San Jose officials want to stop shady politics – San Jos Spotlight – San Jos Spotlight
San Jose is on a path to close anelection loophole that former Mayor Sam Liccardo and his right-hand man usedto raise more than $1.5 million to fill seats on the City Council.
The city is looking to prohibit elected officials and their staff from working on political action committees (PACs) that raise money for local races. This move comes after residents and city leadersquestioned the extracurricular political activities of Jim Reed while he served as Liccardos chief of staff. The council voted 8-1-2 on Tuesday to change city laws, with Councilmember Bien Doan dissenting and Councilmembers Sergio Jimenez and Omar Torres absent. The law is slated to take effect by August, pending final approval.
Current city policy only prohibits someone running for officea candidatefrom working on PACs. The definition of candidate would be redefined to include elected city officials, their employees and any City Hall employee. The shift would align San Jose with state law.
Reed and Liccardo raised nearly $1.5 million from wealthy landowners, developers and business executives through their political action committee Common Good Silicon Valley. Most of the dollars went to support Mayor Matt Mahans bid for the citys top seat. Reed is now Mahans chief of staff. And while his fundraising involvement was allowed then, it could soon violate city policy.
Mahan and Reed previously told San Jos Spotlightno one on the mayors staff will be working on a local PAC while Mahan runs for reelection in 2024. Reed said he volunteered for Common Good and never received payment for his work. However, councilmembers want to expedite the rule change to take effect by August when election season officially starts.
The importance of maintaining the integrity of our political system and preventing corruption and undue inputs from special interest groups is paramount, Councilmember Domingo Candelas said. Thats ultimately what were doing, protecting the public trust in our government.
Former Councilmember Maya Esparzawas one of the first to call on the city to change local election laws last November, after she lost her reelection bid to Doan. She was one of the candidates that Reed and Liccardos PAC spent money against.
Several residents called out Reed by name at Tuesdays council meeting. John Tucker, a union member of MEF-AFSCME Local 101, said hes particularly concerned with Reeds political activity because having wealthy contractors donate to Common Good could curry favors from the mayors office.He pointed to two different contractors that donated $10,000 each to the PAC: California Waste Solutions and GreenWaste Recovery Inc.
Bully for Jim Reed who abused this loophole to get his candidate elected and keep his own job in the process, Tucker said.
Tucker said the policy change would help eliminate the perception of favoritism and potential corruption at City Hall.
Esparza also directed the city to explore banning elected officials and city employees from working at a local PAC for a specific period of timeafter they leave the position, also known as a revolving door policy. However, the city attorneys office said the idea could violate their First Amendment rights to participate in local elections. Councilmembers deferred further discussion of the policy until August.
Matthew Alvarez, board member of the California Political Attorneys Association, said the changes would be unconstitutional during last weeks Rules and Open Government Committee meeting. Alvarez works at the Sutton Law Firm which represents Common Good.
The city has no compelling interest to prevent employees from participating in their personal time on whatever campaigns they wish and in whatever capacity they wish, Alvarez told councilmembers. This is basic First Amendment law 101 and the city is completely ignoring it.
The first hearing of the local election rule changes is June13 and the council will vote on June 20. If approved, the rule will go into effect on July 20. Learn how to watch and participate.
Contact Jana Kadah at [emailprotected] or @Jana_Kadah on Twitter.
Original post:
San Jose officials want to stop shady politics - San Jos Spotlight - San Jos Spotlight
- Free speech BACKLASH as even members of Trump's base reject his attack on the First Amendment - MSNBC News - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- The Observer view: Save the First Amendment - The Observer - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- How does the First Amendment protect free speech? - Post and Courier - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Anna Gomez Calls Kimmel Suspension Most Alarming Attack on the First Amendment in Recent Memory - Vanity Fair - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Larson, Crockett, and Jeffries Speak Out Against Trump Administration Report Targeting Them for Exercising First Amendment Rights - Congressman John... - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Editorial: Using the First Amendment to protect our rights - Everett Herald - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- League of Women Voters to host program on Free Speech, First Amendment - Midland Daily News - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Republicans railroad the First Amendment, and the Pentagon's war crime worries - Daily Kos - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Free Speech on Trial: The Jimmy Kimmel Case and the First Amendment - The Boca Raton Tribune - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Trump and his allies are suddenly downplaying the First Amendment - CNN - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel, the FCC, and Why Broadcasters Still Have Junior Varsity First Amendment Rights - Cato Institute - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Does the First Amendment apply in Jimmy Kimmel's suspension? - CBS News - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- What to Know About Hate Speech and the First Amendment - The New York Times - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Why Jimmy Kimmels First Amendment rights werent violated but ABCs would be protected if it stood up to the FCC and Trump - The Conversation - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- First Amendment discussion takes Tim Heaphy back to the days writing 2017 report - Cville Right Now - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- First Amendment advocates increasingly worried after ABC pulled Jimmy Kimmel's show - USA Today - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- While you may not agree with the content, canceling Jimmy Kimmel Live! out of fear of retaliation from a President who quite literally cant take a... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Is hate speech protected by the First Amendment? What to know after Charlie Kirk's killing - IndyStar - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- What does Jimmy Kimmels suspension really say about the First Amendment? | ChicagoNOW - FOX 32 Chicago - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Press Freedom and the First Amendment - Concord Monitor - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Philanthropies and Nonprofits Speak Out Against Attacks on First Amendment - Inside Philanthropy - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Daily Herald opinion: The first amendment is under assault. We should all be defending it - Daily Herald - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The First Amendment and judicial proceedings: Mary McCord in conversation - The Contrarian - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- SPJ announces 2025 winners of Distinguished Teaching in Journalism, Galvan Outstanding Graduate in Journalism, Lewis First Amendment Awards - Society... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- R.I.P. the First Amendment, Killed by Cowardice and Greed - The Daily Beast - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Free speech in the workplace? A First Amendment attorney weighs in - WKYC - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Do you think the Trump administration is a threat to First Amendment free speech protections with its recent efforts to stifle dissent? - Wyoming... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- First Amendment advocates increasingly worried after ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel. Here's why - Yahoo - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Mass. teachers are being placed on leave for posts on Charlie Kirks death. What are their First Amendment rights? - The Boston Globe - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The First Amendment is for we, not just thee - Baptist News Global - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk And The Chill Effect Ices The First Amendment - Colorado Times Recorder - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Opinion | Censoring Jimmy Kimmel Is Not The Biggest Threat To The First Amendment - Common Dreams - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- LAUSD has a social media policy for parents. ACLU says it violates the First Amendment - LAist - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- What does the First Amendment mean and how does it work? - CBS News - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Pam Bondi's hate speech comments exposed a stunning ignorance of the First Amendment - MSNBC News - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Jon Stewart Responds to Jimmy Kimmel Live! Being Pulled: 'We Have a Little Thing Called the First Amendment' - People.com - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Private unions and the limits of First Amendment claims - Daily Journal - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The first amendment is not what it used to be: Nicolle Wallace reacts to Jimmy Kimmels suspension - MSNBC News - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- ISU legal scholar on the First Amendment: 'Its very misunderstood' - WGLT - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Cruz says First Amendment absolutely protects hate speech in wake of Charlie Kirk killing - Politico - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Does the First Amendment protect you at work? Charlie Kirk critics are learning the answer - The Hill - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Pam Bondi Is Clueless About the First Amendment - New York Magazine - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- The rights free speech defenders declare war on First Amendment over Charlie Kirk murder reactions - The Independent - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Federal judge overturns part of Floridas book ban law, drawing on nearly 100 years of precedent protecting First Amendment access to ideas - The... - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- How online reactions to Charlie Kirk's killing test limits of First Amendment - USA Today - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- From TikTok to the First Amendment: Exploring journalism and democracy in a USC Annenberg course open to all majors - USC Annenberg - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk comments got them fired: Do they have First Amendment protection? - NewsNation - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Law professor on First Amendment and social media in the wake of Charlie Kirk assassination - WCTV - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Hiding Behind Kirk, Team Trump Launches 'Biggest Assault on the First Amendment' in Modern US History - Common Dreams - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Donald Trump vs the First Amendment - The Spectator World - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- New Yorks Ban on Addictive Social Media Feeds for Kids Takes Shape With Proposed Rules - First Amendment Watch - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Republicans are honoring Charlie Kirks memory by declaring war on the First Amendment - The Verge - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk comments got them fired: Do they have First Amendment protection? - MSN - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- South Bend responds to teacher comments about Charlie Kirk's death, cites First Amendment - South Bend Tribune - September 15th, 2025 [September 15th, 2025]
- What are the limits of free speech? Online controversies spark First Amendment debate - WKRC - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Are teachers' social media posts on Charlie Kirk protected by the First Amendment? - CBS News - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Federal Court Blocks Trump Administrations Freeze of Grants to Harvard University: Implications for First Amendment and Title VI Enforcement -... - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Dunleavy: A tribute to Charlie Kirk and the First Amendment - Juneau Empire - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- This Just In: The Very First Amendment - Chapelboro.com - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- FWC is limiting social media comments, raising First Amendment concerns - Creative Loafing Tampa - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- On the First Amendment and the Fourth Estate - Boca Beacon - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- WATCH: The first amendment vs. fascism - The.Ink | Anand Giridharadas - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Opinion | Vivek Ramaswamy: An Ohio County vs. the First Amendment - The Wall Street Journal - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Former Backpage CEO Gets Three Years of Probation After Testifying at Trial About Sites Sex Ads - First Amendment Watch - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk Died Protecting the First Amendment Says Grant County GOP Chair - Source ONE News - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- This school year, attacks on the First Amendment extend to our schoolhouse doors | Opinion - Bergen Record - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- A Decades-Long Peace Vigil Outside the White House Is Dismantled After Trumps Order - First Amendment Watch - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Woman sues Madison County attorney, former Madison city clerk over alleged violation of First Amendment rights - norfolkneradio.com - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Talkative Defendant Is Told He Misunderstands First Amendment By Harvey Weinstein Judge - Inner City Press - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- 'South Park' keeps tying Trump to Satan. What to know about satire and the First Amendment - USA Today - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Man told to take down Trump flag says it's a First Amendment issue. Mayor says it has to be on a flag pole - News 12 - Westchester - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- First Amendment Rights and Protesting in Tennessee - Nashville Banner - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Northwestern University President Says He Will Resign Following Tenure Marked by White House Tension - First Amendment Watch - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Surprise resident's First Amendment fight against city far from over one year later - yourvalley.net - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Letter: Trump crushes the First Amendment - InForum - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- From Kozminski to Cherwitz: The TVPA's Transformation from Anti-Trafficking Tool to First Amendment Weapon - The National Law Review - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Graham Linehans arrest shows we need a UK First Amendment - Spiked - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- First Amendment battles loom over another religious law in Texas - yahoo.com - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Agrees To Restore Health Websites and Data - First Amendment Watch - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- MFIA Clinic Urges FTC to Withdraw Proposed Consent Order on First Amendment Grounds - Yale Law School - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]