Archive for July, 2017

Forum, July: In Defense of Hillary Clinton – Valley News

In Defense of Hillary Clinton

I was disturbed to read that columnist Willem Lange (The Democrats Have Lost Their Bearings Along the Way, July 5) joined the many disgruntled Americans who voted for Hillary Clinton because the alternative was unthinkable. At a recent social event here in Grantham, neighbors sat around a table lamenting the fact that both candidates were flawed.

I am not a historian or a politician, but am very interested in both American history and our political history. I read widely and have worked for every political candidate whose ideas I support. (Full disclosure: I am culturally deprived. I do not watch Fox News.) I believe that Hillary Clinton was the most qualified presidential candidate in my lifetime, more qualified than her husband and certainly more qualified than any of the candidates mentioned by Lange in his column, even Joe Kennedy, whom I admire.

Clinton has been maligned by some in letters to this newspaper for daring to try to explain her loss, and by others for retreating into relative obscurity. I write to praise her for her dignity, her intelligence, patriotism and gravitas. She is a class act.

Judy McCarthy

Grantham

Sad but true!

So sad that Twitter users did not recognize our own Declaration of Independence (NPRs Declaration of Independence Tweets Called Propaganda, July 7).

The tradition of reading the Declaration dates back to the first Fourth and I am thankful to NPR for doing that reading every year. Thank you for printing this story that underlines the strong feelings people have in this day and time, plus many more good op-eds to keep us informed.

Susan Westbrook

Randolph

As we celebrated July Fourth: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

In 1776, there was no need to mention medical care, since purging and bleeding were the mainstays of treatment back when life expectancy was 36 years. Modern health concepts and medical science have altered disease, alleviated suffering and extended life. So it is gratifying to see our nation coming to recognize the moral imperative of affordable health care.

However, we are hobbled by a 70-year legacy of supposed free-market and employer-based insurance concepts to the realm of health care. Medicare remains the most efficient (2-3 percent overhead) and popular form of American health insurance since 1965. But younger Americans increasingly became uninsured in the two decades before Obamacare, as fewer employees received benefits from lifelong employers, and health premiums for the self-insured became progressively unaffordable. Not long ago, 62 percent of U.S. personal bankruptcy was a consequence of medical expenses and 75 percent of Americans who incurred medical bankruptcy did so while covered by flimsy under-insurance that was affordable but worthless.

The introduction of multiple patchwork, tax-funded programs (Medicaid, Medicare, SCHIP, ACA, VA, tax credits, etc.) to this system has resulted in the most expensive and inefficient health care system in the world. Pharmaceutical and health lobbies support the pretense that free-market rules apply. In the effort to avoid any taint of socialism, we spend more tax money per capita than any other developed country, but rank dead last in efficiency, equity and outcome.

As we reflect on American values and our health care, its time to become educated on the advantages of substituting an expanded Medicare for All to our citizens, business and our nation. Please join us on Sunday at 2 p.m. for a panel discussion and information meeting on Medicare for All at Main Street BookEnds in Warner, N.H.

Kenneth Dolkart, M.D.

Grantham

I was encouraged to see that a Vermont legislative committee delayed until October adopting new rules for wind turbines in the state. Although there are many legitimate concerns individuals may have concerning large wind turbines on ridgelines near their homes and community, there are also many ways of addressing those concerns without making efficient wind power installation impractical or impossible in Vermont.

Near-100 percent carbon-free energy will be essential if we are to limit our planets temperature to levels conducive to life, and perhaps even to pre-industrial levels. And because both wind and solar power will be essential ingredients in this centurys carbon-free energy system, Vermont should be very careful to develop its guidelines in such a way as not to limit Vermonts ridgeline wind potential.

Vermonts wind energy potential belongs to all of us. And like our roads, wind power generated as part of our states carbon-free energy infrastructure will serve us all. And also like our roads and other infrastructure, restrictions to construct must not be allowed based on the interests of a few who may be affected. Rather, the entire states interest must be weighed.

Carbon-free energy system development, just as for roads or other public infrastructure, should include reimbursement costs to those adversely affected. A science-based effort to define reimbursable impacts should be an important part of any new legislation impacting carbon-free energy development.

Charles McKenna

Wilder

Go here to see the original:
Forum, July: In Defense of Hillary Clinton - Valley News

TIME Person of the Year Runner Up: Recep Tayyip Erdogan

A failed coup left the Turkish president even more powerful BY JARED MALSIN

When a rogue faction of Turkeys military moved to seize control of the country on the night of July 15, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was on vacation in the Mediterranean city of Marmaris. Alerted to the coup attempt, he escaped his hotel just ahead of commandos sent to capture or possibly kill him, clinging to power by a thread. Yet in response he flew not to the capital, Ankara, where warplanes were bombing the parliament building, but to Istanbul, where he had come of age and begun his career in politics, and is still remembered as the mayor who brought running water to the citys slums. The capital was slightly closer and contained the levers of power that the putschists scrambled to control. But Erdogan placed his bet on the people who had known him longestand who he knew would fight for him.

For much of that night, doubt clouded the one thing that had been clear for close to 14 years in Turkey: who was in charge. A turning point came when Erdoganunable to address the public on TV stations commandeered by coup plottersconnected to a private Turkish newscaster over the iPhone app FaceTime. As the anchor held her phone up to the camera, the President urged his supporters to take to the streets. It was after midnight. In the hours that followed, more than 265 people would be killed, but by dawn, troops participating in the coup were fleeing. Later that day, a triumphant Erdogan appeared before throngs in Istanbul, calling for prosecution of the plotters. We want execution! the crowd chanted back. The President had emerged from his near-death experience stronger than everand ever more determined to tighten his grip on power.

Watershed moments have not been scarce in the Middle East lately, but in recent decades it has been rare for one to take place in Istanbul, the city that reigned over the entire region for 400 years. The sultans of the Ottoman Empire ruled from palaces overlooking the Bosporus Strait, but when their empire collapsed after World War I, what followed was not royal drama but processthe methodical construction of what would replace empires in organizing the world: a nation-state. The new Republic of Turkey, founded by the indomitable Kemal Ataturk, was democratic and oriented to the West, which in the early years of the Cold War made it the easternmost member of NATO. And the hope ardently voiced by visiting U.S. diplomatsand by the Turkish generals who repeatedly succeeded in deposing elected governments deemed too religious or unpredictablewas that it would inspire secular, democratic imitators in nearby lands.

It never did. Not even, as it turned out, in Turkey. Erdogan, 62, had survived, and with him, his grip on power. In the neighborhood around Erdogans house, one group pushed through the crowd, carrying the Turkish flagthe banner of what surveys count as one of the most nationalistic nations on earthand chanting Allahu akbar! or God is great! We believe, said Ayse Kol, 20, on a corner two blocks from the Presidents home, that Recep Tayyip Erdogan is a world leader.

The president had emerged from his near-death experience stronger than ever

He is that, if only by dint of how much of the world gathers around him, awaiting his decisions. The strands of crises from both Europe and Asia now collide in Turkey. The European Union has all but outsourced its refugee crisis to Erdogan and, with it, the future of Europes own elected leaders, if not the E.U. itself. The democratic leaders of Western Europe now implore and bargain with the Turkish autocrat to cease the flow of Syrian refugees and other migrants into a continent whose politics is increasingly defined by backlash to outsiders. At the same time, Erdogan has inserted Turkey directly into the wars raging on its borderssending troops into Iraq, whether they are welcome or not, in the assault on ISIS-held Mosul, and crossing the border into Syrias inferno. In both countries, Turkeys goal is both to suppress the radical extremists of ISISthe jihadists who have repeatedly drawn blood on Turkish soiland also to check the military might of Kurdish guerrillas who are fighting ISIS within Syria even as their brothers battle the state inside Turkey.

And just as authoritarianism surges back onto the world stage, Erdogan shows all the signs of a strongman in full. He has company. To the north lies Russia, the massive threat that Turkey has mistrusted since the days of competing empire, through the Cold War to the chilly equilibrium Erdogan now maintains with Vladimir Putin. The Turkish leader clashed with President Obama, but now Erdogan has welcomed the election of a fellow populist in Donald Trump. The President-elects first conversation with the Turkish leader, however, made news for Trumps raising his own business interests in Turkey, quoting his business partner to Erdogan as your great admirer. In a speech in Ankara on Nov. 9, Erdogan said Trumps election would bring a new era in U.S.-Turkey relations.

Half of the country adores Erdogan, and half of the country loathes him, says Soner Cagaptay of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Cagaptay says he expects Turkey to remain, in the best-case scenario, in a perpetual state of crisis.

Erdogans authoritarian impulseson display for years as he jailed journalists, critics and perceived rivalshave intensified. In the month following the coup, up to 36,000 people were detained, including so many F-16 pilots that the U.S.-led coalition attacking ISIS had to scramble to pick up the slack, according to U.S. Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James. Since the coup, human-rights groups have documented an increasing use of torture by security forces, but Turkish officials are unrepentant. In a state of emergency, were not in a situation to compete with Sweden or Denmark in terms of human-rights issues, says Egemen Bagis, Turkeys former chief negotiator in talks to enter the E.U.

Instead of providing a model for democracy, Turkeys leader represents a throwback: an elected autocrat, tolerated by the West for maintaining a certain stability within and without, overseeing a procedural democracy with a pliant press and a dominant political party that serves only his wishes. His housing reflects his indispensability. The presidential mansion completed in 2014 that Erdogan calls home has more than 1,000 rooms, including one with a lab dedicated to detecting poison in the Presidents food. The decor, heavy on red carpets, marble and chandeliers, suggests a return to Ottoman glory.

From Islamist to Populist Erdogan is a deeply religious man in a country where the elites are staunchly secular. It is a tension that defines both Erdogans place in his nations history and his countrys complex place in the world.

When Erdogans Justice and Development Party (known by its Turkish acronym AKP) swept into parliament in an election in 2002, its leader was still barred from office for espousing Islamism. (Erdogan even spent four months in jail in 1998 for reciting a religious poemone likening minarets to bayonets.) Turkey is so secular that female civil servants were banned from wearing headscarves until 2013. Since taking office, Erdogan has survived mass protests and a devastating corruption scandal, along the way sidelining anyone in Turkish politics who could conceivably challenge his hold on power.

After Erdogan moved from the Prime Ministers office to the presidency in 2014, his party briefly lost its majority in parliament in 2015. But it prevailed again in a snap election later that year, which followed the resumption of a long-running civil war with militants from the countrys Kurdish minority. The renewed fighting undermined a pro-Kurdish party that had lured away many AKP voters. In early November, authorities jailed Selahattin Demirtas, the leader of the party, a former human-rights lawyer noted for his opposition to Erdogans bid to amend Turkeys constitution so that the presidency, his new office, would hold unprecedented powers. Thanks to the coup attempt, Erdogan is poised to push through the change, cementing his rule for years to come.

Burak KaraGetty ImagesTurkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan speaks on CNNTurk via a Facetime call in the early morning hours of July 16, 2016 in Istanbul.

Through the early years of Erdogans premiership, Turkeys economy grew and the middle class expanded, while his government moved to make peace with some of the nations internal contradictions. It granted more rights to the minority Kurdsan ethnic group in southern Turkey as well as in surrounding countriesand entered into talks with the outlawed guerrillas of the Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK. Erdogan occasionally alarmed liberals with retrograde proposals, like a 2004 plan to criminalize adultery, but he rarely followed through. For years his government also had a nasty habit of jailing journalists and critics. But Turkey had its first government grounded in the mutual regard of voters from the Anatolian heartlandreligious and conservative, but also intensely nationalistic.

There was even talk of exporting its success. If Erdogan is a survivor, he is also a political operator who adapted his message to match the shifting winds of international politics. In 2011, as the Arab Spring toppled despots and left populations in Tunisia, Egypt and elsewhere casting about for a system of government, the AKPs brand of moderate Islamism appeared to offer a model. In those days the partys vision was outward-looking, seeking to establish Turkey as a leader of the Sunni Muslim world, yet keeping alive the hope of one day joining the E.U.

This is the Erdogan paradox. In 2011, he cast himself as an exemplar for the Arab Spring. Five years later, he stands as an icon of both populism and repression. In the aftermath of the failed July coup, he oversaw the arrest of dozens of journalists and opposition leadersincluding many with no apparent tie to the coups alleged ringleader: the onetime Erdogan ally turned nemesis Fethullah Gulen. The moderate Muslim cleric, 75, is regarded as a cultlike figure who operates a global educational and religious empire from exile in rural Pennsylvania. Erdogan has demanded the extradition of Gulen, whom he considers a terrorist. The Obama Administration says it is reviewing the request.

Erdogan is attuned to the brutish mood of politics across the world

The postcoup clampdown has not isolated Erdogan internationally. In Europe, the right is gaining. In the Middle East, authoritarian leaders are snuffing out what remains of the Arab revolts, presenting themselves as the only alternative to the chaos in Syria, Iraq and lawless Libya. And in the U.S., Trump is rewriting the rules of politics, ushering in a new era of chauvinism.

Istanbul born and raised Erdogan was born in Istanbul to a father who migrated to the city from the Black Sea coast and at one point worked as a ferry captain in Istanbul. It was the era of Prime Minister Adnan Menderes, whose coalition of poorer, slightly more conservative, more overtly religious people prefigured the AKP, and likewise chafed at the rule of the so-called White Turk Western-facing elites. Toward the end of his rule, Menderes turned increasingly to authoritarian methods, and he was overthrown in 1960 in the first of Turkeys military coups. Erdogan advisers say he remembered hearing his father weep while listening to the news of Menderes execution by hanging. Erdogan is basically the result of Turkish political evolution in the last 90-plus years, which has always been a game of rough politics, says Burak Kadercan, a political scientist at the U.S. Naval War College in Rhode Island.

Istanbuls Kasimpasa neighborhood is draped on a hillside on the citys European side. The rows of apartment buildings are wedged close to each other, and the roads slope vertically. Erdogan spent the latter portion of his childhood and the first part of his adulthood there. After he graduated from a religious school, he became a semiprofessional soccer player, a businessman and a leader in the emerging world of Islamist politics in the 1980s.

His associates often say Erdogans faith grants him a rare patience and self-assuredness. Can Paker, a businessman and intellectual who has known Erdogan for years, says, In many talks, I have seen that he believed that whatever comes will come from God and is his destiny. Even on the night of the coup attempt, the President later told Paker, he had been thinking, Whatever will come is from Allah.

But people who knew him in the early days of his political career say his real strength was retail politics: connecting with individual people. Semha Karaoglu, 50, who runs a convenience store across the street from Erdogans old apartment, remembers him as a polite man who worked long hours and bought sweets for the neighborhood children. Erdogan stayed in touch, even inviting the shopkeeper to his daughters wedding. On the night of the coup, she says, she felt a personal fear for Erdogans family. But when I saw Tayyip Erdogan on TV, I relaxed and I knew everything would be O.K.

Around the corner, the manager of a tea shop approaches. I could write a book about Erdogan, but in a negative way, he says. The economy is going down; the sources of growth, industries like textiles, are shutting down. He declines to give his name. I dont want to go to prison just because I talked to you, he says before walking away.

After nearly 14 years in national office, Erdogans lifestyle is no longer his old neighbors. But former speechwriter Huseyin Besli, who has known the President for some 40 years, said Erdogan makes a point of eating street food wherever he goes, cajoling his aides to join him. When hes going to a TV interview at night, if he has time hell go to a taxi stand and sit with the drivers and listen to them, he says.

That charisma and political talent can veer into the realm of a personality cult. He appears keen to cast himself as the new Ataturk and has pushed aside any who would question him, even mild-mannered Ahmet Davutoglu, who resigned as Premier in May. By surviving the July coup, Erdogan also managed to vanquish two other powerful rivals: One was the militaryalready largely neutered by prosecutions of past coup plots and a 2010 referendum that allowed officers to be tried in civilian courts. The other was Gulen, whose vast network of loyalists insinuated themselves within the state for decades, at least according to the government and some experts. Erdogan has used the coup attempt to purge around a third of the militarys top leadership and decimate the ranks of the judiciary and other bureaucracies.

The crackdown didnt stop there. Erdogan expanded the sweep to include political rivals who had nothing to do with the coup. In early November, police arrested the leaders of the Peoples Democratic Party, a leftist, pro-Kurdish group that controls the third largest share of parliament. A week earlier, authorities rounded up the editors and top reporters of one of Turkeys oldest and most respected newspapers, Cumhuriyet, joining dozens of papers, radio stations and websites closed after the failed putsch. Erdogan has become so paranoid, so power-hungry, he doesnt even allow institutions to flourish, says Gonul Tol, a Turkey analyst at the Middle East Institute in Washington. It has become a one-man show.

And abroad? As Turkeys bad neighborhood grows rougher still, it remains far from certain that Erdogan will ever exert anywhere near the same dominance over the Middle East that he has at home. Muslim but not Arab, Turkey also is handicapped by the burden of its Ottoman legacya source of pride among Turks, but of apprehension among those they once ruled. Yet that doesnt mean Erdogan wont try.

This was the year he mended fences with Russia after downing one of its warplanes, and with Israel after six years of strife, even as the chance that Turkey will ever actually join the E.U. became ever more remote. But Erdogans foreign policy was branded neo-Ottoman even before he justified sending troops to Iraq and Syria by questioning the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, which set the borders of the state that followed the empire. We cannot act in the year 2016 with the psychology of 1923, he said on Oct. 18. Adding, We did not voluntarily accept the borders of our country, he urged that young Turks be taught that Mosul was once theirs. In another speech, he cast a growing regional conflict not in terms of nations but of sects. What you call Baghdad is an administrator of an army composed of Shiites, he said.

Peace at home, peace abroad was the slogan Turkish schoolchildren learned from Ataturk. Under Erdogan, the country may end up with neither.

Go here to read the rest:
TIME Person of the Year Runner Up: Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Trump, Putin and Erdogan: the three men upending global diplomacy – CNN

The first says: "I'm the most powerful man in the room -- 33 million people follow me on Twitter."

And the third says: "No, I'm the most powerful man in the room -- I've got all the passwords."

The punch line, of course, is that no one can tell any of them that they are wrong.

The G20 summit in Hamburg comes at time of particular global disunity. Elder statesmen and women of diplomacy have declared that the post-WWII world order is over, potentially leaving decades of dependable stability in terminal decline.

As today's most powerful 20 leaders gather in Germany's northern port city, some among them may cast an eye across the city's skyline remembering when much here looked as Mosul does today: crumpled and broken by war.

In July 1943, allied bombers began an aerial bombing campaign, Operation Gomorrah. In just eight days, 42,000 civilians were killed and 37,000 were injured.

The awfulness of that war and the international desire to never again allow megalomaniacs to hold complete global sway is part of what makes the meeting of world leaders at the G20 today so important. It is, partly, why we should all care that some of the many grievances that these leaders will grudgingly discuss here do get resolved.

It doesn't help that some of those arriving in Hamburg toting the biggest bags of diplomatic gripes and animus are world leaders buried so far in their own beliefs that they've lost sight of the art of compromise.

He comes to the G20 a global outlier on climate change. Shortly after the G7 summit in May, he snubbed the other leaders by dumping Barack Obama's commitment to the Paris climate accord.

And like Putin, Trump's disruptions are not singular. He has recently ratcheted up tension with China, courting controversy over weapon sales to Taiwan and testing waters around disputed islands -- not to mention his tough talk on trade.

All of that baggage seems to sink any hope of a meeting of minds on North Korea, something other G20 leaders were hoping might walk the region back from the risk of nuclear-tipped confrontation.

Of course this is exactly the impact North Korea's Kim Jong Un will have hoped for.

They will both likely agree that the other outsized strongman attending -- Turkey's President Erdogan -- is an emerging problem child. Not only because he administered a referendum that delivered the powers of Parliament to his hands in the presidency, but also his penchant for riotous assembly.

Trump's problems with Erdogan are bigger than Merkel's. As fighting in the Syrian war appears to be reaching its conclusion -- ISIS is losing its grip of its previous stronghold and de facto capital in Raqqa -- Trump's arming of Kurdish fighters to kill ISIS fighters angers Erdogan, who considers both ISIS and the Kurdish forces to be terrorists.

For his part, Putin is happy to have Trump and Erdogan squabble over this -- it allows his ally Assad to reap the rewards.

But beyond the fight for Raqqa, the real strategic end game in Syria is the race for the ISIS-riddled eastern town of Deir Ezzor. It'll be the hidden subtext of any G20 talk over Syria.

If Assad gets there first, then he, Russia and Iran control the vital highways that turn the Tehran, Baghdad, Damascus, Beirut axis into one smooth tarmac ride from the Persian mountains and Iran's mullahs to their seaside proxies Hezbollah, more than 1,000 miles away in Lebanon.

This outcome is unpalatable to G20 member Saudi Arabia. As King Salman has canceled his visit, the diplomatic stakes are already raised. His son, the young, ambitious and recently promoted Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, is likely to be far tougher to tame at the top table of global politics.

MBS, as he is known, arrives already exercised by tiny Gulf state Qatar's refusal to fall into line with his and the UAE's recent demands to cut its ties with terrorist groups, among other things. His peers at the summit will no doubt encourage the young prince to cool his jets and try to reach a deal.

This backdrop makes it unlikely that he will be in any sort of mood to compromise on Syria and see his nemesis Iran gain more traction in the region.

British Prime Minister Theresa May is up for making friends and getting deals done, but her clout is on the wane.

Yet it's not all doom and gloom. A rising international star, the fresh-faced French President Emmanuel Macron, can be expected to inject some optimism. He believes Trump can be brought in from the isolationism of "America First."

His first G20 could be his fellow europhile centrist Angela Merkel's last.

Germans go to the polls in the next few months. While she seems to enjoy something of a lead, not to mention the respect of many of the leaders, she could still use a positive summit to boost her popularity.

But even on this Trump is a disruptor.

He has talked Merkel down so much -- criticizing her refugee policy and slamming German car sales to the US -- that she has decided to let his German critics be heard by holding the G20 in a city center building that can and likely will be surrounded by protestors.

Suffice to say, rarely in the field of recent global diplomacy have so many relied on so few for so much.

Therefore it's a shame, in a way, about the strongmen.

A few less of those might just have tipped the balance towards a more favourable G20 outcome.

Talking of which, did you hear about the three world leaders who left the meeting room? They all agreed that they were the best leaders at the meeting and had won all their arguments.

Originally posted here:
Trump, Putin and Erdogan: the three men upending global diplomacy - CNN

In Turkey, Erdogan’s Post-Revolutionary Agenda Invades Classrooms and Threatens Universities – The Wire

Education Erdogans conservative AKP has doubled religion class hours, removed evolutionary theory from classrooms and shut down universities in his bid to raise a pious generation.

Turkeys Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan addresses members of parliament from his ruling AK Party during a meeting at the Turkish parliament. Credit: Reuters/Umit Bektas

While the earliereducation reforms of Turkeys socially conservative AKP (Justice and Development Party) pointed towards inclusiveness, the current ones have a far more troubling direction.

Not content with removing around 45,000 education ministry staff from the government payroll following an abortive coup in July last year, Turkeys ruling party is now looking to take down Darwin.

Last month the government announced thatthe theory of evolutionwouldbe removed from the teaching curriculum at Turkish schools until students reach university.

The announcement adds to evidence cited by concerned secularists who suggestTurkeys education system is being remodelled in line with President Erdogans bid to raise pious generations and forge a New Turkey.

Efforts to rejigthe countrys teaching curriculum along more religious lines are not new, dating back at least asFebruary 2012.

What has changed since is President Erdogans seemingly unassailable position in post-coup attempt and post-referendum Turkey.

New Turkey

Despite its shrunken majority and the ever-increasing polarization of the Turkish electorate or perhaps because of these things AKP is pushing its policy agenda more aggressively than ever before.

Along with the ban on evolution in the classroom, the AKP educational reforms will seethe governments narrative on the 2016coup attemptembedded in school syllabi, while class time dedicated to modern Turkeys secular founder Kemal Attaturk will be reduced.

Forced enrolment of some school-age students intocontroversial religious imam-hatip stateschoolsis another feature of the new education agenda.

The AKP government won praise from both liberals and conservatives for managingtoreverse the countrysrepressive ban on headscarfs in universities back in 2010.The moveallowed womenfrom observant Muslim families to receive furthereducation.

But the imam-hatip schools have faced criticism for discouraging girls from doing that very thing.Secularists seetheschools growing rolein Turkeys education system as yet another sign thatAKP is trying to recast the country in its own traditionalist image.

An evolving threat

Accordingto the head of curriculum for the Turkish education ministry, teaching evolution in schoolsis controversial, but opponents of the ban were quick to side with science.

(They have removed evolution from the curriculum, biology class hours have been reduced by 33%, while religion class hours have been increased by 100%. God willing, we are going to get ahead of Iran soon.)

(They are removing evolution theory class. I am not wondering what they are going to teach our children.)

(There wont be any classes on evolution. But there are classes on Sharia criminal law and religion. This is the meaning of New Turkey.)

(Biology class, first class, first slide: evolution is real, and cannot be argued against. I have remembered this for 29 years. The teacher was right.)

The international response has also beencritical:

Currently the evolution ban only applies to schools, but many fear that universities are being targetedfor a serious government-led overhaul, too. Thousands of academics weredismissedfrom their jobs following the military coup, whileout of 180 universities currently operating in Turkey, 15 wereshut down.

This article originally appeared in Global Voices.

Categories: Education, External Affairs, Religion, Science, Society, World

Tagged as: AKP, Erdogan, evolutionary theory, new turkey, no-donate-link, pious generation, Sharia, Turkey coup

Visit link:
In Turkey, Erdogan's Post-Revolutionary Agenda Invades Classrooms and Threatens Universities - The Wire

Does the SEO Firm You Hired Know SEO? – TrainingZone.co.uk (blog)

Congratulations! You just hired an SEO firm to climb the SERPs and enjoy a tsunami of targeted visitors to your site. However, before finally sending in the money against the invoice, stop and think!

Are you sure that the firm you hired the SEO packages from really knows their game? Or did this question itself kicked off warning bells inside your head? For if it did, we have the right 5 pointers to help you know which is the typical SEO company and which is not!

Meta Tags: Check for the Meta Tags on the pages. Meta tags can be a large warning sign for any potential client to look at the authenticity and the efficacy of an SEO firm. The more potent and targeted Meta Tags for an SEO company is, the more you can trust the people who will be working for you.

SEO Content: Don't fall for tall claims from SEO agencies that they have the best copywriting hands on deck. Check their content as a sample. Mean, grammatically incorrect, academically written lots of texts, etc. that have been given off as SEO copy can be another indication that this is not the firm you had been looking for, irrespective of how affordable the cases can be.

301 Re-direct: 301 Re-direct has to be executed right by any and every SEO company. The one that doesn't do it (a redirect to the www version of the site whenever the "www" has not been typed into the URL) is not worthy of your investment, money or time!

The range of Services or SEO Packages: The extent of the SEO company's acumen is also a fair indicator of the company's ability to deliver on the promises it makes. So if you find an SEO firm that looks decent and offers almost all of the branches in an SEO package deal (viral marketing, Organic SEO, PPC, content development, Blogging, etc.) - you should know that you have struck gold!

The SEO Firm's Rankings: 'People living in glass houses can mirror the world best.' So you know, the more SEO-competitive and well-established an SEO agency are, the better it will be in handling your SEO assignments through its customized SEO packages. So the next you are on the lookout for the best SEO packages, turn the tables on the SEO firm. Ask for a targeted keyword, Google it, and let the consequent rankings influence your decision.

See, it's easy to identify the best from the rest. All you need is SEO Expert Igor Lav as a layman, understand the way SEO packages are structured and customized. And oh yes, you need to have the points above in mind too!

With these tips in your arsenal, the possibility of being fleeced by amateur SEO firms is as bleak as Steve Jobs going bankrupt! On a serious note, if you have been a hawk-eye as far as selecting SEO packages are concerned, you will have safe passage to the top of SERPs in no time!

See the article here:
Does the SEO Firm You Hired Know SEO? - TrainingZone.co.uk (blog)