Media Search:



Bizarre Photos Of ‘Elon Musk Kissing A Robot’ Go Viral, Leave The Internet Baffled – Times Now

Updated May 22, 2023 | 08:17 AM IST

Bizarre Photo Of 'Elon Musk kissing a robot' Leaves The Internet Baffled

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

This time, a photo of him kissing a female humanoid robot has gone viral and left netizens baffled. But is the image real?

After the release of a footage that showed Tesla's humanoid robots 'Optimus' taking its first steps, a Twitter user posted photos of the Tesla founder kissing four different female robots on May 16.

The photos were shared by a user named Daniel Mavern, who claimed that Musk is designing a robot that has been manufactured specifically designed with artificial intelligence with the personality and the characteristics of the female that he dreams of.

The truth about the four photos accompanying Mavern's tweet is that they are AI-generated.

Mavern informed his followers that the humanoid robots were specifically designed with artificial intelligence with the personality and the characteristics of a female.

He wrote: "It is the first robot that has been manufactured specifically designed with artificial intelligence with the personality and the characteristics of the female that he dreams ofwhich is not found in any normal person, because of course, there is no normal person that has all the required specifications."

"Catnilla works with solar energy without charging, it is equipped with sensory means that make her feel sad and happy, and she has a balanced and interactive mindset so she can share it if she is in a crisis or the feelings that she is experiencing or needs when she is exposed to any psychological stress," the tweet adds.

Mavern added towards the end of his tweet that he post was to 'clarify the dangers of AI (artificial intelligence) in the coming period, especially after Tesla Company released the first integrated robot "Optimus"'

Even though the images are AI-generated, Twitter users had a field day reacting to them.

A user quipped, "So he goes around making babies but at the end he want to settle with a robot, typical man."

Some users drew comparisons with MEGAN, the humanoid robot seen in the 2022 film with the same title.

@elonmusk is taking it too far now Wheres the robot husband? wrote another.

Read more:

Bizarre Photos Of 'Elon Musk Kissing A Robot' Go Viral, Leave The Internet Baffled - Times Now

Climate Alarmists Claim They Are Being Abused On Twitter Since … – Cowboy State Daily

Climate scientists are claiming that changes at Twitter following Elon Musks takeover of the social media platform have unleashed a wave of unfair abuse directed at them.

The platform, they claim, is now flooded with climate denial.

Dr. Mark Maslin, professor of Earth System Science at University College London, told The Guardian hes been the target of abuse and rude comments on Twitter as a result of him challenging the position of climate deniers.

Maslin also said that, prior to Musk taking over, he used to have meetings with a top Twitter executive to coordinate efforts to ensure that trusted information would be pushed to the top of feed rankings. That way, perspectives Maslin disagrees with would be less likely to be seen.

Musk laid off that department head during a purge after he bought the platform.

No Definitions And Examples

The Guardian article doesnt explain exactly what climate denial is or provide any links to or screenshots of examples of what the scientists are calling abuse.

The article quotes Maslin and other scientists referring to climate denial. The article headline refers to climate crisis deniers, which seems to imply that climate denial is also disputing if climate change is producing catastrophic outcomes.

Cowboy State Daily reached out to Maslin to ask what he believes falls outside the realm of trusted information and if that includes perspectives he simply disagrees with as opposed to the promotion of perspectives that challenge established, indisputable science.

Maslin was also asked if thinks its appropriate for a social media platform to coordinate with activists on an issue to purge perspectives they dont agree with.

Maslin didnt reply.

Hateful Canard

Dr. Judith Curry, president and co-owner of Climate Forecast Application Network, told Cowboy State Daily the issue of climate denial is a hateful canard thats applied to a range of ideas that arent approved by a circle of climate scientists.

Before she moved into the private sector, Curry was a professor of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Institute of Technology, as well as chair of the program. She also was a professor in the Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Environmental Studies Program at the University of Colorado-Boulder.

Curry is a moderate voice in the debate. In her latest book, Climate Uncertainty and Risk, she argues that climate change is an exceedingly complex issue, both in terms of the science and its impacts, as well as the policies aimed at addressing it.

We have mischaracterized climate risk by conflating the slow incremental risks from warming (such as sea level rise) and the risks from extreme weather that have little, if anything, to do with the warming, Curry said.

She said in our zeal to eliminate carbon dioxide emissions, were jeopardizing our energy supply, which will only cause more harm than good.

Denial Label

In 2011, Curry criticized the hockey stick graph, which shows temperatures over the last 1,000 years.

The graph, which was produced by climatologist and Penn State Professor Michael E. Mann and some of his colleagues, purportedly shows an exponential rise in temperatures over the last few decades, which makes it look like a hockey stick.

For her criticism of the graph, Curry said she was labeled a denier.

I have seen scientists and politicians labeled as deniers who agree with the IPCC science assessment, but dont think that this is a problem that trumps all others and needs to be urgently addressed, Curry said.

Curry said the label has been applied to highly reputable scientists, such as James Hansen and Kerry Emanual, because they advocate for nuclear energy instead of solar and wind.

Because of his extremely active levels of denial entrepreneurship, my operating definition of climate denier is anyone who disagrees with Michael Mann about anything related to climate, Curry said.

Censorship Collusion

Curry said its concerning that Maslin admitted in the Guardian article to coordinating with employees of Twitter to suppress perspectives he doesnt like and admitted it apparently with some pride.

Following his takeover of Twitter, Musk released thousands of documents showing frequent collusion between staff members of Twitter and government officials, as well as deliberate efforts to suppress conservative viewpoints.

Prior to Musks takeover, Curry said the engagement she received on her Twitter feed was considerably lower.

For the [approximately] 18 months prior to Musks takeover of Twitter, I felt as if I was tweeting into a void hardly any new followers and virtually no likes or retweets of my tweets, Curry said.

Within a week after Musk took over, she said, her followers and engagement greatly increased. Since November, her followers have doubled.

I was obviously shadow banned in some way, Curry said, referring to the practice of lowering the ranking of content so its seen by fewer users of a platform.

Hateful Attacks

Curry said Twitter has vastly improved under Musk, but its a work in progress.

There are people on both sides of the debate on climate issues that are exceedingly ignorant about science and the impact of climate change, she said. But they speak loudly on the topic.

However, its those on the alarmist side of the debate whose rhetoric of extinction and crisis is the most out of touch with reality, she said.

Curry said that despite the bad information they spread, she thinks its more important to reign in what she calls libelous and hateful attacks by climate scientists who hold faculty positions at universities.

Lately, Mann has been on a rampage on Twitter, attacking figures who express viewpoints he doesnt like. Some might call the Tweets abusive.

In one tweet, Mann called Curry a go-to figure on the denial circuit.

Disparaging Tweets

In a tweet about Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder Roger Pielke Jr., Mann wrote, Roger Pielk Jr. is still around? I thought he was now writing a sports column or something.

Pielke has been a regular commenter on climate change issues, arguing that the science on extreme weather is far more nuanced and uncertain than is often presented in the media. Hes also been critical of the International Panel on Climate Change, a consortium of the worlds leading climate scientists, for what he says is an increasingly biased view of climate change.

Mann also disparaged research meteorologist Ryan Maue, who served as a chief scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration during the Trump administration.

Mann called him a fossil fuel propagandist.

Whos The Abuser?

Maslin, too, isnt above throwing the same type of harsh criticism at the people who disagree with him.

He accused Dr. Matthew Wielicki of posting fake science. When Wielicki asked for examples of what Maslin considered to be fake science, Maslin didnt provide any. Instead, Maslin replied, And you are not even consistent in your denial so we all assume you are doing this for attention.

Mann has apparently singled us out for attacks because each of us has greater than 50,000 followers on Twitter, Curry said.

She said rather than being reprimanded for such behavior, scientists like Mann are rewarded by prestigious university chairs and institutes, as well as given awards from professional societies.

Until this problem is cleaned up, I see no home for addressing this issue, Curry said, adding that its ironic for them to complain about hostile comments on Twitter when they tend to dish it out so much.

Everyone Gets Nasty Comments

Curry said that abusive comments happen on Twitter all the time, but its nothing exclusive to climate scientists on the alarmist side of the debate, such as Mann and Maslin.

I receive nasty comments all the time, Curry said.

She said when it gets to be too much, shell mute the individual, and Twitter provides tools to limit notifications to help screen out some of the unwanted remarks.

Since Curry tends toward the middle on climate issues, she said the hateful comments come to her from both sides.

However, I will say that the really vile and hateful comments come predominantly from the alarmed side of the spectrum, Curry said.

Contact Kevin Killough at Kevin@CowboyStateDaily.com

Go here to see the original:

Climate Alarmists Claim They Are Being Abused On Twitter Since ... - Cowboy State Daily

Bitcoin and NFTs collide: Kurt Wuckert Jr. talks to the Morgan Report – CoinGeek

Kurt Wuckert Jr. appeared on the Morgan Report to discuss Ordinals and Bitcoins role in revitalizing the non-fungible token (NFT) market. Of course, he covered more ground than that in this latest interview.

NFTs on BTCthanks, Casey Rodarmor!

Morgan begins by noting that Wuckert was the most requested guest to return to the podcast by viewers. He says he intentionally held off on having him back as he wanted to make the podcast as valuable as possible and was waiting for the right moment.

Wuckert dives right in, saying that the NFT craze is the big thing that made Ethereum blow upsome of them were selling for millions of dollars. He points out that, on Ethereum, users cant store theirNFTswhich have to sit on separate servers due to the technical limitations of that blockchain.

After the frenzy, people presumed the NFT market had gone away, and in many ways, it did, Wuckert says. However, theres a lot of potential utility to NFTs that this immature market hasnt yet explored.

More recently, BTC developerCasey Rodarmor came up with Ordinals inspections on the BTC blockchain. He realized he could inscribe artwork directly on satoshis, storing it on the blockchain and making it immutable.

Now your artwork is as immutable as the blockchain itself, he says, noting that this has caused a huge stir, and many are asking fundamental questions about tokens, NFTs, and whats possible on Bitcoin again.This is causing tensionbetween those whosee BTC as digital goldand those who are interested in what else it can do.

A brief look at the wider digital currency industry

Morgan then asks Wuckert for his thoughts on the recent BTC price move upwards and the value of XRP. He is interested in both and wants to hear Wuckerts opinion.

Handling the BTC price move first, Wuckert believes its a suckers rally. He cant see where the money is coming from to kick off a bull market when interest rates are so high, BRICS nations are attacking the dollar, and were on the precipice of a major global conflict. In short, the macro conditions arent favorable to a new bull market right now, and the maximalists calling for it have a track record of being wrong.

What about XRP? Wuckert notes that Ripple (the company) preceded Bitcoin and was even mentioned by Satoshi Nakamoto in the early days. However, while he thinks Ripple has some interesting technology, he doesnt see the need for XRP, which has done little other than enrich Ripple executives,hence the lawsuit with the SEC. He says that Bitcoin should try to compete with Ripple in the areas they are interested in, such as remittances, settlements, and small payments.

Having said this, Wuckert notes that BTC is incapable of competing with Ripple in the aforementioned areas. Hes a miner onBitcoin SV, which has much faster payments with lower fees. If any blockchain can compete, its BSV, and Wuckert is betting with his reputation and his money that it will.

Are the regulators taking crypto-friendly banks down?

Morgan notes the recent failure of banks like Signature, Silvergate and Silicon Valley Bank and wonders if theres a conspiracy to get crypto out of the way.

Wuckert asks a return question, who are the banks? He notes that there are factions, and banks like JP Morgan (NASDAQ: JPM) can hardly be classified as the same as the others. He notes that the same factions exist within the regulator camps, with different agencies stating different opinions. For example, theCommodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has said Ethereum is a commodity, whereas the SEC is leaning towards classifying it as a security.

Wuckert also points out that, as the traveling circus of crypto goes from town to town, robbing people blind, it makes it more difficult for libertarians such as himself to make a case for a light-touch or relatively hands-off approach to the industry. Likewise, as the years roll by, the chance forBitcoin to disrupt paymentsand create change is slipping away; whereas it was compelling in 2008, its now facing competition from a multitude of apps like Venmo.

Speaking briefly oncentral bank digital currencies(CBDCs), Wuckert says they have only entered the conversation because Bitcoin has failed to disrupt payments meaningfully. For him, CBDCs are the worst of both worlds.

On the pointlessness and absurdity of maximalism

Morgan states his opinion that maximalism of any kind is pointless. He wants to know Wuckerts thoughts on it.

Wuckert says hes a Bitcoin maximalist, but not in the typical way. In fact, many typical BTC maximalists would consider him a Judas and a traitor. He views Bitcoin as a valuable attestation tool and source of truth.

However, he agrees that BTC maximalism is absurd. The vision some of them promote is dystopian and cant exist unless the world collapses, and thats not to anyones benefit.

In summary, Wuckert says weve wasted a lot of time, but theres still time to pull off theBitcoin revolution. Hes deeply invested and hopes it works out, but he says its important to hedge and remember you might be wrong. In closing, he encourages everyone to invest in themselves and their skills because that way, youre never really out of the game.

Watch: On the very start of Bitcoin

New to Bitcoin? Check out CoinGeeksBitcoin for Beginnerssection, the ultimate resource guide to learn more about Bitcoinas originally envisioned by Satoshi Nakamotoand blockchain.

Link:

Bitcoin and NFTs collide: Kurt Wuckert Jr. talks to the Morgan Report - CoinGeek

Exploring the benefits of holding Bitcoin for long-term investment – The Daily Progress

In today's fast-paced and ever-changing world, achieving financial freedom is a dream that many aspire to. With the rise of digital currencies, such as Bitcoin, a new investment strategy has emerged: holding Bitcoin for the long term. This article will explore why holding Bitcoin can be the key to financial freedom and how it can revolutionize your approach to wealth-building.

Understanding Bitcoin

Bitcoin, often referred to as a digital or cryptocurrency, is a decentralized form of currency that operates on a peer-to-peer network. In 2009, it was created by an unknown individual or group using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Based on blockchain technology, it aims to ensure transparency, security and immutability of transactions.

Over the years, Bitcoin has gained widespread adoption and has shown significant growth in value. As of this article, Bitcoin has reached an all-time high in terms of its market capitalization, surpassing traditional financial institutions and gaining recognition from major companies and investors.

People are also reading

Concept of holding Bitcoin

Once you buy Bitcoin with a credit card, there are various approaches, including short-term trading, day trading or long-term holding. While short-term trading can be lucrative for some, it requires constant monitoring, technical analysis and a high tolerance for risk. On the other hand, holding Bitcoin for the long term can offer a more passive and strategic approach to building wealth.

Holding Bitcoin involves purchasing Bitcoin with the intention of keeping it for an extended period, typically years, rather than frequently buying and selling based on short-term market fluctuations. This strategy is based on the belief that Bitcoin has the potential for long-term appreciation in value, driven by its scarcity, utility and growing acceptance worldwide.

Why holding Bitcoin can offer potential benefits for long-term investment and wealth-building strategies

One of the main reasons why holding Bitcoin can be the key to financial freedom is its unique characteristics as a store of value. Unlike traditional fiat currencies, such as the U.S. dollar or the Euro, which can be subject to inflation and depreciation, Bitcoin's limited supply may offer protection against inflation and depreciation of fiat currencies. With a limited supply of 21 million Bitcoins, its scarcity and mathematical scarcity make it an attractive option for hedging against inflation and preserving wealth.

While short-term trading can be lucrative for some, it requires constant monitoring, technical analysis and a high tolerance for risk. On the other hand, holding Bitcoin for the long term can offer a more passive and strategic approach to building wealth. Bitcoin may offer potential benefits as part of a diversified investment portfolio, but investors should also consider the potential risks and uncertainties associated with this emerging asset class. These risks may include market volatility, regulatory uncertainty and potential security breaches, among others.

In addition, holding Bitcoin can offer diversification benefits to an investment portfolio. Traditional investment assets, such as stocks, bonds or real estate, are subject to market fluctuations and risks that can affect the overall performance of a portfolio. By adding Bitcoin to a diversified investment portfolio, investors can reduce the risk of over-reliance on traditional assets and potentially enhance their overall returns.

Overcoming common misconceptions about Bitcoin

Despite its growing popularity, Bitcoin still faces misconceptions and skepticism from some individuals. Concerns about its volatility, risks and legitimacy are often cited as reasons to avoid holding Bitcoin. However, it's important to note that Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days and has gained significant mainstream acceptance.

While it's true that Bitcoin can experience short-term price volatility, especially in an emerging and relatively unregulated market, its long-term trajectory has been positive. Many experts argue that the risks associated with Bitcoin can be mitigated through careful planning, education and risk management strategies. At the same time, it is important for investors to acknowledge that Bitcoin has faced criticism and concerns from some investors and regulators. It is crucial for investors to educate themselves about the potential risks and uncertainties of investing in this asset class. Some concerns may include its volatile price movements, the potential for fraud or market manipulation and the lack of a clear regulatory framework in some jurisdictions.

Conclusion

Holding Bitcoin can be the key to financial freedom, offering the potential for wealth accumulation, diversification and a hedge against inflation. Despite misconceptions and risks associated with Bitcoin, its growing acceptance, increasing institutional adoption and historical price appreciation make it a compelling investment option for those looking to achieve financial freedom. By educating yourself, developing a strategic plan, practicing risk management and taking a long-term investment approach, you can unlock the potential of holding Bitcoin and embark on a path toward financial freedom.

This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice.

Lee Enterprises newsroom and editorial were not involved in the creation of this content.

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Read more:

Exploring the benefits of holding Bitcoin for long-term investment - The Daily Progress

Michael Saylor Highlights Bitcoin Ordinals’ Role In MicroStrategy’s App Development Vision – TronWeekly

According to Michael Saylor, the co-founder and Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy, the company is not only aware of Ordinals but also intrigued by the protocols potential to spark software innovation. Saylor emphasized that the protocol, which has generated significant excitement within the Bitcoin community, has caught MicroStrategys attention as a possible catalyst for groundbreaking advancements in software development.

During an exclusive interview at Bitcoin 2023 in Miami, Michael Saylor revealed that MicroStrategy is actively examining Ordinals and evaluating its potential impact on application development. Saylor emphasized the companys focus on assessing how Ordinals could be leveraged to drive advancements in the field of software development.

Ordinals, which debuted in January, have gained popularity as a means to create Bitcoin-based assets similar to NFTs. Although the community has not fully embraced the protocol, it has sparked a fresh wave of experimentation with the original cryptocurrency, encouraging new possibilities and avenues for exploration.

A recent advancement in the field involves the utilization of Ordinals to develop a pioneering framework for constructing tokens on the Bitcoin network. This innovative approach was first introduced by an anonymous on-chain data enthusiast named Domo in early March. Since then, numerous other tokens known as BRC-20 tokens have emerged, with thousands being created in a short span of time.

The surge in transactions, partly attributed to the utilization of Ordinals, has contributed to increased transaction fees on the network. This development has proven advantageous for Bitcoin miners, as they earn transaction fees for securing the network. However, many community members have expressed concerns that these high fees hinder the use of Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, as originally intended by Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin.

According to Saylor, the dialogue surrounding Ordinals holds significance because the long-term success of Bitcoin miners is crucial. Furthermore, he highlighted that the development of applications leveraging capabilities has the potential to enhance the overall adoption of the cryptocurrency by individuals, businesses, and even governments.

Although Michael Saylor did not explicitly mention the specific use cases that MicroStrategy is exploring with Ordinals, he acknowledged that the ability to store data on Bitcoins blockchain beyond traditional transactions holds immense potential for various applications. Saylor highlighted the concept of burning data on the blockchain, which opens up possibilities such as storing digital signatures, registrations, or even hashed documents.

This indicates that MicroStrategy is considering diverse applications that leverage the capability of Ordinals to incorporate and authenticate different types of data on the Bitcoin blockchain.

When discussing corporate security, Michael Saylor referred to DocuSign, a platform that enables secure agreement signing using electronic signatures for businesses and individuals. However, Saylor pointed out that such mega corporations currently rely on a proprietary database for their operations.

Saylor highlighted the disparity in security levels between enterprises and Bitcoin, stating that the existing security measures in enterprises are comparatively weaker. He suggested that innovative applications utilizing the worlds largest cryptocurrency could potentially introduce an unprecedented level of security, providing companies with enhanced protection that is currently unavailable to them. This implies that Bitcoin-based solutions have the potential to revolutionize corporate security and offer novel security measures not presently in existence.

Saylors recent statements follow his previous characterization of Ordinals as a catalyst for Bitcoin adoption during an episode of the PBD Podcast just a week ago. However, he also recognizes that Ordinals have been utilized for various frivolous purposes.

During the Miami event, Saylor emphasized the importance of allowing criticism for things that are considered silly, but without resorting to censorship. He suggested that while certain applications of Ordinals may not be widely appreciated, it is crucial to maintain an open dialogue and refrain from stifling innovation in the cryptocurrency space.

Saylor refrained from making predictions about the eventual triumph of any particular protocol. However, he strongly expressed his opposition to modifying Bitcoin in a way that would enable censorship of specific uses. This sentiment was in response to the actions of a group of core Bitcoin developers, led by Luke Dashjr, who considered Ordinals as spam and sought to filter them out of transactions.

According to Saylor, altering the Bitcoin protocol to restrict certain individuals from utilizing the cryptocurrency goes against the fundamental values of the community. He firmly believes in the concept of having rules without the need for rulers, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the decentralized and inclusive nature of Bitcoin.

Originally posted here:

Michael Saylor Highlights Bitcoin Ordinals' Role In MicroStrategy's App Development Vision - TronWeekly