Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

Options on Afghanistan to Be Presented to Trump ‘Very Soon’: Mattis – New York Times

Options on Afghanistan to Be Presented to Trump 'Very Soon': Mattis
New York Times
WASHINGTON U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said on Monday that he would present options on Afghanistan to President Donald Trump "very soon," saying the strategy would take a regional approach rather than looking at the war-torn country in ...

and more »

Visit link:
Options on Afghanistan to Be Presented to Trump 'Very Soon': Mattis - New York Times

NC soldier killed in Afghanistan – News & Observer


Washington Examiner
NC soldier killed in Afghanistan
News & Observer
A soldier from North Carolina has died from gunshot wounds in Afghanistan, according to the Department of Defense. Cpl. Dillon C. Baldridge, 22 of Youngsville, NC, was one of three soldiers killed June 10 in Peka Valley, Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan.
Pentagon identifies 3 US soldiers killed in AfghanistanWashington Examiner
3 Fort Campbell Soldiers Killed In AfghanistanNewsChannel5.com
Baltimore soldier, 25, killed in AfghanistanBaltimore Sun

all 90 news articles »

See original here:
NC soldier killed in Afghanistan - News & Observer

All 6 US Combat Deaths in Afghanistan in 2017 Were in Fight Against ISIS – New York Times


New York Times
All 6 US Combat Deaths in Afghanistan in 2017 Were in Fight Against ISIS
New York Times
KABUL, Afghanistan All six of the American soldiers who have died in combat in Afghanistan this year were S involved in the fight against the Islamic State group in its stronghold in a small eastern area of the country. Five of the six may have been ...
Officials: 3 US soldiers killed in eastern Afghanistan attackBusiness Insider
At Least 3 US Soldiers Killed In 'Insider Attack' In AfghanistanNPR
Afghanistan: US soldiers 'killed by commando' in Achin districtBBC News
NBCNews.com -WBAL Baltimore -U.S. News & World Report -Aljazeera.com
all 217 news articles »

Follow this link:
All 6 US Combat Deaths in Afghanistan in 2017 Were in Fight Against ISIS - New York Times

Opinion/Editorial: Clear goal needed for Afghanistan – The Daily Progress

Even by the grim markers of the 16-year war, the recent car-bomb attack in the Afghan capital of Kabul, which killed at least 90 people, was a grave and stunning setback in the fight against global terror. Coming as strains are appearing in the Trump administration's relations with America's NATO partners, the attack underscores that the West has few good options in improving Afghan security over even the short-term, raising the stakes for continuing a military presence that helps feed the insurgency.

The Trump administration needs to consider carefully what could reasonably be accomplished by sending up to 5,000 additional U.S. troops to the country, because a compelling case has yet to be made that the return on the investment of money and American lives would be worth the risk.

The explosion occurred at the peak of Kabul's rush hour in a highly secure area of the capital that is home to many embassies and Afghanistan's presidential palace. The blast wounded more than 460 people, including at least 11 Americans and several foreign diplomats. It also damaged the embassies of Germany, China, France and at least three other countries.

The sheer size of the explosion and the bombers' ability to move freely in one of the most heavily guarded areas of the capital underscores the militants' organization and the inability of security forces to control the territorial heart of the Afghan central government.

The United States already provides the bulk of the international force assisting the Afghan army, about 8,400 of the 13,000 troops. The White House is considering a Pentagon request to send 3,000 to 5,000 additional personnel, including special operations forces, to further train and assist the Afghans, putting U.S. troops closer to the fighting in an effort U.S. commanders say is aimed at breaking the military stalemate and bringing the militants to the negotiating table. But that seems optimistic, given that the U.S. could not accomplish that same goal when it had a vastly larger military presence in the country. Trump has yet to offer a comprehensive strategy, and continues to say in many contexts that his administration will focus on "America first." That calls into question whether any approach exists for ending this prolonged military mission.

Trump overplayed his hand with the allies on his European visit, and he further alienated them on the climate decision. That puts him in a weaker place to rally NATO around any game-changing strategy to end the Afghan war. The bombing attack has also left in tatters a planned peace conference scheduled in the Afghan capital. Trump needs to explain how sending more U.S. troops would change the course of the war, what the time line would be and what expectations exist of the Afghan government. The Pentagon's request for troops smacks of more of the same old approach with no assurance the outcome would be different.

Excerpted from the Tampa Bay Times.

Read more:
Opinion/Editorial: Clear goal needed for Afghanistan - The Daily Progress

Canada considering NATO request for police trainers in Afghanistan, Sajjan says – Toronto Star

The Canadian government is considering a NATO request to send police trainers to Afghanistan, Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan has said, though he added that Canadas military focus remains in Iraq. ( Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS )

By Michael MacDonaldThe Canadian Press

Mon., June 12, 2017

HALIFAXThe federal government is considering a NATO request to send police trainers to Afghanistan, but Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan says Canadas military focus remains in Iraq.

As any good allied partner does, we will look at that request, Sajjan said Monday after a news conference highlighting the Defence Departments new, 10-year defence policy, which was rolled out last week.

Our focus right now is on our mission in Iraq and the region. We will be moving forward with that mission.

Sajjan said even though Canada continues to provide funding for development and security personnel in Afghanistan, the military mission there ended three years ago.

The conflict claimed the lives of 158 Canadian soldiers, one diplomat and one journalist between 2001 and 2014. Thousands of those who served there continue to suffer from physical or mental injuries, an issue that continues to make headlines across the country.

Highlights from the Liberals new defence policy

Big-ticket defence plan will help Canada face new global threats, top general says

As for Iraq, Sajjan says Canada remains committed to maintaining a long-term military presence in that country, but he followed up by suggesting some changes were in order.

For Iraq ... we are in this as a reliable coalition partner, in for the long term, the minister said as he answered questions from reporters gathered at Her Majestys Canadian Dockyard, along the west side of Halifaxs sprawling harbour.

Were going to make adjustments to the mission ... We have taken this year to review the evolution of the situation on the ground. We will be extending the mission, but well be making the final decision on this very shortly to outline what our contributions will be. One thing I can assure you: we will remain as a credible partner to make sure the coalition has all the right assets in place.

There are about 200 Canadian special forces soldiers deployed in northern Iraq. Though their mission is to train Kurdish fighters, they have engaged in gun battles in Iraq.

The federal government has confirmed that in March some of the special forces took part in the battle to reclaim the Iraqi city of Mosul from Daesh.

In the defence policy overhaul, Sajjan has committed to adding 605 new elite special forces commandos.

Overall, the new policy commits Canada to spending an extra $14 billion over the next 10 years on defence matters a 70 per cent increase for the departments budget.

The money will be used to put another 5,000 troops in uniform and, among other big-ticket items, offset the skyrocketing cost of buying new warships and fighter jets.

But much of the money wont flow until after the next election, and its not clear whether the spending spike would mean bigger federal deficits or spending cuts in other areas.

Sajjan noted that two of Canadas new Arctic patrol ships were under construction at the nearby Halifax Shipyard, and he said his new defence policy commits the government to spending up to $60 billion on building 15 new warships, which will replace much of the Royal Canadian Navys aging fleet.

We are excited for the economic growth and development that this policy means for Halifax, Nova Scotia and the broader Canadian defence industry, he said. More than 14,000 Nova Scotians are employed as part of a defence team that spends $1.3 billion annually in the province, he said.

Sajjan said the original budget for the Canadian Surface Combatant program in 2008 was set at $26.2 billion, which the Parliamentary Budget Office later determined was enough for only six ships.

We need 15 and we are committed to 15 ships, Sajjan said, adding that the policy also commits the government to maintaining the navys four problem-plagued submarines and to build two new support ships.

The Toronto Star and thestar.com, each property of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited, One Yonge Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5E1E6. You can unsubscribe at any time. Please contact us or see our privacy policy for more information.

See the original post:
Canada considering NATO request for police trainers in Afghanistan, Sajjan says - Toronto Star