Mediaboss Marketing

Stack Overflow, the popular online community for programmers, is seeking to revitalize its platform by integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into its services. This new AI offering, called OverflowAI, aims to provide developers with access to the vast amount of knowledge and expertise contained in the platforms 58 million community questions and answers.

The integration of OverflowAI will take place through an extension into Visual Studio Code, allowing developers to access validated content directly from Stack Overflow without leaving their Integrated Development Environment (IDE). The AI-powered extension will provide personalized summaries, solutions, and the ability to document new learnings and solutions, all within the IDE.

While other similar extensions, such as GitHub CoPilot, already exist, Stack Overflows CEO, Prashanth Chandrasekar, emphasizes that OverflowAI offers additional benefits. It can ensure the accuracy and trustworthiness of the AI-generated content by leveraging the vast Stack Overflow community.

In addition to the IDE integration, Stack Overflow is introducing StackPlusOne, a chatbot that integrates with Slack. This chatbot utilizes AI to provide answers to questions using data from both the users Stack Overflow for Teams instance and the wider community.

The platforms search capabilities have also been upgraded with the introduction of semantic search, which utilizes machine learning to understand the relationship between words. This approach allows users to ask questions naturally, similar to how they would ask a friend, and receive relevant results.

OverflowAI will also introduce enterprise knowledge ingestion, allowing users to curate and build their own knowledge base using existing trusted content. Stack Overflow is further expanding its offerings in AI by creating a community centered around AI tools and a collective focused on discussions related to natural language processing (NLP) in AI and machine learning.

With these advancements, Stack Overflow aims to enhance the quality and trustworthiness of its data while expanding its user base and becoming a go-to destination for developers and experts in the field. OverflowAI is currently in the alpha phase and is expected to be ready for full production within the next 12 months.

See the article here:
Stack Overflow Adds Artificial Intelligence to Improve Developer ... - Fagen wasanni

My buddy, Art Aloe, was laughing into his beer when I walked into the bar. Im just enjoying the AI predictions used to scare us about the future. Did you see the front page of the Indianapolis Star Friday the 28th?

Yes, I said.

Wasnt that a great headline: AI to place 140K Indianapolis jobs in danger? Art said.

Yeah, I said. Thats from something called Chamberofcommerce.org. Its some kind of scare monger. They once did a story titled, Data reveal loneliest cities in America. It was just a recitation of census data on one-person households. People who live alone arent necessarily lonely.

And the precision, Art chuckled, 140,000 jobs, but no timeline.

Yeah, I said. Exactly what my colleague at IU often said: Give em a number or give em a date, but not both.

And, Art said, many experts tell youngsters to get more education to confront the future.

Yet the next day, I added, the highly respected Pew Research Center says the greater the level of education, the more likely AI will replace workers.

Ah, Art sighed, in this age of entertainment, if you wish to amuse, just confuse. It works as well for experts as for politicians.

Indeed, I agreed. Howey Politics ran a story from the appropriately named Insider Monkeys 25 Poorest States report. This farcical piece of misused data identifies Bloomington as the poorest city in Indiana and one of the poorest in the nation.

Of course it is, I continued. While the report uses education attainment of those 25 and older, it uses all households to determine poverty.

Art quickly took over: Thats like comparing Brussels sprouts and plums because of similarity in shape. Bloomington has many student and young person households. If they used households of those 25 and older, theyd get a far different picture.

Here I noted the egregious failure to adjust pensions of retired Indiana state workers with an appropriate inflation measure. But Art came back with a failure of Congress worse than the ignominious inaction of the Indiana Legislature.

The most obvious way to avoid a crisis in Social Security, Art said, is for Congress to raise the cap on the level of earnings being taxed. Right now that cap is $160,200 per year. That means more than 20% of all earnings go untaxed for Social Security, but only about 7% of workers make more than the cap.

You want to tax high income earners? I asked. Wont that strangle productivity, destroy creative activity, eliminate entrepreneurship, and repress get-up-and-go-ism?

No, he replied. It means more earnings for attorneys and accountants to figure out additional ways to avoid earnings and get income by other means, like capital gains and dividends.

Nah, I objected. Those jobs will go to AI, leaving todays law and accounting students out in the cold.

Morton Marcus is an economist. Reach him at [emailprotected]. Follow his views and those of John Guy on Who Gets What? wherever podcasts are available or at mortonjohn.libsyn.com. Send comments to [emailprotected].

Here is the original post:
Morton Marcus: Artificial intelligence and the artful use of data - The Republic

The Australian government is facing several challenges as it seeks to regulate artificial intelligence (AI), according to experts. These challenges include the potential loss of jobs to countries with looser regulations, the need to rein in the power of tech companies, and addressing biased data.

The Labor Party is currently working on a policy position and framework for the use of AI within Australia, which will become part of its national platform. The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) has also called for the establishment of a national body to regulate AI policies.

Dr. Dana McKay, a senior lecturer at RMIT University, notes that there is growing interest in promoting the ethical use of AI language models in Australia and around the world. This includes considerations such as fair compensation for content creators in relation to music and images.

Currently, there is no specific regulation governing the use of AI language models in Australia. However, the federal government has introduced voluntary guiding principles for businesses to responsibly design, develop, and implement AI solutions in the workplace.

One potential challenge in regulating AI is the risk of job automation leading to companies outsourcing work to countries with fewer restrictions. Dr. McKay argues that rather than banning automation, regulation should be based on principles.

Australia has already encountered resistance from tech companies when it introduced the News Media Bargaining Code earlier this year. This raises concerns that if multinational organizations are not based in Australia, the governments authority to regulate them may be limited.

The challenges facing Australia in regulating AI are not unique, as the European Union also plans to introduce its own AI Act by the end of the year. This Act includes significant fines for companies that put peoples safety at risk through the use of AI, among other provisions.

Addressing biases in AI models is another important issue. Guidelines in Australia currently do not specifically tackle biases in the training data used for generative AI. This lack of attention to biases can have harmful consequences, such as AI systems making decisions that disproportionately affect certain groups.

Ultimately, finding the right balance in regulating AI is crucial. Dialogues and discussions are necessary to understand the opposing views and determine what will work best for Australia. In addition to regulation, considerations must be given to the moral and ethical implications of using public data for commercial purposes and the rapid development of these technologies.

Originally posted here:
The Challenges of Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Australia - Fagen wasanni

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been making notable strides in various fields, but its struggles with accuracy are well-documented. The technology has produced falsehoods and fabrications, ranging from fake legal decisions to pseudoscientific papers and even sham historical images. While these inaccuracies are often minimal and easily disproven, there are instances where AI creates and spreads fiction about specific individuals, threatening their reputations with limited options for protection or recourse.

One example is Marietje Schaake, a Dutch politician and international policy director at Stanford University. When a colleague used BlenderBot 3, a conversational AI developed by Meta, to ask who a terrorist is, the AI incorrectly responded by identifying Schaake as a terrorist. Schaake, who has never engaged in any illegal or violent activities, expressed concerns about how others with less agency to prove their identities could be negatively affected by such false information.

Similarly, OpenAIs ChatGPT chatbot linked a legal scholar to a non-existent sexual harassment claim, leading to reputational damage. High school students in New York created a deepfake video of a local principal, raising concerns about AIs potential to spread false information about individuals sexual orientation or job candidacy.

While some adjustments have been made to improve AI accuracy, the problems persist. Meta, for instance, later acknowledged that BlenderBot had combined unrelated information to incorrectly classify Schaake as a terrorist and closed the project in June.

Legal precedent surrounding AI is limited, but individuals are starting to take legal action against AI companies. In one case, an aerospace professor filed a defamation lawsuit against Microsoft, as the companys Bing chatbot wrongly conflated his biography with that of a convicted terrorist. OpenAI also faced a libel lawsuit from a radio host in Georgia due to false accusations made by ChatGPT.

The inaccuracies in AI arise partly due to a lack of information available online and the technologys reliance on statistical pattern prediction. Consequently, chatbots may generate false biographical details or mash up identities, a phenomenon referred to as Frankenpeople by some researchers.

To mitigate accidental inaccuracies, Microsoft and OpenAI employ content filtering, abuse detection, and other tools. These companies also encourage users to provide feedback and not rely solely on AI-generated content. They aim to enhance AIs fact-checking capabilities and develop mechanisms for recognizing and correcting inaccurate responses.

Furthermore, Meta has released its LLaMA 2 AI technology for community feedback and vulnerability identification, emphasizing ongoing efforts to enhance safety and accuracy.

However, AI also has the potential for intentional abuse. Cloned audio, for example, has become a prevalent issue, prompting government warnings against AI-generated voice scams.

As AI continues to evolve, it is crucial to address its limitations and potential harm. Stricter regulations and safeguards are necessary to prevent the spread of false information and protect individuals from reputational damage.

Here is the original post:
Artificial Intelligence's Struggles with Accuracy and the Potential ... - Fagen wasanni

Exploring the Epsilon-Greedy Algorithm: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in AI Decision-Making

The power of artificial intelligence (AI) lies in its ability to make intelligent decisions based on vast amounts of data. One of the most critical aspects of AI decision-making is striking the right balance between exploration and exploitation. This is where the epsilon-greedy algorithm comes into play. The epsilon-greedy algorithm is a simple yet powerful approach to balance exploration and exploitation in AI decision-making, and it has been widely adopted in various applications, such as reinforcement learning, recommendation systems, and online advertising.

The epsilon-greedy algorithm is based on the idea of taking the best action most of the time but occasionally exploring other options. This is achieved by defining a parameter epsilon (), which represents the probability of choosing a random action instead of the best-known action. The value of epsilon is typically set between 0 and 1, with a smaller value indicating a higher preference for exploitation and a larger value indicating a higher preference for exploration.

The core concept behind the epsilon-greedy algorithm is to balance the trade-off between exploration and exploitation. Exploitation refers to the process of selecting the best-known action to maximize immediate rewards, while exploration involves trying out different actions to discover potentially better options. In the context of AI decision-making, exploitation helps the AI system to make the most of its current knowledge, while exploration allows it to gather new information and improve its understanding of the environment.

One of the key advantages of the epsilon-greedy algorithm is its simplicity. It requires minimal computational resources and can be easily implemented in various AI applications. Moreover, the algorithm can be easily adapted to different situations by adjusting the value of epsilon. For instance, a higher value of epsilon can be used in the initial stages of learning to encourage more exploration, while a lower value can be used later on to focus on exploiting the best-known actions.

Another significant benefit of the epsilon-greedy algorithm is its ability to handle the exploration-exploitation dilemma in a dynamic environment. In many real-world scenarios, the optimal action may change over time due to various factors, such as changing user preferences or market conditions. The epsilon-greedy algorithm can adapt to these changes by continuously exploring new actions and updating its knowledge of the environment.

Despite its simplicity and effectiveness, the epsilon-greedy algorithm has some limitations. One of the main drawbacks is that it explores actions uniformly at random, which may not be the most efficient way to gather new information. More sophisticated exploration strategies, such as Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) or Thompson Sampling, can provide better exploration efficiency by taking into account the uncertainty in the estimated rewards of different actions.

Another limitation of the epsilon-greedy algorithm is that it requires a fixed value of epsilon, which may not be optimal in all situations. In some cases, it may be beneficial to use an adaptive epsilon strategy, where the value of epsilon decreases over time as the AI system gains more knowledge about the environment. This can help to strike a better balance between exploration and exploitation throughout the learning process.

In conclusion, the epsilon-greedy algorithm is a powerful tool for balancing exploration and exploitation in AI decision-making. Its simplicity, adaptability, and ability to handle dynamic environments make it a popular choice for various AI applications. However, it is essential to consider its limitations and explore alternative exploration strategies to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of AI decision-making. As AI continues to advance and play an increasingly significant role in our lives, understanding and harnessing the power of algorithms like the epsilon-greedy algorithm will be crucial in unlocking the full potential of artificial intelligence.

Read the original post:
The Power of the Epsilon-Greedy Algorithm in Artificial Intelligence - Fagen wasanni