Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

House Democrats have passed hundreds of bills. Trump and Republicans are ignoring them – Vox.com

Theres a pervasive sense of legislative paralysis gripping Capitol Hill. And its been there long before the impeachment inquiry began.

For months, President Donald Trump has fired off tweet missives accusing House Democrats of getting nothing done in Congress, and being consumed with impeachment.

Trump may want to look to the Republican-controlled Senate instead. Democrats in the House have been passing bills at a rapid clip; as of November 15, the House has passed nearly 400 bills, not including resolutions. But the House Democratic Policy and Communications Committee estimates 80 percent of those bill have hit a snag in the Senate, where Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is prioritizing confirming judges over passing bills.

Congress has passed just 70 bills into law this year. Granted, it still has one more year in its term, but the number pales in comparison to recent past sessions of Congress, which typically see 300-500 bills passed in two years (and that is even a diminished number from the 700-800 bills passed in the 1970s and 1980s).

Ten of those 70 bills this year have been renaming federal post offices or Veterans Affairs facilities, and many others are related to appropriations or extending programs like the National Flood Insurance Program or the 9/11 victim compensation fund.

This has led to House Democrats decrying McConnells so-called legislative graveyard, a moniker the Senate majority leader has proudly adopted. McConnell calls himself the grim reaper of Democratic legislation he derides as socialist, but many of the bills that never see the Senate floor are bipartisan issues, like a universal background check bill, net neutrality, and reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.

From raising the minimum wage to ensuring equal pay, we have passed legislation to raise wages. And we have passed legislation to protect and expand health coverage and bring down prescription drug prices, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said in a statement to Vox. We continue to urge Senator McConnell to take up our bills, many of which are bipartisan.

McConnell is focused on transforming the federal judiciary instead, with the Senate confirming over 150 of Trumps nominees to the federal bench. And he has refused to bring Democratic bills to the Senate floor in part to protect vulnerable Republican senators from having to take tough votes that could divide the GOP ahead of the 2020 election. Still, some Senate Republicans fear inaction could make them just as vulnerable.

Im very eager to turn from nominations to legislation, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) recently told the New York Timess Carl Hulse. There are important issues that are pending, and I think we could produce some terrific bills that would be signed into law.

Lately, Republicans and Trump are accusing Democrats of single-mindedly pursuing impeachment at the detriment of passing bills.

Again, the more accurate picture is that Democrats have been passing a lot of bills in addition to investigating the president. But split control of government and Trumps fury at being investigated by Democratic committees paralyzed Washingtons legislative functions well before impeachment proceedings began in the fall.

Back in May, Trump was blasting Democrats for not making enough progress on infrastructure, health care, and veterans issues. His complaints intensified after an explosive White House meeting on infrastructure between Trump and Democrats the day before, which the president walked out of.

Their heart is not into Infrastructure, lower drug prices, pre-existing conditions and our great Vets, Trump tweeted. All they are geared up to do, six committees, is squander time, day after day, trying to find anything which will be bad for me.

Months later, the presidents complaints remain the same. He recently tweeted, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, AOC and the rest of the Democrats are not getting important legislation done, hence, the Do Nothing Democrats.

Trump isnt the only one with a perception that very little is happening in Congress. Congresss approval rating is a dismal 24 percent, with 72 percent disapproval, according to Gallup.

During the Republican-controlled Congress in 2017 and 2018, the two major legislative accomplishments of McConnell, Trump, and House Speaker Paul Ryan were a massive GOP tax cut and a bipartisan criminal justice reform bill in 2018. The very end of Ryans time as speaker also saw Trump drive a government shutdown that continued into Pelosis tenure in 2019.

Since Democrats took control of the House, the few things theyve been able to agree with Senate Republicans on include a bill to reopen the federal government after a three-week shutdown, a resolution to end US involvement in the war in Yemen (which was vetoed by Trump), and a disaster aid agreement. But other big-ticket items Democrats hoped to achieve, like an infrastructure package and a prescription drug bill, have yet to be passed.

As we near the end of the year, much of the media focus will continue to be on impeachment. House Democrats will also be focused on a vote on a major bill to lower prescription drug costs (something Trump has said is a priority for him), the Voting Rights Advancement Act, and the National Defense Authorization Act.

Just because impeachment is the main story in Washington doesnt mean policy work isnt happening. It just means it isnt getting talked about as much, and that the president a figure who could apply pressure on McConnell to take up some of the bipartisan legislation currently gathering dust has other priorities.

Given the Senate could soon be consumed by an impeachment trial, the remaining weeks of 2019 could be the final opportunity for lawmakers in the upper chamber to advance legislation. However, there are no signals that Republican Senate leaders will seize that opportunity.

House Democrats have passed a wide range of bills since they came to power in January, ranging from a sweeping anti-corruption and pro-democracy reform known as H.R.1, to bills to save net neutrality, pass universal background checks for guns, and reenter the United States into the Paris climate accords.

They have also put a large emphasis on health care, a defining issue of the 2018 election after Trump and Senate Republicans attempted to pass a bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. Democrats have focused on bills to lower prescription drug costs, protect preexisting conditions, and condemning the Trump administrations legal battle to strike down the ACA in the courts. And although Medicare-for-all is driving the conversation in the 2020 presidential primary, it has not gotten a vote in the House.

Much of this agenda is sitting in the Senate. There have been a few things House Democrats and Senate Republicans have agreed on: disaster relief aid, reopening the government after the shutdown, the resolution to end US involvement in the Yemen war, a bill to protect public lands, and a resolution disapproving of Trumps use of emergency powers.

But on major policy issues like health care and infrastructure, or even bipartisan ones like net neutrality, the Equal Pay Act, or even a simple reauthorization of the longstanding Violence Against Women Act Democrats bills are continuing to languish in the Senate. House Democrats are expecting to take up House Resolution 3, a major health care bill to lower the cost of prescription drugs, before the Christmas break. Although were not going to list all 400 bills for brevitys sake, heres a list of major bills and resolutions the House has passed so far.

View post:
House Democrats have passed hundreds of bills. Trump and Republicans are ignoring them - Vox.com

Takeaways from the 5th Democratic 2020 presidential debate – Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) Democrats spent more time making the case for their ability to beat President Donald Trump than trying to defeat each other in their fifth debate.

Civil in tone, mostly cautious in approach, the forum on Wednesday did little to reorder the field and may have given encouragement to two new entrants into the race, Mike Bloomberg and Deval Patrick.

Key takeaways:

IMPEACHMENT CLOUD HOVERS

The impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump took up much of the oxygen early in the debate.

The questions about impeachment did little to create much separation in a field that universally condemns the Republican president.

The candidates tried mightily to pivot to their agenda. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren talked about how a major Trump donor became the ambassador at the heart of the Ukraine scandal and reiterated her vow to not award ambassadorships to donors. Former Vice President Joe Biden tried to tout the investigation as a measure of how much Trump fears his candidacy.

Impeachment is potentially perilous to the Democratic candidates for two reasons. A Senate trial may trap a good chunk of the field in Washington just as early states vote in February. It also highlights a challenge for Democrats since Trump entered the presidential race in 2015 shifting the conversation from Trumps serial controversies to their own agenda.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders warned, We cannot simply be consumed by Donald Trump, because if you are youre going to lose the election.

___

OBAMA COALITION

Perhaps more than in any debate so far, Democrats explicitly acknowledged the importance of black and other minority voters.

California Sen. Kamala Harris said repeatedly that Democrats must reassemble the Obama coalition to defeat Trump. Harris, one of three black candidates running for the nomination, highlighted black women especially, arguing that her experiences make her an ideal nominee.

Another black candidate, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, added: Ive had a lot of experience with black voters. ... Ive been one since I was 18.

Neither Booker nor Harris, though, has been able to parlay life experiences into strong support in the primary, in no small part because of Bidens strong standing in the black community.

Bidens standing also is a barrier to other white candidates, including South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who is surging in overwhelmingly white Iowa but struggling badly with black voters in Southern states like South Carolina that have proven critical to previous Democratic nominees.

Buttigieg acknowledged as much, saying he welcomes the challenge of connecting with black voters in America who dont yet know me.

The exchanges show that candidates seemingly accept the proposition that the eventual nominee will have to put together a racially diverse coalition to win, and that those whose bases remain overwhelmingly white (or just too small altogether) arent likely to be the nominee.

___

CLIMATE CRISIS GETS AIR

The climate crisis, which Democratic voters cite as a top concern, finally gained at least some attention.

There were flashes of the debate Wednesday night, as billionaire environmental activist Tom Steyer swiped at Biden by suggesting the former vice president wants an inadequate, piecemeal approach to the crisis. Biden hit right back, reminding Steyer that he sponsored climate legislation as a senator in the 1980s while Steyer built his fortune in part on investments in coal.

Buttigieg turned a question about the effects of Trumps policies on farmers into a call for the U.S. agriculture sector to become a key piece of an emissions-free economy.

But those details seem less important than the overall exchange or lack thereof. Perhaps its the complexities of the policies involved. Or perhaps its just the politics. Whatever the case, the remaining field simply doesnt seem comfortable or willing to push climate policy to the forefront, and debate moderators dont either.

___

HEALTH CARE GROUNDHOG DAY

Before every debate, Democratic presidential campaigns aides lay out nuanced, focused arguments their candidates surely will make on the stage. And every debate seems to evolve quickly into an argument over health care.

So it was again. Within minutes of the start, Warren found herself on the defensive as she explained she still supports a single-payer government run insurance system Medicare for All despite her recent modified proposal to get there in phases. Not to be outdone, Sanders reminded people that hes the original Senate sponsor of the Medicare for All bill that animates progressives. I wrote the damn bill, he quipped. Again.

Biden jumped in to remind his more liberal rivals that their ideas would not pass in Congress. The former vice president touted his commitment to adding a government insurance plan to existing Affordable Care Act exchanges that now sell private insurance policies.

The debate highlights a fundamental tension for candidates: Democratic voters identify health care as their top domestic policy concern, but they also tell pollsters their top political priority in the primary campaign is finding a nominee who can defeat Trump.

The top contenders did nothing to settle the argument Wednesday, instead offering evidence that the ideological tug-of-war will remain until someone wins enough delegates to claim the nomination.

___

DID YOU HEAR THE ONE ...

The debate was so genial that some of the most memorable moments were the candidates well-rehearsed jokes.

Asked what hed say to Russian President Vladimir Putin if hes elected to the White House, technology entrepreneur Andrew Yang said his first words would be, Sorry I beat your guy.

Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar drew laughs for an often-repeated anecdote about how she set a record by raising $17,000 from ex-boyfriends during her first campaign. She also pushed back at fears of a female candidacy by saying, If you think a woman cant beat Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi does it every day.

Booker, criticizing Biden for not agreeing to legalize marijuana, said, I thought you might have been high when you said it.

And Harris may have issued the zinger of the night at the president when discussing his nuclear negotiations with North Korea: Donald Trump got punked.

___

GABBARD AS GADFLY

Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has carved out a distinctive role during the Democratic debates reliable gadfly.

On Wednesday she kept sniping at her own party, standing by her comments last month that its last presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton, is the personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long.

Asked to elaborate, Gabbard said Democrats are no longer the party that is of, by and for the people, it is a party that continues to be influenced by the foreign policy establishment in Washington, by the military-industrial complex.

Gabbards fondness for slamming Democrats has led some in the party to fear shes laying the groundwork for a third-party run, something the congresswoman denies. Her criticism Wednesday drew a sharp riposte from Harris, who said Gabbard had been on Fox News full-time during President Barack Obamas administration and noting she met with Trump after the presidents election.

Gabbard dismissively replied that Harris response only makes me guess that she as president will continue the status quo. She later tangled with Buttigieg, contending he had supported sending U.S. troops to Mexico, a charge that reduced him to disbelieving chuckles.

Gabbard made the stage due to the burst of attention she got after getting into her fight with Clinton. Wednesdays exchange showed how she can easily stay before the cameras while criticizing her own party.

The Trump campaign was quick to embrace the fight, tweeting out Gabbards slamming of her party.

___

Catch up on the 2020 election campaign with AP experts on our weekly politics podcast, Ground Game.

Read this article:
Takeaways from the 5th Democratic 2020 presidential debate - Associated Press

They Voted Democratic. Now They Support Trump. – The New York Times

His main priority is voting for the person whos going to get more done thats why he stuck with the Democrats in the midterms but at the national level, he said, the Democrats have disappointed him on that front.

If youre going to Washington, you need to do something, he said. If the only thing youre going to do the whole time youre there is try to get rid of the president, thats a problem. I mean, Trump is not a great person, but youve got to get some work done.

Other voters say they are preparing to take an even greater leap: vote for Mr. Trump after supporting Democratic congressional candidates in 2018 and Mrs. Clinton in 2016.

In the survey, 7 percent of those who supported Mrs. Clinton in 2016 said they now approved of the presidents performance despite his personality and his Twitter account, many said.

In 2016, I hated both candidates, said Juli Anna California, 57, a nurse from Coral Springs, Fla. I went with Hillary because Trump had no history as a politician.

Mr. Trump has convinced her, though not with his character, but with his policies.

Hes not exactly the person Id have as my best friend, said Ms. California, who currently lives in Los Angeles as a traveling nurse. But hes a great president. Most politicians just talk about doing things, but Trump does them.

Scott Will, 51, an equipment operator in Ligonier, Pa., also voted for Mrs. Clinton in 2016, and will vote for Mr. Trump next year. So will much of his family, union workers who had been die-hard Democrats. Mr. Will, who started college but left to get married before graduating, credits Mr. Trumps trade deals and pledge to bring jobs back to the United States.

Continued here:
They Voted Democratic. Now They Support Trump. - The New York Times

Democrats just might reelect Trump, and they’ll have no one to blame but themselves. – USA TODAY

Glenn Harlan Reynolds, Opinion columnist Published 5:00 a.m. ET Nov. 27, 2019

All Democrats have to do is be marginally reasonable, and they can't even do that. They shouldn't be surprised when another election passes them by.

If President Donald Trump is re-elected next November, hell owe a lot of his victory to the army of activists working tirelessly to put him over the top. No, Im not talking about the red-hatted MAGA crowd, tireless as they are. Im talking about the army of leftist activists whose nonstop craziness is moving moderates into the Trump column day by day.

Anti-Trump conservative Rod Dreher sharesa letter from a reader who notes the unpersoning of feminist Posie Parker (her crime: not believing that transwomen are women)and the recent attacks on the Salvation Army and writes: I have never voted for a Republican for president, and I cant stand Trump. But the 'Tolerant Left'is making me so angry with them that I am thinking of voting for him. Since I live in Massachusetts the Electoral College makes it irrelevant, but it would be a protest vote.

Likewise, since the Democrats the-mountain-labored-and-brought-forth-a-mouse impeachment circus began, Trump has moved to a net-positivein one poll, picked up a lot of moderate votersand moved into the lead in swing states like Wisconsin.The assault on Trump brings to mind the old saying about wrestling with a pig you get dirty, and the pig likes it.

All the Democrats had to do was not be crazy, and they couldnt even do that. They started out after the last election demanding that Donald Trump not be normalizedas president and then proceeded to act as abnormally as possible. Weirdly,this strategy seems to be backfiring.

The conventional wisdom has always been that when you lose an election you accept it thereby showing your loyalty to the American system and endeavor to show the voters that youre worthy of being elected next time. That involves working with the other party where you can, to show that you put the good of the country first, and acting sensible and responsible the rest of the time.That, to put it mildly, is not the approach the Democrats have chosen.

Mission High School students Hope Robertson, left, and Cat Larson yell as they protest with other high school students in opposition of Donald Trump's presidential election victory in front of City Hall in San Francisco, Thursday, Nov. 10, 2016. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu) ORG XMIT: CAJC116Protestors in San Francisco on Nov. 10, 2016.(Photo: Jeff Chiu/AP)

The current impeachment clown show was not made more credible by the fact that his opponentsbegantalking impeachment even before President Trump was sworn into office.

Nor has the endless talk of Trumps opposition as the Resistance,as if 2019 America were equivalent to France in 1940, done a lot for credibility. When much of the opposition to Trump comes across as fantasy role-play by people who didnt get enough validation in high school, it robs the entire enterprise of its seriousness.

Get real: If 2020 Democrats want to beat Trump, they shouldn't ignore moderates and indulge the left

Weve been told repeatedly that Trump is Hitler, even as he backed Israel in the UN and moved the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.Weve been told that Trump is a Putin puppet even as he soldanti-tank missiles to Ukraine(something Obama never did)and championed frackingin the United States, the success of which has done more to weaken Putin than anything the Obama/Hillary reset ever managed. (You could make a better case that the current Democratic candidates who vow to ban fracking are Putin puppets than you could for Trump.)

And even beyond the resistance, the left in general seems determined to move as many moderates into the Trump camp as possible. In left-leaningHoward County, Maryland, the school board adopted a 1970s style busing programover the objections of constituents.This despite the fact thatcomments on the bill were overwhelminglynegative. The board then scolded the community for its opposition.

All over the country, universities are going crazy over anonymous fliers that read, simply, Its okayto be white.This, were told, is a hate crime, and theFBI is investigatingto find the perpetrators.

At this years Harvard/Yale gameclimate protesters took over the field and delayed play.As double Ivy League alumnus (Dartmouth and Yale) Roger L.Simonwrites, the level of idiocy there is making him think we should abolish the Ivy Leagueas unserious.In the middle of this year's Harvard-Yale game, the greatactivistesspewed out onto the field to demand, what else, action on climate change delaying the game for over an hour. But all these Ivy League smarty-pants couldn't come up with a slogan more original than 'Hey hey, ho ho, fossil fuels have got to go.' Who'd they learn that from, their grandparents? Decades ago, during Vietnam, it was 'Hey hey, ho ho, LBJ has got to go.'"

They want to take the party too far left: Progressive Democrats let their 'policy freak flags' fly

Like I said, its fantasy role-play, in this case by people sad that they were born too late for the 1960s. Anyway, if you care about climate, you should be protesting outside the Chinese embassy China is addingvast numbers of new coal-fired power plantsunlike the United States, which has actually seen carbon emissions dropthanks to fracking.

I could go on and on, but pretty much any random days survey of the news makes my point. The conventional, sensible way to beat Trump would have been to demonstrate the sort of sensible, competent, non-threatening approach that would win over moderate voters. The Democrats and the left have chosen a different approach. Lets see how it works out for them, but if they lose, itll be because their activists were actually working on behalf of the very man they purport to hate.

Glenn Harlan Reynolds, a University of Tennessee law professor and the author of "The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself," is a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/11/27/democrats-reelect-donald-trump-blame-far-left-liberals-column/4292960002/

See the rest here:
Democrats just might reelect Trump, and they'll have no one to blame but themselves. - USA TODAY

Senate Democrats reveal new digital privacy bill that would strengthen the FTC’s enforcement powers over tech companies – CNBC

Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington and ranking member of the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, makes an opening statement during a hearing in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Top Democratic senators revealed a new online privacy bill Tuesday that could mark a milestone in the lengthy push for a federal privacy law and would strengthen the Federal Trade Commission's ability to enforce digital privacy protections.

Washington Sen. Maria Cantwell, the top Democrat on the Senate Commerce Committee, is leading the charge for the new bill as Congress has struggled to come to a consensus on what to include in federal privacy legislation.

Cantwell in a press release likened the bill's protections to "Miranda rights" for digital consumers. The bill would grant citizens the right to request their information from companies and ask for data to be deleted or corrected. It would also make companies responsible for getting permission to collect and share sensitive data, which includes biometric information and precise locations. Companies must not collect more information than they reasonably need to function under the bill's proposals.

Cantwell's legislation addresses two sticking points in privacy discussions that may stir up pushback from Republicans and tech companies. The proposal would allow for states to continue to issue their own privacy laws and give citizens a private right of action to bring their own lawsuits. The Commerce Committee is set to discuss privacy legislation proposals at a December hearing.

"The legislation released today reflects where the Democrats want to go," said Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., the chairman of the Commerce Committee, in a statement. "But any privacy bill will need bipartisan support to become law. I am committed to continuing to work with the ranking member and my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to get a bill that can get across the finish line. I expect that we will have a bill to discuss at next week's hearing."

Cantwell's bill, which is also sponsored by Sens. Ed Markey, D-Mass., Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, is not the first privacy bill to be floated in Congress. In the House, for example, two Silicon Valley congresswomen recently introduced a bill that goes beyond some of the measures in California's new privacy legislation. California's privacy law goes into effect in January and may serve as a testing ground for privacy ideas on the federal level.

The new Senate bill, dubbed the "Consumer Online Privacy Rights Act" or "COPRA" is significant because of Cantwell's standing on the Commerce Committee, which is heavily involved in tech issues. The committee has held hearings on automated vehicles, cybersecurity and social media in the wake of Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal. It also has oversight of the Federal Communications Commission.

The proposal would also further strengthen the Federal Trade Commission, which has been ridiculed by Democrats over its privacy settlements with Facebook and Google's YouTube this year, which some claimed were too weak to prevent further wrongdoing. Rather than create a new federal agency, as the Democratic House bill proposes, Cantwell's legislation would create a new bureau within the FTC to handle digital privacy enforcement. The bill mandates that bureau be fully staffed and operational within two years of its enactment.

State attorneys general could also enforce the federal law, as well as their state laws. Relief under the federal legislation would funnel into a consumer relief fund, according to the proposal.

The bill also places greater responsibility on company executives to ensure their adherence to digital privacy protections. Beginning one year after the law's enactment, CEOs of companies that hold large amounts of data would have to certify to the FTC on a yearly basis that they have "adequate internal controls" and reporting structures to comply with the law.

For tech companies, federal privacy legislation has been a top priority as Congress' stalemate has motivated states to take the matter into their own hands. Tech leaders have warned of the potential for fragmented platforms if states continue to impose varied standards, which would likely be more costly and less efficient for companies to comply with. Cantwell's proposal would not necessarily provide the relief tech companies have been looking for, as it would still allow states to enact and enforce their own privacy laws.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been among the tech leaders urging congressional leaders to move forward on federal regulation. Zuckerberg met with several representatives in September to discuss "future internet regulation" in closed-door meetings, a Facebook spokesperson said at the time.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

WATCH: Why Facebook's business model is only now coming under fire

Read more:
Senate Democrats reveal new digital privacy bill that would strengthen the FTC's enforcement powers over tech companies - CNBC