Media Search:



Newt Gingrich’s Unintentional Burn Of Donald Trump Is Priceless – Yahoo News

Former GOP Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich suggested Wednesday that Donald Trump communicates better than Ron DeSantis but it didnt come off as complimentary to many. (Watch the video below.)

One of Trumps great advantages is he talks at a level where third, fourth and fifth grade educations can say, Oh yeah, I get that. I understand it. Gingrich told host Laura Ingraham on her Fox News show.

The comment drew mockery from online critics. The fact that [Trump] speaks to the children says everything you need to know about the educational level the Right is shooting for, one person on Twitter wrote. I dont see where thats good for somebody thats running a country. SMH, another commented.

Gingrich was assessing the strengths of the two leading Republican candidates for president after DeSantis officially entered the race on Wednesday. He praised the Florida governors intelligence but questioned his communication skills after Ingraham played a clip of DeSantis making a convoluted comparison involving financial institutions and elections.

Gingrich, a Fox News contributor, recommended that the Florida governor boil down the message to a slogan.

Here are other reactions to Gingrichs remarks about Trump:

Follow this link:
Newt Gingrich's Unintentional Burn Of Donald Trump Is Priceless - Yahoo News

Ex-DOJ Official Predicts When Donald Trumps Worst Nightmare Will Happen – Yahoo! Voices

Former acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal predicted Wednesday that an indictment for Donald Trump in the classified documents scandal is coming soon and explained why it will be the former presidents worst nightmare.

Katyal, appearing on MSNBCs Deadline: White House, noted to anchor Nicolle Wallace how neither Attorney General Merrick Garland nor special counsel Jack Smith, whom Garland appointed to lead the investigation, are overtly political, much to Trumps annoyance.

Garland, although a political appointee, has a long-standing reputation in Washington of being bipartisan, of being a careful and respected jurist on both sides of the aisle, Katyal said.

Smith, meanwhile, is independent.

So, as between those two, when were talking about something as sensitive as Do you indict a former president?, it would make all the sense in the world that thats a Jack Smith determination, Katyal said.

And thats what Donald Trump is afraid of, he added. Hes afraid of having someone independent do this. If its someone political, at least he can trash it as being political or this or that. So this is Trumps worst nightmare.

Amid reports Smiths investigation has almost concluded, Katyal noted Justice Department rules are to bring prosecutions when they are ready and you dont really look to external influences or things like that.

My expectation is this is going to be soon, he added.

Former Trump White House lawyer Ty Cobb this week said the Department of Justice has a tight case against Trump for allegedly refusing to return classified documents after leaving the White House.

Trump denies any criminal wrongdoing.

Watch the interview here:

Read more:
Ex-DOJ Official Predicts When Donald Trumps Worst Nightmare Will Happen - Yahoo! Voices

Did Donald Trump rack up more debt than any other president? – PolitiFact

As White House and congressional Republican negotiators met to hammer out a way to raise the nations debt limit, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., cast blame for the nations $31 trillion-plus debt on the most recent Republican president, Donald Trump.

The debt limit could be met as soon as early June, and a failure to raise the limit could force the government to default on payments to bondholders, federal employees, contractors and beneficiaries of programs such as Social Security. Republicans have proposed raising the limit in tandem with spending cuts, but the White House considers the scale of the Republicans proposed cuts untenable.

In a May 12 tweet, Jeffries said Republicans were to blame for much of the debt. Jeffries wrote, "Trump ran up more debt than any other President in American history. He wants Republicans to force a dangerous default if they dont get their way. We cannot let right-wing extremists hold our economy hostage."

Strictly speaking, former President Barack Obama accumulated more debt than Trump. But Trump accumulated the most debt per year served in office.

Jeffries office did not answer an inquiry for this article.

What are the numbers?

Treasury Department data shows the gross federal debt rose by about $7.8 trillion on Trumps watch. But that wasnt the biggest increase of any president in raw dollars.

The record for the largest increase was set by President Barack Obama, with more than$9.5 trillion.

One caveat: Obamas figure is larger than Trumps partly because Obama served eight years, while Trump served four.

If you adjust the measurement for that reality by looking at debt accumulated per year in office, Trump does stand alone.

If you divide the debt accumulated during each presidents tenure by the number of years they served, Trump oversaw an increase in the debt of almost $2 trillion per year. President Joe Biden has overseen the addition of almost $1.6 trillion per year in his two-and-one-third years in office, which ranks second. In third place is Obama, who presided over the addition of nearly $1.2 trillion a year.

Why president-to-president comparisons are hard

The blame game on federal debt is not clear cut.

Much of the current federal debt stems from mandatory payments, such as those for Social Security and Medicare. These began spiking when the baby boom generation started drawing heavily from these programs around 2010. Not coincidentally, thats when the federal debt began accelerating.

Generations of politicians in both parties approved and modified these programs long before Trump took office.

"It is always challenging to figure out how much spending was on whose watch," said Steve Ellis, president of the federal budget-watching nonprofit group Taxpayers for Common Sense.

The biggest single spikes in the federal debt came from the initial rounds of coronavirus relief legislation in 2020. Trump signed them, but they passed with broad bipartisan support.

"Everyone, including me, said it was worth it, and without it, things would have been worse," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the center-right American Action Forum. "So, (its) not fair to blame Trump exclusively for something everyone thought was needed."

Our ruling

Jeffries said Trump "ran up more debt than any other president in American history."

Obama ran up more debt than any other president in American history. If you look at debt accumulated on a per-year basis, Trumps rate of increase in the debt was higher over four years than over Obamas eight.

Assigning debt to a particular president can be misleading because so much of it traces back to decades-old, bipartisan legislation that set the parameters for Social Security and Medicare.

The statement contains an element of truth but ignores evidence that would give a different impression, so we rate it Mostly False.

Go here to see the original:
Did Donald Trump rack up more debt than any other president? - PolitiFact

Donald Trump Jr.’s response to White House U-Haul crash reveals … – MSNBC

Authorities say a 19-year-old Missouri man with a Nazi flag in the truckcrashed a U-Haul into security barriers near the White House late Monday night. The Nazi flag that authorities say he had with him was later photographed unfurled on the ground near the truck. He could face multiple charges, including threatening to hurt the president.

Trump Jr. wrote, If the threat of white supremacy is so real, why do they have to outsource all the hate?

Donald Trump Jr., the son of the former president, soon retweeted a post that expressed skepticism about the official version of events and added more skepticism of his own. He said of federal law enforcement, You would think they would be able to do a much better job at creating fake crimes and fake hate. Later, in a tweet that drew attention to the suspects Indian name, Trump Jr. wrote, If the threat of white supremacy is so real, why do they have to outsource all the hate?

That wasnt the first time weve seen Trump Jr. accusing federal authorities of exaggerating the white supremacist threat.Last Saturday, after about a hundred members of the white nationalist group Patriot Front marched in Washington, Trump Jr. suggested the marchers were all feds: Do we really want to pretend its not a fed operation? he asked on a podcast. He was preaching to the choir of conspiracy theorists across platforms that echoed similar sentiments. Popular podcaster Joe Rogan joked with guest Matt Taibbi that the marchers had to be federal agents because, he said, there were no fat people among them.

Those high-profile people werent alone. In fact, claiming that federal authorities are falsely connecting crimes to white supremacists has become a trend. Almost as fast as the Secret Service descended on the man in the U-Haul, far-right MAGA followers launched a counteroffensive against any implication that the driver was one of theirs. Were in an interesting moment when followers and close associates of a former president seem compelled, sometimes in unison, to deny any association with the authoritarian, white supremacist, white nationalist or even neo-Nazi ideologies some of them seem to espouse. To paraphrase a character in Shakespeares Hamlet, Methinks they doth protest too much.

This new strategy involves claiming that any violent incident by someone who even appears to have such leanings is not just a false flag operation but maybe a false flag operation staged by the government. These claims happen so quickly, in such large volume and across so many social media platforms, that the word feds was trending on Twitter for much of Tuesday morning. At that time, we didnt yet have the report from authorities that the U-Haul suspect had praised Hitler to police and told them that his intent was to kill President Joe Biden. Facts werent needed. Someone had to defend the honor of MAGA loyalists.

The same strategy of feigned disbelief was on display after the May 6 mass shooting at a mall in Allen, Texas. The police reported that the Latino suspect had neo-Nazi ideation and wore associated patches and tattoos, but the MAGA faithful pretended it was all a government ruse designed to make them look bad. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., tweeted: Only dumb white people would believe that a Mexican gang member is killing people for white supremacy.

The fact that people who arent white have been known to identify with white supremacy didnt stop people from making arguments that law enforcements reports about the Allen shooter were wrong. Twitter CEO Elon Musk also joined in and claimed the shooters alleged ideologies seemed suspicious.

There are three reasons why this strategy of denying the validity of reports linking violent crimes to white supremacy and deflecting them onto scheming federal agents has become so prevalent.

The same strategy of feigned disbelief was on display after the May 6 mass shooting at mall in Allen, Texas.

First, the strategy sends a reassuring message to far-right adherents who might think that a hate-fueled mass shooting, or other violent attack, is their cue to leave the MAGA movement. Well-publicized claims that such crimes or the hateful marchers dressed in khaki cargo pants arent real, provides the kind of solace that helps delude adherents into sticking around. Effectively, the message to the MAGA masses is, Dont worry.We didnt do this.

Second, denial and deflection tactics help far-right extremists convince themselves that the problem of violence associated with white nationalism is overblown. It encourages far-right opinion writers to cherry-pick anecdotes in an attempt to demonstrate that the racism problem isnt as bad as its made out to be. But the data tells another story. Violent hate is on the rise.

In 2020, Christopher Wray, the then-FBI director who'd been appointed by Trump, said in testimony before Congress that the Bureaus data indicates that motivated violent extremistsin recent years have been responsible for the most lethal activity. Similarly, President Biden told the graduating class of Howard University last Saturday that white supremacy is the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland.

Third, the deniers and deflectors are increasingly aware that the feds, as they consistently call them, are not only investigating their leader but may be close to indicting him. They fear whats coming. If and when charges come, folks such as Donald Trump Jr. will need to be able to refute any charges by repeating the mantra that the feds make stuff up, including, even criminal cases. Theyll likely tell their followers that the folks who investigated Trump are the same people who staged violent incidents to make it look like MAGA followers were responsible.

Denial, deflection and delusion. Thats not just a Trump Jr. thing. It's also the strategic opiate of the chronically unaware. Sad to see how often it works.

Link:
Donald Trump Jr.'s response to White House U-Haul crash reveals ... - MSNBC

San Jose officials want to stop shady politics – San Jos Spotlight – San Jos Spotlight

San Jose is on a path to close anelection loophole that former Mayor Sam Liccardo and his right-hand man usedto raise more than $1.5 million to fill seats on the City Council.

The city is looking to prohibit elected officials and their staff from working on political action committees (PACs) that raise money for local races. This move comes after residents and city leadersquestioned the extracurricular political activities of Jim Reed while he served as Liccardos chief of staff. The council voted 8-1-2 on Tuesday to change city laws, with Councilmember Bien Doan dissenting and Councilmembers Sergio Jimenez and Omar Torres absent. The law is slated to take effect by August, pending final approval.

Current city policy only prohibits someone running for officea candidatefrom working on PACs. The definition of candidate would be redefined to include elected city officials, their employees and any City Hall employee. The shift would align San Jose with state law.

Reed and Liccardo raised nearly $1.5 million from wealthy landowners, developers and business executives through their political action committee Common Good Silicon Valley. Most of the dollars went to support Mayor Matt Mahans bid for the citys top seat. Reed is now Mahans chief of staff. And while his fundraising involvement was allowed then, it could soon violate city policy.

Mahan and Reed previously told San Jos Spotlightno one on the mayors staff will be working on a local PAC while Mahan runs for reelection in 2024. Reed said he volunteered for Common Good and never received payment for his work. However, councilmembers want to expedite the rule change to take effect by August when election season officially starts.

The importance of maintaining the integrity of our political system and preventing corruption and undue inputs from special interest groups is paramount, Councilmember Domingo Candelas said. Thats ultimately what were doing, protecting the public trust in our government.

Former Councilmember Maya Esparzawas one of the first to call on the city to change local election laws last November, after she lost her reelection bid to Doan. She was one of the candidates that Reed and Liccardos PAC spent money against.

Several residents called out Reed by name at Tuesdays council meeting. John Tucker, a union member of MEF-AFSCME Local 101, said hes particularly concerned with Reeds political activity because having wealthy contractors donate to Common Good could curry favors from the mayors office.He pointed to two different contractors that donated $10,000 each to the PAC: California Waste Solutions and GreenWaste Recovery Inc.

Bully for Jim Reed who abused this loophole to get his candidate elected and keep his own job in the process, Tucker said.

Tucker said the policy change would help eliminate the perception of favoritism and potential corruption at City Hall.

Esparza also directed the city to explore banning elected officials and city employees from working at a local PAC for a specific period of timeafter they leave the position, also known as a revolving door policy. However, the city attorneys office said the idea could violate their First Amendment rights to participate in local elections. Councilmembers deferred further discussion of the policy until August.

Matthew Alvarez, board member of the California Political Attorneys Association, said the changes would be unconstitutional during last weeks Rules and Open Government Committee meeting. Alvarez works at the Sutton Law Firm which represents Common Good.

The city has no compelling interest to prevent employees from participating in their personal time on whatever campaigns they wish and in whatever capacity they wish, Alvarez told councilmembers. This is basic First Amendment law 101 and the city is completely ignoring it.

The first hearing of the local election rule changes is June13 and the council will vote on June 20. If approved, the rule will go into effect on July 20. Learn how to watch and participate.

Contact Jana Kadah at [emailprotected] or @Jana_Kadah on Twitter.

Original post:
San Jose officials want to stop shady politics - San Jos Spotlight - San Jos Spotlight