Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Vaccination and Censorship: The Truth Will Set Us Free – TideWater Latest News

This article was beforehand revealed February 6, 2021, and has been up to date with new info.

On December 22, 2020, a nonprofit restricted firm primarily based in Great Britain that calls itself the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH)1,2,3 revealed a report titled The Anti-Vaxx Playbook.4

It incorporates false and deceptive details about the Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination, which was sponsored by the 39-year-old U.S. nonprofit instructional charity the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), and held on-line in October 2020. Promotion of the CCDH report resulted within the spreading of pretend information and misinformation by mainline media shops in Great Britain and the U.S.5,6,7,8,9

NVICs pay-for-view digital convention10 was transparently open to the general public and featured displays by 51 audio system from the U.S. and different nations discussing vaccine science, public well being coverage and regulation, knowledgeable consent and civil liberties.

Dedicated to Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century, the convention was made obtainable on February 2, 2021 at no cost viewing on-line. Go to NVIC.org11 to entry the convention web site and watch all the displays.

Influence Watch, which screens people and teams that affect12 public coverage, describes CCDH as a London-based advocacy group that targets accused hate groups and individuals for de-platforming campaigns to remove them from major social media outlets and has ties to the left-wing British Labour Party and British left-progressivism.13

The anonymously funded CCDH additionally has an workplace in Washington, D.C. and the defamatory publicity marketing campaign created in December 2020 was designed to not solely discredit NVICs four-decade public document of working throughout the U.S. democratic system to safe vaccine security and knowledgeable consent protections in public well being insurance policies and legal guidelines, however to destroy our small charity.

The misinformation marketing campaign was spearheaded by the CEO of CCDH, whos a political operative14 personally affiliated with Great Britains socialist Labour Party.15,16,17

The report deceived readers by describing NVICs 2020 convention as a gathering recently held in private over three days, which implied secrecy,18 despite the fact that the occasion was transparently open to the general public identical to the 4 earlier vaccination conferences NVIC hosted in 1997, 2000, 2002 and 2009.19

One British tabloid learn the report and described NVICs public convention as a private conference call the place secret plans had been plotted to launch the largest ever misinformation campaign about vaccines.20

Last summer time, CCDH revealed their first report alleging that Big Tech corporations working social media platforms make large income by permitting people and organizations criticizing vaccine science, coverage and regulation to message on their platforms,21 and will take stronger motion to censor on-line public conversations about vaccination that dont conform with the scientific consensus that vaccines are safe.22,23

That July 2020 report was promoted by mainline media shops in Britain24,25,26,27 and the U.S.28 However, CCDHs report revealed 5 months later in December 2020, which created faux information and misinformation about NVICs convention, contained much more inflammatory rhetoric.

It demonized these who criticize vaccine security as malignant actors,29 and CCDH demanded that corporations and governments nearly eradicate people or teams publishing info on-line that fails to align with authorities and trade narratives about vaccination and public well being coverage.

In that report, CCDH ordered Big Tech corporations and governments to censor and punish dissenters, charging that anything less than the dismantling of these individuals profiles, pages and groups and permanent denial of service, now they know what is happening, is willing acquiescence.30

On January 18, 2021, the anonymously funded CCDH as soon as once more publicly attacked the National Vaccine Information Center, this time for making use of for a U.S. Paycheck Protection Program mortgage to safe the continued employment of NVICs 21 employees throughout large nationwide unemployment brought on by lockdowns.

The British nonprofit firm appeared to counsel that the U.S. authorities mustnt have been viewpoint-neutral in granting reduction loans, however ought to have utilized an ideological litmus take a look at to NVICs mortgage request that was made to retain workers throughout catastrophic financial hardship brought on by lockdowns which have affected donations to charities.31

CCDH CEO Imran Ahmed stated, Lending money to these organizations so they can prosper is a sickening use of taxpayer money.32 Once once more, mainline media shops in Britain and the U.S. extensively promoted CCDHs allegations.33,34,35,36,37

Six months of orchestrated public assaults on NVIC by CCDH have generated hate mail to our small charity, which was based and has been led by dad and mom of vaccine-injured youngsters for 4 a long time.38

I used to be born into a post-World War II technology within the U.S., a technology identified for difficult the established order and exercising the suitable to dissent, which is protected underneath the U.S. Constitution.39

Whether it was advocating for the suitable to take heed to rock n roll and becoming a member of antinuclear protests in the Fifties,40,41 or marching in help of civil rights and opposing an undeclared warfare in Asia within the Sixties,42,43 or ladies combating for equal alternative and pay and shopper activists working for environmental safety and automobile security legal guidelines within the Seventies,44,45,46,47 or moms protesting towards drunk drivers48 and selecting a drug-free beginning and breastfeeding for his or her infants within the Nineteen Eighties,49,50 the child boomer technology has been identified for exercising freedom of thought and speech.

Contentious social, political and well being problems with the Twentieth century sparked heated debates on faculty campuses,51 the place college students might nonetheless discover, critique and brazenly seek for fact, and in mainline newspapers, magazines and radio and tv stations, the place level/counterpoint examination of controversial subjects was the hallmark of fine journalism as a result of public debate is the hallmark of free speech.

The America the place I grew up within the mid-Twentieth century was a beacon of hope for folks residing behind the Iron Curtain52 and in different totalitarian or authoritarian societies,53 the place train of freedom of thought, speech and conscience and the suitable to dissent and peacefully assemble and petition the federal government for redress of grievances had been eradicated, the place folks had been became silent indentured servants working to serve a small ruling class answerable for the state.54

Statists, who consider that financial management and planning should be within the arms of a extremely centralized authorities,55 are at all times afraid of the reality, afraid that folks armed with information will act collectively to problem management of the state by a strong and privileged few.

I was in junior highschool when President John F. Kennedy addressed the American Newspaper Publishers Association in 1961. He stated:56

Without debate, with out criticism no administration and no nation can succeed and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a criminal offense for any citizen to shrink from controversy.

And thats the reason our press was protected by the First Amendment the one enterprise in America particularly protected by the Constitution not primarily to amuse and entertain, to not emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, to not merely give the general public what it needs however to tell, to arouse, to replicate, to state our risks and our alternatives, to point our crises and our selections, to guide, mould, educate and generally even anger public opinion.

He closed with these phrases:

So it is to the printing press to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help, man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.

That speech given 60 years in the past was a ringing endorsement for freedom of the press. Yet, within the twenty first century, its changing into clear that there are political operatives and firms in search of to censor freedom of thought and speech by citizen journalists publishing evaluation and perspective on the worldwide net, an digital communications community that has been the worlds greatest discussion board at no cost speech over the previous quarter century.57,58

The proper to dissent59 and train freedom of thought, speech and conscience60 is underneath assault in America,61 despite the fact that these cherished civil liberties are codified into the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution. And civil liberties are underneath assault internationally in different nations with consultant democracies, as effectively.62

Today, political operatives are pressuring authorities, media firms and different establishments to eradicate freedom of speech, particularly public conversations about vaccine science, coverage and regulation.63,64,65

Spirited public debate about vaccine security and obligatory vaccination legal guidelines has been occurring for greater than two centuries.66,67 What is the justification for censoring that public dialog now and punishing those that interact in it with financial and social sanctions?68,69

And if the public dialog about vaccination and well being could be censored, what subject would be the subsequent one placed on the no fly listing?70,71

Im a co-founder and president of the extremely rated nonprofit instructional charity established in 1982 and identified at this time because the National Vaccine Information Center.72,73 Our mission is to stop vaccine accidents and deaths by public schooling. NVIC doesnt make vaccine use suggestions. We advocate for the human and authorized proper to make knowledgeable and voluntary choices about vaccination with out being coerced or punished for the choice made.74

Our not-for-profit charitable group was established for one motive: We had been moms and fathers of youngsters mind injured by the extremely reactive pertussis vaccine in the DPT shot and we needed a safer pertussis vaccine to interchange the one which had damage our youngsters. That objective was completed after 14 years of shopper advocacy when a much less reactive acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine was licensed for infants within the U.S. in 1996.75

We additionally needed dad and mom to have entry to correct and full details about the dangers and issues of each illnesses and vaccines earlier than youngsters are vaccinated, so dad and mom and pediatricians might work collectively to establish these youngsters whore extra inclined to vaccine reactions and shield their well being.

That is why we labored with Congress to safe vaccine security informing, recording, reporting and analysis provisions within the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, a regulation by which the U.S. authorities formally acknowledged for the primary time that vaccine security needs to be made a nationwide precedence as a result of federally licensed and really helpful and state mandated childhood vaccines can and do trigger everlasting accidents and even dying for some youngsters.76,77,78

We arent all the identical. We dont all react the identical option to pharmaceutical merchandise,79,80,81 which is why our group has strongly supported analysis into genetic, epigenetic, environmental and different danger components that make some people extra inclined to adversarial responses to vaccination.82,83

We consider each life is essential, and that the lives of these harmed by vaccines and infectious illnesses needs to be equally valued and guarded.

We consider that shopper advocacy has and will proceed to play an lively position in holding pharmaceutical corporations and authorities businesses accountable for vaccine product security, and were devoted to working responsibly throughout the democratic system of this Constitutional Republic to make well being coverage and regulation safer and simpler for everybody.84,85,86

Since 1988, I and different NVIC representatives have served as shopper members of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee, FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines, Vaccine Policy Analysis Collaborative and different federal and state public engagement initiatives discussing vaccine science, coverage and regulation points with vaccine builders, federal and state well being officers, medical commerce and pharmaceutical trade representatives, and members of different nonprofit organizations.87,88,89

My 22 years of service as a shopper member on federal advisory committees and public engagement initiatives contains 4 years as a member of the Institute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Forum on the National Academy of Science, the place I helped to coordinate public workshops on vaccine science, coverage and regulation points90 and was an editor for the report on Risk Communication and Vaccination revealed by the National Academy Press. That report importantly said:91

The objective that each one events share concerning vaccine danger communication needs to be knowledgeable determination making. Consent for vaccination is really knowledgeable when the members of the general public know the dangers and advantages and make voluntary choices.

The dialogue of obligatory vaccination on the workshop advised that it could intervene with knowledgeable consent and will injury belief and deter efficient communication, and thus must be rigorously weighed towards its advantages.

We consider the human proper to freedom of thought, speech and conscience needs to be revered, not devalued. As public well being rules and legal guidelines are being created through the coronavirus pandemic to limit or eradicate civil liberties,92 we needs to be encouraging folks to have civil conversations about vaccination, well being and autonomy. Americans needs to be welcomed by legislators to take part in not be shut out of the democratic regulation making course of.93

When folks really feel disenfranchised and consider that these in energy dont care about their lives or the lives of their youngsters, thats when belief in authorities is misplaced and other people let worry, anger and despair management their actions. Empowering folks with information and the hope they may help impact significant change in the event that they do it in a rational and constructive method has at all times been certainly one of NVICs guiding rules.94

I need to thank the beneficiant sponsors and attendees of the Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination: Protecting Health and Autonomy within the twenty first Century, who helped to make it financially potential for NVIC to host a digital convention final fall.95

The convention had been scheduled for 2 years to be held in October 2020 in a lodge within the Washington, D.C. space. When journey and social distancing restrictions had been enacted within the spring of 2020, we had to choose between canceling the convention or pivoting to a pay-for-view on-line public convention.

We selected to carry the convention on-line as a result of we knew that the controversial points being debated within the public sq. this yr wanted a public discussion board the place well-anchored info and perspective may very well be introduced.

We owe a debt of gratitude to the greater than two dozen principled and brave scientists, physicians, holistic well being professionals, authors, attorneys, religion leaders, dad and mom of vaccine injured youngsters and civil and human rights activists, who signify various areas of experience and took part in our convention.96

No matter what number of political operatives, firms and establishments threaten and attempt to discredit NVIC and our work as a way to silence us, we is not going to abandon our 40-year mission devoted to stopping vaccine accidents and deaths by public schooling and defending the moral precept of knowledgeable consent. We are shifting ahead with religion and resolve that we will safe a future for America that protects well being and autonomy within the twenty first century.

Because we all know that if the state can tag, monitor down and pressure people towards their will to be injected with biologicals of identified and unknown toxicity at this time, then therell be no restrict on which people freedoms the state can take away within the identify of the higher good tomorrow.

Be the one who by no means has to say you didnt do at this time what you may have executed to alter tomorrow. Its your well being. Your household. Your alternative. And our mission continues. No compelled vaccination. Not in America.

Source link

Link:
Vaccination and Censorship: The Truth Will Set Us Free - TideWater Latest News

Letter to the Editor: Censorship in reporting on RSU 9 board Meetings Daily Bulldog – Daily Bulldog

It seems we the public are only told of what certain people want printed. For example, it was never reported that the board voted unanimously to move the central office out of the high school to an undesignated location for thirty-two to thirty-four months and up to thirty-eight hundred dollars per month rent. This was to be paid by ESSR Funds, free covid money, so you know what happens next. There have been no estimates of cost of renovation to the high school, so what will this ultimately cost us. They also voted unanimously to have the superintendent enter into a contract with Ms. McCalmon to facilitate strategic planning, again with no mention of how much money would be involved. It was also stated by the board chair at the last meeting there is no state law on public comment at a board meeting. Obviously the havent read Title twenty A subsection 1001, 20, in duties of a schoolboard. They talk about transparency. Hard to be transparent when all the windows are painted black. No light in, you cant see out. I believe we will be hit with the construction of a new building in the near future. What do you think that will cost to build and maintain? I have said before you need to pay attention or the costs in this district will soar, especially when all the positions and other items paid with free money runs out.

Craig StickneyChesterville

View original post here:
Letter to the Editor: Censorship in reporting on RSU 9 board Meetings Daily Bulldog - Daily Bulldog

FX Censors Controversial Family Guy Scene Featuring The Simpsons – ComicBook.com

Two animated comedies that are always pitted against one another are Family Guy and The Simpsons. The latter turned FOX into must-see television on Sunday nights, leading the way for the creation of the network's "Animation Domination" animated block of programming. Family Guy, created by Seth MacFarlane, is arguably the second biggest animated hit for FOX behind The Simpsons. So naturally, both shows like to take not-so-subtle jabs at each other, though one such occurrence has been censored by the FX Network for a controversial scene.

The Family Guy scene in question comes from Episode 2 in Season 6, titled "Movin' Out (Brian's Song)." It begins with Peter, Lois and Brian together in the family living room. Lois is chastising Brian for using a woman only for sex, and believing he is above that type of behavior. As this speech is taking place, a banner appears at the bottom of the screen promoting "The Simpsons Sundays on FOX" with a miniature Marge Simpson waving to the audience. Okay, nothing out of the ordinary so far. However, Quagmire quickly returns and tackles Marge from behind. Quagmire then proceeds to kiss all over Marge's face while she tries to push him off of her, eventually pummeling him with her fists.

At one point during their struggle, Quagmire unbuckled his pants. This gives Marge just enough of an opening to kick him away, allowing her to run off while Quagmire trots after her with his pants around his ankles. Keep in mind Peter, Lois and Brian are still holding a conversation in the background, but at this point, no one is paying attention to their dialogue as all eyes follow Marge and Quagmire. Once they run off-camera, the banner for The Simpsons disappears and we hear Brian mention how he'll invite Gillian to move in with him. Now Marge and Quagmire re-enter, with the Family Guy trio now noticing them at the bottom of the screen. Apparently, Quagmire was successful in his sexual pursuit of Marge, and they walk off together to pick up Round 2 at The Simpsons' residence.

The FX censorship cut out the entire Simpsons and FOX logo graphic at the bottom of the screen, including the Marge/Quagmire altercation. Those watching on FX miss out on Round 2, where Homer walks in on the two of them in bed together (off-camera). We only see the outside of the Simpsons house, as Quagmire uses a gun to murder Homer, Bart, Lisa and even Baby Maggie when they each walk into the bedroom.

Comedy was at a much different place in September 2007, which is when "Movin' Out (Brian's Song)" originally aired. Television shows could get away with including sexual misconduct for laughs, but with the #MeToo movement and women stepping forward to call out sexual predators, it doesn't make sense for FX to air that segment of the episode as-is. Examples of networks and streaming services pulling other controversial content includes Netflix removing episodes and scenes from Community and The Office that included blackface.

When it comes to Family Guy and The Simpsons, which series is your favorite? Let us know in the comments section below.

Read the original here:
FX Censors Controversial Family Guy Scene Featuring The Simpsons - ComicBook.com

One from the road: Fact-checking on Facebook – who is the authority and why? – Pratt Tribune

Ron Moore| St. John News

My cousin Robin shared a video from Nurse Nicole Whitley on Facebook. I thought it had some good information so I shared it. Soon after that, Facebook shut down the video and wrote on the post, "False information. Check by independent fact-checkers". I decided to read what the fact-checkers had to say.

First they said that Nurse Whitley didn't show any proof that she was a nurse. What proof do we have that says that these fact-checkers are who they say they are? We are to take their word that they have a degree in fact-checking.

The fact-checker next wrote that Nurse Whitley video was first released on Dr. Sebastian Gorka Facebook page. What does this have to do with the video? Dr. Gorda was a military and intelligence analyst who served as Deputy Assistant to President Trump. Those independent fact-checkers have a bias and hate for President Trump and anyone who worked with and for him. Now you can see where this is heading.

Nurse Whitley said that Ivermetcin, a drug that is safe and highly effective, can not be found in the US. This is a preventive drug and my daughter asked her doctor about it and was told that if they could get it, it would be months away. Maybe Nurse Whitley knows something.

She showed charts and graphs where the drug was administered in areas of Peru. The number of cases were reduced drastically from other areas that didn't use the drug. The fact-checkers said this was a purely correlation observation, and correlation alone doesn't mean that there is a casual relationship between the two.

They went on to say that Nurse Whitley failed to account for other factors, such as lock downs, mask wearing, and physical distancing. Where are the facts that this had happened? This is a correlation on their part that they believe is right.

Nurse Whitley went on to say that the PCR test is unreliable. It is a sensitivity test where they can set cycle thresholds in order to detect the presence or absence of a virus. The creator of the PCR test said that this is not a diagnostic and not to be used for that and yet, they are.

The fact-checkers said that this test doesn't have a false positive and if it is, it's possible that it was contaminated by other samples with the virus during the handling. I wonder if Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh thinks the test is accurate? He tested positive and isn't showing any signs of illness. His family tested negative. Have you seen the Cologuard commercial? They always mention there could be a false positive result. You don't think that the scientists didn't try to make a perfect test?

Nurse Whitley then said on January 20th, inauguration day this year, the World Health Organization reduced the testing cycle. I remember hearing that it went from 50 cycles to 30 cycles. According to my own research offact-checkers, this did not happen. It was in a blog by virologist Ian Mackay. He reminded the laboratory staff to read the instructions and understand the purpose of testing. Do you remember hearing this last January?

I could go on with more about fact-checking but this isn't about the facts. It's about censorship. They are nothing but a very biased group of people that will censor you if you don't believe what they do. It's not happening only on Facebook but innewspapers as well. Many of the large conglomerate holdingswill use the fact-checker or sensitivity groupsto keep articles out of print that don't agree with their perspective. It has happened and it will continue.

I wonder if this article will make it out to the public. Let me know if you see it!

* Ron Moore is an over-the-road truck driver based in Stafford County, Kansas. He is a grandfather, husband, rural community supporter and writer.

Read more:
One from the road: Fact-checking on Facebook - who is the authority and why? - Pratt Tribune

Oklahoma Sued By ACLU Over Concerns Of Censorship On Critical Race Theory Topics – news9.com KWTV

A house bill that passed this spring is now coming under fire by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) over concerns it censors some topics in public schools.

When House Bill 1775 went into emergency effect this summer, it was unclear what impact the legislation would have on Oklahoma classrooms.

The bill was passed along party lines by Republican lawmakers who sought to limit conversations about race or gender at public schools.

Now the ACLU cites specific examples in its lawsuit against the state saying the broad language in the law chills free speech and violates the states education standards.

The harm is coming from how broadly the bill is written, how confusing the language is, and how steep some of the consequences are for violating that very broad language, said Megan Lambert, ACLU of Oklahoma Legal Director.

Lambert said educators are removing content on race and gender out of an abundance of caution, because community members can have their credentials pulled for violating the law, through a complaint process thats open to the public.

Edmond Public Schools is named in the suit for cancelling diversity trainings and changing its booklist to follow guidance from the bill.

The district removed books by women and Black authors, like To Kill A Mockingbird, A Raisin In The Sun, Their Eyes Are Watching God, I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings, and Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglas.

Anthony Crawford, an English teacher at Millwood Public Schools,is one of the plaintiffs. He said the law is unclear to teachers and contradicts the Oklahoma Education Standards.

Everything they are telling us we cannot teach is in the Oklahoma Standards, he said.

Crawford said he is concerned about the harsh penalties to teachers.

I was scared. Im not going to lie to you. I was petrified, I got a daughter on the way, so I was really scared, he said.

But, without being able to teach about themes like systemic racism or diversity, he said students will be unprepared as adults.

Without that piece of information, without that history, then they will go into the real world blindsided, Crawford said.

At the Capitol, some are standing by the law.

Secretary of Education Ryan Walters said in a statement the bill ensures students are taught an honest depiction of the past and knows teachers can teach that without prejudging those who are responsible for our future.

There were several other states that passed similar bills during spring of 2021 seeking to ban a concept called critical race theory, even though the concept isn't taught in K-12 schools or well-defined in K-12 settings.

The ACLU said Oklahoma's restrictions are the most severe.

Read the complaint in full below.

Read the rest here:
Oklahoma Sued By ACLU Over Concerns Of Censorship On Critical Race Theory Topics - news9.com KWTV