Mediaboss Marketing

A 24-year-old illegal alien named Lorenzo Alonso Romero allegedly drove over three women in his Oldsmobile on May 27.

The Laredo Morning-Times reports that Romero, who is currently being held in Webb County jail, claims to have driven over the women in an act of retaliation against the first victim as revenge for a police report she filed against him two years ago.

The victim was taken to Laredo Medical Center for her injuries.

Two hours after he allegedly ran down the first victim, Romero allegedly drove over a second woman, who was jogging near a school twice. She was also taken to the same hospital. Speaking to the victims, police learned that the suspect vehicle matched in both cases.

A third call was made to 911 on the same day, with a report that the same vehicle had struck another woman. She was also treated for injuries at the LMC. Speaking to police, the victim described the same vehicle. The victim says that she noticed the vehicle stalking her before it hit her.

Lorenzo indicated to police that he was upset over the fact that he was upset over a report filed against him two years ago by a neighbor. He claims the allegations were false.

When asked why two years later he was still upset, he stated he was just upset with women in general and was taking out his frustration on random women he would encounter, states the criminal complaint.

The complaint states that Lorenzo took full responsibility for intentionally and knowingly struck all three women with his vehicle, a black 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora, which he borrowed from the car lot where he is employed at.

This isnt Romeros first brush with the law. In 2015, he allegedly attempted to stab a man during an altercation. The Laredo-Morning Times states that he was also charged with assaulting women on two separate occasions including an attempted stabbing. In the second case, he allegedly grabbed a woman by the neck after she told him to stop drinking.

The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement states that Romero was deported twice to his native country of Mexico. Hes currently being held in jail on an immigration detainer.

More:
Illegal Immigrant Drives Over Three Females in Fit of Rage Against Women - The Daily Caller

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

President Donald Trumps immigration policies - even those not yet fully in effect - are already a huge success. How do we know? Well, for one thing, The New York Times is crediting Mr. Trumps policies with having had a swift and significant effect on curbing illegal immigration. And, although we dont often have cause to say this, in this instance, The NYTimes is absolutely correct.

In a full-length piece in Mondays print edition, reporter Kirk Semple makes the persuasive case that President Trumps get-tough approach to immigration policy has played a significant role in the decrease of illegal immigration into the United States. From the article: From February through May [of this year], the number of undocumented immigrants stopped or caught along the southwest border of the United States fell 60 percent from the same period last year, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection - evidence that far fewer migrants are heading north, officials on both sides of the border say.

Mr. Semple argues that would-be illegal immigrants are no longer making the trek to the United States because the risk that they will be deported is too great. In other words, the chances that the United States will actually enforce its immigration laws are a far greater probability in the Trump era than in the previous administrations era of immigration lawlessness.

The NYTimes piece displays two of the papers chief defining characteristics - East Coast elitism that is willfully out of touch with Real America, coupled with a patronizing insistence that our nations immigration laws are not only un-enforceable, but they are also borderline inhuman. It is precisely this worldview The NYTimes possesses that is so utterly at odds with the worldview of the vast majority Americans. And it is this exact reason that The NYTimes elites were so caught off guard by Mr. Trumps surprising win.

President Trump was elected last November, in no small part, because of his willingness to be the candidate most aggressive about enforcing our immigration laws. His simple stance on immigration - which at times was almost simplistic - was that our immigration laws must be enforced. He never shied away from talking about deportations or even building a wall, and he was elected - not because Americans were willing to overlook his immigration rhetoric, but because his supporters actually believed he would do exactly what he said on immigration.

Mr. Trumps policies were based on a few fundamental premises: that a society that respects the rule of law must actually enforce its laws, and that there is something inherently unsafe about not knowing which people are here, for how long, and for what purpose. Beyond the rule of law and national security implications, candidate Trump started a national dialogue about the latent unfairness - and even un-Americanness - of immigration policies (and the policy of not enforcing our immigration laws) that prioritize non-U.S. citizens over U.S. citizens. It was a conversation many Americans found refreshing.

Mr. Semples piece profiles various people who were considering coming to the United States illegally, but who thought better of it, given the change in policy. One person, preparing to come to the United States illegally, was warned by a friend in New York: The United States [is] no longer a place for undocumented migrants. Although it violates every elitist instinct, the fact that the United States is no longer a place for routine and flippant disregard for our laws, is actually a welcome change.

Unable to escape The NYTimes dogma on illegal immigration, Semple laments that [a]rrests of immigrants living illegally in the United States have soared, with the biggest increase coming among those migrants with no criminal records. Because, from The NYTimes perspective, it is possible to flagrantly disregard and violate our nations immigration laws, and also be innocent of any criminal wrongdoing.

The NYTimes article almost comically betrays the elitist bias in favor of illegal immigration. In one particularly revealing passage, Mr. Semple bemoans the devastating impact of Mr. Trumps policies on - incredibly! - migrant smugglers in Honduras, who are presented as savvy small-business owners. Migrant smugglers in Honduras say their business has dried up since Mr. Trump took office. And one such migrant smuggler says he has only had one client since President Trump was sworn into office. The New York Times has thus unwittingly published high praise for President Trumps track record of putting Central American criminal enterprises and networks out of business.

Liberals and Establishment Republicans (read: Washingtons elites) have long argued that our immigration laws are too difficult and too expensive to enforce, and that we cannot possibly or practicably deport illegal immigrants, and, as a consequence, that illegal immigration is just something we have to accept.

In six short months of President Trumps presidency, he has done more than stem the tide of illegal immigrants into the country; he has also single-handedly demonstrated the falsehoods that make up elitist thinking about immigration.

Continue reading here:
Trump immigration policies working - Washington Times

Vice President Mike Pence, chairman of the recently re-established National Space Council, toured the Kennedy Space Center Thursday and vowed to renew American leadership on the high frontier, telling spaceport workers "our nation will return to the moon, and we will put American boots on the face of Mars."

Speaking to a throng of spaceport workers inside the cavernous Vehicle Assembly Building where Saturn 5 moon rockets and space shuttles were once put together -- and where NASA's gargantuan Space Launch System rockets will be assembled -- Pence provided no details about the Trump administration's space policy or what changes might be in the offing.

But as the chairman of the re-formed National Space Council, the vice president promised that under President Donald Trump, "America will lead in space once again."

"For nearly 25 years, our government's commitment seems to have not matched the spirit of the American people," he said. "But I'm here to tell you, that as we still enter this new century, we will beat back any disadvantage that our lack of attention has placed, and American will once again lead in space for the benefit and security of all of our people and all of the world."

Positioned directly behind the podium were a SpaceX Dragon capsule, a Boeing CST-100 spacecraft -- both being commercially developed to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station -- and NASA's Orion capsule, being built to carry astronauts beyond low-Earth orbit and on to the moon or Mars.

Vice President Mike Pence addresses workers at the Kennedy Space Center

NASA TV

The Boeing and SpaceX ferry ships are expected to make their first piloted test flights next year while the first flight of the new SLS booster and an unpiloted Orion capsule is scheduled for 2019. The first crewed flight of the Orion/SLS system is targeted for the 2021 timeframe.

Speaking in general terms with frequent references and praise for the president, Pence seemed to re-emphasize NASA's current goals, saying "we will re-orient America's space program toward human space exploration and discovery for the benefit of the American people and all of the world."

"We will return our nation to the moon, we will go to Mars and we will still go farther to places that our children's children can only imagine," he said. "We will maintain a constant presence in low-Earth orbit and we'll develop policies that will carry human space exploration across our solar system. As the president has said, space is, in his words, the next great American frontier."

Pence made it clear that he plans to take an active role as chairman of the National Space Council and that he plans to hold the group's first meeting later this summer.

Play Video

NASA introduced 12 new astronauts, selected from more than 18,300 applicants, in a ceremony at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. Vice Preside...

"We'll review our current policy and our long-range goals and coordinate national space activities from national security to commerce to exploration and beyond," he said. "And crucially, at the president's direction, we will, in his words, foster close coordination, cooperation, technology and information exchange among all the stake holders and sectors involved in space activity."

That includes government agencies, the military and "leaders from the realms of private industry and the academic world. We will bring the best of America together once again to lead with Americans in space."

Current U.S. national space policy evolved in the wake of the 2003 shuttle Columbia disaster and President George Bush's decision in 2004 to complete the International Space Station and retire the space shuttle by the end of the decade and develop new rockets and spacecraft to carry astronauts back to the moon by the early 2020s for long-duration stays.

The Obama administration concluded the resulting Constellation moon program was not affordable and ordered a major change of course. The Orion spacecraft developed for the Constellation program was retained and NASA eventually won approval to design the heavy lift SLS booster.

But the moon was taken off the table in favor of a more nebulous "flexible path" strategy that called for visiting an asteroid in the mid 2020s before eventual flights to the vicinity of Mars in the mid 2030s.

President Trump canceled the asteroid retrieval mission that was a centerpiece of the Obama administration's policy and NASA managers have been quietly studying plans for a base of some sort in lunar orbit that could serve as a jumping off point for eventual deep space missions.

Play Video

NASA has big plans for Martian exploration with Mars 2020. Only on CBS This Morning, Jan Crawford take a behind-the-scenes look at the assembly...

But the Trump administration has not yet articulated a detailed space policy or named a NASA administrator to replace Charles Bolden, a former shuttle commander who led the agency during the Obama era.

But during a White House ceremony June 30, Trump signed an executive order re-establishing the National Space Council, a panel of civilian and military leaders responsible for coordinating civil, military and commercial space policies and programs.

"The National Space Council will be a central hub guiding space policy within the administration," Trump said. "And I will draw on it for advice and information and recommendations for action. And the Vice President, myself, and a few others are going to pick some private people to be on the board. ... Some of the most successful people in the world want to be on this board."

Chaired by Pence, the council will include the secretaries of State, Defense, Commerce, Homeland Security and Transportation, along with the director of the Office of Management and Budget, the director of the White House Science and Technology Policy office, the director of National Intelligence and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The yet-to-be-named administrator of NASA also will be on the panel, along with other senior government and industry leaders.

John Logsdon, a noted space historian, author and space policy analyst, said the National Space Council has had a checkered on-again, off-again history. The National Aeronautics and Space Council was established by Congress in the act that created NASA in 1958. Originally chaired by the president, it was intended to coordinate civilian space projects and national security space initiatives.

President John F. Kennedy made his vice president, Lyndon Johnson, the chairman of the panel. Logsdon credited the council with playing a key role in Kennedy's decision to send astronauts to the moon in what became the Apollo program.

The council fell into disuse after Kennedy's assassination when subsequent vice presidents Hubert Humphrey and Spiro Agnew expressed little interest in space. President Richard Nixon ultimately did away with the council in 1973.

But congressional interest revived it toward the end of the Reagan administration and President George H.W. Bush brought the new panel into being under the leadership of Vice President Dan Quayle.

Logsdon said the National Space Council played an initially strong role, but the panel was eliminated by President Bill Clinton in a broader move to cut costs across the executive branch.

The National Space Council, Logsdon said, has a "mixed record, and it totally depends on how the president relates to the vice president and how the vice president chooses to use his limited influence, whether he makes this an area of priority for him, which Humphrey and Agnew did not, Bush-Quayle did. You can't really predict."

As for what Pence and the council might do in the near term, Logsdon cautioned not to expect any immediate changes in direction.

"Obama came in in '09 having been warned by his transition team that there were problems with Constellation, and his first step was to carry out a major review of Constellation, which was the Augustine committee," Logsdon said. "Then a year later, a year after taking office, he made his big space policy decision.

"I think it's entirely plausible that maybe the first task for the Space Council is to review the program as it now exists, make some recommendations with changes six or nine months down the line."

Here is the original post:
Vice President Mike Pence vows to make space program great again - CBS News

The national drama over a federal commission on election integrity has come home to roost at the White House.

Most of the darts flying over the panel and its massive request for voter data have been aimed at the panels vice chairman, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach.

But the actual boss of the panel, created after President Donald Trump claimed without evidence that millions of voted illegally in the 2016 elections, is Vice President Mike Pence. And until now, hes ducked the negative attention in the face of whats become a nationwide backlash against the commission.

On Thursday, a spokesman for Pence went on television to confront the matter of Kobachs request for sensitive voter data including Americans election participation records, party affiliation, military and criminal history and even partial Social Security numbers.

One of the things I think youre seeing is a little bit of partisanship and some gamesmanship by a few states, Pence spokesman Marc Lotter said during an appearance on Fox & Friends.

It should be noted that most states, about 36 right now, are actively working with the commission or are looking at the request from the commission to see what they can release publicly under their state laws, Lotter continued. Its important to note that all the commission is seeking is publicly available data data that states on a regular basis provide to campaigns, state political parties and other national groups.

Really, the question you have to ask is for those 14 states that say they are not going to comply is, What are they trying to hide? Lotter asked. What are they covering up, or is this just pure partisanship that they may be ignoring their own state laws and their own public records laws in terms of what they can release and should release to the commission?

Lotters argument is at odds with published reports that officials from more than 40 states both Republican and Democrat have refused to cooperate with the commissions data request, citing privacy or legal concerns. Meanwhile, watchdog groups are calling the commission as a whole a racist dog whistle geared at voter suppression.

Rick Hasen, a professor of law and political science at the University of California, Irvine, who has been sharply critical of the voter panel on his Election Law Blog and in writings elsewhere, told Mic the Lotter appearance certainly ties the vice president closely to the work of the commission.

It is most unusual to have a commission headed by someone who is a candidate for re-election, debating the best election rules for an election the chair himself will run in, he added, dryly.

This is hardly the first time Pence, who didnt even have the current president as his first choice for GOP nominee last year, has had to use the skills he gleaned from years in both media and radio to defend Trumps positioning.

Darrell West, vice president and director of governance studies at the Brookings Institution, said on Thursday that Pence has to take responsibility because he is the formal chair of the group.

[Members of Pences team] are the ones guiding the effort and pushing for further analysis, West said. They clearly see this as a vehicle to crack down on fraud and enact more stringent voter-suppression rules in the future. People should not ignore Pence in all the discussion over Kobach, because he also has spoken about fraud and exaggerated its scope and impact.

Vice President Mike Pence and his wife, Karen, arrive for a visit to Colorado Springs, Colorado, in June.

Larry Sabato of the University of Virginias Center for Politics said in an email interview that it was absolutely Pences problem.

He knows very well that there is nothing to Trumps claim of 3 to 5 million illegal votes, or even any substantial vote fraud in 2016, Sabato said. Yet hell have to find a way to create enough doubt about fraud to please the boss and give Trump enough facts to justify his bluster.

On the flip side, Robert Popper, who heads the Election Integrity Project at Judicial Watch a self-described conservative, nonpartisan educational foundation insisted theres nothing to see here.

In a video released Thursday afternoon, Popper, a former deputy chief of the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, said, We at Judicial Watch routinely ask states for their voter registration rolls. And we get them.

Private marketing groups get ahold of these voter registration lists all the time. Theyre for sale, theyre exchanged. The idea that the Trump administration is doing something outrageous is nonsense, Popper said. What theyre doing is gathering data on voter registration that weve needed for years.

Even if thats the case, the election integrity panel seems in no hurry to face in-person questions about its mission when it meets for the first time July 19. According to the Federal Register, the commission will only accept written comments from the public at this first meeting, though individuals will have the opportunity to make oral comments at future gatherings of the panel.

Neither a Pence spokesman nor the federal worker designated as the panels contact responded to Mics requests for comment.

Allegra Chapman, director of voting and elections for the government accountability group Common Cause, said keeping the public away is a way for the government here to control the narrative.

If the commission can quash questions about methods or tactics or the data that theyre using, Chapman said in a phone interview, it is more free to push a pre-ordained agenda.

What agenda might that be? Continuing to spread this fear, this myth, that there is widespread illegal voting going on across the country and that states should be sort of putting into place some new restrictions based on that, she said.

Go here to see the original:
The election commission's woes are Mike Pence's problem now - Mic

Media outlets seemed to take immense pleasure in tarring Pence as misogynistic, sexist and medieval for his efforts to be a faithful husband, with journalists comparing his actions to Sharia law with its subjugation of women as inherently inferior to men.

Referring to Pences 2002 statement that he never drinks in public unless his wife is with him and doesnt eat alone with a woman other than his wife, Erin Duffy slammed the Vice President in an article in Fortune, schooling him that women are people, too and accusing him of shifting the blame for extra-marital affairs to women. His dumb dinner rule puts women at a disadvantage, she huffed.

Writing in the Huffington Post, Emma Gray said that in Pences worldview, men have no self-control, and women are either temptresses or guardians of virtue. Moreover, the Pences Christianity is part of a system that works to prop up male power and keep women subordinate.

And yet as hard as the media tried to paint Pence as woefully out of touch for his antiquated views of marital fidelity, a new poll finds that most Americans actually agree with him.

It was none other than the New York Times, declared foe of the Trump administration, to publish the results of a survey showing that U.S. citizens believe that married people need to be careful in their dealings with the opposite sex if they want to be faithful to their spouses.

A majority of women, and nearly half of men, say its unacceptable to have dinner or drinks alone with someone of the opposite sex other than their spouse, writes Claire Cain Miller in her analysis of the polls findings.

Over all, people thought dinner or drinks with a member of the opposite sex other than a spouse was the most inappropriate, with more people disapproving than approving, Miller said. Lunch and car rides were less objectionable, but more than a third of people said they were inappropriate.

As Mollie Hemingway noted in an insightfulessay following the poll, How out of touch are newsrooms that they thought this position was Sharia-like, as opposed to what it turns out to be: completely normal?

It is small wonder that the mainstream media were unable to fathom a Trump-Pence victory last November, since the bubble they live in excludes rank-and-file Americans who are trying to make a living, raise families and be true to their spouses and their friends.

It would seem like those who are truly out of touch with Americans are not the Pences, but the media that cannot abide them.

Follow Thomas D. Williams on Twitter

P.S. DO YOU WANT MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS ONE DELIVERED RIGHT TO YOUR INBOX?SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY BREITBART NEWSLETTER.

Read more:
NYT Poll: Americans Agree with Mike Pence's Rules About Dining with Women - Breitbart News