Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

Review: ‘Legion of Brothers’ on Secret Missions in Afghanistan – New York Times


New York Times
Review: 'Legion of Brothers' on Secret Missions in Afghanistan
New York Times
This documentary, directed by Greg Barker, recounts secret missions by Special Forces who were sent to Afghanistan immediately after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Within weeks, small teams of these soldiers formed coalitions with the Afghan Northern ...

Read the original here:
Review: 'Legion of Brothers' on Secret Missions in Afghanistan - New York Times

Why Pakistan wants the US to lose in Afghanistan – Washington Examiner

Pakistan sees China, not the United States, as its long-term strategic partner.

Pakistan has always viewed Afghanistan as a client state, a security buffer against what they consider potential Indian encirclement and as a springboard to extend their own influence into the resource-rich areas of Central Asia.

Now Pakistan has significant economic incentive to exclude western countries from maintaining any influence in Afghanistan.

It is called the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which is part of China's larger Belt and Road Initiative that aims to connect Asia through land-based and maritime economic zones.

CPEC is an infrastructure project, the backbone of which is a transportation network connecting China to the Pakistani seaports of Gwadar and Karachi located on the Arabian Sea. That network will be coupled to special economic zones and energy projects, the latter to help alleviate Pakistan's chronic energy shortages.

As noted by Forbes, "For Pakistan it's a big infrastructure project, which could help the country make a big step forward, from emerging to a mature economy. For China, CPEC is the western route to the Middle East oil, and the riches of its 'third continent,' Africa. It also serves Beijing's strategic ambition to encircle India, something that makes Pakistan a natural ally."

An extension of CPEC to Afghanistan would benefit both China and Pakistan, whose economic goals include exploiting the estimated $3 trillion in untapped Afghan mineral resources. The withdrawal of the U.S. and NATO from Afghanistan would allow China to reap rewards from the reconstruction of the war-torn country, possibly as a quid pro quo for mining rights.

Islamic militancy has long been one element of Pakistan's foreign policy. As early as the 1950s, it began inserting Islamists associated with the Pakistan-based Jamaat-e-Islami into Afghanistan.

In 1974, then Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto set up a cell within Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI) to begin managing dissident Islamists in Afghanistan. Pakistani President Zia ul-Haq (1977-1988) once told one of his generals: "Afghanistan must be made to boil at the right temperature."

Pakistan's present support for the Taliban is just a recent iteration of a long-held policy to influence or destabilize Afghanistan. The use of instability may have served its interests in the past, but Pakistan is holding the Islamist tiger by the tail.

It is not clear that a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan would cooperate in fulfilling Pakistan's or China's international plans or, more broadly, hinder them simply by providing a Petri dish for instability. During the period in the 1990s when the Taliban ruled Afghanistan, they three times thwarted one of Pakistan's key foreign policy objectives, to recognize the Durand Line as the permanent border between the countries.

The success of the CPEC project depends on the stability of Balochistan, Pakistan's largest province, where the CPEC ports of Gwadar and Karachi are located.

It is an ethnically mixed transnational region spanning southwestern Pakistan, eastern Iran and southern Afghanistan, where the Baloch people and the Pashtuns constitute the majority of the population, while the remainder comprises smaller communities of Brahui, Hazaras, Sindhis and Punjabis.

Since 1948, Balochistan has been the home of a festering insurgency waged by Baloch nationalists against the governments of Pakistan and Iran.

Pakistan may someday regret using the Taliban as an instrument of its foreign policy. Stability is a prerequisite for successful economic develop and it is a more difficult condition to create than instability.

Those who live by insurgency can also die by insurgency. Pakistan would do well to remember that.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired US Army Reserve colonel, an IT command and control subject matter expert, trained in Arabic and Kurdish, and a veteran of Afghanistan, northern Iraq and a humanitarian mission to West Africa. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.

If you would like to write an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, please read ourguidelines on submissions.

Go here to see the original:
Why Pakistan wants the US to lose in Afghanistan - Washington Examiner

20 Guard soldiers come home from Afghanistan – St. Cloud Times

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

38

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Battalion returns from 9-month deployment

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

TIMES STAFF REPORT 9:58 a.m. CT May 18, 2017

The Massachusetts National Guard conduct a flyover to help kick off the Boston Marathon. VPC

Minnesota National Guard logo(Photo: Submitted image)

Twenty members of the Minnesota National Guard will be recognized Saturday in St. Cloud for their service in Afghanistan.

Members of Company B, 2-211th General Support Aviation Battalion, were deployed for nine months as part ofthe Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan.

"Im proud of the work theyve done and grateful to have them safely back home with their families,Col. Shawn Manke, commander of the 34th Combat Aviation Brigade, said in a statement released Thursday.

Missions includedcargo movement, passenger movement andhelicopter assault missions. The company flew over 3,000 aircraft hours and executed over 300 combat missions across Afghanistan, according to a news release from the Minnesota National Guard. They moved more than 1 million pounds of cargo.

The return ceremony is scheduled for Saturday morning at Rivers Edge Convention Center.

Read or Share this story: http://on.sctimes.com/2qWgsY7

8:05

1:02

1:52

0:38

0:52

1:50

0:22

1:23

0:58

2:17

More here:
20 Guard soldiers come home from Afghanistan - St. Cloud Times

NATO in Afghanistan: Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford says alliance should move quickly to deploy forces – USA TODAY

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg says that military chiefs want a few thousand more troops from the alliance to be deployed in Afghanistan to help combat Islamist insurgents. Video provided by AFP Newslook

British Chief of Defense Air Chief Marshal Sir Stuart Peach, left, speaks with U.S. Chief of Defense General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr. during a meeting of NATO chiefs of defense at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Wednesday, May 17, 2017. (AP Photo/Virginia Mayo) ORG XMIT: VLM108(Photo: Virginia Mayo, AP)

BRUSSELS The top U.S. military officer saysNATO should be prepared to move fast to deploy additional forces if President Trump and other heads of states agree to bolster the alliances mission in Afghanistan, where government forces are locked in a stalemate with the Taliban.

What I asked my counterparts to do today is be prepared to act quickly, Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Wednesday after a meeting with NATOs military leaders.If the political decision is to do more, lets do more as fast as we can.

The decision is urgent because Afghanistan is entering the so-called fighting season, when snow melts and mountains become passable, allowing the Taliban to increase attacks.

Wed like to see if we (can) contribute to the Afghans success in the summer of '17, Dunford told a small group of reporters as he flew back to the United States after the meeting.

Wednesday's meetingwill help set the stage for next weeks gathering ofNATO leaders, including Trump,in Brussels. The White House has said the president will make a decision on whether to increase U.S. forces in Afghanistan after that meeting.

Dunford and other NATO leaders did not discuss numbers, but the top commander in Afghanistan, Army Gen. John Nicholson, has said several thousand more troops are needed to turn the tide of war there. He has described the war with the Taliban as a stalemate.

READ MORE:

Time for a surge in Afghanistan

U.S. gives NATO allies 2 months for defense spending plans

Arming the Kurds: Why the U.S. is putting military needs over diplomacy

The additional troops would allow Nicholson to provide more advisers to Afghan forces. The U.S. and its allies are also providing some air support to Afghan forces.

Any increase in forces would not change NATOs mission, which is limited to advising and providing other support to Afghanistans military. The United States and its allies are not in a direct combat role. NATO has about 13,500 troops in Afghanistan, including about 9,000 American forces.

Afghanistans military took the lead role in the war against the Taliban in 2014 as the United States and NATO continued to reduce the number of troops there.

Since then Afghan forces have taken heavy casualties and the Taliban have expanded their control over some parts of the country.

The Afghan security forces are faced with a challenging security environment, said Czech Gen. Petr Pavel, chairman of NATOs military committee.

The decision about troop levels in Afghanistan comes as NATO is considering a range of options that will broaden its mission to adjust to growing threats from terror organizations. The alliance was born decades ago during the Cold War to defend against the former Soviet Union.

NATO leaders are considering playing a larger role in Iraq, where the alliance recently deployed a small training mission to work with Iraqi forces.

There is general agreement that NATO can and should do more, Pavel said.

Dunford said the alliance may be in a position to provide long-term assistance to Iraqs security forces once the militants have been driven from Mosul, Iraqs second largest city, and the level of violence has been reduced.

Any decision, however, would have to wait until Iraqs government makes a formal request for continued support for its military, Dunford said.

This is a global trans-regional threat, Dunford said of terror groups. We need a global trans-regional network to combat it. "NATO is an important part of that network.

As a presidential candidate, Trump criticized NATO, suggesting the alliance had become obsolete. But since taking office, he and members of his administration have praised the alliance and recognized its value.

You can be supportive of NATO while recognizing that NATO has to transform to reflect the character of war in the 21st century and more equitable burden sharing, Dunford said. Burden sharing refers to the amount of money each member country is required to spend on their militaries. Some nations have not met the minimum NATO requirement of 2% of their gross domestic product.

If you look at all the statements from the United States from January 2017 to today they have all been very strong in support of NATO, Dunford said.

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2rtBFop

Read the rest here:
NATO in Afghanistan: Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford says alliance should move quickly to deploy forces - USA TODAY

US to provide Afghanistan with up to 159 Black Hawks to help break … – Military Times

As part of Afghanistans four-year road map to double its 17,000-strong special forces unit and bolster the Afghan Air Force, the U.S. plans to provide Afghanistan with up to 159 refurbished UH-60A Black Hawks to replace its aging fleet of Russian Mi-17 transport helicopters, according to Afghan and U.S. defense officials.

Ahmad Shah Katawazai, defense liaison and security expert at the Embassy of Afghanistan in Washington, D.C., told Military Times that the addition of Black Hawks to the Afghan fleet is vital for giving the security forces leverage needed to end the stalemate.

We are in the midst of an insurgency where the enemy is getting tacit support from neighboring countries. Our security forces are under immense pressure as they are fighting each day, on several fronts, with more than 20 terrorist organizations.

The development comes after Gen. John Nicholson, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee in February, saying more U.S. troops were needed to help break the "stalemate" against terrorists groups fighting there. The Trump administration is evaluating how many additional personnel it may deploy.

There is $814 million designated this year to bolster Afghanistans air force, including enough funding for 53 of the 159 Black Hawks, a defense official told Military Times. Each year, the Defense Department will have to request additional funding for the remainder. Officials expect to deliver 30 a year. The first delivery is expected in about 21 months.

Given that it takes substantial U.S. support to maintain the airframes that the Afghan Air Force has already, it doesn't seem feasible that they would be able to support that many Black Hawks without a significant contribution from NATO, Dr. Matthew Archibald, an independent researcher and consultant on South Asian issues, told Military Times.

Afghanistan has had considerable problems with maintaining its current fleet of aircraft. The 2016 Mi-17 crash that injured top Afghan military officials and killed Afghan Army CommanderGen. Muhayuddin Ghori was determined to be caused by a mechanical failure resulting from lack of maintenance.

According to latest estimates from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction , roughly 18 of AfghanistansRussian Mi-17s are unusable, two of the four C-130s are undergoing serious repair and one MD-530 crashed as a result of mechanical failure. Though the report acknowledges that most of the issues with the Mi-17 stem from their overuse, as Afghanistan heavily relies on the lumbering helicopter for troop transport, air assault operations and, at times, for offensive ground air support.

The replacement of the Mi-17 with the UH-60 has the potential to degrade Afghanistans total lift capacity and offensive firing capabilities, according to Archibald. The Black Hawk doesn't bring nearly the amount of close air support capability that the Mi-17 does, he said. In 2016, the Mi-17 fired its rocket pods over 600 times in support of ground operations in Afghanistan, a similar rate to its primary ground attack platform the MD-530.

U.S. defense officials push back on that claim. Pentagon spokesman Adam Stump said that although 63 Mi-17s were equipped with the ability to fire rockets, not all of them are actually armed and very few of these aircraft have been outfitted with rockets because their primary role is to perform lift, air assaults and medevac missions rather than aerial fires missions."

Stump also said some of the Black Hawks will be equipped with rocket pods and additional offensive aerial platforms are being added to Afghanistans air force, which will make up for any loss in offensive capabilities with the switch.Afghanistan is also set to receive an additional armed 30 MD-530 Cayuse Warrior ground attack helicopters, six more A-29 fixed wing close attack aircraft, and five armed AC-208 fixed wing aircraft, he said.

American security detail watches while an Afghan MD-530 Cayuse Warrior takes off from Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul on Sept. 27, 2015. Photo Credit: Staff Sgt. Sandra Welch/Air Force As for a loss in total lift capacity, the Black Hawks are receiving a new engine designed to handle Afghanistans punishing terrain and will be able to perform almost all of the same missions that the current Mi-17 fleet has been conducting in terms of number of people and cargo typically carried, Stump said. And then there's the question of timing and whether it will take too long to train pilots and deliver the helicopters in time to make a difference on the ground.

U.S. defense officials say it will only take 12 weeks to train Afghan pilots on the Black Hawk.For new pilots, training could take nine to 13 months depending on the English proficiency of the student.But according to a recent SIGAR report on Afghanistan, there are 68 Mi-17 pilots and 35 of them are instructor pilots, meaning Afghanistan could have to send almost hundred new pilots through entry-level training, taking up to a year to complete.

The nearly two-year time frame before the first UH-60's arrive may not be realistic or beneficial to Afghanistan, according to Franz-Stefan Gaddy, a senior fellow at the East-West Institute. "TheAfghan military just does not have the luxury to wait a couple of years for the Black Hawks to arrive...these aircraft will certainly not be available by the time the AAF [Afghan Air Force] needs to retire its Mi-17 fleet next year," he said.

The procurement process to get the first batch of A-29 Super Tucanos took almost half a decade, and the entire fleet is still not operational, Gady explained. "From a tactical and operational perspective, acquiring the Black Hawk would be a bad decision for the Afghan military."

Training is expected to begin almost immediately according to an Afghan defense official. Four UH-60s slated for training purposes are expected to arrive in Afghanistan later this fall, the official told Military Times, speaking on condition of anonymity because the plan is still in initial stages. Officials at the Pentagon would not confirm the time or place of the training because the issues were still pre-decisional.

President Donald Trump is headed to the NATO summit in Brussels this week where the war in Afghanistan will be high on the agenda. Nicholson submitted his recommendation in April calling for an additional 3,000 to 5,000 more U.S. troops to assist with the "train and advise" mission called Operation Resolute Support. NATO allies are also considering a a troop increase in the war-torn country.

Shawn Snow is a Military Times staff writer and editor of the Early Bird Brief. On Twitter:@SnowSox184. Mackenzie Wolf is a Military Times editorial intern. On Twitter:@Coffeeshopjihad.

More:
US to provide Afghanistan with up to 159 Black Hawks to help break ... - Military Times