Archive for January, 2018

FLASHBACK: Obama Called Libya A ‘Shit Sh | The Daily Caller

Pinterest

Reddit

LinkedIn

Following President Trumps Thursday comments, its worth noting that former President Obama called the African country of Libya a shit show just two years ago.

The comments were recorded in an interview with The Atlantic. The wide-ranging interview was based on Obamas foreign policy over his eight years in office. During one portion of the interview, Obama said described Libya as a mess to the interviewer but behind closed doors called the country a shit show.

RELATED:

According to the Atlantic:

So we actually executed this plan as well as I could have expected: We got a UN mandate, we built a coalition, it cost us $1 billion which, when it comes to military operations, is very cheap. We averted large-scale civilian casualties, we prevented what almost surely would have been a prolonged and bloody civil conflict. And despite all that, Libya is a mess.

Messis the presidents diplomatic term; privately, he calls Libya a shit show, in part because its subsequently become anISIShaven one that he has already targeted with air strikes. It became a shit show, Obama believes, for reasons that had less to do with American incompetence than with the passivity of Americas allies and with the obdurate power of tribalism.

The comments received little coverage when made public at the end of Obamas term.

Food for thought.

Continued here:
FLASHBACK: Obama Called Libya A 'Shit Sh | The Daily Caller

Ann Coulter torches Trump for immigration meeting | TheHill

Conservative commentator Ann Coulter blasted President TrumpDonald John TrumpHouse Democrat slams Donald Trump Jr. for serious case of amnesia after testimony Skier Lindsey Vonn: I dont want to represent Trump at Olympics Poll: 4 in 10 Republicans think senior Trump advisers had improper dealings with Russia MORE on Wednesday, accusing him of "selling out his base" in a meeting with lawmakers in which he appeared to endorse a deal that would grant millions of immigrants living in the U.S. illegally a pathway to citizenship.

In a post on her website, Coulter suggested that the Tuesday meeting with Democratic and Republican lawmakers was the "lowest moment of the Trump presidency," and that the president appeared on the path to endorsing an unending amnesty for certain immigrants.

She also wrote that Trump's plan for the meeting "to prove he doesn't have dementia" ultimately backfired and that he verified claims put forward in a recent book, "Fire and Fury" by Michael Wolff, that he was not mentally fit to hold office.

"Trump was more than willing to sell out the base to solve a personal problem of his the Michael Wolff book but managed to not convince a single American that he's articulate, bright or a good leader," Coulter wrote.

Coulter's scathing comments came after Trump suggested that he would "sign whatever immigration bill" lawmakers send him and that he is willing to compromise with Democrats on border security measures that he has said must be included in a legislative effort to codify the protections of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Coulter, a vehement critic of illegal immigration, was a vocal supporter of Trump's presidential campaign when he vowed to take a hard line on immigration enforcement.

Facing criticism from conservatives, Trump reaffirmed on Wednesday his position that any deal on DACA would have to include funding for his proposed border wall between the U.S. and Mexico.

"The United States needs the security of the Wall on the Southern Border, which must be part of any DACA approval. The safety and security of our country is #1!" Trump tweeted.

The United States needs the security of the Wall on the Southern Border, which must be part of any DACA approval. The safety and security of our country is #1! pic.twitter.com/4CFzQXb5aS

View original post here:
Ann Coulter torches Trump for immigration meeting | TheHill

Rand Paul: ‘We don’t have money to spend’ for Trump’s border …

Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulLexington mayor launches bid for Congress Trump-free Kennedy Center Honors avoids politics Meet the Iran hawk who could be Trump's next secretary of State MORE (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that while he supports additional barriers at the U.S.-Mexico border, he believes some of the estimated costs for President TrumpDonald John TrumpHouse Democrat slams Donald Trump Jr. for serious case of amnesia after testimony Skier Lindsey Vonn: I dont want to represent Trump at Olympics Poll: 4 in 10 Republicans think senior Trump advisers had improper dealings with Russia MOREs border wall are too high to justify.

"I remain a fiscal conservative, even on the wall, so Im not excited about spending $20, $30, $40 billion on a wall. Im still a believer that we dont have money to spend. Were $700 billion in the hole, Paul said on CNN.

And while I will vote for money for barriers, Im not voting for $40 billion for barriers, Paul added.

The Trump administration is seeking $33 billion in total to increase southern border security, with the remaining $15 billion going to fund technology, personnel and other improvements.

Another $8.5 billion over seven years would be used to pay for 5,000 new Border Patrol agents.

Paul said Wednesday he supports having barriers in certain locations along the border, but that the price tag of those barriers should be debated. He also advocated for using technology to improve border security, which he argued is a cheaper alternative.

"The barriers, I think we need to look at the cost of them. The people advocating for it are forgetting theyre fiscally conservative and are just giving enormous numbers, Paul added.

Lawmakers met Tuesday to discuss immigration, including border security and the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Trump has said funding for the border wall is a requirement forhis agreement on a legislative fix for DACA, which allows certain immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children tolive and work in the countrywithout fear of deportation.

Read more:
Rand Paul: 'We don't have money to spend' for Trump's border ...

Black Lives Matter: The Rise of the "DINDU" – YouTube

Michael Brown was a man, who robbed a liquor store and at the same time assaulted its clerk. He then went on to attack a police officer and attempted to hijack his weapon and was shot in the ensuing scuffle. And to top it all off, Black Lives Matter (BLM) got its start and first martyr. Also many in his community and then nationwide tried to claim him to be an innocent "gentle giant."

The term "dindu," became popular in the aftermath of Michael Brown's death and the Ferguson, Missouri riots to describe a certain class of criminal. The term is a pejorative for criminals and gang members (and their families) who feign innocence and never take responsibility for their actions (when caught in the commission of a crime by the police). It is used, in the title to explain the rise of criminals and their supporters who believe they are not required to be responsible for their actions and now have movements like BLM who will support them against "the system" no matter what they do.

The media / government and those that fund them: The corporations. The well funded (George Soros) along with academia is pushing to divide peoples everywhere. They use events like this to enrage people. Resist with knowledge.

This whole video was inspired by someone who sent me the article on the former Marine being assaulted by BLM supporters. -- Hat tip to Ted. T.

For material used, please see here. https://plus.google.com/+BlackPigeonS...

Go here to read the rest:
Black Lives Matter: The Rise of the "DINDU" - YouTube

New York Times Communism Series — Red Century & Lies …

EDITORS NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldbergs weekly newsletter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays.

Dear Reader (including those of you who can imagine a great Dear Reader gag here),

The New York Times is not widely known as a hotbed of necromancy the mystical science of communicating with or even raising the dead but Im starting to wonder if it is trying to get my late father to come back to earth so he can walk through the Gray Ladys offices and slap the editors with a semi-frozen mackerel.

The Times has been running a series on Communism called The Red Century. Its really, really weird. At times, it feels like the greatest high-brow trolling effort in recorded history. Some of the headlines read like they were plucked from the reject pile at The Onion. I particularly enjoyed Why Women Had Better Sex Under Socialism. One wonders what all the women who had to service their prison guards for a crust of bread would think about that. With the exception of one essay by Harvey Klehr, the upshot seems to be an effort to rehabilitate Communism for a certain kind of New York Times liberal who desperately needs to cling to the belief that he was on the right side of an argument he lost.

The tone is less Communism was awesome and more Well, we sophisticated people understand it was a mixed bag, so lets focus on the bright spots. E.g., Maos collectivization liberated women from domestic service and put them to work in factories (that is the millions of women who werent killed in the process).

This passage from Vivian Gornicks gauzy memoir of Communism captures the overall spirit of the series (emphasis mine):

Most Communists never set foot in party headquarters, laid eyes on a Central Committee member, or were privy to policy-making sessions. But every rank-and-filer knew that party unionists were crucial to the rise of industrial labor; party lawyers defended blacks in the South; party organizers lived, worked, and sometimes died with miners in Appalachia; farm workers in California; steel workers in Pittsburgh. What made it all real were the organizations the party built: the International Workers Order, the National Negro Congress, the Unemployment Councils. Whenever some new world catastrophe announced itself throughout the Depression and World War II, The Daily Worker sold out in minutes.

It is perhaps hard to understand now, but at that time, in this place, the Marxist vision of world solidarity as translated by the Communist Party induced in the most ordinary of men and women a sense of ones own humanity that ran deep, made life feel large; large and clarified. It was to this clarity of inner being that so many became not only attached, but addicted. No reward of life, no love nor fame nor wealth, could compete with the experience. It was this all-in-allness of world and self that, all too often, made of the Communists true believers who could not face up to the police state corruption at the heart of their faith, even when a 3-year-old could see that it was eating itself alive.

I wrote about Gornicks essay on the Corner at the time, so I wont dwell on it now. But the ideas here and throughout the series are fairly obvious, because so many of them hardened into sad clichs long ago. The motives were good! The revolution was betrayed! Real socialism is a worthy goal! Its never been tried!

Frankly, I find the Twitter feed of the Socialist Party of Great Britain more entertaining and more honest:

Its an incredibly useful debating tactic to say that every failed socialist country wasnt really socialist because it had a ruling class. The problem is that there will never be a true socialist country because ruling classes are inevitable. The unapologetic reds should spend a little less time reading Marx and read more Max Nomad, Milovan Djilas, Max Schachtman, James Burnham, and other Communists and former Communists who understood that any attempt to create a true socialist society runs into the Iron Law of Oligarchy. Every organization requires some small group of people to make important decisions. They may use their special knowledge and power to help people, but its also a sure bet that they will use it to help themselves as well. A society without democratic institutions and market mechanisms by its nature will invest bureaucrats with enormous power to make choices about how other people will live.

Anyway, what got me thinking about Communism in the first place was this story. It turns out that Russian meddling in the election wasnt reserved for generating an army of MAGA Twitter bots:

A social media campaign calling itself Blacktivist and linked to the Russian government used both Facebook and Twitter in an apparent attempt to amplify racial tensions during the U.S. presidential election, two sources with knowledge of the matter told CNN.

This is amusing for a bunch of reasons, but the relevant one brings us back to the Times Red Century stuff. It is absolutely true that many dedicated American Communists and Communist sympathizers cared sincerely and passionately about civil rights. And that cause was indeed good and noble. But what gets left out of the picture is that Soviet support for their cause was not good and noble. It was, simply, evil and cynical. First of all, the notion that a totalitarian dictatorship that murdered and enslaved its own people actually cared about civil rights for Americans shouldnt have passed the laugh test.

But on the matter of Russias meddling in American politics, the hypocrisy of American liberals isnt remotely captured by shouting Romney was right! about Russia.

Russias meddling in American politics has continued, with only the briefest interruption in the 1990s, for a century. Liberals may only recently have discovered fake news but that crap has been made in Russia for decades. The Soviets, with the aid of useful idiots and even-more-useful agents, convinced large swathes of the world that the CIA created AIDS. During the Korean War, they fabricated confessions and other evidence that America used biological-warfare weapons. The Soviets undermined democratic societies and developing countries throughout the world with conspiracy theories planted in newspapers and TV shows and peddled by seemingly legitimate academics. Moscows Patrice Lumumba University (no really) granted Ph.D.s in Holocaust denial and anti-Zionist canards.

The Soviets loved black radicals in the U.S. not because they gave a rats ass about black empowerment or civil rights but because they wanted to sow unrest in America. At minimum, they liked to use images of civil unrest for even greater propaganda victories. But the ultimate goal, until the very end of the Cold War, was the collapse of the United States.

Id go into further detail, but ThinkProgress actually has a very good article on this history:

For instance, as described in Christopher Andrews The Sword and the Shield, a detailed composition of KGB operations compiled by a former KGB archivist, Soviet operations to stoke racial tensions spiked in the 1960s and 1970s. In 1967, Moscow aimed at removing Martin Luther King, Jr., from his leadership role within the broader civil rights movement. Per Andrew, KGB higher-ups approved a plan to place articles in the African press, which could then be reprinted in American newspapers, portraying King as an Uncle Tom who was secretly receiving government subsidies to tame the civil rights movement and prevent it threatening the Johnson administration. (Writes Andrew, MLK was probably the only prominent American to be the target of active measures by both the FBI and the KGB.)

As War is Borings Darien Cavanaugh added, the campaign sought to replace King with Stokely Carmichael, hoping a less pacifist leader would help spark a race war within the U.S. The drive also included, in a harbinger of the Facebook ads to come, distributing fabricated pamphlets that showed far-right groups bent on developing a plan for the physical elimination of leading figures in the Negro movement in the U.S.

Growing bolder by the early 1970s, the KGB moved beyond innuendo into a far more violent strain of its campaign. Moscow higher-ups including then-KGB chief Yuri Andropov, who would eventually lead the Soviet Union in the early 1980s signed off on pamphlets, to be sent to African-American militants, which said that Jewish vigilante groups viewed them as black mongrels. Writes Cavanaugh, the pamphlets were distributed to 30 black militant groups in the New York area.

Meanwhile, the KGB approved a plan to release explosives in the Negro section of New York, with one KGB official suggesting bombing one of the Negro colleges as a back-up option. Following the planned bombing, KGB agents would then issue anonymous phone calls to two or three black organizations, claiming that the explosion was the work of the Jewish Defense League.

I know this is running long, but two points need to be made. First, when you read about how American Communists and fellow-travelers had the best of intentions and were on the right side of history, bear in mind that these people were at best noble dupes and useful idiots for an evil empire.

Second, for the conservatives out there who have suddenly developed a strange new respect for Vladimir Putin because hes a strong leader or some other flaming garbage, you should keep in mind that the former KGB agent is an unapologetic creature of that evil empire, shorn of Marxist pretense. He is doing to America today what he was trained to do.

Various & Sundry

By now, youve probably heard that the podcast is up and running. The debut episode featured renowned corn-stalk-urination specialist Ben Sasse. For the second episode, I invited my cellmate from Rykers, Yuval Levin.

No one knows better than this guy that its still a work in progress. But the early reviews have been pretty positive. Im still eager for feedback. Im married to nothing (except my wife). Well probably get some new music in there soon (send your suggestions), and Ive got all kinds of weird ideas about the format, but Im open to hearing more (if someone can figure out how to incorporate dogs as podcast guests, Id love to hear from you). Im told that its very important that you give it 8 trillion stars at iTunes and other platforms and that you actually subscribe. At a minimum, I would love to have more subscribers than that villainous coven podcast The Editors.

Canine Update: Because I believe in honest reporting in this newsletter, I feel compelled to share the shame of the Goldberg house these days. One of the dogs has been pooping in the house. We dont know whos doing it, though I suspect its Pippa. One of the great things about having a Carolina dog is that they are, like Sir John Gielgud, very private poopers. When were in the woods, Zo prefers to run off out of sight and do her business in some secret ancient poop burial ground. Meanwhile, Pippa is like some eccentric British aristocrat and thinks her poop is a problem for the help to take care of. Anyway, its dismaying because we dont think either of them is sick, and they keep pointing the damning paw of blame at each other. The cats think its all disgusting.

Meanwhile the only other thing of note to report is that Pippa was shnurfling around in some leaves the other day and uncovered a frog that proceeded to jump right into her face. Our cherished dogwalker Kirsten said that Pippa let out a shriek that frightened all of the other dogs in the pack, along with Kirsten herself. Pippa had PTSD for a while afterwards. Im actually at a conference in upstate New York right now, but Im told that the beasts miss me greatly (File photos). Almost as much as I miss them.

Book Update: Im not sure I officially told you folks yet, but the manuscript has been accepted by the publisher. So now I am waiting for page proofs, which is a whole different level of Book Hell. The pub date is set for late April, and Im going to be doing a lot of promotion for it in the spring. If you know of an organization that might want to host an event in 2018 for the book, please let me know. You can send an email to [emailprotected].

Oh, and just a reminder for folks in Northern California: I will be speaking to the Conservative Forum of Silicon Valley next week.

ICYMI...

Last weeks G-File

The Las Vegas shooting and politicization

Tevi Troy for HHS secretary

The Republican base is beyond Trumps control.

My interview with Hugh Hewitt about Tevi Troy

The second episode of my new podcast, with guest star Yuval Levin

The NRA doesnt buy its support.

And now, the weird stuff.

Debbys Friday Links

The abandoned Soviet germ-warfare island

Were probably not living in a computer simulation

Jeremy Benthams head exhumed

Drunk man claims to be time traveler from the future to warn about aliens

If aliens exist, well know by 2035

A 30-foot, 900-pound snake

(But can it turn into James Earl Jones?)

Painting art with flight paths

Did something come before the Big Bang?

Are space, time, and gravity all just illusions?

Do you want to own a toilet museum?

Saint Nicks tomb found?

The Battle of Athens (Georgia)

The history of the X-Ray

Londons creepiest cemetery

Go here to see the original:
New York Times Communism Series -- Red Century & Lies ...