Archive for January, 2018

The Psychology That Explains How People Become Liberals …

Ive studied numerous psychologists, from Freud to Jung, and from Berne to Maslow, but one of the most interesting psychologists out there is Timothy Leary.

Despite being a Professor at Harvard in the early 1960s, his seemingly stable position was completely pulled out from underneath him, due to his controversial work involving LSD. At one point, the US government even hated him so much that they gave him 30 years in prison for a minor possession of marijuana, which he claims they planted on him.

Leary, after years of extensive studies, research, and experimentation, developed a framework through which to understand the human mind: the 8 Circuits of Consciousness. The goal of this article is to better understand how leftists think, and what sort of childhood events would lead to such a vehement position on social justice. First, however, I will give a brief analysis of the 8 circuits.

A good introductory book to this theory, as I spoke about here, is Prometheus Rising by Dr. Robert Anton Wilson.Sadly the book is not in print anymore (its a hidden gem that not many people know about), but if you dont feel like buying the kindle version you can check out an hour long YouTube video that I made about the 8 Circuit Model.

In a nutshell, the model claims that human beings have 8 circuits of consciousness, or 8 ways of interpreting external information. When a child is born, he only uses the first circuit. Then, as he gets older, he activates the second. Then, he activates the third, and the fourth.

Most human beings stop here; only a select few have ever activated the latter four. Buddha likely activated the 6th circuit, Jesus the 5th, and Beethoven the 7th.

Due to the complexity of the latter four circuits, I will not discuss them. I will, however focus heavily on the first four, because they have a massive impact in creating a liberal robot. Once a circuit is imprinted, it is extremely difficult to undo. This is why it is so god damn hard to convince liberals of their misguided ways. As I go through this psychological model, and explain why liberals believe what they do, you should start to see just how robotized some people really are.

This is what Carl Sagan would call the Reptilian brain and what Freud would call the oral imprint. This circuit is activated when a child is first born, and is imprinted all the way up until he becomes a toddler. This circuit interprets environmental stimulus in one of two ways: either its pleasurable, or painful. Good, or bad. Safe, or unsafe. Typically, the mother plays the integral role in imprinting this circuit.

If this circuit receives ample conditioning that the world is a good place, by receiving enough food, enough love, and enough pleasure, the child will grow up to believe that the world is generally a very safe place.

If this circuit receives ample conditioning that the world is a bad place, by being frequently hungry, not receiving enough love, and experiencing a large amount of pain, the child will grow up to believe that the world is generally a very unsafe place.

Liberals are almost always indefinitely imprinted with a negative world-view. This is why liberals, when theyre adults, tend to the view the world as being an unsafe place. They need daddy government, to take care of everything for them, because the world is scary.

They need the strong patriarchy to stop hurting their feelings, because the world is too scary for them to handle.

This is what Carl Sagan would call the mammalian brain and what Freud would call the anal imprint. This circuit is activated around the time that a child becomes a toddler, and is imprinted all the way up until around age 6 or 7. This circuit interprets relationships with other human beings in one of two ways: am I dominant, or submissive? Am I top-dog or bottom-dog? Am I alpha male, or beta male? Typically, the father plays an integral role in imprinting this circuit.

Have you ever wondered why toddlers are so god damn emotional? Its because theyre starting to develop their egoam I dominant (anger) or submissive (fear)? This is why toddlers typically go through a mine phase, as well. Theyre claiming their territory, so to speak.

If a childs father is a strong, masculine man who is a good role model, the child will model himself after his father and be dominant in most interactions. Not in an obtrusive, egotistical way, but rather hell view himself as an alpha male; as the leader.

If a childs father is very weak and if that childs mother runs the relationship, this child will inevitably have a submissive, imprint in this circuit. He will typically be bullied in grade school, because others can sense his weakness.

Every single leftist has this submissive imprint, which is almost always due to an overbearing mother. Conversely, sometimes it can also be caused by an abusive father; regardless, this is the psychology of a liberal. This is why liberals typically need top dog government to help them. They feel the need to be submissive, and rely on someone else to take the lead (in this case the government).

This is why liberals typically dislike masculine men; it points out their own submissiveness and inadequacies. Its why leftists are typically very spineless and are afraid to stand up for anything that isnt the norm. This is also why they typically have a mother-boy dynamic in their romantic relationships.

Have you ever seen hyper-liberals with their wives? They typically act like a little boy afraid of offending mommy and her feminist ideologies. This is why. Theyre conditioned to be submissive from a young age, which allows a nanny state to easily come into play, breaks apart the family unit, and creates a man without a backbone.

This is what Carl Sagan would call the human brain. Interestingly enough, Freud skips over this one, likely because, like a fish surrounded by water, Freud is so surrounded by his ideology that he cant even see it.

This circuit is typically imprinted from the ages of 7 to 13, when a child goes through rigorous schooling on how to write, how to read, etc. Its concerned with creating a map to better understand reality; in other words, its your religion, your beliefs, your opinions, and your political ideology. Its your general world-view put into words. This circuit is not binary (only A or B) like the previous ones; it can have an almost unlimited number of imprints.

The catch, however, is that because most people dont use logic to understand reality, this circuit is typically just an extension of circuits 1 and 2. For example, as I said before, most liberals have a negative first and second circuit imprint: they believe the world is very unsafe, and that theyre bottom-dog/submissive. So, what do you think happens when they start to form a map of reality?

They become a socialist. Now, of course this belief stems from their deeply seeded feelings of inadequacy, fear, and weakness, which is why they want daddy government to take care of them, but they arent even aware of this.

Their third circuit will come up with all sorts of justifications and logical fallacies to explain away these gnawing feelings:

Despite the obvious flaws within these statements, liberals literally cannot even comprehend why theyre wrong. As Roosh said before, its because liberals argue fromemotionnot from reason.In other words, their first and second circuits create the reality map that is their third circuit.

Their third circuit basically, then, does nothing but go back and justify their original imprints and emotions. They will selectively seek out information to confirm their biases, and ignore any and all information that contradicts them.

This is why hyper-liberals can claim that men are useless pigs, despite the fact that men are the very ones who are giving them the right to vote, protecting them in war, and paying taxes for their welfare. This is why Leftism isliterallya mental disorder.

For the liberal, their third circuit is merely a logical extension and justification of their underlying fear, depression, feelings of inadequacy, and general victim-complex.

This is what Freud would call the sexual imprint. Its much more than that, howeverits when a child begins to develop deeper connections with those around him. This circuit is responsible for tribal information. What is the reality-tunnel that your local tribe, school, church, or community has?

This circuit is how religious beliefs, political beliefs, and other ideologies, are typically passed down from generation to generation. Its a survival mechanism that ensures we are able to fit in, lest we be ostracized and end up starving to death.

This is why liberalism infecting our schools is so god damn insidious. Hyper-liberals take advantage of this critical period, when children are most vulnerable to being imprinted with various ideologies, norms, and sexual practices. Its why homosexuality is practically the norm now, why transgenderism is on its way, and why pedophilia and zoophilia are next up.

Prior to the internet and media, it was the local high school, the neighbors, and the church that imprinted a child with various cultural beliefs. Now, however, the brainwashing box right in front of our noses has been tearing these strong pillars of culture down.

What a child is exposed to during this time period is of the utmost importance; it will, for the most part, determine his lifelong sexual interests and cultural beliefs. Most Leftists, during this time in their lives, are exposed to homosexuality, transgenderism, and cultural Marxism by their schoolteachers, their peers, and the media. This only exacerbates their previous imprinting (circuits 1-3).

This is why leftists become pan-sexual, or any other weird deviancy. They believe that theres something fundamentally wrong with them; it goes so deep that it even changes their sexuality.

This is why once leftists grow up, they dye their hair and break social norms. They are so desperate to be bullied (and confirm their first circuit bias that the world is unsafe and their second circuit bias that theyre bottom dog) that they go out of their way to dress up in a bunch of weird shit that they know will get them made fun of.

This is why leftists preach equality and become political activists. They use this to meet other like-minded degenerates and can all hide their feelings of inadequacy and self-hatred by trying to bring others down.

Feminism is cancer.

During a leftists early childhood, his mother likely doesnt pay enough attention to him. Hes frequently hungry, in pain, and deprived of love. This creates the foundation of leftism; that the world is generally unsafe.

So then, when the leftist becomes a toddler, he is plagued by a chronic fear. This leads others to pick on him, which only further reinforces his first circuit imprint that the world is unsafe, and creates a new imprint: that hes bottom dog (second circuit binary imprint).

These two imprints create what is known as a victim complex. Victims typically view the world as being very unsafe, and they view themselves as being very weak, and not capable of protecting themselves from the perils that surround them. Does this not sound exactly like a liberal?

Then, when the liberal hits the age of cognition, when his neo-cortex starts to develop further, he enters into the third circuit imprinting period. Here he forms a number of beliefs that merely serve to justify his prior imprinting, such as:

From here, they start to enter the fourth circuit, primed and ready to fully accept liberal social principles. They often times take on a deviant sexual imprint, or they hate themselves so much that they cant even bear their own gender, so their fourth circuit effectively becomes an extension of their first two circuits.

From here, they go out into the world and get involved in social media and political activism, by grouping up with other like-minded individuals. This surrounding of themselves by liberals only enforces their fourth circuit imprinting that homosexuality, transgenderism, pansexualism, and whatever-the-fuck-else-ism is normal.

It is extremely difficult to undo a liberals imprinting without using unethical methods (LSD re-imprinting, brainwashing them, controlling their food and water supply to revert them to a childlike state, etc.). And even if these things werent unethical, we dont have the resources to do them.

So, what I propose, is that we simply become aware of this phenomena and work to stop it. I know this sounds so cliche, and Ive said it a million times, but we NEED TO start creating more masculine men in the world. And it starts with our youth. It starts with you and me.

Take a martial art, work out, and get your finances in check.Slowly we will start to undo the monstrosity that is modern liberalism. The most important thing, however, is that wetake action.

Dont put up with your girlfriend treating you like shit. Instead, learn how to actually get girls, so that you arent afraid to leave her. Dont accept bitchyexcuses. Be a fucking man and do what you need to do to get what you want to have.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out Roosh's book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain our operation.

Read More: Analyzing The 5 Main Alpha Archetypes

More here:
The Psychology That Explains How People Become Liberals ...

Media Control (Windows) – msdn.microsoft.com

This documentation is archived and is not being maintained.

TAPI can request the execution of a limited set of media control operations on the call's media stream triggered by telephony events. Although the TAPI clients normally use the media function specifically defined for the media type, media control can yield a significant performance improvement for client/server implementations because simple "detect/control" sequences can be offloaded to the server. The operation TSPI_lineSetMediaControl allows TAPI to specify a list of tuples specifying a telephony event and the associated media-control action, and thus sets up a call's media stream for media control. The telephony events that can trigger media control activities are:

Media control actions are defined generically for the different media types. Not all media streams can provide meaningful interpretations of the media control actions. Operations that may be possible are indicated in LINEMEDIACONTROL_ Constants.

The scope of media control is bounded by the lifetime of the call. Media control on a call ends as soon the call disconnects or goes idle. Only a single media control request can be outstanding on a call across all applications.

Originally posted here:
Media Control (Windows) - msdn.microsoft.com

Illegal Immigration Forum – City-Data.com

Synopsis

08-22-2011 03:15 AMby Yac

ontheroad

02-26-2008 08:57 AMby ontheroad

AnywhereElse

Today 01:16 PMby AnywhereElse

Mr. Lee

Today 01:10 PMby AnywhereElse

k374

Today 09:30 AMby dkf747

Mr. Lee

Yesterday 07:41 PMby Arabianhorsebreeder

westcoastforme

Yesterday 06:26 PMby westcoastforme

Galvatron99

Yesterday 06:05 PMby westcoastforme

AnywhereElse

Yesterday 10:35 AMby Oldglory

Workaholic?

12-30-2017 08:37 PMby Legion777

Mr. Lee

12-30-2017 09:31 AMby elan

PilgrimsProgress

12-28-2017 03:12 PMby BigDGeek

k374

12-28-2017 02:27 PMby AnywhereElse

PilgrimsProgress

12-28-2017 02:26 PMby AnywhereElse

Mr. Lee

12-27-2017 09:53 AMby AnywhereElse

Silver-Fox

12-27-2017 07:54 AMby Yac

Mr. Lee

12-27-2017 07:18 AMby Oldglory

AnywhereElse

12-24-2017 08:20 AMby AnywhereElse

AnywhereElse

12-22-2017 10:14 PMby Silver-Fox

AnywhereElse

12-20-2017 09:29 AMby Mr. Lee

Mr. Lee

12-18-2017 11:39 AMby Oldglory

AnywhereElse

12-17-2017 05:51 PMby Mr. Lee

Mr. Lee

12-17-2017 05:13 PMby AnywhereElse

MongooseHugger

12-17-2017 04:59 PMby AnywhereElse

AnywhereElse

12-17-2017 04:37 PMby AnywhereElse

JDubsMom

12-16-2017 11:50 AMby boneyard1962

AnywhereElse

12-15-2017 07:45 AMby Podo944

armourereric

12-14-2017 01:54 AMby Yac

Mr. Lee

12-11-2017 01:48 PMby cremebrulee

Mr. Lee

12-10-2017 06:07 PMby MongooseHugger

MongooseHugger

12-10-2017 11:03 AMby Mouser

Mr. Lee

12-09-2017 06:55 PMby BobNJ1960

AnywhereElse

12-09-2017 05:05 PMby Mr. Lee

AnywhereElse

12-08-2017 09:06 PMby Oldglory

OldRetiredGuy

12-08-2017 02:18 PMby Oldglory

Minethatbird

12-08-2017 12:36 PMby AnywhereElse

AnywhereElse

12-07-2017 06:55 PMby boneyard1962

AnywhereElse

12-07-2017 03:18 PMby AnywhereElse

k374

12-07-2017 03:05 PMby Maccabee 2A

AnywhereElse

12-06-2017 05:37 PMby Legion777

Mr. Lee

12-06-2017 02:29 PMby AnywhereElse

AnywhereElse

12-06-2017 01:03 AMby 90266

Go here to read the rest:
Illegal Immigration Forum - City-Data.com

Narrative Collapse: Is Charlottesvilles James Alex Fields …

President Donald Trump finally did what no-one in the Conservative Establishment would: calling out the Antifa (the Alt Left in his words) for sparking violence at the legally-sanctioned demonstration in Charlottesville: You had a group on the other side that came charging in without permit, the President said. They were very violent [Trump Says Both Sides to Blame in Charlottesville Violence, Reversing Mondays Stance, by Peter Nicholas, Wall Street Journal, August 15, 2017].

This is objectively a true statement. And it has sparked nothing short of shrieking hysteria from the Opposition Party, the far-Left journalists who are tirelessly working to overthrow the President of the United States and ruin the lives of everyone who voted for him.

But Donald Trump did say something questionable. He called James Alex Fields Jr., the man who allegedly drove a car that collided with a crowd of protesters and killed one person, a murderer. He thundered:

I want to know the facts. The driver of the car is a disgrace to himself, his family, and his country. You can call it terrorism. You can call it murder. You can call it whatever you want. And then you get into legal semantics. The driver of the car is a murderer, and what he did is a horrible thing.

[Trump: The Driver Of The Car Is A Disgrace To His Country, Terrorist, Murderer, by Tim Hains, RealClearPolitics, August 15, 2017]

Needless to say, Trump will get no credit for these words. And perhaps he shouldnt. Especially when it follows a statement about wanting to know the facts, it is wildly premature to call James Fields a murderer. There is a surprisingly good chance he will be acquittedor, perhaps more likely, convicted of a lesser offense such as manslaughter. This is exactly what happened with George Zimmerman, Officer Darren Wilson and a long list of other Main Stream Media lynching victims (including most notoriously South Charleston police officer Michael Slager, whose murder charges were ultimately dropped).

The key fact which the Main Stream Media is concealing: the Antifa Communists were allowed, and indeed, encouraged, to run wild and attack people after the police broke up the #UniteTheRight rally. This included taking over the streets, something you would think would not be allowed after Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe had declared a State of Emergency i n order to break up the rally. As Rebel Medias Faith Goldy pointed out on the scene, this was a blatant double standard.

Not surprisingly, when heavily armed far-Left psychopaths are marching around looking for people to attack, there is violence. And this includes attacking people in cars. Antifa and Black Lives Matter activists have long practiced trapping people in cars before attacking them. An eyewitness reported that this was precisely what was being done to James Fields. Taylor Lorenz of The Hill made several points:

For good reason.

Though there are many conspiracy theories out there, lets accept that Fields was the driver. He plowed into the crowd, and then, damningly, backed up and hit more people.

However, video evidence shows his car was quickly set upon by a mob wielding bats, who smashed his back windows and would presumably have smashed his skull had he not backed out quickly. Thats clearly self-defense.

What about the initial plunge into the crowd? Video evidence shows the car was struck before hitting anyonemeaning Fields could have panicked and hit the gas.

Most importantly, he did not accelerate after hitting the crowd, he braked and paused. He threw the car into reverse only when his window was smashed.

Fields car also shows signs of having sustained damage before encountering the crowdmeaning a confused and frightened Fields was driving around a town he didnt know, perhaps chased by Antifa, and then hit the gas when his car was struck. Already, there are reports saying that just this occurred [Eyewitnesses: James Fields Car Was Attacked, Police Set Up Rally-Goers To Be Assaulted, by Patrick Howley, Big League Politics, August 14, 2017]

And obviously, regardless of the exact circumstances, none of this would have happened had Charlottesville police simply done (or been allowed to do) their job and prevented riots in the streets.

Of course, Fields does appear to be a troubled kid. Though all groups at the rally deny he was a member, he was apparently not there by happenstance. [Alleged driver of car that plowed into Charlottesville crowd was a Nazi sympathizer, former teacher says, by T. Rees Shapiro, Alice Crites, Laura Vozzella, and John Woddrow Cox, Washington Post, August 13, 2017] He allegedly threatened his own mothr. [Very threatening: Mother of Charlottesville suspect James A. Fields called 911 twice, by Arelis Hernandez, Jack Gillum, Michael Miller and Steve Hendrix, Washington Post, August 14, 2017] He flunked out of the Army and may suffer from mental disorders, including schizophrenia. [What We Know About James Alex Fields, the Driver Charged In The Charlottesville Attack, by Margaret Hartmann, New York, August 14, 2017]

Of course his politics will be presented as relevant in the trial, used to support the motive that Fields ruthlessly and deliberately tried to kill as many people as possible. But is this really relevant?

Consider the case of Epic Beard Man, Thomas Bruso, an older white man who was accosted on a bus and defended himself against a black man, becoming an Internet celebrity. Though Bruso did not start the fight, he used Politically Incorrect language and apparently had a history of mental illness.

Should he have been convicted of a crime? Of course not. And in fact he was not.

Similarly, Fields may have views that many people consider repugnant. He may have committed actions in his past that are deeply troubling or even disgusting. But the key question in the upcoming trial is not whether he is a good or bad person, but whether he was attacked and in fear for his life.

Certainly it seems unquestionable at this point that the Narrative claiming he deliberately tried to kill his as many people as possible by backing up is totally false.

What remains to be seen is what happened in the critical seconds not captured on video, before Fields approached the crowd in his car. These will determine whether he was trying to run the crowd down or just to escape.

Needless to say, many people will not care about this. They will simply insist Fields must be convicted because he allegedly has racist sympathies, attended a racist rally, and put himself in a position where he was likely to be attacked.

Which of course was the MSM case against George Zimmerman. He was quickly pronounced guilty by the MSM after the death of Trayvon Martin. The MSM argument: Zimmerman should never have approached Martin, that in some way he had brought Martins attack on himself. And the FBIs investigation included interviewing witnesses to determine whether George Zimmerman was a racist. [Witnesses tell FBI that George Zimmerman is no racist, by Ashley Hayes, CNN, July 13, 2012]. They could find no evidence he was.

(Presumably, if they had, Zimmerman would have met a different fate. Its called Equal Justice).

Obviously, the evidence already exists to suggest Fields is racist, whatever that means in todays hysterically anti-white society. Indeed, with the all the video evidence already in the public domain and all the other evidence that will emerge during the investigation, Fieldss racism may be the only real evidence the prosecution has for the charge of murder.

If Fields is acquitted, or convicted of a lesser charge, this country may see further riots like the ones that followed the acquittal of the officers who arrested Rodney Kingwhich apparently scared our Ruling Class permanentl y

But if Fields is convicted of murder, it may be another example of a System using exemplary sentencing to tell Whites this isnt their country any moreand that the Constitution no longer applies to those who have the wrong, Politically Incorrect, opinions.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.

Read the original:
Narrative Collapse: Is Charlottesvilles James Alex Fields ...