Mediaboss Marketing

I dont see Democrats putting anything forward as a plan other than orange-man bad, said Vinny Papa, 54, who works as a parts manager at a car dealership in Suffolk County.

Mr. Papa, an independent voter who said he has voted for both Democrats and Republicans, said he is not a big Trump supporter, but voted for Mr. Trump because Republicans are bad, and the Democrats are a hundred times worse.

Dana Gencarelli, 35, a mother of two young children, said that she was happy with Ms. Malliotakiss lead because her top concern was public safety, a priority she said Mr. Rose did not share.

Do I always feel Republicans are doing the right thing? No, she said, as she had pizza with family outside of Leos in Bay Ridge. But right now the Democrats arent doing the right thing.

Still others, including Cameron Lory Faulds, a Bay Ridge resident who has voted for both parties in the past, voted for the entire Democratic ticket, including Joseph R. Biden Jr. as did her husband, who is a registered Republican. Her social views, she said, were key in her choice of candidates.

Im not voting for Trumps enablers, she said standing by a yard sign outside her home that read: Im a Republican but not a fool! Biden 2020.

In many cases, however, voters appeared jaded by an election cycle that devolved into one of the most bruising and divisive in recent memory. With the outcome of the election still uncertain, some voters preferred not to express their political views or say who they had voted for.

Original post:
How Defund the Police Roiled Competitive Races in New York - The New York Times

Democrats are encouraging Rep. Tony Crdenas (D-Calif.) to drop out of the race for assistant Speaker and run to lead the House Democrats 2022 campaign operation following a disappointing election night for the party, multiple sources told The Hill.

I think Tony would have a lot of support for DCCC. Maybe not automatic but a very clean shot," Rep. Filemon VelaFilemon Bartolome VelaDemocrats try to draft Cardenas to run campaign arm after disappointing night Hispanic Caucus asks for Department of Labor meeting on COVID in meatpacking plants The Hill's Campaign Report: Biden builds big lead in battleground Florida MORE (D-Texas), a close friend and fellow Hispanic Caucus member, said in an interview Thursday, referring to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Current DCCC Chairwoman Cheri BustosCheryl (Cheri) Lea BustosDemocrats' post-election 'family meeting' descends into chaos Democrats try to draft Cardenas to run campaign arm after disappointing night The Hill's 12:30 Report: How to read the battleground votes trickling in MORE (D-Ill.) has not said whether shell seek a second term leading the campaign arm. Shes focused on getting every vote counted in a number of close House races across the country that havent been called yet, DCCC spokesman Cole Leiter said.

Election night proved to be a huge disappointment for Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiBiden claims a 'mandate' to govern, calls for end to 'partisan warfare' Election scrambles prospects for next COVID-19 relief bill Overnight Health Care: Election results underscore different views on coronavirus | What could a Biden administration do on health care? | Battle lines form over coronavirus fight in lame duck MORE (D-Calif.), Bustos and their fellow House Democrats. Bolstered by positive polling and record fundraising, they had hoped to pick up anywhere from five to 15 seats, winning districts deep in Trump country. Instead, they watched as at least seven vulnerable members went down to defeat and are now on track to have a net loss of seats.

Many Democrats said they dont envision Bustos, a centrist, leading the DCCC after Tuesday nights results, particularly as her own district's politics become more complicated and she is forced to focus more energy on defending her own seat in western Illinois. The Associated Press on Thursday projected Bustos, who was leading her GOP challenger 52 percent to 48 percent, would win her race.

"What got under members' skin is the fact that she had to get bailed out. Why did we spend $1 million to bail out the DCCC chair? That's the bur under their saddle,"a former Democratic leadership aide said of Democratic super PAC spending in the race. "If this was a bad cycle for her, imagine 2022."

Crdenas, 57, is currently locked in a three-way race to replace the assistant Speaker, Rep. Ben Ray Lujn, a former chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) who won an open Senate seat in New Mexico on Tuesday night. The California Democrat is running against Rep. Katherine ClarkKatherine Marlea ClarkDemocrats try to draft Cardenas to run campaign arm after disappointing night Pocan won't seek another term as Progressive Caucus co-chair Democratic leaders: Supreme Court fight is about ObamaCare MORE (D-Mass.), the vice chairwoman of the Democratic caucus; and Rep. David CicillineDavid Nicola CicillineCivil Rights group, watchdog formally request Twitter suspend Trump's account over disinformation Democrats try to draft Cardenas to run campaign arm after disappointing night Justice Department charges Google with illegally maintaining search monopoly MORE (D-R.I.), who heads up the partys messaging arm known as the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee.

But the DCCC job could be a better fit for Crdenas, one of the Congressional Hispanic Caucuss leaders and a prolific fundraiser, some Democrats say.

At the campaign organization, the former Los Angeles city councilman would follow in the steps of Lujn, who engineered the 2018 Democratic sweep that gave the party the House majority. Some party insiders and members were initially miffed at Bustos for putting her imprint on the job, rather than just building on Lujn's work.

Crdenas is currently chairman of Bold PAC, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) campaign arm, a post that Lujn had previously held.

Bold PAC was a relatively minor operation before Lujn, mostly focused on supporting CHC incumbents in tough races. Lujn overhauled the operation in the 2014 campaign cycle, Bold PAC raised nearly $1 million, twice what it raised two cycles prior.

But Crdenas changed the face of Bold PAC entirely, raising more than $6 million for 2016, $11 million for 2018 and more than $13 million for 2020, and expanding the group's reach to support vulnerable members beyond the CHC.

Democrats who are wary of the 2020 House results see Crdenas's job at Bold PAC as a supercharged version of Lujn's role there, and hope that could translate to a DCCC expected to face a huge challenge in protecting its majority in what almost certainly will be a difficult midterm election for Democrats.

Crdenas is the name that keeps coming up by members [who think] he would be the right guy because of what he's done with Bold PAC, the former Democratic aide said.

Democrats are especially concerned about lost ground with Hispanic voters in areas like the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, where Hispanic support for Republicans grew aggressively in 2020.

Democrats were also caught off guard in two key Miami-Dade seats poached by Republicans, where Trump's consistent messaging on Latin American socialism essentially erased gains Democrats had made among South Florida Hispanics, particularly the powerful Cuban American voting bloc.

House campaigns throughout the country also suffered because favorite tactics door knocking and in-person get out the vote efforts were discarded by Democrats in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

Many Democrats view Crdenas, an advocate of the early-and-often approach to Hispanic outreach used in 2018, as uniquely poised to bring back that strategy.

Bustos, who early in her DCCC tenure was criticized for a lack of diversity in her leadership team, has said she runs the committee with a mindset of permanent engagement with voters, responding to criticism that minority voters are approached late in each cycle.

But the shock of a disappointing 2020 House election, plus concerns about Bustos's own job security amid impending redistricting, have Democrats calling Crdenas en masse to consider the campaign job.

Whether that's enough for Crdenas to mount a challenge against Bustos remains to be seen.

Crdenas, who has made no secret of his leadership ambitions, said earlier in the summer that he did not challenge Bustos out of respect, and decided to go for the assistant speakership.

Crdenas considers Bustos a friend and is unlikely to formally announce any designs on the DCCC role unless Bustos steps aside, sources said.

The former Democratic leadership aide said there's a group of members actively trying to recruit Crdenas for DCCC chair, though this source said there's been no indication that Crdenas is ready to make a jump.

"I haven't heard that Crdenas is moving. I know that members are trying to convince him that he should get into that race," the former aide said Thursday by phone, adding that many members are waiting to hear Bustos's side before outright calling for her ouster.

While a number of outstanding races remain to be called, there's already grumbling from a number of moderate Democrats that leadership botched the party's campaign message. Some have called for a leadership shake-up from Pelosi down, though the former leadership aide said those voices represent a small, if restless, minority.

"There's the usual rumbling, but I don't know if anyone's going to be willing to say, 'Hey, we need new leadership top to bottom.' I haven't heard that part," the source said. "I have heard that Bustos is sort-of the center of their energy right now."

Updated: 10:10 p.m.

View post:
Democrats try to draft Cardenas to run campaign arm after disappointing night | TheHill - The Hill

How could the electoral circumstances for the US Democrats have been more favourable? A quarter of a million Americans have died in a pandemic bungled by the incumbent president, and at least 6 million have consequently been driven into poverty. The coronavirus crisis is the devastating climax of a presidency defined by hundreds of scandals, many of which alone, in normal circumstances, could have destroyed the political career of whoever occupied the White House.

Despite having the active support of almost the entire US press, Joe Bidens victory looks to be far narrower than predicted. During the Democratic primaries, Bidens cheerleaders argued that his socialist challenger Bernie Sanders would repel Floridas voters, and yet Donald Trump has triumphed in the sunshine state. They argued that his unelectable rival would risk the Senate and down-ballot races, yet the Republicans may retain control of the Senate, and Democrats are losing seats in the House of Representatives.

Without coronavirus, Trump would have undoubtedly secured another term and potentially dismantled an already flawed US democracy for a generation or more. This should have been a landslide, and now the world will pay the cost for the self-inflicted wounds of the Democratic establishment. Trump may be defeated; Trumpism lives on.

While attention should now focus on resisting attempts by Trump and his allies to steal the election, the Democratic establishment must also understand why this entirely avoidable farce came to pass. As their phones lit up four years ago with notifications that he had become the 45th president of the American republic, Trump was, to self-styled Democratic moderates, a sudden hurricane that materialised under clear blue skies: an aberration; a glitch; a perverse accident to be undone so normality and civility could be restored.

Many Democrats comforted themselves with the notion they had nothing to answer for: they had simply been cheated, Russia was to blame, and Hillary Clinton whose hubristic campaign had initially wanted Trump as its preferred Republican nominee had been tragically wronged. Rather than offering an inspiring alternative, Biden would bask in the reflected glory of Barack Obama, present himself as the grownup in the room, and focus on flipping erstwhile Trump voters on the grounds of competence alone. Striking, then, that not only did Trump win more votes than 2016, but 93% of Republicans opted for him this time around, up three points from that fateful election.

Ample criticisms can be made of Bidens candidacy, which limited its political horizons in deference to the Democrats corporate client base, when even Fox News exit polls showed that most Americans favoured a government-run healthcare plan. Democrats have taken Latino and black Americans for granted, an oversight that Trump ably exploited, winning (albeit from low numbers) increased support among both groups. But the roots of this failure go back decades. The Democratic establishment has long refused to embrace even the basic tenets of social democracy not least taxing the better-off to fund programmes such as a comprehensive welfare state and universal healthcare.

The political consequences of this failure have been devastating. In the 1960s, the Democratic president Lyndon B Johnson launched a series of great society programmes to tackle poverty. Yet while the tax burden of the average American family nearly doubled between the mid-1950s and 1980, taxes on corporate America have been successively slashed. Here was a resentment to be tapped into: that hard-working Americans, rather than the boss class, were subsidising those demonised as the undeserving poor.

This fury became racialised as the struggle of black Americans which was met with harsh white backlash forced the federal government to introduce basic civil rights. When Ronald Reagan furiously denounced welfare queens, many blue-collar workers heard a dog whistle targeting often single black mothers, who their hard-earned tax dollars were supposedly subsidising. When Bill Clintons administration backed trade agreements that devastated industrial jobs in the rust belt, here was another grievance waiting to be mined. And it was, by the most unlikely figurehead, the former host of the Apprentice. Trumpism has exploited racism, and fury at economic grievances, successfully welding both forces together.

In the aftermath of the financial crash, Obamas presidential campaign appeared to offer a break with the failures of successive Republican and Democratic administrations. But while he rescued the banks and let financial executives off the hook for their role in the 2008 crash, wages for millions of Americans stagnated or declined. While the slice of national income belonging to middle Americans fell from 62% to 43% between 1970 and 2018, the number of billionaires has surged: from 66 in 1990 with a combined wealth of $240bn, to 614 today, with a total fortune of nearly $3tn. America is now a society in which one in every 11 black adult is either in prison, or on parole or probation racial injustices that Black Lives Matter has urgently underlined.

The Democratic establishment has proved itself politically bankrupt and unable to meet these challenges. The party lost against Trump in 2016, and has at best scraped a stillborn administration this time around. We will all pick up the tab for this failure. Although Biden committed to signing the worlds biggest polluter back up to the Paris climate accords, a failure to win the Senate will block a Green New Deal that is desperately needed to tackle the existential threat of the climate emergency. The world cannot afford another four years of inaction. With Bidens likely presidency held hostage by a potentially hostile Senate and supreme court, the Republicans will be able to further gerrymander an already fatally compromised democratic system and, come mid-terms, tap into peoples disillusionment with an inevitably do-nothing government.

That does not mean there is no hope. The so-called Squad of progressive Congressional Democrats whose most famous member is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has doubled in number, including the election of former nurse Cori Bush in Missouri and the first queer black Congressman, Mondaire Jones, in New York. The old Democratic establishment has failed to inflict the final reckoning on Trumpism that is deserved. It falls to this new generation of progressive leaders predominantly working-class people of colour to finish the job, not just for the United States, but for all of us.

Join Guardian journalist Owen Jones, Labour MP Dawn Butler and academic Maya Goodfellow as they discuss the hostile environment and attitudes towards immigration in Britain. Tuesday 24 November, 7pm GMT Book tickets here

More:
Even if Biden wins, the world will pay the price for the Democrats' failures - The Guardian

Democrats are forecast to keep control of the U.S. House after Tuesdays elections, but with at least six incumbents losing their seats and others in jeopardy Republicans have likely chipped away at their majority.

Among the Democrats defeated were several elected in the 2018 blue wave that swept the party into the House majority, as well as with Agriculture Chairman Collin Peterson, who has represented his Minnesota district since 1991. There were 13 other Democrats trailing or in tight races in Pennsylvania, New York, Michigan, Iowa, Virginia and California.

With the losses and the failure to flip targeted GOP seats in Illinois, Ohio and Texas, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will have less room to maneuver and will face questions from House Democrats about her strategy and priorities leading up the election.

Democrats also are on the verge of failing in their quest for a Senate majority meaning, they might have to shelve their most ambitious plans for health care, fighting climate change and responding to the coronavirus epidemic.

Its not over until every vote is counted, Pelosi told supporters, pointing to races in her home state of California and elsewhere in the western U.S. that havent yet been called.

WATCH: Were all there for the people and to have a strategic plan to be successful. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says shes confident Democrats will continue to hold Congress.

business: https://bloom.bg/2TR2UcP #Election2020 (Source: QuickTake)

More from Election

In addition, Pelosi will be facing more pressure from the left. New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez easily won re-election and will be joined by several more self-described progressive members, including Jamaal Bowman, Mondaire Jones and Ritchie Torres in New York, and Missouris Cori Bush, who are replacing more centrist Democrats.

Democrats took over the House after they netted 41 seats in the 2018 midterm elections, the largest single-year pick-up since the post-Watergate midterms of 1974. But some of those new Democrats were among the partys losers Tuesday.

In Florida, Democratic Representative Debbie Mucarsel-Powell was defeated by Republican Carlos Gimenez, the mayor of Miami-Dade County. Democrat Donna Shalala, former Health and Human Services secretary, lost to Republican Maria Elvira Salazar, a broadcast journalist. Both districts have large Latino populations.

Read More: Democrats Chances for Senate Majority Diminish After GOP Wins

Three other first-term Democrats lost on Tuesday as well. Oklahoma Democratic Representative Kendra Horn conceded in her contest against Stephanie Bice, though the race had not been officially called. And South Carolina Democrat Joe Cunningham lost to Republican challenger Nancy Mace. New Mexicos Xochitl Torres Small lost to Republican Yvette Herrell.

Democrats picked up two formerly GOP seats that had been redistricted in North Carolina.

Part of House Democrats pre-election optimism came from the number of GOP retirements and the defeat of some Republican incumbents in primaries.

But Republicans held the seat opened up by the retirement of GOP Representative Francis Rooney in Florida. The winner of that contest, Byron Donalds, will be the only Black Republican in the House. Another open race in Texas for a Waco-area seat now held by retiring Republican Bill Flores was won by former House Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions, who had been defeated in his old Dallas area district in 2018.

Pelosi, the only woman ever to hold the speakers gavel, has already said she plans to run for re-election as speaker in the next Congress. House Democrats return on Nov. 18 and 19 to Washington, along with their members-elect, to elect leaders for the new session in January. That includes nominating a speaker who must then be elected by the full House of Representatives.

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.

See the article here:
Election Results: Democrats Holding House Majority, But Lose Several Incumbents - Bloomberg

Topline

Former Vice President Joe Bidens remark during the final presidential debate that he would transition away from the fossil fuel industry was met with heavy pushback not only from Republicans who instantly identified the remark as Bidens weak point of the night but vulnerable Democrats as well.

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE - OCTOBER 22: Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden ... [+] answers a question during the second and final presidential debate at Belmont University on October 22, 2020 in Nashville, Tennessee. This is the last debate between the two candidates before the election on November 3. (Photo by Morry Gash-Pool/Getty Images)

Asked by President Donald Trump during the debate if he would close down the oil industry, Biden replied: I would transition from the oil industry, yes which Trump called a big statement.

Biden said his rationale was that the oil industry pollutes significantly and has to be replaced by renewable energy over time, adding that he would stop giving them federal subsidies.

Trump expressed glee about the comment which seemingly confirmed his common claim that Biden is against oil asking: Will you remember that Texas? Will you remember that Pennsylvania? Oklahoma?"

Rep. Kendra Horn (D-Okla.), one of the most endangered House Democrats, affirmed Trumps reaction, calling Bidens stated position one of the places Biden and I disagree, and declaring: We must stand up for our oil and gas industry.

Another vulnerable freshman Democrat, Rep. Xochitl Torres Small (D-M.N.) warned against demonizing the industry and stated she would continue to stand up to my party when theyre out of touch with the reality on the ground.

Biden attempted to walk back the comment later in the night, telling reporters he meant a transition from government subsidies for the industry, stating: Were not getting rid of fossil fuels for a long time probably 2050, and claiming nobody in oil would lose their jobs because a lot more jobs are going to be created in other alternatives.

Democrats, Republicans and Independents know that the U.S. natural gas and oil industry delivers affordable and reliable energy to American families and businesses and all over the world, the American Petroleum Institute said in a statement following the debate. We are proud of the grit, innovation and progress we've made so that Americans no longer have to choose between environmental progress and access to affordable, reliable and cleaner energy. And we arent going anywhere.

Biden's comment about transitioning from oil isn't the game-changer some of you believe it is, argued Politico chief political correspondent Tim Alberta. We've been transitioning from oil for 50 years. Voters see that in their everyday lives w/ industries utilizing new green tech. Biden didn't say anything tonight he hasn't said before.

5 points. Thats the size of Bidens lead in Pennsylvania, a pivotal battleground state, in the RealClearPolitics average. He trails by 4 points in Texas, a state Democrats hope to net but is unnecessary for an electoral college win for them. A Morning Consult poll of 799 Pennsylvania voters, conducted in June and July on behalf of API, found that 80% of Pennsylvania voters say gas and oil provide some value or a great deal of value to them personally. 67% said oil and gas would be a part of Americas energy needs 20 years from now.

The Biggest Falsehoods Of The Final Trump-Biden Presidential Debate (Forbes)

Go here to see the original:
Vulnerable Democrats Break With Biden Over Transition From Oil Industry - Forbes