Spin is spin, even when it is written by    journalists. (Image: scyther5 / iStock / Getty Images    Plus)  
    Stories like this can't be found in corporate media!    Make a tax-deductible donation to Truthout by clicking    here.  
    I first started writing articles when I was a teenager, as    one of the ways I could contribute to the movement to stop the    war on Iraq, to free the refugees from detention in Australia    and to stop a waste dump being built where I lived (one of the    poorest parts of Sydney).  
    I've been a journalist for 16 years now, writing from    Bolivia, Mexico, Venezuela, Pakistan and other countries --    aiming to center the voices of those who aren't usually heard,    and covering the other side of the story. But now, as a    freelancer in Mexico, like many journalists and writers, I'm    forced to do content writing between the journalism in order to    pay the bills. As a result, I've learned a lot about how this    huge and booming marketing industry works. I'm alarmed by how    many people don't realize the supposed blogs they're reading    are simply well-concealed marketing, and about the serious    social impact of this calculated, dollar-driven invasion of the    internet.  
    ***  
    Nearly half of millennials (43 percent) have been misled by medical    information on the internet. A recent Harris Poll found that    people tend to click the first article that comes up in a    search, even though such articles are often advertising content    aimed at selling medicine or medical devices.  
    When people aren't searching, they are often coming across such    misleading content via social media. Of the 20 most-shared    articles about cancer on Facebook last year, over half,    according to TheIndependent, contained claims discredited    by doctors and health authorities.  
    How does this misinformation make its way into widely    circulated articles? Often, it is there on purpose: Content    marketing -- corporate advertising disguised as articles,    videos and information -- is being systematically manufactured    on an industrial scale.  
    The global spend on content marketing is predicted to    reachUS$313 billionby 2019 -- around    double what it was in 2014. Companies are devoting more and    more effort to creating advertising that doesn't look like    advertising: content that consumers want to interact with, such    as blog articles, infographics, reports and studies, moving    emotional YouTube videos, social media content and "native    advertising" (ads that look like news or opinion content).  
    Content marketing aims to be useful or entertaining so that    consumers invest time reading or interacting with it -- unlike    other forms of advertising that can easily be ignored.    Companies are also mass producing content for their sites and    social media pages, as more pages mean better search engine    optimization, more visitors or social media views, and higher    brand awareness.  
    The number of "news" stories has increased by 36 percent each    year, Christopher S. Penn, VP of marketing technology with    SHIFT Communications, toldEContent. He said that in 2016, his company    expected 88 million stories to be published. "No matter how    amazing we think our content marketing is, customers are    drowning in media," he said, referring to the phenomenon as    "content shock."  
    The overall composition of internet information is shifting    toward strategically executed corporate drivel: substandard    health articles aimed at convincing readers to consume more    wine, real estate articles pretending to enable consumers with    helpful "tips" to find the house they can't afford and    emotionally manipulative Pepsi videos pretending to understand    rebellion and social justice struggles.  
    The proportions of junk food we consume affect our bodies.    Similarly, the composition of the information we're fed affects    our collective knowledge, our ability to think critically and    the focus of our collective attention.  
    The Quality of Content Marketing  
    "One's mouth becomes watery when, people around you boast of    fried foods. Weather one is male or female, young or old,    maximum people have the fondness for the shiny, greasy food,"    opens onearticleon Listovative. Though    clickbait rather than content marketing, the article showed up    at the top of two separate Google searches, showing that with    the right strategy, low quality can make it to the top.  
    Then there'sthisunsound mortgage advice with bonus    grammar mistakes on real estate site Trulia, including    oversimplified statements like, "It might be five years before    you recoup the initial costs of purchasing a home." Companies    like Trulia employ a strategy of mass production of such    content in order to attract clicks and readers. Typically, they    content farm their "blog articles" from extremely underpaid and    often inexperienced writers. Often, this means unqualified    people are producing content that provides what is portrayed as    serious health, parenting, diet and financial advice. The    content pretends to be useful for the reader, but it could in    fact be counterproductive, or even dangerous.  
    WebMD, for example, earned $561.3 million in 2016 from    advertising and sponsored content -- 79.6 percent of its total    revenue, according to itsannual report. Because the site produces    good, reliable information, it can be hard to weed out the    sponsored content, such as a depression test, sponsored by drug    giant Eli Lilly, maker of antidepressant Cymbalta. Now removed    from the site, the test gave everyone who took it the result:    "Youmay be at risk for major    depression."  
    As long ago as 2010, a Nottingham Universitystudyof health advice on the internet found    that none of the sponsored or commercial websites provided    correct medical information. A similar study from 2013 found    that in searches about sports injuries, nearly half of the top    results came from companies trying to sell something.    Theresearchers-- doctors -- had noticed    that many of their patents were coming in and, based on what    they had read online, would request medical devices that were    not appropriate for them.  
    Another type of content marketing with little integrity is    "newsjacking," where companies use trending hashtags to promote    themselves. A few of the more infamous examples of this include    designer Kenneth Cole taking advantage of the Cairo protests in    2011 andtweeting,"Millions are in uproar in    #Cairo. Rumor is they heard our new spring collection is now    available online." The Golf Channel used Martin Luther King    Day in the US totweet,"Tweet your 'golf' dream on the    anniversary of MLK's 'I have a dream' speech."  
    Meanwhile,62 percentof business-to-consumer    marketers use infographics as a tool as well, seeing that this    didactic format works well as an advertising weapon.  
    The proliferation of junk content is aided by economic    inequality. The internet is not a level playing field, and just    like in the real world, those with more money often hog the    limelight. Those companies with more money to spend on page    creation, advertising, analytics, influencers (people with high    social media followings can be paid to promote content) and    social media campaigns skip to the front. Social media signals    like retweets, shares, retweets by influencers and so on,    candrastically affecta site's Google    search ranking, and those retweets, likes and shares can be    bought through companies like Mechanical Turk or    Boostlikes.com.  
    The Business-Run Newsroom  
    On the other hand, the newsroom is being taken over directly by    corporations, with businesses boycotting traditional channels    and creating their own "newsroom" as part of their corporate    website. (For instance, Red Bull may encourage you to find out    the latest sports news by going to its site.) Meanwhile,    traditional newsrooms are using their editorial teams, or    setting up special native advertising teams, just to provide    disguised content for companies.  
    CocaCola'snewsroomincludes not    only articles about the product, but also listicles about    topics vaguely connected to the product, such as16 Things You Didn't Knowabout    Vending Machines in Japan and Around the World, and news    sections, such as community, business and innovation. Plus, the    site offers ways for consumers to participate -- by submitting    photos of their "Coke moments," for example.  
    Red Bull'sContent Poolis focused on the sports    and culture events the brand sponsors, as well as a quotes    corner, photos of the week and "premium" film and music    content. Red    Bull TVstreams similar content live.  
    Nestl,according toColumbia Journalism Review(CJR),    creates more than 1,500 pieces of content daily, with its    subsidiary, Purina, a pet food company, having its    ownanimal story site.  
    Still, there's an advantage for businesses if content they    produce (or pay for) appears to be independently produced or    published. This is where news outlets like BuzzFeed come in. In    BuzzFeed videos, people try food and products, and their    sometimes-critical responses lend credibility and interest    value to the marketing, at a time when the newer generations    are increasingly skeptical of direct advertising.CJR notesthat BuzzFeed employs a team    of 65 people to produce work on behalf of corporate clients,    while a larger team produces other editorial content.  
    The world of "native ads" is growing. Fairfax Media launched    its native advertising business, Brand Discover, in 2015, and    it has since grown from a team of three, to a full-time team    of28, plus more than 3,000freelancers.    In a campaign for the South Australia tourism authority,    Fairfax created and published over 200 content elements,    including listicles, infographics and itineraries. Time Inc.,    meanwhile, also launched its native advertising agency, The    Foundry, in 2015, and itsteam of150has since served    companies like Bank of America, Volvo, Emirates, Merrill Lynch    and California Tourism.  
    Meanwhile, many consumers struggle to tell the difference    between journalism and marketing, with nearly half of the    respondents for onesurveynot knowing what native advertising    was.  
    Fewer Journalists  
    With this mega shift towards news that is more directly    produced by (or for) corporations, journalism is changing:    Writers and journalists are expected to be able to write    advertising copy, and those writing for company "newsrooms" are    considered journalists.  
    More people are working in native advertising teams and as    content writers, and the number of actual journalists is    decreasing. In the US, the number of journalists in daily    newspapers dropped by39 percentbetween 2005 and 2015 --    from 54,100 to 32,900. In the UK, the number of journalists    dropped from70,000in 2013 to 64,000 in 2015, but    the number of UK workers describing themselves as public    relations professionals jumped from 37,000 in 2013 to 55,000 in    2015.  
    Many freelance journalists, writers and other creatives are    also being forced to turn to content writing to supplement    their income. This means journalists are writing more about    food, celebrities, tech and companies than about social justice    or global issues. On top of this, content writing can be    extremely exploitative. Sites like iWriter pay rates of $1.62    for a 300-word article, and $4.05 for a 700-word article.    Clients (in my experience) will then often read over the    finished piece, keep the text and use it, then rate the writing    low in order to not have to pay even that. Other sites like    Upwork see freelancers competing to bid the lowest for their    labor, while Upwork keeps 20 percent of the wage for itself.  
    Social Consequences of More Corporate Information and    Content  
    The digital information we have access to is increasingly    corporate-made and sponsored. Of course, collaboration between    much of the big media and the business world isn't new, but    this collaboration is increasingly pretending to be content    worth reading -- and since the internet provides infinite space    for articles, infographics and video content, we're seeing a    deluge of this type of clandestine marketing.  
    The era of sponsored content portends a vulnerable fate for the    next generation of consumers, when it comes to misinformation    and manipulation. A2016 Stanford studyof US high school    and university students found that their ability to analyze    information on the internet was "bleak" and "they are easily    duped." In one test, 80 percent of students believed native    advertising was a real story. In the example, a picture of a    homepage, the native advertising was marked clearly with the    words "sponsored content." In another test, 40 percent of    students felt that photos on their own -- without context,    explanation or coming from a reliable source (in this case,    uploaded to Imgur) -- were a reliable source.  
    Whether the content is low quality and uninformed or part of an    expensive, well-resourced and multichannel corporate campaign,    spin is spin when it comes from corporations -- and now, that    spin is dominating the information quickly available to us on    the internet.  
Continue reading here:
Journalism Is Dying and Content Marketing Is Taking Its Place (I Know Because I Do Both) - Truth-Out