Archive for the ‘Artificial Intelligence’ Category

Rise of artificial intelligence is inevitable but should not be feared, father of AI says – The Guardian

Artificial intelligence (AI)

Jrgen Schmidhuber believes AI will progress to the point where it surpasses human intelligence and will pay no attention to people

The man once described as the father of artificial intelligence is breaking ranks with many of his contemporaries who are fearful of the AI arms race, saying what is coming is inevitable and we should learn to embrace it.

Prof Jrgen Schmidhubers work on neural networks in the 1990s was developed into language-processing models that went on to be used in technologies such as Google Translate and Apples Siri. The New York Times in 2016 said when AI matures it might call Schmidhuber Dad.

That maturity has arrived, and while some AI pioneers are looking upon their creations in horror calling for a handbrake on the acceleration and proliferation of the technology Schmidhuber says those calls are misguided.

The German computer scientist says there is competition between governments, universities and companies all seeking to advance the technology, meaning there is now an AI arms race, whether humanity likes it or not.

You cannot stop it, says Schmidhuber, who is now the director of the King Abdullah University of Science and Technologys AI initiative in Saudi Arabia.

Surely not on an international level, because one country might may have really different goals from another country. So, of course, they are not going to participate in some sort of moratorium.

But then I think you also shouldnt stop it. Because in 95% of all cases, AI research is really about our old motto, which is make human lives longer and healthier and easier.

Schmidhubers position contrasts with a number of his contemporaries, including Dr Geoffrey Hinton, who spectacularly quit Google this week after a decade with the company in order to speak more freely on AI.

Hinton, who is referred to as the godfather of AI, won the Turing award in 2018 for his work on deep learning, which is the foundation for much of the AI in use today.

He said companies like Google had stopped being proper stewards for AI in the face of competition to advance the technology. He believes if AI becomes more intelligent than humans, it could be exploited by bad actors, including authoritarian leaders.

But Schmidhuber, who has had a long-running dispute with Hinton and others in his industry over appropriate credit for AI research, says much of these fears are misplaced. He says the best counter to bad actors using AI will be developing good tools with AI.

Its just that the same tools that are now being used to improve lives can be used by bad actors, but they can also be used against the bad actors, he says.

And I would be much more worried about the old dangers of nuclear bombs than about the new little dangers of AI that we see now.

Schmidhuber believes AI will advance to the point where it surpasses human intelligence and has no interest in humans while humans will continue to benefit and use the tools developed by AI. This is a theme Schmidhuber has discussed for years, and was once accused at a conference of destroying the scientific method with his assertions.

As the Guardian has reported previously, Schmidhubers position as AIs father is not undisputed, and he can be a controversial figure within the AI community. Some have said his optimism about the rate of technological progress was unfounded and possibly dangerous.

In addition to Hinton, others more recently have called for AI development to slow down. Billionaire Elon Musk was one of thousands to sign a letter published in late March by the Future of Life Institute calling for a six-month moratorium on the creation of AIs more powerful than GPT-4, the machine behind ChatGPT.

Musk revealed he had fallen out with Google co-founder Larry Page last month because he said Page was not taking AI safety seriously enough and was seeking to create a digital god.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

Read more:
Rise of artificial intelligence is inevitable but should not be feared, father of AI says - The Guardian

Rapid Sustainment Office’s CBM+ artificial intelligence toolkit earns … – Air Force Link

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) -- ' + '' + ' '; } else { caption += $(this).find('figcaption').html() + getDetailsURL($(this).parent()) + getDownloadURL($(this).parent()) + showFBShare(); } } return caption; }, afterLoad: function (instance, current) { //initial desktop view if (isMobile()) $(".fancybox-caption__body").addClass("mobile"); }, afterShow: function (instance, current) { var $currentSlide = $(".fancybox-slide.fancybox-slide--current.fancybox-slide--image").parent().parent(); if (isMobile()) $currentSlide.find(".fancy-detail-link").on("touchstart", function() { captionToggle(); }); }, afterClose: function () { } })); let debounceTimer; $(window).on("resize", function (event) { if (isMobile()) return; if ($(".af3-caption-body").length > 0 && $(".af3-caption-body").css("height") != undefined) { event.stopImmediatePropagation(); $(".fancybox-caption__body").removeClass("half"); isDesktopInit = false; captionToggle(); debounceTimer = setTimeout(function () { clearTimeout(debounceTimer); debounceTimer = null; recalculateImageSize(); }, 1000); } }); function recalculateImageSize() { // Fancy box miscalculates because of race conditions with new layout var origImgWth = $(".fancybox-image").prop("naturalWidth"); var origImgHgt = $(".fancybox-image").prop("naturalHeight"); var winWth = $(window).innerWidth(); var winHgt = $(window).innerHeight() var ratio = Math.min(winWth / origImgWth, winHgt / origImgHgt); var newImgWth = (origImgWth * ratio); var newImgHgt = (origImgHgt * ratio); var dstTop = Math.floor((winHgt - newImgHgt)) / 2; var dstLeft = Math.floor((winWth - newImgWth)) / 2; $(".fancybox-content").removeAttr("style"); $(".fancybox-content").css("width", newImgWth + "px"); $(".fancybox-content").css("height", newImgHgt + "px"); $(".fancybox-content").css("transform", "translate(" + dstLeft + "px, " + dstTop + "px)"); } function captionToggle() { if ($(".fancybox-caption__body").hasClass("af3-caption-body")) { $(".af3-caption-body").stop(true, false).animate({ height: "0vh" }, 800, function () { // Animation complete. closeDetails(); }); $(".fancy-photo-detail-link").html($(".fancy-photo-detail-link").html().replace("CLOSE", "SHOW")); } else { $(".fancybox-caption__body").addClass("af3-caption-body"); $(".af3-caption-body").addClass(detailSize); $(".af3-caption-body").animate({ height: displayhgt }, 800); $(".fancybox-caption").addClass("af3-caption-bg"); $(".base-caption-info").addClass("full-height"); $(".fancy-photo-detail-link").addClass("photo-detail-gradient"); $(".fancybox-button").css("display", "none"); $(".fancy-photo-detail-link").html($(".fancy-photo-detail-link").html().replace("SHOW", "CLOSE")); $(".fancybox-caption__body").prepend(prependClosing()); $(".closing-box, .closingx").on("touchstart", function() { captionToggle(); }); } } function getDetailsURL(fbObj) { return 'DETAILS'; } function getDownloadURL(fbObj) { return 'DOWNLOAD'; } function showFBShare() { return 'SHARE'; } function closeDetails() { $(".af3-caption-body").removeClass(detailSize); $(".fancybox-caption__body").removeClass("af3-caption-body"); $(".fancybox-caption").removeClass("af3-caption-bg"); $(".base-caption-info").removeClass("full-height"); $(".fancy-photo-detail-link").removeClass("photo-detail-gradient"); $(".fancybox-button").css("display", "block"); if (detailSize === "half") { detailSize = "full"; displayhgt = "90vh"; $(".fancybox-caption").removeClass("desktop-init"); } } function prependClosing() { return '' } function isMobile() { var isMobile = false; //initiate as false // device detection if (/(android|bbd+|meego).+mobile|avantgo|bada/|blackberry|blazer|compal|elaine|fennec|hiptop|iemobile|ip(hone|od)|ipad|iris|kindle|Android|Silk|lge |maemo|midp|mmp|netfront|opera m(ob|in)i|palm( os)?|phone|p(ixi|re)/|plucker|pocket|psp|series(4|6)0|symbian|treo|up.(browser|link)|vodafone|wap|windows (ce|phone)|xda|xiino/i.test(navigator.userAgent) || /1207|6310|6590|3gso|4thp|50[1-6]i|770s|802s|a wa|abac|ac(er|oo|s-)|ai(ko|rn)|al(av|ca|co)|amoi|an(ex|ny|yw)|aptu|ar(ch|go)|as(te|us)|attw|au(di|-m|r |s )|avan|be(ck|ll|nq)|bi(lb|rd)|bl(ac|az)|br(e|v)w|bumb|bw-(n|u)|c55/|capi|ccwa|cdm-|cell|chtm|cldc|cmd-|co(mp|nd)|craw|da(it|ll|ng)|dbte|dc-s|devi|dica|dmob|do(c|p)o|ds(12|-d)|el(49|ai)|em(l2|ul)|er(ic|k0)|esl8|ez([4-7]0|os|wa|ze)|fetc|fly(-|_)|g1 u|g560|gene|gf-5|g-mo|go(.w|od)|gr(ad|un)|haie|hcit|hd-(m|p|t)|hei-|hi(pt|ta)|hp( i|ip)|hs-c|ht(c(-| |_|a|g|p|s|t)|tp)|hu(aw|tc)|i-(20|go|ma)|i230|iac( |-|/)|ibro|idea|ig01|ikom|im1k|inno|ipaq|iris|ja(t|v)a|jbro|jemu|jigs|kddi|keji|kgt( |/)|klon|kpt |kwc-|kyo(c|k)|le(no|xi)|lg( g|/(k|l|u)|50|54|-[a-w])|libw|lynx|m1-w|m3ga|m50/|ma(te|ui|xo)|mc(01|21|ca)|m-cr|me(rc|ri)|mi(o8|oa|ts)|mmef|mo(01|02|bi|de|do|t(-| |o|v)|zz)|mt(50|p1|v )|mwbp|mywa|n10[0-2]|n20[2-3]|n30(0|2)|n50(0|2|5)|n7(0(0|1)|10)|ne((c|m)-|on|tf|wf|wg|wt)|nok(6|i)|nzph|o2im|op(ti|wv)|oran|owg1|p800|pan(a|d|t)|pdxg|pg(13|-([1-8]|c))|phil|pire|pl(ay|uc)|pn-2|po(ck|rt|se)|prox|psio|pt-g|qa-a|qc(07|12|21|32|60|-[2-7]|i-)|qtek|r380|r600|raks|rim9|ro(ve|zo)|s55/|sa(ge|ma|mm|ms|ny|va)|sc(01|h-|oo|p-)|sdk/|se(c(-|0|1)|47|mc|nd|ri)|sgh-|shar|sie(-|m)|sk-0|sl(45|id)|sm(al|ar|b3|it|t5)|so(ft|ny)|sp(01|h-|v-|v )|sy(01|mb)|t2(18|50)|t6(00|10|18)|ta(gt|lk)|tcl-|tdg-|tel(i|m)|tim-|t-mo|to(pl|sh)|ts(70|m-|m3|m5)|tx-9|up(.b|g1|si)|utst|v400|v750|veri|vi(rg|te)|vk(40|5[0-3]|-v)|vm40|voda|vulc|vx(52|53|60|61|70|80|81|83|85|98)|w3c(-| )|webc|whit|wi(g |nc|nw)|wmlb|wonu|x700|yas-|your|zeto|zte-/i.test(navigator.userAgent.substr(0, 4))) { isMobile = true; } return isMobile; } });The Air Force Rapid Sustainment Offices Predictive Analytics and Decision Assistant leverages artificial intelligence software to transform logistics data into actionable predictive maintenance alerts. The Air Force has designated PANDA as the System of Record for Condition Based Maintenance Plus and predictive maintenance, the first such designation for the RSO.

CBM+ is a collaborative Department of Defense readiness initiative focused on data analysis to improve availability and lifecycle cost. CBM+ requires advanced tools and technologies for analysis to formulate evidence of need to perform maintenance.

Developed by the RSO and partner, C3.ai, PANDA is an artificial intelligence software toolkit that delivers integrated and interoperable tools, technologies, and information infrastructures to facilitate CBM+ collaboration across multiple functional and organizational boundaries. It maximizes the use of common equipment and technologies to capture, store, analyze, and forward CBM+ predictive maintenance data. PANDA has rapidly expanded to the maintenance operations of 16 aircraft platform communities across all nine Air Force major commands. PANDA routinely generates over 30,000 predictive maintenance recommendations and sensor-based alerts detecting impending component failure.

PANDA being designated as the Air Forces system of record for CBM+ is a monumental achievement for the RSO and Air Force CBM+ enterprise, said Chris Damani, RSO CBM+ Program Office chief. Alignment to one technology solution unites the sustainment enterprise to one tool and brings focus, dedication, and prioritization of resources to PANDA allowing for further expansion, optimization, and impact to mission readiness.

The RSO CBM+ Program Office is the Air Forces CBM+ Center of Excellence leading the implementation and execution of CBM+ across the Air Force. The office will now lead and manage all Air Force CBM+ initiatives interested in integration into the PANDA platform, which is expandable to all Air Force materiel categories, including aircraft, missiles, and support equipment and vehicles.

The future of Air Force predictive maintenance is now, and PANDA is the Air Force System of Record helping to lead the way.

Learn more about PANDA:

Read more here:
Rapid Sustainment Office's CBM+ artificial intelligence toolkit earns ... - Air Force Link

Is Artificial Intelligence the End of ‘Real’ Photography? – Fstoppers

It feels like stories about AI have dominated photography news over the last year.Part of me keeps ignoring the headlines as an irrelevance, but chirping away in the background, the other part of me keeps asking: what does it all mean? What's AI capable of? Will it really be a revolution? And perhaps the biggest question of them all: are photographers at risk of becoming obsolete because of AI?

Only in certain circumstances and only if we let it, according to this video by Lucy Lumen.In a thoughtful and interesting discussion, Lumen outlines her thoughts on this contentious topic and ways that we can counter the rise of AI. She even goes as far as saying that it could save photography.

Her first piece of advice for photographers is to lean into the human element of photography. AI represents the antithesis of mistakes and happy accidents, and often, this human element in the image-making process creates beautiful, memorable, or even career-changing images.

Secondly, she suggests that now is the perfect time for photographers to reflect and think about what makes them unique and how they can add value for clients.

This is a fantastic way of looking at the issue. AI might gain a significant share in the stock photography market, but it's doubtful that clients will be looking to buy AI-generated wedding photos or magazine editors will be buying AI-generated documentary or travel images. In these fields, authenticity is key. Photographers should look at what makes them special and articulate that to their market.

As for her thoughts on how AI can save photography, you'll have to watch the video and find out for yourself.

Read this article:
Is Artificial Intelligence the End of 'Real' Photography? - Fstoppers

Harari and the Danger of Artificial Intelligence – Econlib

Yuval Noah Harari, a historian, philosopher, and lecturer at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, has an interesting article on AI in The Economist (Yuval Noah Harari Argues that AI Has Hacked the Operating System of Human Civilization, April 28, 2023). He presents a more sophisticated argument on the danger of AI than the usual Luddite scare. A few excerpts:

Forget about school essays. Think of the next American presidential race in 2024, and try to imagine the impact of AI tools that can be made to mass-produce political content, fake-news stories and scriptures for new cults.

While to the best of our knowledge all previous [QAnons] drops were composed by humans, and bots merely helped disseminate them, in future we might see the first cults in history whose revered texts were written by a non-human intelligence.

It is utterly pointless for us to spend time trying to change the declared opinions of an AI bot, while the AI could hone its messages so precisely that it stands a good chance of influencing us.

Through its mastery of language, AI could even form intimate relationships with people, and use the power of intimacy to change our opinions and worldviews.

What will happen to the course of history when AI takes over culture, and begins producing stories, melodies, laws and religions?

If we are not careful, we might be trapped behind a curtain of illusions, which we could not tear awayor even realise is there.

Just as a pharmaceutical company cannot release new drugs before testing both their short-term and long-term side-effects, so tech companies shouldnt release new AI tools before they are made safe. We need an equivalent of the Food and Drug Administration for new technology.

The last bit is certainly not his most interesting point: it looks to me like the feared AI-bot propaganda. Such a trust in the state reminds me of what New-Dealer Rexford Guy Tugwell wrote in a 1932 American Economic Review article:

New industries will not just happen as the automobile industry did; they will have to be foreseen, to be argued for, to seem probably desirable features of the whole economy before they can be entered upon.

We dont know how close AI will come to human intelligence. Friedrich Hayek, whom Harari may never have heard of, argued that mind and culture developed concurrently and not successively (from the epilogue of his Law, Legislation, and Liberty; his underlines). The process took a few hundred thousand years, and it is unlikely that artificial minds can advance in Trump time, as Peter Navarro would say. Enormous resources will be needed to improve AI as we know it. Training of ChatGPT-4 may have cost $100 million, consuming a lot of computing power and a lot of electricity. And the cost increases proportionately faster than the intelligence. (See Large, Creative AI Models Will Transform Lives and Labour Markets, The Economist, April 22, 2023.) I think it is doubtful that an artificial mind will ever say like Descartes, I think, therefore I am (cogito, ergo sum), except by plagiarizing the French philosopher.

Here is what I would retain of, or deduct from, Hararis argument. One can view the intellectual history of mankind as a race to discover the secrets of the universe, including recently to create something similar to intelligence, concurrent with an education race so that the mass of individuals do not to fall prey to snake-oil peddlers and tyrants. To the extent that AI does come close to human intelligence or discourse, the question is whether or not humans will by then be intellectually streetwise enough not to be swindled and dominated by robots or by the tyrants who would use them. If the first race is won before the second, the future of mankind would be bleak indeed.

Some 15% of American voters see solid evidence that the 2020 election was stolen, although that proportion seems to be decreasing. All over the developed world, even more believe in social justice, not to speak of the rest of the world, in the grip of more primitive tribalism. Hararis idea that humans may fall for AI bots like gobblers fall for hen decoys is intriguing.

The slow but continuous dismissal of classical liberalism over the past century or so, the intellectual darkness that seems to be descending on the 21st century, and the rise of populist leaders, the kings of democracy, suggest that the race to create new gods has been gaining more momentum than the race to general education, knowledge, and wisdom. If that is true, a real problem is looming, as Harari fears. However, his apparent solution, to let the state (and its strongmen) control AI, is based on the tragic illusion that the it will protect people against the robots, instead of unleashing the robots against disobedient individuals. The risk is certainly much lower if AI is left free and can be shared among individuals, corporations, (decentralized) governments, and other institutions.

Go here to see the original:
Harari and the Danger of Artificial Intelligence - Econlib

Three Ways Generative Artificial Intelligence Is A Gamechanger For … – Entrepreneur

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

You're reading Entrepreneur Middle East, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.

So, this whole generative artificial intelligence (AI) thing is generating a lot of hoopla. Indeed, Goldman Sachs says 300 million jobs will be affected by it.

And like most people, I only care about one of those jobs: my own. I'm an architect, interior designer, and business owner. Here are three ways I believe AI to a gamechanger in my field- and one way the game remains the same.

Gamechanger #1: Architects are more vulnerable than most

Goldman Sachs analysed a whole range of jobs, to assess how much of a threat AI posed. The good news is that we're better off than lawyers, but the bad news is that we're worse off than most.

To be precise, they evaluated what they call "current work tasks that could be automated by AI." For lawyers, it's 44%; for architects. it's 37%. (The average across all jobs is 25%.)

One possible solution: we could switch from designing buildings to getting our hands dirty and actually building the things. You see, just 1% of construction and maintenance jobs could be automated, according to Goldman Sachs.

Gamechanger #2: Floor plans, goodbye..?

To find out which bits of our jobs fall into that 37% category, we asked ChatGPT, the poster child of generative AI. "Artificial intelligence can significantly improve design efficiency by automating repetitive tasks such as creating floor plans, three-dimensional models, and rendering images," it told us.

Take a software like maket.ai. For US$30 a month, it promises to generate multiple floor plans, and export them in a drawing exchange format (.dxf) format. They talk a good game about "revolutionizing architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) too- of course, some of it is just hype; I doubt it would have done as good a job as Frank Gehry on the Guggenheim in Bilbao, or Sean Killa's Museum of the Future in Dubai. But there's definitely something in it. Autodesk has an AI lab and is working with universities including Stanford and

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). It'd take a brave designer to bet against these powerhouses.

AI is also very good at the boring but important stuff in fields such as safety and sustainability. Whether it's a new build or a retrofit, we can install of bunch of (relatively) cheap sensors, and let AI do the rest. It generates fascinating insights on human issues such as air quality and desk utilization rates, to vital structural problems such as concrete cracks.

Gamechanger #3: Sales gets a boost

As a business owner, sales is a massive part of my job. But not in the way you'd think. Sure, I have to constantly focus on business development to generate the cash to pay the rent, taxes, and salaries.

But more importantly, even after we've won the contract, we're constantly selling our ideas and our designs to existing clients. I always remember a great quote from the graphic designer Paula Scher on the Netflix documentary Abstract. She said that she spends 10% of her time designing, but 90% of her time convincing clients that the designs are good. That's probably a slight exaggeration, but the point is well made.

AI can and does help here. Like most interior design and architecture firms, we have a big team that does nothing but create 3D visuals, either static or fly-throughs. They are time-consuming and expensive. But we need them at every stage of the design process. At the pitch, at pre-concept, at concept design, at detail design, for the client's marketing campaign- the list is endless.

Open AI the ChatGPT guys have launched a 3D generator called Point-E. It's still in beta mode, but the potential is there. There's little doubt that AI will be hugely powerful in generating virtual reality content.

But despite all this, the game remains -fundamentally- the same

I was born in 1981, the year John Walker and 12 programmers in San Francisco created AutoCAD. Computed aided design was touted at the time as the death of architecture. Turns out it wasn't. Around the same time, calculators and spreadsheets were prompting doom and gloom headlines about the death of accountancy as a profession. Nope.

Even the guys at maket.ai recognize that you still need humans: "We empower architects, designers, builders, contractors, and developers." The key word being empower, not replace.

Bottom line: as a business owner, if I could fire my 30-strong workforce tomorrow and replace them with an algorithm, my profit margin would go through the roof. But I cannot. Nor can I send a computer to a client pitch, or a site meeting with project managers and engineers over a tricky construction challenge. Generative AI will help us be more efficient, and maybe even be more creative, but it will not replace us.

Related: Five Things A Metaverse Sceptic Learned By Buying Real Estate In A Virtual Universe

Read more:
Three Ways Generative Artificial Intelligence Is A Gamechanger For ... - Entrepreneur