Media Search:



Are some Democrats trying to recruit a former Marquette University … – WisconsinWatch.org

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Wisconsin Watch, a nonprofit newsroom, is partnering withGigafactto produce fact briefs bite-sized fact checks of trending claims.Sign up for ournewsletterfor more stories straight to your inbox.

Democratic donors in Florida are trying to persuade former National Basketball Association stars Dwyane Wade and Grant Hill to run for a Florida U.S. Senate seat in 2024, NBC News reported May 8, 2023.

Wade, 41, led Marquette University to a Final Four appearance in the National Collegiate Athletic Association tournament in 2003.

He then played for the Miami Heat in 15 of his 17 seasons in the NBA, ending in 2019.

The Florida donors and party operatives are seeking a high-profile candidate to run as a Democrat against Republican Sen. Rick Scott, NBC reported.

Scott, the former governor, was elected to the Senate in 2018. He defeated the incumbent, Democrat Bill Nelson, by 50.1% to 49.9%.

Cook Political Report rates the 2024 race as likely Republican.

Wade stated that he and his family moved out of Florida in support of his 15-year-old transgender daughter after state lawmakers pushed to implement anti-LGBTQ laws there.

This Fact Brief is responsive to conversations such asthis one.

Sources

NBC NewsDemocratic donors hope to recruit NBA legends Grant Hill and Dwyane Wade to run for Senate in Florida

Encyclopedia BritannicaDwyane Wade

US Senator Rick ScottRick Scott Senate Biography

New York TimesFlorida Senate Election Results: Bill Nelson vs. Rick Scott

Cook Political Report2024 CPR Senate Race Ratings

The HillDwyane Wade says his family left Florida because they would not be accepted there

Originally posted here:
Are some Democrats trying to recruit a former Marquette University ... - WisconsinWatch.org

Building Social Capital When You Work Remotely – HBR.org Daily

While garnering social capital has always been essential to internal corporate collaboration, it has become even more critical for every hybrid employee, remote-working person, or solo entrepreneur today. Simply having the skills to do a particular job is no longer sufficient because our hybrid offices have made many people invisible. Your ability to partner with team members, make an impression, network in your industry, and stay ripe for opportunities depends on the strength of your professional relationships and communication skills.

Just like any other currency, social capital can be earned, invested, and spent. When it comes to your professional longevity, there is no greater fortune than your worth in social capital. So how much do you have in your bank?

Earning social capital is dependent on our ability to work together effectively by having a shared set of values and working toward a common goal. In a corporate environment, it makes employees more collaborative, but for remote employees, solo entrepreneurs, or members of the gig economy, it is non-negotiable to success. Couple that with the challenges of a hybrid or remote work environment, and it is the difference between being considered for an opportunity, ruled out, or completely forgotten.

When I left my 17-year corporate career at a luxury brand to pursue consulting, I went from being a member of a large corporate office to working remotely and independently. Without my executive title and the credibility of being employed by a well-known retail group, I could only lean on myself when pursuing new business. My nearly two decades of accrued social capital bolstered my ability to have my calls returned and my emails responded to.

I understood the value of staying connected to my network and showing a genuine interest in their careers while sharing my future ambitions for consulting projects. I checked in on important contacts to inquire how they were and what they were working on during a time when I didnt need to ask for anything. I sought them out on social media to amplify and support their content shares and to keep my name top of mind. When it was time to pitch ideas or ask for favors, I wrote persuasive emails expressing my request and offering support in return. I valued peoples time and made sure to write succinctly and directly. I have always believed that being accessible makes you indispensable, so I stayed on top of my inbox to guarantee my responsive communication was swift. I knew being readily available for whatever came my way was vital. If my outreach met silence, I followed up again appropriately within a week.

Once I confirmed a project, I knew it was my job to communicate proactively. As a remote consultant, I needed tolet managementknow that I was abreast of my work while also making meaningful connections with the team I was working with.In addition, that ensured that I received up-to-the-minute information. When you are not physically present, it is easy for others to forget they need to communicate directives beyond their four walls. I needed to stay on peoples radars and demonstrate reliability. A good result with one client would naturally lead to a subsequent referral.

The same issues can also affect a corporate remote employee. When you dont have the luxury of proximity, its easy to get left behind and feel a sense of loneliness. Remote employees need to make a greater effort to actively participate in the company culture than people physically in the office. That means they, too, need to communicate proactively and sometimes overcommunicate, while also making a concerted effort to have virtual coffees with teammates.

Hybrid employees that straddle in-person and remote life typically have the bulk of the meeting loadcrammed into their in-office days. That requires them to balance their relationship-building efforts and focus on more than just the colleagues they physically see.

What makes one person accrue social capital versus another? It comes down to your principles, work ethic, and, sometimes, your ability to organize yourself.

If you have strong principles and a steadfast work ethic, you naturally want to do right by someone. You want to complete that task no matter what it takes because you committed to it, and not following through would hurt you as much as it would disappoint someone else. I believe your word should mean something. When you say youre going to do something, following through is tallied and judged on your professional scorecard. Even so, if youre working to improve your executive functioning (organizing, prioritizing, etc.) or your skills in managing yourself, drafting a to-do list might not be sufficient. Instead, consider making meetings with yourself to block the time for each task on your calendar. This can help you accomplish what you need to in the assigned timeframe and will support you in delivering on your word.

Despite the clear benefit in doing what you say you will, how many times has someone promised you that they would make an introduction for you but then ghosted? Can you count how often someone owed you something that was done incompletely or past a deadline? There are way too many instances to count. The risk of unfulfilled promises is that when you fail to deliver, you become labeled as someone who is unreliable.

Conversely, Im sure youcan easily name the people you know you can count on and who earn the covetable reputation of consistently being great to work with. You are confident these people can deliver whatever you ask of them well and on time. Because of this, you are likely to call on them repeatedly. You will think about these people even when they are not in the room. In doing so, they have earned social capital with you.

Unlike money, which can compound when left alone if appropriately invested, social capital can only be sustained with connection and relationship maintenance. A once-positive reputation can become negative if an effort is not made to sustain it. Take work references, for example. You cant assume someone who vouched for your work several years ago would go out on a limb for you today if you havent put in the effort to maintain that relationship. Social capital can expire, and if you are not careful, you might find yourself checking your bank account one day and discovering a zero balance.

Follow these five tips to make sure youre maintaining this positive regard in every relationship you navigate, especially when you are not face-to-face:

If you are on a team, raising your hand to support someone elses project or going beyond the scope of your role to help others will make you an invaluable and memorable colleague. It is how people establish a collaborative reputation and often get identified for internal mobility. If you have a goal to one day move into a different department of your organization, proactively doing this can yield powerful results.

For independent contractors, no one wants to work for less than they are worth or for free, and most people cannot afford to, but sometimes its strategic and acceptable to do so. For example, if you know that working with this client will add credibility and valuable experience to your business, and is likely to signal to other clients that you do good work, it might be worth it. Even so, this is not something you want to do as a regular practice. Always weigh the pros and cons.

Whenyou do something as a favor for someone when necessary, you have taken your first step in building social capital with that person. Furthermore, doing so, especially to gain experience in an area where you may need expertise, effectively fills that skillset void. Negotiating a testimonial as part of your fee is strategic and acceptable. It can build your credibility and be a valuable asset on your website or secure a referral in the future.

The most critical factor to success when youre behind a screen is ensuring your communication is written to inspire action. First, consider your timing. Whether youre sending a pitch, catching up on email, or sending updates on projects, make sure youre considering where your colleagues are. Just because you dont mind emailing after hours doesnt mean others do or can. Or perhaps you are in a different time zone. Send or schedule your emails to be delivered within your shared working hours to increase your odds of real-time response.

Second, your words need to connect with the reader. That begins with understanding who you are addressing. Often, people forget to consider their audience. They focus on what they want to say and ignore who is on the other side. Do some research to understand the recipients experience or point of view. If you are pitching an idea, it is always beneficial to understand what has been done before and what they might be looking for.

When setting expectations, make sure your words are backed by action. Accurately assess your capabilities and deliver on that. Or better yet, exceed expectations. Make your words mean something.

As your career progresses, keeping track of your network inside and outside the company becomes increasingly complex, primarily if you work remotely. While it may take slightly more effort, maintaining a spreadsheet of your networking interactions and referrals will be tremendously valuable. Not only will this assist you in relationship management; it will support you in connecting the dots between people. For example, if an introduction from a friend resulted in a new client, you will want to remember who to thank in the future. It will also help you monitor when it is time to follow up with people.

Inbox zero is a lofty goal for many, but managing all your forms of communication will allow you to take advantage of every opportunity. Utilize tools like inbox labels and filters to help organize yourself. Being a speedy responder shows people you are efficient and reliable. In a world inundated with messaging coming from every direction, being quick to respond is a superpower and is valued dearly. If colleagues know you are accessible, you will become someone known as good to work with.While everyone needs work-life balance, quickly scrolling through your emails after hours just to ensure nothing critical came in could mean the difference between putting out a fire or jumping on an opportunity. This is especially important if you work with people across time zones.

If youre difficult to get in touch with, the opposite holds. You may become labeled as someone who cannot be depended on and may be passed over for opportunities. Its best practice to ensure that people are responded to within a reasonable amount of time (ideally no longer than two business days). Even if you dont have the answer yet, letting someone know that youre working on it will give them peace of mind that their email was in fact received. In addition, and as a gentle reminder, if you communicate with team members on tech tools like Slack, remember that your teammates can see when you are actively online or not.

Lending unsolicited support and amplifying another persons efforts go a long way. It is also never too late to thank someone for an opportunity. There is no expiration date on gratitude. Thanking someone is also an underrated way to get back in touch. In addition, if you are someone who reaches out to your network to ask how they are while asking for nothing or even better, to offer support and take a sincere interest in what they are doing you will find yourself flush with social capital. A simple way to do this is to say, Your name popped into my head today, and I wanted to reach out to see how you are.

Remember that your credentials cant speak for themselves; they need to be bolstered by the relationships that you are fostering along the way. Your social capital ensures your professional longevity, especially when you are not physically present. For any type of professional, your connections are as meaningful as what you know and the skills you have. Even from afar, the most significant opportunities will always stem from your trusted reputation.

See original here:
Building Social Capital When You Work Remotely - HBR.org Daily

Tarrant County Democrats ask feds to investigate OHares actions … – Fort Worth Report

Democratic leaders from Tarrant County want the Department of Justice to investigate the actions of Tarrant County Judge Tim OHare and the countys election integrity unit.

In a letter sent to the office of the U.S. Attorney General, US Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Fort Worth, asked Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke to conduct a federal investigation into the County Judges actions to protect minority voters in Tarrant County from harassment and discrimination.

Veasey, county commissioners Alisa Simmons and Roy Brooks and state Reps. Nicole Collier, Ramon Romero, Chris Turner, and Salman Bohjani all Democrats signed the letter, sent May 15. In it, they lay out concerns surrounding the creation of the task force and the subsequent resignation of election administrator Heider Garcia.

Four months after a trio of Republican leaders in Tarrant County OHare, Sheriff Bill Waybourn and District Attorney Phil Sorrells created an election integrity task force, the Democratic elected officials said they were worried that the task force and OHares conduct will frighten minority residents and keep them from exercising their right to vote.

As elected officials representing districts that are predominantly communities of color in Tarrant County, we are deeply concerned that recent actions by Tarrant County Judge Tim OHare and other county officials will further diminish the voting rights of those we represent and undermine their ability to freely and effectively participate in elections, the group wrote in its letter.

The Fort Worth Report reached out to OHare for comment but did not immediately get a response.

The letter also requests a written response outlining how the Department of Justice plans to end the pattern in Tarrant County of voter intimidation and harassment. The officials are concerned with the transparency in establishing the election integrity task force, and offered assistance to the DOJ to ensure voting rights are protected.

The letter was sent weeks after Garcia, Tarrant Countys election administrator, resigned from the county following a meeting with County Judge Tim OHare. In the letter, Garcia cited a conversation with OHare before his departure.

The letter sent by Veasey and others to the Department of Justice also mentions harassment and intimidation directed toward Garcia by local groups, including a group called Citizens for Election Integrity and the True Texas Project. OHare has previously spoken at True Texas Project events, including an April meeting where he said low voter turnout in local elections would help Republican candidates.

County Judge OHare has consistently challenged Mr. Garcias efforts to uphold the integrity and racial fairness of our elections, the letter reads. Statements made leading up to the 2020 elections and the actions taken since then by the County Judge, the County District Attorney, and the County Sheriff appear to be designed to undermine and suppress minority voter participation in Tarrant County elections.

This is a developing story. Check back for more updates as the Report receives more information.

At the Fort Worth Report, news decisions are made independently of our board members and financial supporters. Read more about our editorial independence policyhere.

Rachel Behrndt is a government accountability reporter for the Fort Worth Report. Contact her atrachel.behrndt@fortworthreport.orgor viaTwitter.

Emily Wolf is a government accountability reporter for the Fort Worth Report. Contact her at emily.wolf@fortworthreport.org or viaTwitter.

Related

Republish This Story

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, by following our guidelines.

Continue reading here:
Tarrant County Democrats ask feds to investigate OHares actions ... - Fort Worth Report

Discrimination in the Formation of Academic Networks at #EconTwitter – ProMarket

In a field experiment conducted with economists on Twitter, the authors find that users who are identifiable as white, women, and PhD students affiliated with top-ten universities are more likely to receive follow-backs.

Professional networks are important determinants of labor market outcomes, especially in academia, where collaboration is critical. Nevertheless, individuals access to formal and informal academic networks is far from homogeneous. This heterogeneity may exist for several reasons, but a plausible cause is discrimination: do individuals with specific group-based characteristics such as gender, race, or university affiliation have lower access to networks due to discrimination based on these characteristics?

To test this hypothesis, we conducted a randomized experiment on Twitter, a social media platform widely used by academics to develop their professional networks. We created human-like fictional accounts that claimed to be PhD students in economics at universities in the U.S. The accounts were identical to each other apart from their perceived gender (male or female), race (Black or white), and university affiliation (one of the top-ten U.S. universities or a relatively lower-ranked university listed between 79-100, according to the 2017 U.S. News & World Report).

The experimental accounts randomly followed Twitter profiles of various economists from around the world. The subjects in our experiment are people who used the #EconTwitter in posts in January and February 2022.

Interestingly, we can use public information from Twitter to predict some of those users characteristics, such as their gender, race, and university affiliation. Even in the observational data from this sample, we find some disparities in the number of followers between different groups of economists, particularly in terms of the economists race and university affiliation. This is illustrated in Figure 1, which shows our subjects log number of followers according to their predicted gender, race, and university ranking (conditional on the subject being an academic economist). In the observational data, the gender of the economist has no impact on the number of their followers. However, the distribution of followers for white economists is shifted to the right relative to the distribution among non-white economists, suggesting the median white economist has more followers than the median non-white economist. Top-ranked university economists similarly have more followers than economists from lower-ranked institutions. However, many factors may explain the differences (or lack thereof) in the number of followers between these groups, such that these results alone are not evidence of discrimination. For example, publication records or the frequency of posts on the platform could correlate with the racial identity or university affiliation of economists who use Twitter, so that race or university affiliation do not themselves explain differences in the number of followers. Our experiment allows us to identify whether discrimination exists in these dimensions (and in which direction) since the accounts created are identical in all dimensions except those we study.

Figure 1: Distribution of followers on #EconTwitter

For the core experiment of our study, we created 80 fictitious accounts and followed about 8,000 economists on Twitter. Figure 2 gives examples of our experimental accounts: the profile picture (an artificially generated image) signals gender and race, while the profiles description signals university affiliation. Names, both first and last, were selected from a list of common names according to the 2000 U.S. census. Names that indicated a specific ethnic minority group were removed from possible use. The experimental accounts randomly followed profiles of various economists. Then, after a few days, we measured the proportion of economists who reciprocally followed them back. By comparing the follow-back rate for each type of account, we could identify the existence (or not) of discrimination, since our accounts were identical except for the characteristics we manipulated.

Follow-backs are an interesting outcome in our setting because having many followers is essential to benefit from Twitter. The more followers an account has, the greater its potential impact and reach on this social network. Moreover, following an account back is a relatively low-cost action, suggesting that the disparities we find could be even larger in other (costlier) situations.

Figure 2: Sample experimental accounts

Overall, the follow-back rate varies substantially depending on the characteristics of the experimental accounts, as shown in Figure 3. For example, comparing the most extreme cases, we document that white women studying at prestigious universities were followed back in 23.9% of cases. In comparison, Black men from relatively less prestigious universities were followed back in only 14.4% of cases, a difference of over 65%. Strikingly, we also find that Black male students from top-ranked universities fare no better than white male students from lower-ranked institutions.

Figure 3: Follow-back rate by bot group

Figure 4 displays the main results of the experiment, comparing the marginal follow-back rate for each dimension we experimentally manipulated. Black students had a 10% less chance of receiving follow-backs than white students, while students who claimed to be studying at top-10 U.S. universities received almost 22% more follow-backs than their relatively lower-ranked counterparts. In addition, women had 25% more follow-backs than men.

Figure 4: Follow-back rates by bot group, marginal distributions

The differences found are substantial and statistically significant at conventional levels. They quantitatively demonstrate disparities in access to academic networks among members of these different groups, which can contribute to the lack of diversity in the profession. The race and university affiliation results are consistent with economists perceptions and evidence of disparities in these dimensions.

However, the result for gendersubjects were more likely to follow back female than male accountsruns counter to the overwhelming evidence, both within economics and in other contexts, of discrimination against women. We note that different mechanisms may be at play to explain this result. Some users, conscious of the barriers women face in the profession, could be attempting to engage more with women to correct those barriers. It is also possible that some subjects were using Twitter to establish social rather than professional connections and disproportionately wished to establish such connections with women. These two motives might have different implications regarding the consequences of having more Twitter followers on womens professional outcomes. While we cannot elicit the motivation behind each follow-back, considering how this effect varies by different subgroups of subjects may provide us some hints about this behavior (e.g., male subjects follow back female bots at a higher rate than female subjects).

Overall, by documenting that discrimination is indeed present in the context of the formation of academic networks, we aim to contribute to the debate about the lack of diversity in academia. Nevertheless, much more research on the topic is needed to understand, for instance, the motivation behind follows and how discrimination occurs in different stages of professional interactions. Still, our results indicate that, even on a platform regarded as democratic and egalitarian, different groups face different barriers to networking, which may reduce the potential benefit these groups obtain from the social media presence.

Articles represent the opinions of their writers, not necessarily those of the University of Chicago, the Booth School of Business, or its faculty.

Read more:
Discrimination in the Formation of Academic Networks at #EconTwitter - ProMarket

South Carolina House Democrats file 1,000 amendments to stop 6-week abortion ban – Fox News

South Carolina legislators are gearing up for what is expected to be a lengthy debate on Tuesday as Democrats have filed 1,000 amendments for a bill that bars abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected.

House Speaker Murrell Smith said last week that the South Carolina House will not adjourn Tuesday until the measure gets approved, but Democrats are hoping to prolong the discussion.

"Bring supper, dinner, breakfast, lunch, whatever for days or however long you want to get through amendments," Smith said last week.

The bill facing consideration would almost entirely ban abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy. It comes as a compromise of sorts after the state Senate rejected a previous proposal to outlaw the procedure.

NEAR-TOTAL ABORTION BANS FAIL IN SOUTH CAROLINA, NEBRASKA AS REPUBLICAN HOLDOUTS EXPRESS CONCERNS

Senators confer during a break while debating amendments about the ban on abortion in the South Carolina Senate chamber on Thursday, Sept. 8, 2022, in Columbia, South Carolina. (Tracy Glantz/The State/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

Republicans control both legislative chambers so an abortion ban is expected to pass, but disagreements exist within the party on what limits, if any, should be in place.

The abortion debate in the state first kicked off when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade last year. As a result, the two GOP-dominated chambers began debating the perimeters of the state's abortion law.

An effort last year resulted in a law banning abortions once cardiac activity is detected, but it was struck down by the state Supreme Court in January.

That decision left abortion in the state legal through 22 weeks of pregnancy leading Republicans back to the drawing board.

State Sen. Tom Davis, R-Beaufort, discusses an amendment on the abortion ban bill fellow senators listen in the South Carolina Senate chamber on Thursday, Sept. 8, 2022, in Columbia, South Carolina. (Tracy Glantz/The State/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

South Carolina Republican Sen. Larry Grooms said his partys "troubles" first started when some House lawmakers "wanted to be more pro-life" and pursued a near-total ban. However, it lacked support in the state Senate.

"For those folks, the politics were more important than the policy," said Grooms.

NORTH CAROLINA'S GOVERNOR SAYS JUST 1 REPUBLICAN CAN KILL 12-WEEK ABORTION BILL

South Carolina Republican Sen. Tom Davis, who helped block the near-total ban, described the ongoing discussions as "playing with live ammunition."

"It was like this is for real now and everything that we debate and pass is going to be law," Davis said.

State Sen. Gerald Malloy, D-Darlington, addresses the abortion ban bill while debating amendments in the South Carolina Senate chamber on Thursday, Sept. 8, 2022, in Columbia, South Carolina. (Tracy Glantz/The State/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

The House is now weighing a Senate bill that would ban abortion when an ultrasound detects cardiac activity. Critics have described the so-called "heartbeat bill" as essentially an "outright abortion ban."

The House could have passed the Senate bill without amendments and it would have reached the governors desk to become law but a House committee last week approved changes that include mandating child support starting at conception and requiring a judge sign off on any minors request for an abortion.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Ann Warner, the CEO of Womens Rights and Empowerment Network, said last week that the bill "puts peoples lives at risk, because it pushes health care further out of reach for the vulnerable, and makes pregnancy more dangerous for everyone."

Lawmakers in both chambers believe the new version contains tweaks that will overcome anticipated legal challenges.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Read more:
South Carolina House Democrats file 1,000 amendments to stop 6-week abortion ban - Fox News