Mediaboss Marketing

16 October 2020

Kris Jenner thinks societal media has contributed toKeeping Up With the Kardashians coming to a finish.

Kris Jenner

The 64-year old celebrity climbed to fame on the truth show that follows the lives of their mixed Kardashian-Jenner household which is coming to a conclusion after 14 decades at 2021 however Kris thinks that the growth of social networking platforms has diminished the need for tv.

She explained:When we started, there wasnt any Instagram or even Snapchat or alternative social networking platforms. The entire world has really changed.

Today there are numerous, the audience does not need to wait for three or four weeks to find an event. We could provide them all the info anyone would want to understand about real time.

Kris is included in the managing of her allies Kim Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Khloe Kardashian, Kendall Jenner along with Kylie Jenner professions in addition to juggling other small business ventures like conducting a manufacturing firm and Kris has shown that she must maintain her different company independent from one another.

She added:I do not do things in precisely the identical moment. I really dont commingle my encounters or the time that I spend on every different company. They certainly have their own traces. Otherwise I could not stay organized

The TV character also implied thatintellect will be the trick to achievement.

Kris advised Beauty Inc magazine:I really dont believe you must get all the expertise in the Earth, but intellect is actually important.

Read the original here:
Kris Jenner suggests societal networking has contributed to Keeping Up With the Kardashians end - The News Pocket

Aaron Sorkin is ready to start writing a sequel to The Social Network as soon as David Fincher agrees to direct it.

Speaking to MTVs Happy Sad Confused podcast, the Mollys Game director said: Do I want to write that movie? Yeah I do. I will only write it if David directs it. If Billy Wilder came back from the grave and said he wanted to direct it, Id say Id only do it with David.

Sorkin wrote the script for The Social Network which celebrates its 10th anniversary this month and won the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay and the Golden Globe for Best Screenplay.

Based on Ben Mezrichs book The Accidental Billionaires, the Fincher-directed movie stars Jesse Eisenberg as Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. It follows Zuckerbergs founding of the social networking site as a student at Harvard University and the ensuing lawsuits.

The movie also features Andrew Garfield as Zuckerbergs friend and Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin and Justin Timberlake as the sites first president Sean Parker. Armie Hammer played both entrepreneurial twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, who sued Zuckerberg and claimed he stole the idea for the social networking site from them.

Sorkin went on to say that hed already met with former Facebook investor Roger McNamee to discuss a sequel. McNamee is also the author of 2019s Zucked, a book that takes a critical look at Zuckerberg, as well as Facebook CEO Sheryl Sandberg. No one from Facebook was involved with the original movie (although Saverin was a consultant for Mezrichs book).

With Sorkins first Social Network screenplay featuring iconic quotes like Sorry! My Prada's at the cleaners! Along with my hoodie and my 'fuck you' flip-flops, you pretentious douchebag!, weve got high hopes for the sequel whenever Fincher agrees to come on board In the meantime, be sure to check out Sorkins latest movie, The Trial of the Chicago 7, in cinemas now and coming to Netflix on October 16.

Original post:
Aaron Sorkin wants to write The Social Network 2 but only if David Fincher directs - GamesRadar+

A recent study has found associations between the time we spend in front of some devices and certain negative health outcomes.

New research has found links between the amount of time that people spend in front of some screened devices and various negative health outcomes.

The study findings, which appear in the journal BMC Public Health, lay the groundwork for future research to explore these associations in more detail.

Throughout the 20th century, television spread across the globe, becoming an important part of many peoples lives.

Significant amounts of research have explored the associations between watching TV for prolonged periods of time and various health outcomes.

For example, scientists have found links have between significant TV watching and obesity and type 2 diabetes, as well as abnormal glucose metabolism.

Part of the explanation for these links lies in the association between prolonged periods of time spent in front of the TV and less healthful eating habits, such as eating more fast foods or items that typically contain higher levels of salt, sugar, and saturated fat.

Although TV is still a central part of many peoples leisure time, there are now many other types of screens competing for our attention. These include computers, tablets, and smartphones.

If there is an association between prolonged TV viewing and negative health outcomes, the question arises: Does this association also apply to excessive use of other screened devices?

For corresponding study author Chris Wharton, the assistant dean of innovation and strategic initiatives at Arizona State Universitys College of Health Solutions in Phoenix:

A lot of screen time-related literature has primarily focused on television. But with the advancement of all these other types of devices that people use throughout the day, we wanted to see how health behaviors and factors are associated with a variety of screen-based devices.

Wharton and team produced an 18-question survey and sent it to 978 adults in the United States who owned a TV and at least one other device with a screen.

After excluding some respondents for incorrectly filling in the survey, the researchers had 926 responses.

The survey measured:

The team categorized the participants screen time as light, moderate, or heavy use.

The research showed that people who exhibited heavy use of screened devices that is, those who had a median screen time of 17.5 hours per day had the worst health-related characteristics and dietary patterns.

These users tended to eat fewer fruit and vegetables and more sweets and fast foods. They also tended to have the least physical activity, get the least sleep, have the worst sleep quality, and experience the greatest perceived stress (compared with those with light or moderate screen use).

The researchers also found that overuse of different types of devices also had associations with diet and health characteristics.

People with heavy TV and smartphone use said that they had worse dietary patterns and health characteristics than people who spent a lot of time in front of computers, tablets, or devices connected to a TV.

As Wharton notes, Were engaging with media in lots of different ways, and in mobile ways. And across a lot of these devices, heavy users were engaging in a lot of fast food consumption. So the convenience of (screen use) seems to be associated with the convenience of fast food.

The team also found that watching many episodes of a show or many different shows in quick succession was associated with poor dietary patterns and increases in self-perceived stress.

Although the study identified associations between screen time and health outcomes, precisely how or why this happens is less clear.

For example, while watching TV for an excessive amount of time could be a marker of sedentary behavior which, in turn, could worsen a persons health it might also be that those with worse health are more likely to spend more time in front of screens.

For the study authors, the results suggest that there could be a constellation of diverse factors that adversely impact health, perhaps differentially by type of screen.

Therefore, they call for further research to build on their findings and identify what type of relationship there may be between screen time, the use of different screened devices, and health outcomes.

For Wharton, the findings are particularly pertinent given peoples physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

I worry when people say, Now is the time to re-up your Netflix subscription. What else are you going to do? says Wharton. I would flip that on its head and say, Oh my gosh, now is the time to think about all the things to do other than sit in front of screens.

COVID is really bringing this into crystal-clear focus, that our lives are fully mediated by screens. They were before, they especially are now. I think its a good time to think about what a healthy but technologically plugged-in life could look like where screens arent the only way in which we interact and do everything in our life, but instead are just a small side component of everything else that we do, he adds.

We are nowhere near a conclusion like that, but I think we need to get there because screens have come to dominate us, and they drive real problems in our health.

Read the original post:
'Poor health' and screen time on different devices: What is the link? - Medical News Today

Facebook is letting people hide their money to avoid paying tax and authorities around the world are struggling to play catch up.

Two Australian-based researchers say its an international phenomena across multiple social media platforms, and it has stumped government agencies like the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) even those with sophisticated tax-detection systems.

The loophole means nations around the world are losing millions of dollars in revenue that could otherwise be pumped back into the community.

Selling an old dog kennel or last seasons clothing on Facebook Marketplace could be considered the online equivalent of a garage sale or a modern-day Trading Post.

But instead of receiving a few coins in a bucket, or cash in hand, the profit is transferred through Facebook Pay (yet to be introduced into Australia) into the sellers account within 24 hours.

All from the comfort of home and with the touch of an iPhone button.

Sounds good, right? Well, not for everyone, apparently.

Its become clear that some users activity is more akin to a business not just an occasional sale after a spring clean as, for example, they make frequent transactions and move high volumes of stock.

Tax authorities cant trace the money thats being transferred, just like they cant see cash exchanging hands, said Dr Eva Huang from the University of Sydney.

Right now, most countries are losing millions of dollars in tax because of social networking tools, she told The New Daily.

Her PhD student Xi Nan, who has also been researching the issue, said there are many sellers without a registered business using social payment options like Facebook Pay to earn revenue.

The hidden economy problem has worsened during COVID-19, Ms Xi said.

It could be the person selling masks via Facebook or home-made food via WeChat groups. Seemingly innocent except in some cases its actually business set up to bypass tax law, not a helpful local making a few dollars from their hobby.

Even a platform like Instagram where people cant send or receive money is still being used to hide income.

Dr Huang and Ms Xi uncovered a trend in which users trying to sell something on Instagram will mention in their post a way for buyers to connect with them on another social networking site that enables transactions to be made.

They detailed their findings in a working paper seen by The New Daily.

The pair conducted a study that assessed 2229 Instagram posts with the hashtag #lipstick and found almost a quarter were related to hidden economy transactions and thereby resulting in tax evasion.

As to how big a problem social media is in enabling tax evasion in Australia, Dr Huang said it is too big for me to tell you how big it is.

Because it affects so many countries we dont even know how much of that is [occurring in] Australia, she said.

The in-chat payment feature on Facebook is just one of many social networking apps with a digital wallet function that allows unregistered sellers to hide from tax authorities.

Others include WeChat Pay on WeChat, LINE Pay on LINE and WhatsApp Pay on WhatsApp.

Users are generally required to link their credit or debit card with their digital wallet to use the payment transfer function.

Money is transferred from the buyers digital wallet to the sellers digital wallet, and then to the sellers account via the card.

At this stage, the tax authorities in many countries may face technical difficulties and high compliance costs to achieve the detection on social media platforms, Ms Xi said.

For example, will the social media platform be willing to undertake the joint obligation to report suspicious sellers or account users to the tax office?

Therefore, there are many unregistered sellers who deliberately do not declare the revenue on their tax return as it is not obvious to the tax authority how that money was made, Ms Xi said.

That is another big challenge facing tax authorities (aside from detecting the digital footprints); determining if the income is taxable, she said.

It comes down to the fact that social networks werent designed for commercial purposes, meaning that even if tax authorities begin detecting the money transfers, they will have a hard time differentiating if it was for social or commercial reasons.

For cross-border transactions, Ms Xi said sellers and buyers will always choose to state the parcels are for personal use because governments usually impose tax rates on parcels for commercial purposes.

The indirect taxes are evaded due to the manipulation of the courier statement, she said.

The sellers can also create an offshore bank accounts to receive income from sales, she added.

For some countries like China under a schedular income tax system Australia is under a global income tax system the income tax is levied on particular categories of income stipulated by the taxation law, Ms Xi said.

The ATO maintains its data-matching analysis and forensic capabilities are very sophisticated.

But when it came to questions about tax evasion and social media, the office had nothing to say.

See the original post here:
Virtual tax havens: How social media platforms are helping tax dodgers hide their loot - The New Daily

Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google had roles as gatekeepers in common and controlled prices and the distribution of goods and services, the report said. That made third-party businesses like app developers on Apples App Store and sellers on Amazons marketplace beholden to the companies demands, the report said. The word monopoly appeared in the report nearly 120 times.

With no restrictions of tech companies to own and compete on their own platforms, which are the only options for so many small businesses, it takes away any real sense of competition, said Rep. Pramila Jayapal, a Democrat of Washington, who has been a vocal critic of Amazon.

Even without full bipartisan support, the report sets important groundwork, said Gene Kimmelman, a former senior antitrust official at the Justice Department. He said the breakup of AT&T in the 1980s was supported by policies set forth by Congress. Tuesdays report, he said, was the foundation for legislation and regulation that enables antitrust cases against Google, Facebook and others to actually break markets open to more competition.

Google disputed the findings and said its free service had been a boon to consumers. Googles free products like Search, Maps and Gmail help millions of Americans, the company said in a statement, and weve invested billions of dollars in research and development to build and improve them. We compete fairly in a fast-moving and highly competitive industry.

Amazon said the committees recommendations could end up harming small businesses and consumers.

The flawed thinking would have the primary effect of forcing millions of independent retailers out of online stores, thereby depriving these small businesses of one of the fastest and most profitable ways available to reach customers, Amazon said in a blog post. Far from enhancing competition, these uninformed notions would instead reduce it.

Apple vehemently disagrees with the conclusions in this staff report, the company said in a statement. The App Store has enabled new markets, new services and new products that were unimaginable a dozen years ago, and developers have been primary beneficiaries of this ecosystem, the company said.

Facebook disagreed that its mergers with Instagram and WhatsApp were anticompetitive. We compete with a wide variety of services with millions, even billions, of people using them, the company said in a statement. Acquisitions are part of every industry, and just one way we innovate new technologies to deliver more value to people.

Read this article:
House Lawmakers Condemn Big Techs Monopoly Power and Urge Their Breakups - The New York Times