KPN Fon, Ziggo, Telekom, Telekom_FON, UPC Wi-Free, Upc, UPC WifiSpots, Orange, Orange_FunSpot, SFR, SFR WiFi, SFR WiFi FON, SFR WiFi Mobile and Telia wifi1x - all several popular providers in North America, Europe, and Asia.

Although these networks are often open to the public, connecting to them usually requires the customer to be a subscribe to the particular ISP.

Tesla is partnering with the internet providers directly giving you the ability to seamlessly connect to these networks without having to provide credentials.

These networks can sometimes be fickle, but Tesla will have the ability to white-list or black-list individual networks based on the location of your car and whether the vehicle was able to sucessfully connect.

For owners without Premium Connectivity, this will them more locations to stream music and video while potentially waiting, while charging or waiting for someone near shopping areas.

Even more owners who subscribe to Premium Connectivity, this will give everyone more locations to download software updates, which are usually limited to Wi-Fi.

According to Elon, Superchargers will also receive Wi-Fi connectivity in the future, giving owners even more access.

The ability to connect to ISP provided Wi-Fi access points will be a very well received addition to the Tesla vehicles, as they receive even more internet-based entertainment features.

Read this article:
Tesla's MCU 2 will likely not be upgradeable to MCU 3 - Not a Tesla App