Archive for the ‘Social Networking’ Category

Sacha Baron Cohen Bursts Out On Social Media, Rips Of The Social Networks – The Digital Weekly

Sacha Baron Cohen is bursting out on social media because it appears on a long list of complaints including developing tricks and bogus data. In an address at the Anti-Defamation Leagues Never Is Now Summit on Anti-Semitism and Hate, the 48 years old entertainer ripped into social networks and more tech titans for their loss of ordinances on abhorrence address and intrigue.

Cohen told to praise that all this animosity and intensity is being promoted by some of the internet corporations that amount to the biggest promotion device in antiquity.

The social networking sites like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and many more the subroutine these platforms based on independently expand the standard of content that holds users to busy, stories that activate abuse and anxiety.

Source: The Verge

Further, he told, We have lost, it looks, knowledge of basic truths upon which capitalism depends When, gratitude to social media, tricks take hold, it is more simple for aversion groups to recruit, easier for foreign statistics agencies to intervene in our ballots.

Cohen got the ADLs International Leadership Award throughout the event. Cohen confers instances from earlier comedic performances to show his carriage, describing a time when he was capable to persuade a personality to seek and hurt others depends on fake reports.

Voltaire was right when he stated, Those who can make you believe foolishness can make you commit crimes. And social media lets authoritarians push foolishness to billions of people, he stated, including that steps social media organizations have made to overcome enmity and intrigues have been largely cosmetic.

Cohen made a major re-consider of social media, and how it flattens disgust, tricks, and myths. He also explicitly called out Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Cohen stated that this is not about restricting anyones unfettered address.

This is about providing the public, comprise few of the most wicked people on the world, the largest platform in antiquity to approach a third of the planet.Liberty of speech is not the liberty to reach.

See original here:
Sacha Baron Cohen Bursts Out On Social Media, Rips Of The Social Networks - The Digital Weekly

Army Secretary expects briefing on possible TikTok vulnerabilities by year-end as US keeps pressure on China tech – CNBC

The U.S. Army is still reviewing whether the popular social-networking app TikTok, which it has used for recruitment, poses a data security or intelligence risk because of its Chinese ties.

The Army stopped allowing soldiers to use TikTok "immediately" when a possible national security issue was brought to the attention of Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy earlier this year, he told CNBC's Morgan Brennan during an interview on CNBC's Squawk Alley on Tuesday.

"We've begun a review with Army Cyber Command on the potential vulnerabilities associated with that app," McCarthy said. He said he expects to receive a brief on any vulnerabilities associated with TikTok "right around the Christmas holiday."

The app, which allows users to create short videos, is very popular with young adults including those at a prime age for military recruitment and service the majority of TikTok's approximately 750 million users are under 30. In addition to ending the app-based recruitment push, the Army asked soldiers to discontinue use of the app, because of concerns related to TikTok's China-based parent company ByteDance and uncertainties about how the app may share information with the Chinese government.

TikTok CEO Alex Zhu told The New York Times in November that if asked by China President Xi Jinping to hand over user data, "I would turn him down." However, TikTok declined an invitation to testify at a recent congressional hearing on app security.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has called for an investigation into the Army's use of TikTok, and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) has proposed a bill that would forbid the app and other tech companies like Apple and Google from storing the data of U.S. citizens in China.

The U.S. has been cracking down on a wide range of China-based technology firms despite ongoing protests from those companies, which include artificial intelligence and surveillance giants, as well as China's largest equipment manufacturers Huawei and ZTE.

Companies with Chinese investors are also facing a possible money crunch, as the Treasury Department's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has been working to significantly expand its review process to include businesses in technology, infrastructure and sensitive personal data.

If approved, the new review process would be implemented in February 2020, according to the Treasury Department. As proposed, the rules would define "sensitive personal data" as wide-ranging personal information on more than 1 million users, that could "be used to analyze or determine an individual's financial distress or hardship," or relates to "the physical, mental, or psychological health condition of an individual," among numerous other qualifiers.

CFIUS has contacted TikTok's Chinese parent, Bytedance, over concerns that its acquisition of social media app Musical.ly poses a national security risk, people familiar with the situation have told CNBC.

An adverse CFIUS review can have significant implications for any company that takes money from China-based firms, including giving the U.S. power to block, modify or unwind financial transactions and investments.

Follow @CNBCtech on Twitter for the latest tech industry news.

See the original post here:
Army Secretary expects briefing on possible TikTok vulnerabilities by year-end as US keeps pressure on China tech - CNBC

Vancouver-raised Taiwanese model and actor Godfrey Gao, 35, dies while filming Chinese reality show – Straight.com

Taiwanese-born and North Vancouver-raised international model and actor Godfrey Gao has died after suffering an apparent heart attack while filming a Chinese reality TV show.

According to multiple Asian media outlets such as Taiwan News and the Straits Times, the 35-year-old celebrity was filming Chase Me, a physical endurance competition show in Ningbo, Zhejiang province, China when he collapsed on the morning of November 27.

The actors agency JetStar Entertainment confirmed Gao had passed away early Wednesday morning (November 27) in a statement posted on Chinese social networking site Weibo.

Chase Mes official Weibo account also released a statement, which said Gao was running during the filming segment when he suddenly slowed and fell to the ground.

The shows medical staff began rescue efforts right away, and then rushed him to the hospital, read the statement. After more than two hours of intense rescue efforts, the hospital announced that Gao had died from sudden cardiac arrest. We feel incomparable pain and extreme sadness.

Social media users are scrutinizing the reality show and its production company for pushing its contestants over their physical capabilities, without allowing adequate time for rest and recovery.

Gao was known as the first Asian male to model for luxury fashion house Louis Vuitton. He has appeared in films such as The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones, Legend of the Ancient Sword, and The Jade Pendant.

He studied at North Vancouvers Capilano University before moving to Taipei in 2004 to pursue a career in the entertainment industry.

See more here:
Vancouver-raised Taiwanese model and actor Godfrey Gao, 35, dies while filming Chinese reality show - Straight.com

Rebrands can remedy scandals, but they can also cause them. Here are 6 of the most controversial company rebrands of 2019. – Business Insider

captionSears came under fire from critics who said its new logo closely resembled Airbnbs.sourceAirbnb/Sears

Rebranding can be a strategic way for a company to shift its outward-facing image.

However, while some rebrands can leave a new, positive impression, they can also create an entirely new controversy.

While some companies were criticized this year for poorly designed logos, others were accused of running from their problems following a scandal.

Here are six of the most controversial company rebrands of 2019.

Reviews were mixed when fast-fashion retailer Zara unveiled its new logo in January. The new design paid homage to its 2011 predecessor, but the typefaces letters were noticeably closer together. Many critics of the new logo remarked that it looked squashed, to the point where one Fast Company reporter remarked that it made them feel claustrophobic.

One well-known graphic designer, Erik Spiekermann, wrote on Twitter, That is the worst piece of type Ive seen in years. Was this done by one of those new robots that will replace humans?

Pepsi came under fire in 2019 when it announced its new slogan, which critics remarked was far too similar to McDonalds iconic tagline. In a statement to CNBC, Roberto Rios, senior vice president of marketing at PepsiCo, claimed the new slogan was inspired by the iconic brand rooted in entertainment with a refreshing and delicious beverage people around the world love.

However, while people may love the taste of Pepsi, they certainly didnt love the new tagline and rebranding. Not only was the new slogan compared to McDonalds Im Lovin It catchphrase, but it also seemed to be eerily similar to Coca-Colas 1982 slogan for Diet Coke, Just for the Taste of It, which was brought back in 1995 and 2009.

Sears has had a rough year. Between declining sales, a report of messy stores, and a battle to bounce back after bankruptcy, the retailer cant seem to catch a break. However, it caused even more controversy with its rebrand in March 2019. The new logo, which also features the phrase making moments matter, was quickly compared to Airbnbs logo.

While the logo was reportedly created to represent the infinity loop of family, home, and heart, many critics simply couldnt ignore the fact it looked extremely similar to the home-rental websites symbol.

When it comes to a company rebrand, the last thing marketing teams want is to offend. However, when Slack launched its revamped logo in January 2019, the company was promptly met with internet backlash. Some compared it to Google Photos colorful logo, while others said it closely resembled offensive imagery like a Nazi swastika.

On November 5, Facebook Inc. announced its logo change, which shifted towards a more colorful yet minimalist font style. The logo features Facebook in a new, all-caps font and alternates between blue, green, purple, red, and orange in a GIF format. The colors chosen represent the companys multiple brands blue for Facebook, green for WhatsApp, and purple, red, and orange for Instagram.

Following a year of controversy surrounding Facebooks data collection and privacy policies, the new logo was thought to distance the parent company from the social network. Antonio Lucio, Facebooks chief marketing officer, told Bloomberg that the company even considered changing the parent company name entirely prior to the rebrand, but was concerned this would come across as Facebook trying to run from the problems associated with its brand.

Of course, the new branding was not without its critics. Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, who has voiced his issues with Facebook in the past, seemed to take a jab at the new, all-caps branding in a tweet: Twitter from TWITTER.

Following Volkswagens 2015 emissions scandal, in which the company pleaded guilty to three felonies and agreed to pay $14.7 billion to settle, it rebranded in September 2019. Featuring thinner lines and a more minimalistic look, the new logo was created to reference the increasingly electric future of the car company.

One online design blogger called the new logo damage control, and said the new design broke many design rules, though they did like the final look of the logo.

As far as we can tell, the new design throws the rule book out of the window; the lines are far too thin, the angles of the letter strokes are all over the place, and the gap between the letters is too wide. Honestly, it shows blatant disregard for the rules.

Read more from the original source:
Rebrands can remedy scandals, but they can also cause them. Here are 6 of the most controversial company rebrands of 2019. - Business Insider

Fusion Family Wealth LLC Sells 1,893 Shares of Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ:FB) – Mitchell Messenger

Fusion Family Wealth LLC reduced its stake in Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ:FB) by 54.8% during the 3rd quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 1,560 shares of the social networking companys stock after selling 1,893 shares during the quarter. Fusion Family Wealth LLCs holdings in Facebook were worth $278,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

Several other large investors also recently modified their holdings of FB. Boltwood Capital Management grew its stake in Facebook by 1.0% during the 2nd quarter. Boltwood Capital Management now owns 6,758 shares of the social networking companys stock valued at $1,304,000 after purchasing an additional 65 shares in the last quarter. Park National Corp OH grew its stake in Facebook by 0.7% during the 2nd quarter. Park National Corp OH now owns 202,943 shares of the social networking companys stock valued at $39,168,000 after purchasing an additional 1,427 shares in the last quarter. Private Trust Co. NA grew its stake in Facebook by 2.1% during the 2nd quarter. Private Trust Co. NA now owns 19,146 shares of the social networking companys stock valued at $3,695,000 after purchasing an additional 387 shares in the last quarter. Baystate Wealth Management LLC grew its stake in Facebook by 19.8% during the 2nd quarter. Baystate Wealth Management LLC now owns 4,432 shares of the social networking companys stock valued at $855,000 after purchasing an additional 734 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Private Asset Management Inc. acquired a new stake in Facebook during the 2nd quarter valued at approximately $212,000. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 63.81% of the companys stock.

Several research analysts have recently commented on the company. Stifel Nicolaus reiterated a hold rating and issued a $205.00 target price (up previously from $180.00) on shares of Facebook in a research report on Monday, October 28th. They noted that the move was a valuation call. Wells Fargo & Co set a $260.00 target price on Facebook and gave the stock a buy rating in a research report on Friday, November 1st. Goldman Sachs Group set a $231.00 price target on Facebook and gave the stock a buy rating in a report on Wednesday, October 30th. Wedbush cut their price target on Facebook from $265.00 to $250.00 and set an outperform rating on the stock in a report on Thursday, October 31st. Finally, Aegis reissued a buy rating on shares of Facebook in a report on Monday, November 4th. One analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, six have issued a hold rating and forty-one have given a buy rating to the companys stock. The stock has an average rating of Buy and a consensus price target of $228.33.

Shares of FB stock opened at $198.91 on Wednesday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.09, a quick ratio of 4.66 and a current ratio of 4.66. The stock has a market cap of $566.98 billion, a PE ratio of 26.28, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 1.12 and a beta of 1.05. The businesss fifty day moving average is $190.51 and its 200-day moving average is $187.80. Facebook, Inc. has a 1 year low of $123.02 and a 1 year high of $208.66.

Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) last issued its earnings results on Wednesday, October 30th. The social networking company reported $2.12 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping the Zacks consensus estimate of $1.91 by $0.21. The business had revenue of $17.65 billion for the quarter, compared to analysts expectations of $17.35 billion. Facebook had a return on equity of 20.39% and a net margin of 27.08%. The companys quarterly revenue was up 28.6% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period in the previous year, the firm posted $1.76 EPS. Equities research analysts predict that Facebook, Inc. will post 8.57 earnings per share for the current year.

Facebook Company Profile

Facebook, Inc provides various products to connect and share through mobile devices, personal computers, and other surfaces worldwide. The company's products include Facebook that enables people to connect, share, discover, and communicate with each other on mobile devices and personal computers; Instagram, a community for sharing photos, videos, and messages; Messenger, a messaging application for people to connect with friends, family, groups, and businesses across platforms and devices; and WhatsApp, a messaging application for use by people and businesses to communicate in a private way.

Read More: Futures Contract

Receive News & Ratings for Facebook Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Facebook and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Go here to read the rest:
Fusion Family Wealth LLC Sells 1,893 Shares of Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ:FB) - Mitchell Messenger