Mediaboss Marketing

With Bitcoin (BTC) currently moving between $25,000 and $30,000, the thought that the crypto pioneer will hit $100,000 this year seems like wishful thinking. But analysts know better than to rule out the possibility. Expert market watchers are also closely monitoring two other high-potential players this year, OKB and Tradecurve. Lets see why.

Bitcoin opened the door to what we know as cryptocurrency today. In 2008, the coin was launched by someone or a group known as Satoshi Nakamoto.

Bitcoin was the first ever decentralized digital currency that brought many benefits to financial transactions. Investors were wowed by its highly permissionless platform and solid security, which a proof-of-work governance model sponsored.

Can Bitcoin reach $100,000 this year? Given that its all-time high of November 2021 is $68,770 and its current price at the time of writing is $27,815, the prospects are pretty slim.

Yet, market analysts wont be too quick to dismiss the prospects. Here, in the crypto market, almost anything is possible. The volatility of the crypto market could swing both ways, and Bitcoin (BTC) is having a good time in the market right now.

Bitcoin (BTC) is among the 35 leading performers on a list of 100 top cryptos in the past year. It has posted 16 green days in the past 30 days and enjoys high liquidity. Lets see what happens in the coming days.

OKB is an ERC-20 token that is issued by the OKB foundation and is native to the OK Exchange, a crypto exchange platform. OK Exchange (OKX) users who hold OKB will benefit from additional benefits.

However, OK Exchange users complain about a complex fee structure that can leave one with lots of suspicions. Thats unlike Tradecurve, which provides a transparent and easy-to-understand system. To make matters worse, unlike Tradecurve, OKX isnt available to residents of the U.S.

Regardless, OKB has been impressive so far in the market. Despite its below-par performance in the past 30 days, during which it had only 12 green days, the coin has consistently shown great promise.

OKB is 4th among the top 100 best-performing cryptos in the past year. It has also done far better than crypto giants Bitcoin and Ethereum during this period.

OKB is set to continue its profit streak after gaining 124% over the last year. Market analysts foresee a price boost plus additional massive gains for investors before the end of 2023.

Tradecurve is a trading exchange that allows users to trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, forex, and commodities all from a single account. To open an account customers simply register an email address, connect their DeFi wallets and can begin trading instantly, there are no KYC requirements or on-boarding questionnaires providing all customers of the Tradecurve ecosystem full anonymity.

Tradecurves native utility token $TCRV will power the entire Tradecurve platform, holders of TCwill also enjoy the benefit of trading with AI and algorithms, making deposits through crypto wallets and currency, plus various bonuses such as the deposit bonus. In addition, Tradecurve operates a transparent ecosystem with low commissions that wont leave a dent in your profit margins. Tradecurve users can earn some passive income by staking their coins too.

Tradecurves native utility token $TCRV has also been audited by Cyber Scope, whilst a team KYC was carried out by AssureDeFi further providing security and transparency to investors.

Tradecurves presale is still in its first stage and selling at $0.01. Analysts predict that the coin will be 50X before the presale ends and 100X before it launches. You can take advantage of its current price, projected to reach $0.48 before the presale ends.

Website: https://tradecurve.io/

Presale: https://app.tradecurve.io/sign-up

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Tradecurveapp

Telegram: https://t.me/tradecurve_official

Continued here:

Will Bitcoin Hit $100k This Year? Experts Believe These 2 Cryptos ... - Analytics Insight

Build your blocks and chain them, making it virtually impossible to pass through! That's precisely what "blockchain technology" has to offer. Blockchain in healthcare has the potential to reduce the significant loopholes in the application and management of medical data and records.

Along with its close kin, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain in healthcare projects promises to create an unprecedented level of accuracy, security, and privacy for both healthcare providers and patients.

What is blockchain technology?The name "blockchain" refers to how digital transaction data is stored-in the form of blocks that are connected in a chain. The blockchain expands as the volume of transactions increases. The concept originated three decades ago, in 1991 when Satoshi Nakamoto of the University of California, Berkeley (California) created a mathematical structure for storing digital transactions or data in an unchangeable, dispersed, decentralized digital book made up of blocks linked by a secret (cryptographic) signature, the chain, that is nearly impossible to fake, hack, or disrupt.

The benefits of blockchain in healthcareSensitive patient data, such as medical records, insurance details, and personally identifiable information (PII), must be handled by the healthcare sector. However, as centralized systems are frequently used to store data, they are susceptible to hacking, data breaches, and unauthorized access.

Blockchain in healthcare projects will do the following to help solve the problem:1. SecurityThe security that blockchain technology provides is one of its key benefits for managing healthcare data. Data breaches and identity theft are less likely due to blockchain technology.

2. Data transparencyData transparency allows patients and healthcare providers to access medical records securely and efficiently. It provides a novel approach to giving patients more control over their data without compromising confidentiality.

The Rationale of Blockchain in HealthcareTo understand the use of blockchain in healthcare projects, you first need to be aware of the typical workflow in a healthcare information system. It involves the following steps:

A successful treatment plan requires extensive background work, which is just as important as the actual treatment. Blockchain technology is instrumental in this process.

Maintaining a typical healthcare information system requires a number of tasks, such as performing backup storage services, having recovery mechanisms in place, and making sure fields are up-to-date. In blockchain technology, there is no single point of data entry, and hence no single point of failure as well."Data is dispersed throughout each node or block, creating a built-in backup system."

Each blockchain node copies the same version of the data. As a result, the overall volume of transactions or digital data in each information system decreases. This reduces the bulk load on the cloud healthcare ecosystem.The whole system is close-knit, with multiple copies of all digital records, that are stored using cryptographic signatures. This makes it impenetrable yet gives easy access to all the parties involved in a healthcare transaction.

How does blockchain in healthcare work?Suppose you find a significant finding in your patient's CT scan report. This report has to be added to the patient's medical records so that it is visible to the concerned specialist. The data should also be visible to the patient, allowing him to seek a second opinion elsewhere.

How will blockchain technology help you?

Proposed Examples of Blockchain in healthcare SolutionsElectronic medical records (EMR) and blockchain EMR refers to digital versions of medical records that are used to store and manage patient data. Blockchain technology and electronic medical records (EMR) are two crucial elements in the management of data in the healthcare sector. The security and privacy of EMR can be improved with the help of blockchain technology. It can make it easier for various healthcare providers to share patient data. With the patient's permission, a safe, open network that lets authorized healthcare professionals access and share patient data can be built using blockchain technology.

Healthcare Data Protection and BlockchainBy establishing a safe and open network that permits authorized healthcare professionals to access and share patient data, blockchain can be utilized to protect patient data. Blockchain technology can help with regulatory compliance, such as with the USA's HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act).

Personal Health Record (PHR) Blockchain Management of DataPersonal health records (PHRs) are electronic copies of individual health records that are maintained by the patient, not a healthcare professional. The management of PHRs using blockchain technology has the potential to enhance data security, privacy, and interoperability (the sharing of medical data in a single format and file type).

Genomics Point-of-Care Using BlockchainThe term "genomics point-of-care" (POC) describes the application of genomic data to support clinical decision-making at the point of care, frequently in a clinical context. Blockchain technology has the potential to improve genomic data security and privacy while facilitating data sharing and analysis between researchers and healthcare professionals.

Blockchain for the Management of EHR DataIt offers a safe, open, and effective platform for hosting, managing, and exchanging electronic health record (EHR) data. It gives patients more power over their health information. Patients can control who has access to their data, granting or denying it as needed to healthcare professionals and researchers.

Real-Life Examples of Blockchain-Based Healthcare SolutionsSeveral healthcare organizations have already implemented blockchain-based solutions for healthcare data management.

Conclusion Blockchain in healthcare has the potential to revolutionize the sector by offering a safe, open, and effective platform for managing private patient information. Whether you work in healthcare, are a patient, or are just an interested viewer, it is obvious that blockchain technology is a game changer. Even though third-world countries might find it financially difficult to implement blockchain in healthcare projects right away, this technology enables more efficient collaboration among healthcare providers, leading to better patient outcomes and a more effective healthcare system.

Here is the original post:

From Crypto to Care: How Blockchain Is Transforming Healthcare Data Management - Boldsky

The debt ceiling might be the single dumbest feature of American law. Congress decides to spend money and later schedules a separate vote on whether the government will pay its bills. If the government doesnt pay its bills, calamity ensues.

Moodys Analytics estimates that even a short debt ceiling breach could cause a recession. An analysis by the White Houses Council of Economic Advisers modeled a more protracted default and foresaw a crash on the order of the 2008 financial crisis: The stock market falls 45 percent, unemployment rises by five points, and Americas long-term borrowing costs are much, much higher. All of this to pay money we already owe and can easily borrow. Madness.

Defenders of the debt ceiling will tell you that the limit has been around a long time and has largely operated to the good. America has never defaulted on its debts, but the debt ceiling has often motivated compromise between the two parties. That may be true, but its a bit like saying that since America has won every game of Russian roulette its played so far, it should keep playing.

And so I understand and share the interest in ways to render the debt ceiling null and void. Democrats should have eliminated the debt ceiling when they held Congress and the White House in 2021 and 2022. But they didnt.

Now two more unconventional tactics are proving particularly popular in the liberal imagination.

In one, President Biden simply declares the debt ceiling unconstitutional, pointing to the 14th Amendment, which holds that the validity of the public debt of the United States shall not be questioned. Five Senate Democrats, including Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, are circulating a letter calling on Biden to do just that. On Friday, 66 progressive congressional Democrats sent the president their own letter making a similar case.

In the other, the Treasury Department uses a loophole in a 1997 law to mint a platinum coin of any value it chooses a trillion dollars, say and uses the new money to keep paying the governments debts.

In remarks after a meeting with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Biden said he was considering the argument that the debt ceiling is unconstitutional. The problem, he continued, is that it would have to be litigated. And thats the problem with all these ideas and why, in the end, its doubtful that Biden or any Democrat will try them.

The legality of the debt ceiling or a trillion-dollar platinum coin doesnt depend on how liberals read the Constitution or the Coinage Act. It depends on how three conservatives read it: John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, who are the closest the Supreme Court now comes to having swing justices.

Its easy enough to come up with counterarguments that conservative justices are likely to find persuasive. Michael McConnell, a former judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, to which he was appointed by President George W. Bush, just offered one in these pages. For the United States to fail to pay interest or principal on its debt would be financially catastrophic, but it would not affect the validity of the debt, he wrote. When borrowers fail to make payments on lawfully incurred debt, this does not question the validity of those debts; their debts are just as valid as before. The borrowers are just in default.

The coin gambit is similarly easy to poke holes in if one wants to. Preston Byrne, a partner at the law firm Brown Rudnick, notes that the Supreme Court has often looked at statutes for which a simple reading of a limited law would seem to grant the executive almost unlimited powers. In many such cases, the court struck down those readings. Congress, the court has said, does not hide elephants in mouse holes.

My point is not that more conservative readings of these laws are right in some absolute sense. Its that no such absolute sense matters. We just watched this Supreme Court wipe out decades of precedent to overrule Roe. It has repeatedly entertained cases that even conservative legal scholars thought farcical just a few years earlier. I still remember Orin Kerr, a law professor who clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy, telling me at the beginning of the Obamacare case that there was a less than 1 percent chance that the courts would invalidate the individual mandate, only to update that to a 50-50 chance as the court prepared to rule.

The Supreme Court does what it wants to do. Does it want to let the Biden administration dissolve the debt ceiling using a novel legal theory?

If testing the question wouldnt cost anything, there would be no harm in trying. But I dont think it would have no cost. The strength of the Biden administrations political position is that it stands for normalcy. The debt ceiling has always been raised before, and it must be raised now. But if the administration declares the debt ceiling unconstitutional, only to have the Supreme Court declare the maneuver unconstitutional, then Biden owns the market chaos that would follow. Who will voters blame in that scenario? Republicans, who say they just wanted to negotiate over the budget, as is tradition? Or Biden, who did something no other president had done and failed?

Right now, at last, the positions are clear. The White House is open to budget negotiations but opposed to debt ceiling brinkmanship. Republicans are the ones threatening default if their demands are not met. They are pulling the pin on this grenade, in full view of the American people. Biden should think carefully before taking the risk of snatching it out of their hands and holding it himself.

Go here to see the original:
Opinion | Liberals Are Persuading Themselves of a Debt Ceiling Plan That Won't Work - The New York Times

May 15, 2023

Ottawa, ON The Liberal Party of Canada has announced the four Team Trudeau candidates for the federal by-elections happening in Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec on June 19, 2023.

Liberals are excited to welcome a strong team of by-election candidates ready to work with Justin Trudeau to continue delivering real results for workers and families in their communities, and right across the country, said Sachit Mehra, President of the Liberal Party of Canada. With diverse backgrounds and decades of combined experience in community leadership roles, our Team Trudeau candidates will continue that tireless work to connect with Canadians, share our positive plan, and bring their communitys voice to Parliament.

The four official Team Trudeau candidates are:

In the lead up to these by-elections, thousands of Liberal volunteers participated in 4 Days of Action this year to continue sharing our positive plan to Canadians in every corner of the country. And earlier this month, more than 4,000 Canadians from across the country took part in the 2023 Liberal National Convention, participating in innovative campaign trainings and policy discussions ready and focused on building winning campaigns, and shaping the ideas that will build a better future for Canadians.

In these important by-elections, Canadians have an important choice. While Pierre Poilievre and the Conservative Party have no serious plan and continue to promote reckless policies that would move our country backward, Justin Trudeau and our Liberal team remain focused on making life more affordable, delivering better public health care, creating middle class jobs, taking strong climate action, and building an economy that works for all Canadians.

By-election candidate biographies.

See the article here:
announces four Team Trudeau candidates for federal by-elections ... - Liberal Party of Canada

How did America become a land of economic extremes, with entrenched, grinding poverty for those struggling at the bottom even as most poor adults who are not seniors are working?

Desmonds greatest contribution is changing the lens from individual behavior the hoary focus of so many books about poverty to asking and answering the larger question, Who benefits from practices that keep people poor? Poverty, he argues, results from three quintessentially American habits: exploitation of the poor; subsidization of the rich; and the intentional segregation of the affluent and the poor such that opportunity is hoarded and social mobility is rare.

Desmond acknowledges the role of anti-Black racism in perfecting Americans antipathy to spending for public benefits. Other books engage directly with the dog-whistling politics that dissuade working and middle class people from voting their economic interests. Desmond focuses more on making transparent the systems that fabricate scarcity and offers solutions.

He paints a clear picture of the morally fraught systems we all participate in. Well-paid professionals like me benefit as consumers from the poverty wages paid to others in an economy where Uber is a verb and surveilled and squeezed gig workers respond to and deliver our every need. Our stock investments swell as companies cut or outsource jobs, stagnate wages and oppose unions. We get free checking; the poor get usurious fees from banks and payday lenders. Meanwhile, zoning codes that allow only single-family homes create artificial housing scarcity that enhances our property values while foisting high costs and homelessness on others. Segregation encourages private opulence and public squalor, Desmond argues, as affluent people withdraw from public institutions and society systemically disinvests in the public goods ordinary people need.

Desmond also shows how the federal government, through the tax code, greatly subsidizes the affluent. In 2021, the U.S. spent $1.8 trillion on tax breaks, forgoing revenue that otherwise would have been paid in taxes, much of it going to very rich people. For example, each year the U.S. loses more than $1 trillion in unpaid taxes because of the tax avoidance strategies of multinational corporations and wealthy families.

What to do about this system of American-designed poverty? Desmond offers a bold proposal. He argues that we could bring nearly every family in America above the official poverty line without adding to the deficit simply by collecting unpaid federal income taxes from the top one percent of households from closing loopholes to going after tax cheats. That would amount to an estimated $175 billion annually; those resources would then be allocated to expand broadly popular programs, like the Earned Income Tax Credit, that directly alleviate poverty. He also advocates for structural reforms that reverse the practices that deny poor people choices in housing, banking and employment.

If it is utterly easy as Desmond claims to find plenty of money to abolish poverty by closing nonsensical tax loopholes, then why dont we do it? He notes that in 2019 other western democracies like France and Germany raised as much as 38 percent of their GDP in tax revenues and invested broadly in public goods while U.S. total revenues were at 25 percent and the U.S. lavished government benefits on affluent families and refused to prosecute tax dodgers.

After laying out his analysis, Desmond urges readers to become poverty abolitionists, to spread an ethic that shuns companies that exploit workers and supports government policies that rebalance the social contract toward alleviating poverty rather than helping elites grow their wealth. Importantly, he is not arguing for redistribution per se. He is arguing that if the rich pay their taxes and the government stops over-subsidizing them and instead invests in the general welfare with aid to the poor, poverty can be eliminated, without adding to the deficit.

It remains to be seen whether an ethic of poverty abolition can take hold or overcome the rigging of electoral politics, particularly by Republican-dominated legislatures that constrain majority will through voter suppression and extreme gerrymandering. But Desmonds surprising insights and proposals offer much needed new thinking.

This brings me back to the role of racial division and the necessity of transcending it if America is to dismantle extreme systemic inequality in which people of all colors suffer.

Desmond notes that white families with accountants benefit most from government largesse. They have the strongest antigovernment sentiments and vote more often than those who both need and appreciate the role of government. And race-coded rationalizations justify hostility to government benefits a false, debunked propaganda that public benefits create welfare dependency being first among them.

Herein lies the rub. Decades of anti-Black racial coding, including Ronald Reagans stoking of the welfare queen stereotype, helped perfect anti-tax and anti-government attitudes and consolidate Republican power, especially in the South. Just as the forces that perpetuate poverty are structural, so are the politics that undergird it.

(Oddly, Desmond doesnt mention political culture-warring against the IRS which underfunded and undermined the agency, itself something of a tax cut for the rich, even as the IRS audited poor wage earners at five times the rate of everyone else. Hopefully, the Inflation Reduction Act will reverse these trends with its $80 billion increase in IRS funding over the next decade.)

Desmond finds hope for a transcending scenario in polls showing that most Americans believe the economy benefits the rich and harms the poor; that the rich do not pay their fair share of taxes; and that there should be a $15 federal minimum wage. Invoking abolition as a mantra for the transformation that needs to occur aptly describes his ambition, though advocates for racial equity or reparation for the legacy of slavery, redlining and other forms of racial oppression may wince at his call for universal strategies for all races. The deep irony is that anti-Black policy and rhetoric were central to the creation of savage systems of inequality that harm everyone, and anti-Black processes continue to sustain segregation. But direct efforts to repair the economic and social damage to Black people inevitably produces backlash or is weaponized by the political right to woo voters, as was done with the Black Lives Matter movement.

Desmond admits that Black people have been disproportionately harmed, especially from historic and contemporary redlining and discrimination in housing. But he suggests that the universal reforms he recommends would disproportionately benefit Blacks while broadening political coalitions to end poverty.

This is an important debate. For my part, I have called for the abolition of Americas residential caste system and argued in support of policies that promote racial equity and repair for historically defunded Black neighborhoods and the citizens who have most suffered predation and disinvestment by government and private institutions. And I applaud local governments that are doing this work. But in wrestling with the conundrum of how to repair the damage of anti-Black racism, I have also been greatly influenced by the late stage thinking of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and contemporary Black civil rights visionaries. They pursued a fusion politics that Desmond also admires.

In the final months of his life, Dr. King envisioned a national Poor Peoples Campaign that intentionally built a multiracial coalition to demand an economic bill of rights. In the 2010s, Reverend William Barber II successfully led the Moral Mondays movement in North Carolina and recently revived a Poor Peoples Campaign that brings conservative poor whites into the movement for economic fairness. The North Carolina movement paid off in 2023 expansions to Medicaid in the state, for example. They are a sign of hope in a nation riven by division, racism and hate. I see traction for a bold politics that joins the aspirations of all economically oppressed people, similar to the exciting rhetoric and moral claims of the new-South Justins who are building multiracial power in Tennessee by speaking to a rainbow of humans seeking freedom from gun violence and oppression of all kinds. The alternative is more of the same, a nation divided, with systems that elevate the wealthy and crush others.

Read more here:
Opinion | America's Poverty Is Built by Design - POLITICO