It was going to be a glorious age. A pristine age. An age    without advertising. Social media was going to kill everything    from TV commercials to display advertisements. People were    going to 'engage' and have 'conversations' with brands instead.  
    Too bad it was completely wrong.  
    Someone might want to tell that to Adidas chief executive    Kasper Rorsted, who recently suggested that the company is        dropping television ads in favour of pursuing digital    "engagement".  
    Who do people follow on social media?  
    According to Socialbakers, here are the top US-based Facebook    pages:  
    Count the brands.  
    The top UK-based Facebook pages:  
    Count the brands.  
    According to Twitaholic, here are the top Twitter accounts in    the United States based on the number of followers specifically    there:  
    Count the brands.  
    The top Twitter accounts in the United Kingdom based on the    number of followers specifically there:  
    Who do people follow on social media? Celebrities, sports    teams, politicians and political causes, and news sources. Not    brands. For most companies, only a small percentage of current    and potential customers will want to follow them on social    media.  
    With whom do people interact on social media?  
    Here are two mental exercises. First, go and look at your past    20 actions on your personal Facebook and Twitter accounts.    Better still, look at 50 or 100. What percentage involved the    pages of brands, and what percentage involved friends, family    members, that person you secretly like and other    flesh-and-blood human beings?  
    Second, imagine yourself entering a supermarket. Ask random    people  normal people, not marketers  if they want to have a    relationship with any of the products in their shopping carts.    Theyll probably punch you in the face for being a pervert.    (Due credit: Ad Contrarian Bob Hoffmans Refrigerator Test was the inspiration for    this example.)  
    People use social media to catch up on the news, connect with    friends and family and get updates on the things with which    they have intense, personal connections such as their favorite    celebrities and sports teams. The last thing that they think    about is interacting with brands.  
    What is the reach and engagement rate of social    media?  
    As of February 2016, the average organic post by a Facebook    page is seen by only 11% of the companys followers. According    to a late 2015 Forrester report, only 0.22% of    the Facebook followers of major brands engage with organic    company posts. In other words, only 1 out of every 455    followers will see as well as 'engage' with an organic post by    a major brands Facebook page.  
    (I put engage in quotes because no one really knows the value    of online 'engagement'. If I am watching the latest episode of    Westworld, then my undivided attention is on the programme. I    am truly engaged. But if I scroll through my Facebook news feed    and like random posts that I will forget seconds later, what is    the real value of each 'engagement'?)  
    Remember: Those organic reach and engagement numbers also take    into account only the small number of consumers who have    already chosen to follow a brand. The numbers are even lower in    the context of the entire market.  
    In the United Kingdom, one has to go to number 30 in Socialbakers' list of the    Facebook pages with the most followers in the UK to reach the    first brand: Coca-Cola.  
    While a Coca-Cola Great Britain spokesperson would not divulge    the number of Britons who regularly drink Coke specifically,    the official told me over email that 46 million people in the    UK have a soft drink every day. Coca-Cola has been estimated to have a 50% market    share in the global soft-drink market, so I will use that    percentage in the following calculations  
    A similar calculation found that Oreos    famous Super Bowl tweet reached less than one percent of that    products market.  
    The common response to these points is that it is valuable to    target people who have actively chosen to follow a brand    because they 'love' it. But most of the revenue of many brands    comes from light, occasional users. I buy a small bottle of    Coca-Cola Zero every day or two  just like countless other    people  but Im not going to follow the companys Facebook    page. I want no more engagement than simply to buy a bottle    at the local kiosk every so often.  
    Seven years ago, Matt Dixon and Lara Ponomareff wrote almost    exactly that in a Harvard Business Review article on the rise    of self-service aptly entitled 'Why Your Customers Dont Want    to Talk to You':  
    Maybe customers are shifting toward self service because    they dont want a relationship with companies. While this    secular trend could be explained away as just a change in    consumers channel preferences, skeptics might argue that    customers never wanted the kind of relationship that companies    have always hoped for, and that self service now allows    customers the 'out' theyve been looking for all along.  
    How social media can actually be helpful  
    Social media will never 'create relationships' between brands    and consumers. But there is another problem that is worse than    marketers falling for that grand delusion. Bad marketers have    been spamming the world with crap marketing.  
    Digital marketers often talk about social networks in the    context of the hack-infested world of 'inbound marketing' in    which people do whatever it takes  such as     putting clickbait headlines on     useless pieces of garbage 'content'  to maximise direct    response social shares and website clicks, no matter what the    long-term brand damage will be inflicted.  
    But social media has the potential to be so much more  if only    marketers would think about it in the correct way.  
    People are never going to 'organically engage' with most    brands. The solution is simply to treat social media platforms    merely as new, additional channels over which marketers can    choose to do traditional marketing activities. After all, no    one ever said 'television marketing' or 'print marketing', so    no one should say 'social media marketing'. Its not a 'thing'.    One does not 'do social media'.  
    Its time to fix the    promotion mix by recognising and then viewing social    platforms for what they really are  additional mediums that    can be used in brand advertising, direct response marketing,    public relations, personal selling and sales promotions.  
    Using social media in the promotion mix  
    Brand advertising  
    Remember 'Back to the Future Day' in 2015? Lexus released an ad    campaign on Facebook that featured its prototype hoverboard  a    working hoverboard!  and received 14m views. That is not    'social media marketing'  it is doing brand advertising over    social media channels.  
    Direct marketing  
    You know those ads that you see in on almost all social media    networks  those 'suggested posts', sign-up forms, product    advertisements and 'click to learn more' calls to action? That    is not 'social media marketing'  it is doing direct-response    marketing over social media channels.  
    Sales promotion  
    Pizza Hut Israel is one of the few brands that I do follow on    Facebook  but only for the coupon that I see in my news feed    every week. Ill usually order Pizza Hut once every weekend. (I    have a problem.) That is not 'social media marketing'  it is    doing sales promotions over social media channels.  
    Personal selling  
    Salespeople love the telephone. But many of those conversations    start elsewhere  and sometimes they begin on social media.    That communication is not 'social media marketing'  it is    doing personal selling over social media channels. (Note that I    am talking about a flesh-and-blood person on social media. See    the next point.)  
    Public relations  
    People hate when brands 'insert themselves into conversations'    on social media. But people do talk to the real people who work    for brands. Marketers can use social media when doing media    relations, community relations and other PR work. That is not    'social media marketing'  it is doing public relations over    social media channels.  
    In the future, there will be no 'social media    jobs'  
    Traditional marketers often approach strategies in this manner:  
    1. Determine and prioritise the different activities within the    promotion mix mentioned above based on the companys goals and    objectives.  
    2. Research the targeted audience segments and develop a    specific media mix of channels over which to execute the    campaigns.  
    Today, however, too many (digital-first or digital-only)    marketers jump to 'social media' or even to specific platforms    such as Facebook or Twitter without even bothering to determine    if those channels should be used. If you ask, What are we    doing on social media? before you even ask, Should we be on    social media? then youve got a problem.  
    Its called being channel-neutral. Anyone who says that a    specific marketing channel is always important is selling    something.  
    And thats why there will be no 'social media jobs' in five    years. Advertisers will do advertising over social media.    Community relations people will do community relations over    social media such as when they host Twitter chats. Publicists    will do publicity campaigns over social media channels.    Customer service representatives will do customer support over    social media.  
    We need to separate marketing activities from marketing    channels. Activities are done over channels. In five years,    people will integrate social media channels into their existing    activities at work just as print advertisers later had to learn    how to do advertising over television.  
    Why? Imagine that a PR team wants to grow a community on    Twitter. Which is easier to do:  
    Add it up, it all spells #duh.  
    Want proof that so-called 'social media marketing' will    disappear? Earlier this year, MediaPost named BBDO as the 'social media agency of    the year' for 2016. After you parse the overly complex language    of the announcement  as Hoffman noted at the time  it turns out that the    agency won for simply running ad campaigns on Facebook.  
    MediaPost summarised with this statement: The solution:    Utilise Facebook not as a social network, but a media    channel.  
    In other words, an agency won a 'social media agency award' for    simply doing advertising over that particular channel. The    company got applause for treating a social media platform just    like how a brand would consider television.  
    Still think that 'social media marketing' is a separate and    distinctive 'thing' unto itself?  
    The Promotion    Fix is a new, exclusive biweekly column for The Drum    contributed by Samuel Scott, director of marketing and    communications for AI-powered log analysis software platform    Logz.io and a    global marketing speaker on integrated traditional    and digital marketing. Follow him on Twitter    and Facebook. Scott is based out of Tel Aviv,    Israel.  
Continued here:
'Social media marketing' is completely useless  but it could be a lot better - The Drum