Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

The White House got in the game after Russia took charge of the Trump-Putin narrative – Washington Post

When President Trump shakes people's hands, the world is watching. Here's why. (Peter Stevenson/The Washington Post)

The White House allowed Russia to shape early impressions of Friday's meeting between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin but responded quickly with its own account of the session that cast Trump as the aggressor who led off by expressingconcerns about election meddling.

Putin got his version of events out first, telling Russian state media outlets that he and Trump discussed a lot ofissues such asUkraine, Syria, other problems, some bilateral issues.

We again returned tothe issues offighting terrorism and cybersecurity, Putin said.

Omitting any mention of a conversation about political interference, Putin raised the possibility that Trump hadn't brought it up during their two-hour sit-down on the sidelines of the G-20 summit in Hamburg.

But the White House did not allow that notion to hang in the air for long. Press secretary Sean Spicer gathered reporters for a news conference at which Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who was in the room, said Trump made meddling the first topic and that he and Putin had a very robust and lengthy exchange on the subject.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov then told reporters that Trump accepted Putin's assurance that Russia did not interfere in the election. An unnamed senior administration officialfollowed up by telling CNN that Trump did no such thing.

This is the messaging game. At least the White House came to play. It was not clear before the meeting that it would.

The following Associated Press report crossed the wire early Friday morning:

The Kremlin says that President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump have exchanged a handshake and a few words ahead of their sit-down at the G-20 summit.

Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that Putin and Trump shook hands and told each other that they will shortly have a separate meeting.

Note the source. The Kremlin, not the White House, notified reporters of the first face-to-face encounter between Trump and Putin ahead of their sit-down later in the day. A video posted online by the German government, which is hosting the Group of 20 summit, confirmed that Trump and Putin did indeed shake hands and exchange pleasantries.

A handshake is a pretty mundane event. There is not much opportunity for propaganda or even subtle spin in such a simple gesture. But as U.S. journalists try to learn as much as possible about the more significant interactions between Trump and Putin, it matters a great deal whether the White House or the Kremlin supplies information.

Because reporters did not witness the presidents' talks firsthand, they have to rely on the accounts of the American and Russian officials in the room. In the past, the Russian side has been more forthcoming.

Recall that the White House's official readout of a May 10 meeting between Trump and Lavrov in the Oval Office neglected to mentiontheinclusion of Russian Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak. American journalists found out about his participation through photos released by Russian state media the only media permitted to document the session.

When Tillerson traveled to Moscow in April, American reporters learned about a previously unscheduled meeting with Putin from the Kremlin. After allowing U.S. journalists to accompany him to a meeting with Lavrov, Tillerson ditched the reporters before meeting Putin at the Kremlin.

At one point during Tillerson's trip, Lavrov told reporters that the United States and Russia had agreed that the United Nations should investigate the use of chemical weapons in Syria a false claim that suggested that the administration was less than certain about whether Syrian President Bashar al-Assad did, in fact, deploy chemical weapons against his own citizens.

Russia, a Syrian ally, wanted to signal to the world that the United States had some doubts about Assad's guilt.

AState Department that regularly engages with reporters might have set the record straight immediately. Instead, 1 hour and 43 minutes passed between the AP's initial report of Lavrov's claim and a follow-up report featuring an on-the-record denial from a Tillerson spokesman.

The White House moved faster Friday.

This post has been updated.

Link:
The White House got in the game after Russia took charge of the Trump-Putin narrative - Washington Post

Levin: The media is ‘out of control,’ ‘grotesque’ – Conservative Review


Conservative Review
Levin: The media is 'out of control,' 'grotesque'
Conservative Review
Thursday evening, Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin took on the media, which once again exposed themselves as rabidly anti-Trump to the point of sheer stupidity in reacting to President Trump's speech in Poland. The media are so out of ...

Go here to read the rest:
Levin: The media is 'out of control,' 'grotesque' - Conservative Review

Meruelo Media Takes Control Of KPWR (Power 106)/Los Angeles … – All Access Music Group

Now With Meruelo

MERUELO MEDIA has officially taken control of recently acquired Top 40/Rhythmic KPWR (POWER 106)/LOS ANGELES. (NET NEWS, 5/9)

MERUELO announced that KPWR would continue to serve its listeners, fans and clients to complement MERUELOs existing programming formats and wildly popular on air talent on Rhythmic AC KDAY/LOS ANGELES and Top 40/Rhythmic KDEY (93.5 THE WILD)/RIVERSIDE. MERUELO will move its entire radio operation to KPWR's facilities in BURBANK.

MERUELO Pres. and COO OTTO PADRON commented, "Combining our three radio brands in one location is our first phase in optimizing our business. This initial move will strengthen our unique and dominant position in the Hip Hop market by maximizing resources to create a real value proposition for clients. MERUELO MEDIA has the most unique and hyper-local DNA in SOCAL. While most media companies homogenize brands in an effort to consolidate operations, we combine complementary brands in ways that celebrate their differences creating one of AMERICAs most diverse and effective multimedia platforms. Bringing these powerful LOS ANGELES brands together is a perfect harmony: POWER 106, #1 for HIP HOP for todays hottest beats and KDAY as the Classic Hip-Hop leader for Back in the Day Hits."

KPWR (POWER 106)/LOS ANGELES SVP/Market Mgr. VAL MAKI takes on a new role as MERUELO RADIO Market Mgr., taking on the responsibility of integrating MERUELO's existing portfolio of radio stations and maximizing the new, three-station cluster.

About MAKI, PADRON added, "VAL is a proven and talented broadcast veteran and the force behind the success of POWER 106. We know that under VAL's vision and leadership these very iconic LOS ANGELES radio stations will continue to grow benefiting our listeners, advertisers, and partners."

see more Net News

Original post:
Meruelo Media Takes Control Of KPWR (Power 106)/Los Angeles ... - All Access Music Group

How To Control Your Media Volume By Default – XDA Developers (blog)


XDA Developers (blog)
How To Control Your Media Volume By Default
XDA Developers (blog)
This does exactly what we're looking for here and nothing more, it just simply locks the volume control to media by default. Rocker Locker: This app doesn't use accessibility services, and that's because it's constantly playing this tone that you ...

and more »

Read more:
How To Control Your Media Volume By Default - XDA Developers (blog)

Chinese media calls for Sikkim’s ‘independence’, scrapping of ‘unfair’ Bhutan treaties – Hindustan Times

Amid the Sino-India border standoff, the Chinese official media has called for Sikkims independence and separation from India and suggested that Beijing should rally the world for the abolition of unfair treaties on sovereignty and defence that New Delhi has allegedly forced Bhutan to sign.

In an unambiguous call to incite violence in Sikkim, the state-controlled media called on Chinese citizens to fuel pro-independence movement in the Indian state bordering China and overturn Indias brutal annexation of the state.

Its near the Sikkims border with China that the Indian and Chinese border troops are locked in a standoff China alleges that Indian troops crossed into its territory in Donglang (Doklam) to disrupt the construction of a road in the area.

India is deeply concerned at the recent Chinese actions and has conveyed to the Chinese government that such construction would represent a significant change of status quo with serious security implications for India, the Indian ministry of external affairs had said on Friday.

But it has cut no ice with the Chinese. Brushing aside Indias concerns, Beijing and its strictly-controlled media have launched a well thought-out verbal offensive against New Delhi, even suggesting that China should take a fresh look at Indias annexation of Sikkim.

Read more: No plans to deny security clearance to Chinese investment amid border row: MHA

Meanwhile, Beijing should reconsider its stance over the Sikkim issue. Although China recognised Indias annexation of Sikkim in 2003, it can readjust its stance on the matter. There are those in Sikkim that cherish its history as a separate state, and they are sensitive to how the outside world views the Sikkim issue. As long as there are voices in Chinese society supporting Sikkims independence, the voices will spread and fuel pro-independence appeals in Sikkim, the nationalistic Global Times said in a brazen editorial.

The Global Times is affiliated to the Communist Party of China (CPC) mouthpiece, Peoples Daily, which is leading the media charge.

With certain conditions, Bhutan and Sikkim will see strong anti-India movements, which will negatively affect Indias already turbulent northeast area and rewrite southern Himalayan geopolitics, the newspaper wrote.

After independence, New Delhi inherited the brutal colonial policies of Britain and pursues regional hegemony at the sacrifice of tiny Himalayan nations, it said.

The newspapers call for Sikkims independence and incite trouble in the northeastern states seems to match with what Indian military, police and intelligence have often claimed that Beijing provides arms, money and logistical support to insurgent groups in the northeastern states of India, encouraging them to indulge in violence and spread unrest.

Although all the editorials and opinions published by the newspaper may not mirror the exact thoughts of the CPC, there is little doubt that the opinion pages of the newspaper are often used by Chinese authorities to send out signals, especially during diplomatic controversies with India.

And, there is no doubt that Global Times tone has certainly been hawkish on the standoff and completely aligned with what the government of China has been aggressively saying about Indias so-called transgressions.

Comparing the situations in Bhutan and Sikkim, it said: India has startling control and oppression over Bhutan, and as a result, Bhutan has not established diplomatic ties with its neighbour China or any other permanent member of the UN Security Council. Through unequal treaties, India has severely jeopardised Bhutans diplomatic sovereignty and controls its national defence.

India imposed a similar coercive policy on Sikkim before. The small neighbours revolts over sovereignty in the 1960s and 1970s were brutally cracked down on by the Indian military. New Delhi deposed the king of Sikkim in 1975 and manipulated the countrys parliament into a referendum to make Sikkim a state of India, the GT editorial said.

The annexation of Sikkim is like a nightmare haunting Bhutan, and the small kingdom is forced to be submissive to Indias bullying.

The newspaper said Beijing should lead a worldwide effort to restore Bhutans sovereignty.

China should lead the international community in restoring Bhutans diplomatic and defense sovereignty. Unfair treaties between India and Bhutan that severely violate the will of the Bhutanese people should be abolished. China needs to put more efforts into establishing diplomatic ties with Bhutan at an earlier date as well.

Go here to read the rest:
Chinese media calls for Sikkim's 'independence', scrapping of 'unfair' Bhutan treaties - Hindustan Times