Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Could Democrats Win the House in November? History Says No.

There are a number of reasons the Democrats will almost certainly not win back the House of Representatives in 2014: Congressional redistricting after the 2010 Census favored the Republicans. The GOP has a small army of well-heeled incumbents on the fall ballot. And this years primaries did not roil the waters; they sent only three Republican House members (and one Democrat) to the sidelines.

But arguably the most compelling factor working against House Democrats is history. They need a net gain of 17 seats in November to reach a majority of 218. That, in itself, is not a particularly daunting number.

But it is when one looks at the midterm election results of the past century and a half.

Only four times since 1862 has the presidents party netted a gain of even one House seat in a midterm election. And in no midterm since the Civil War has the net gain by the presidents party exceeded nine seats, barely half of what the Democrats would need to win control of the House next month. This, according to data published in Vital Statistics on American Politics 2011-2012.

On all four of these occasions that the presidents party scored midterm House gains, the occupant of the White House was near the height of his popularity: Theodore Roosevelt in 1902, when the GOP posted midterm gains after the House had undergone a major expansion; Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1934, his first midterm held in the initial stages of the New Deal; Bill Clinton in 1998, when congressional Republicans made an ill-starred attempt to impeach him; and George W. Bush in the 2002 midterm, which was held between the 9/11 attacks and the launch of the war in Iraq.

Barack Obamas position these days is much weaker. His presidential approval rating is well under 50%, down in the arid terrain where the presidents party invariably loses House seats.

To be sure, no one is predicting huge House losses for the Democrats this timethey dont have that many vulnerable seats left after losing 63 in 2010. But hardly anyone is predicting that they will win a House majority next month either. If you find someone who does, take the bet. History says that it should be a safe one.

Rhodes Cook is a political analyst and publisher of a bimonthly political newsletter.

RELATED IN THINK TANK:

How Would a Narrow Republican Majority Pass Its Agenda?

More here:
Could Democrats Win the House in November? History Says No.

Why Democrats may keep the Senate

Every serious politico is baffled by the polling on this falls elections, in which Democratic Senate candidates across the country are doing a remarkable job of hanging in despite the general consensus that under conventional circumstances this would be a wave year for Republicans.

It should be a wave, experts say, because a) President Obama has a very low approval rating, b) a huge majority of Americans says the country is on the wrong track and c) more Americans say its time to replace their own representatives than ever before in modern history.

The issue environment, as they say, also works against the Democrats. ObamaCare remains unpopular. The world is in chaos, and Obamas foreign policy appears inept at best. There hasnt been a good piece of news out of Washington in God only knows how long.

Meanwhile, in the realm of electoral politics, the GOP has cleaned up its act. In 2010 and 2012, Republican efforts to capture the Senate fell short thanks to the profound weaknesses of certain GOP candidates, who self-destructed spectacularly.

Thats not the case this year, when by common consent Republicans have a pretty remarkable slate of candidates across the country.

Even in Minnesota, a state where the GOP has little hope, Sen. Al Franken faces a first-rate challenger in businessman Mike McFadden, who whomped Franken in a debate last week.

Speaking of debates, I watched one between Colorado Democratic Sen. Mark Udall and challenger Cory Gardner, in which it would not be hyperbole to say Gardner wiped the floor with the incumbent.

This race is emblematic of the improvement in the Republican Partys overall approach in 2014.

Gardner, a dynamic House member, only secured his partys nomination when the Colorado GOP cleared his path by ensuring his congressional seat would be Ken Bucks for the taking.

Buck, a social-conservative darling in a purple state, had lost a race for Senate he shouldve won in 2010 and likely wouldve lost again this year.

Originally posted here:
Why Democrats may keep the Senate

Gina Raimondo and RI Democrats Misleading Voters Yet Again… – Video


Gina Raimondo and RI Democrats Misleading Voters Yet Again...
Paid for by the Rhode Island Republican Party Not authorized by any candidate or candidate #39;s committee.

By: Rhode Island Republican Party

See the original post here:
Gina Raimondo and RI Democrats Misleading Voters Yet Again... - Video

How Republicans, Democrats Will Spin the September Jobs Report – Video


How Republicans, Democrats Will Spin the September Jobs Report
Oct. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Bloomberg #39;s Peter Cook reports on the jobless rate in the U.S. and how the political parties may see the numbers. He speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television #39;s...

By: Bloomberg News

Read more here:
How Republicans, Democrats Will Spin the September Jobs Report - Video

Liberal democrats your party is over hope you enjoyed it – Video


Liberal democrats your party is over hope you enjoyed it
The artist taxi driver.

By: chunkymark

See the article here:
Liberal democrats your party is over hope you enjoyed it - Video