Rupert Murdochs bid to snap up Sky would give him control of Sky  News and pay-TV operations in the UK, Germany, Austria and Italy.  Photograph: Al Bello/Getty Images
    Rupert Murdochs bid to take over Sky must be blocked because    it would give him too much control of news media in the UK and    he is not a fit and proper owner, according to a submission    to Ofcom from the former Labour leader Ed Miliband and the    ex-business secretary Vince Cable.  
    Miliband and Cable, outspoken    critics of Murdochs 11.7bn bid to take over Sky, have the    support of the Labour peer and barrister Charles Falconer and    of Tory father of the house Kenneth Clarke, who have put their    name to the submissions.
    The media regulator is assessing whether the takeover of Sky    raises plurality issues and whether under 21st Century Foxs    full ownership  it currently controls 39% of the pay-TV    company  broadcasting standards would be maintained.  
    Ofcom, which has until 16    May to deliver its decision to the culture secretary, Karen    Bradley, is also reviewing whether Fox is fit and proper to    take control of Skys broadcasting licence.  
    Miliband, Falconer, Clarke and Cable  who was forced to hand    over responsibility for assessing Murdochs failed 2010 bid for    Sky after telling undercover Daily Telegraph reporters that he was    at war with the media mogul  have filed two lengthy    submissions fleshing out their arguments against the deal.  
    An accompanying letter said that while the submission on    plurality concerns was comprehensive and detailed  it runs    to 61 pages  the argument against allowing Murdoch more    control of UK news media was succinctly summed up by Lord Justice    Leveson in his 2012 report into the culture, practices and    ethics of the press.
    All the politicians who gave evidence before the inquiry said    that Mr Murdoch exercised immense power and that this was    almost palpable in their relations with him, said Leveson.
    The letter said this evidence of the immense and outsized    power of the Murdochs was central to Ofcoms public interest    test, which states that the media regulator must prevent any    one media owner, or voice, having too much influence over    public opinion and the political agenda.
    Foxs bid to snap up the 61% of Sky it does not already own    would give Murdoch control of Sky News and pay-TV operations in    the UK, Germany, Austria and Italy.
    His ownership of UK news media also includes the Times, the    Sunday Times and the Sun as well as radio group TalkSport,    which he controls through a separate company, News Corp.
    The letter asserted that this would give them more control    over the viewing and reading habits in our country than any    other provider, apart from the BBC.  
    The 33-page submission raised a catalogue of issues against    Murdoch and Fox being fit and proper to take over Skys    broadcasting licence.  
    We believe on the grounds of fitness and propriety, this bid    should be blocked, the letter said. The fitness test goes to    the question of character and conduct. The record is one of    persistent disregard for the law and regulatory control.  
    During its investigation following Murdochs previous attempt    to take over Sky in 2010, Ofcom found that Sky remained a fit and    proper owner of a broadcast licence despite the phone-hacking    scandal that embroiled the now-defunct News Corporation, then    parent of Fox and Murdochs UK newspapers.
    However, it published a scathing assessment of James Murdoch,    then chief executive of his fathers UK newspaper group and    chairman of Sky, finding that his conduct had repeatedly fallen    short of the standards expected.
    The political fallout ultimately resulted in Rupert Murdoch    withdrawing his bid and James Murdoch standing down as chairman    of Sky and quitting the UK newspaper business to run Fox, the    film and TV operation, from the US.  
    We do not believe that Ofcom could be satisfied that Sky would    remain a fit and proper licensee if this bid was successful,    said the letter from Miliband, Cable and Falconer. Indeed, we    contend that no reasonable Ofcom properly directing itself on    the test it has to apply could come to this conclusion.  
    Following the failure of the previous bid, Rupert Murdoch spun    off the publishing and newspaper assets into a separate    company, News Corp, and film and TV into 21st Century    Fox, with independent boards, in part a corporate    governance measure to facilitate another tilt at Sky.  
    In a letter    to Bradley during the 10-day period she has had to review    whether to refer the bid to Ofcom, Fox argued that in the six    years since the aborted bid, the media landscape had changed    beyond recognition. Fox said media plurality was flourishing    with the rise of digital rivals such as Google and Facebook and    news distributors and new outlets such as Vice, Buzzfeed and    Huffington Post, while newspaper sales declined.  
    Fox also argues that splitting the publishing and TV and film    operations into two companies solves corporate governance,    competition and plurality issues.  
    We are confident that a thorough review of our track record    over 30 years will underscore our commitment to upholding high    broadcast standards, and will demonstrate that the transaction    will not result in there being insufficient plurality in the    UK, said a spokeswoman for Fox.  
    Opponents of the bid have raised concerns that Murdoch, who    also owns the rightwing Fox News, will use his influence to    drive the news agenda, thereby    risking the Foxification of Sky News.  
    Fox has also pledged to keep Fox News at arms length and    continue to broadcast news under the Sky brand maintaining its    excellent record of compliance with the Ofcom broadcasting    code.  
Read the original:
Ofcom must block Murdoch's Sky takeover, Miliband and Cable say - The Guardian