Let the Beat Drop
Download From Here - http://microfire.org/42siw We Are Using New Stealthy Encrypted Injection Method That Allows to Bypass The Security Created by Mediafirex...
By: Maketter29
Read this article:
Let the Beat Drop - Video
In the house of terror You will be torn apart
Scariest clip so far. A man dies to save his wife. activism, advertising, alcohol, alternative-news, ancient-history, animals, animation, anime, architecture...
By: josh4rock
Go here to read the rest:
In the house of terror You will be torn apart - Video
Setting a cow on fire evilest video on youtube
WTF? activism, advertising, alcohol, alternative-news, ancient-history, animals, animation, anime, architecture, arts, astronomy, atheist, bizarre, blogs, bo...
By: josh4rock
Continued here:
Setting a cow on fire evilest video on youtube - Video
Summary: The proliferation of social networking silos, the growth of proprietary social media technologies, and fragmentation of digital conversation must be addressed. Here's one way we can do it and you're invited to contribute.
Open standards have long been a major boon to information technology users because of the many benefits they confer: Interchangability, economies of scale, interoperability, efficiency, open markets, and avoidance of lock-in. The list goes on and has led to countless success stories and even the creation of entire industries.
Not coincidentally, open standards have also been absolutely instrumental to the success of the Internet itself, making it possible for you to read this very piece on any device of your own choosing, running any operating system, any browser, on any network connected to the Internet. As long as they follow the open standards that underpin the Web, that is.
I've long been following the story of open standards and social media, one of the most meandering standardization stories I'm aware of, from early initiatives like DataPortability.org and OpenID to the raft of social standards contenders that had emerged by 2010. The reasons for this are varied, but basically boil down to the highly competitive nature of the big public social networks, a poor understanding of the utility of IT standards by many enterprise social media practitioners, and frankly, a limited comprehension by the industry of what we actually needed in the early years.
To be clear, the benefits of open standards are potentially quite considerable: All our data would be open in any social network, we could export our contacts and conversations whenever we want, we could easily find knowledge anywhere it lies any social system, and innovative new social tools would be easier to adopt because they talk to everything else already (and I do mean everything, since standards like OpenSocial mean even all our applications are integrated into the social fabric.)
If this is so great -- and it's hard to argue a convincing countercase -- then why hasn't it happened? As I pointed out earlier this week, companies already feel like social media is steadily encircling them, service by service, app by app. But making this rapidly growing portfolio of social tools talk together, securing them, and ensuring they are compliant with global regulations and laws is extremely challenging. In other words, social media needs to be a single medium that can be treated one way for all our concerns, not an increasingly fragmented collection of them.
And frankly, another big reason standards adoption has been slow is that digital networks have slightly different rules for success than other ecosystems. One of them is that already successful social networks can easily be tapped by new ones to grow, at least if they're open past a certain point. In other words, the services with the people in them already often don't want to be connected to the services that don't have them, no matter how good it might be for their users. To them, it can sometimes seem like a matter of survival not to support standards.
There are also other reasons open standards for social business haven't taken off, but in the end they just don't matter that much. That's because there's a very important piece missing, and that piece is end-user demand for standards and interoperability. Unfortunately, we have only to look in the mirror for why this is the case. We are not requiring our providers of social media to support them, and especially, to enable them in a way that provides us the value we seek. This locks us in and forces us to lose control of our own information. We've forgotten the priceless lessons of the 1990s when application providers were routinely turned down by companies if they didn't support standards. And it may even be too late to change this.
Today the network effect of Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and the whole host of other services is so large that they can't really be ignored. Your companies and employees must use them, because everyone else does. And to be fair, almost all social network services, both consumer and corporate, support some of the open standards that are now common in social media: OpenSocial, Open Graph, Activity Streams, and to a lesser extent Pubsubhubbub, Portable Contacts, and the Salmon Protocol, to name some of the top candidates.
However, for all these reasons, there simply isn't critical mass in the social media industry today around open standards. Worse, there's no consensus on how best to use them to achieve the larger benefits that are possible. Back in the era of blogs and wikis, we all had control of our own social media platforms. Certainly, the Web itself wouldn't exist if we hadn't defined and defended the standards that make it up. Nowadays, commercial providers provide everything in the cloud, including our friends and data, largely using their own technologies. This has led to the fragmented silos and social apps that increasingly isolate our digital activities into parochial conversational islands within our businesses and across the Web.
Read this article:
How we can create open standards for social business
Squirrel monkeys discovered the power of social networking long before the birth of Facebook and Twitter, a study has shown.
In a series of experiments, scientists identified "trendster" monkeys with the strongest social networks who were quickest to catch on to new foraging crazes.
The researchers presented the monkeys with artificial "fruits" that could be opened in one of two different ways.
A pair of alpha males from two monkey populations were each trained in a different method and then allowed to spread the word among their group mates.
Monkeys with stronger social network connections within the groups picked up the new techniques more successfully, the scientists found.
Statistical analysis showed which animals were at the "heart" of each network and which were more at the edge.
The "trendsters" at the network centre were quicker than their peripheral group-mates to learn how to open the artificial fruits.
Professor Andrew Whiten, from the University of St Andrews in Scotland, who led the research reported in the journal Current Biology, said: "Our study shows that innovations do not just spread randomly in primate groups but, as in humans, are shaped by the monkeys' social networks."
The scientists now plan to look for evidence of different "subcultures" within the monkey social networks.
"If there are subgroups within the network, then what appear to be mixed behaviours at the group level could, in fact, be different behaviours for different sub-groups - what could be called subcultures," said Prof Whiten.
See original here:
Monkeys lead way in social networks