Archive for July, 2017

ALEC’s Covert War on Democracy – HuffPost

The 2017 ALEC Convention in Denver marks 44 years of legislative members & their corporate funders writing laws to benefit the corporate bottom line.

Describing an illiberal or managed democracy, political philosopher Sheldon Wolin and others draw a picture of U.S. government acting as servant of dominant corporate money that subverts democracy, overwhelms representative government and sacrifices the common good, as the major political parties, too, are often captive to corporate control. The people are often excluded from exerting influence, where government takes legitimacy from elections that they have learned to control, and where highly concentrated media corporations determine what is legitimate news.

Almost nonexistent voter fraud captures medias attention, but not the huge disenfranchisement of voters prior to the 2016 elections. The American Legislative Exchange Council, serving large corporate interests, has set the stage for the systematic dismantling of democracy, beginning with voter suppression laws. Since the Supreme Court effectively gutted the 1965 Voting Rights Act in Shelby County vs. Holder, Jim Crow tactics have regained a hold. In 2016 Greg Palast cited at least nine methods of attacking the right to vote of Black, Latino and Asian-American voters, including Caging, purging, blocking legitimate registrations, and wrongly shunting millions to provisional ballots that will never be counted.

Prior to 2016 elections, Operation Crosscheck voter lists compiled by Kansas Secretary of State and white supremacist Kris Kobach, and reportedly distributed to 29 Republican state voting officials, led to the purge of over one million registered voters who had the same first and last names. Kobach now serves as vice chair of the so-called Trump Voter Fraud Commission that seeks lists of all voters from every state. It would be difficult to overstate the consequences of widespread voter disenfranchisement, which should not be normalized. Elections have consequences, assert political operatives. Conversely, Illegitimate elections have illegitimate consequences.

At the forefront of mobilization of anti-democratic activity for over four decades is the Koch-/corporate-funded American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), working below the radar, serving as a catalyst to bring together legislators and their corporate funders in common cause to write legislation in service of their corporate bottom lines. As always, their scheduled 44th Annual Meeting in Denver, July 19-21, will take place behind closed doors, open only to corporate members who contribute thousands of dollars and up, and legislative members who pay up to $100, often directly from their campaign coffers. ALEC presents itself as a 501(c)(3) educational organization that provides nonpartisan research, study and analysis; their professed intent - to develop research-based model policies focused on limited government, free markets and federalism. Limited government is an understatement - it is government truly limited to serving and serving up large financial gains to captains of industry who write policy and in turn grease the palms of their legislative servants who enact their policy for them.

Common Cause has challenged ALECs tax-exempt nonprofit status even as ALEC actively lobbies for profit-driven legislation to benefit corporate members.

ALEC Seeks to Crush Participatory Democracy by Supplanting Voter, Worker & Local Power

Century-long judicial activism by conservative courts have reversed the power equation between corporations and the people who created them, even as unlimited cash has come to dominate corrupted politics, exacerbated by the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission. Massive amounts of cash are directed to campaigns, initiatives and litigation, even as decades of policies have effectively transferred wealth upward.

All that is left for friends of oligarchs is to crush participatory democracy. A primary goal of ALEC and its local government subsidiary, the American City County Exchange (ACCE) has been to suppress voter participation by erecting barriers in the form of photo ID laws and proof of citizenship requirements. Such strategies are intended to disenfranchise many vulnerable voters - the young, the old and minorities.

Achieving corporate goals begins with targeting local government regulations that might impede corporate profits. Ostensibly to promote limited government, ALEC and its allies seek to privatize-for-profit public services, transferring the Public Commons to corporations, thus boosting the corporate bottom line at the expense of the people. Prime targets of privatization include Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, public schools and state pensions.

Furthering the assaults on workers, ALEC-allied corporations seek to ban collective bargaining for public sector unions. Also crippling unions are so-called paycheck protection laws that prevent assessment of union dues for political purposes without annual reauthorization from each member. ALEC-promoted right-to-work campaigns undermine private sector unions. Still more worker assaults preempt minimum wage increases, and require a higher burden of proof in workers compensation cases, while removing no-fault provisions, effectively compelling a worker who loses a claim to pay the employers legal fees.

Preemption laws are part of a dual-track strategy used by corporations and politicians to block progressive policies at the local level. The second track occurs when industries and trade associations file a barrage of lawsuits against local governments as a warning to other localities against considering similar policies. Even as a state preemption bill was being advanced, six New Jersey trade associations rushed to court to challenge the passage of the November 2014 Earned Sick Days ballot measure. ALECs self-described battleground over worker compensation triggered renewed legislation and litigation against raise the wage initiatives in cities like Seattle and Los Angeles in 2014.

Michigans ALEC-backed Emergency Management Laws permit privatization of elected public offices, permitting a governor-appointed emergency manager to replace locally elected officials in a municipality. An emergency manager is granted power to destroy collective bargaining, to lower wages for public workers, to break public employee contracts, and to sell off public assets to the private sector. In such a capacity, a the Flint, Michigan Emergency Manager triggered one of the greatest toxic water emergencies in the U.S. by switching Flints water supply from Detroits system to the contaminated Flint River to save money.

Because it is easier for industry to work their money and influence in 50 state legislatures than in thousands of municipalities, ALEC creates model state preemption laws to directly or retroactively block local laws and ordinances. Preemption laws strip the right of local governance surrounding every conceivable issue, including minimum wage, paid sick leave and benefits, pensions, rent control, community broadband, cyanide heap leach mining, high-volume slick-water hydraulic fracturing (fracking), pesticide and GMO restrictions, plastic bag bans, gun safety laws, factory farming, or anything else industry desires to control.

The ultimate takedown of direct democracy has been the targeting of Citizen Ballot Initiatives, placing the process out of reach for all but the wealthy elite. In order to block proposals for worker protections or industry regulation, ALEC advocates making it harder to qualify referendum language, and requiring super-majorities to pass ballot initiatives. In 2016 the oil and gas industry spent hundreds of millions of dollars on Colorado Initiative 71 to place the Citizen Ballot Initiative out of reach for all but wealthy interests, requiring super-majority passage, as well as a percent of voter signatures from each of 35 state senate districts in order to place a subject on the ballot.

More Model Laws Authored by ALEC with Corporate Funders

Private Prison Industrial Complex Writes Immigration Law Model legislation written by ALEC with member Corrections Corporation of America, the largest U.S. private prison corporation, promoted in various states and enacted in Arizona, permits stopping anyone suspected of being undocumented, and imprisoning those not carrying proper paperwork.

ALEC & Utilities Promote Climate Change Denial & Suppression of Solar Energy Actively promoting climate change denial, ALEC has drafted model legislation in Florida and other states to depress incentives for rooftop solar by ending net metering, while the state Public Service Commission, at the request of Floridas Utility Companies, voted to end Floridas solar rebate program, and granted permission to Power and Light to invest $191 million of customer money in fracking operations in Oklahoma.

Preemption of Local Gun Laws Beginning in the 1990s ALEC worked with the gun industry to enact preemption of gun laws in almost every state. Additionally, super-preemption legislation pushed by the industry creates private right of action allowing individuals or groups the right to sue local governments or local officials if they believe they are enforcing local firearms laws.

Privatization of Public Education for Profit Seeking to privatize public education for profit of private corporations, Charles and David Koch have created a six-figure Colorado campaign through their Americans for Prosperity Foundation and the Libre Initiative (focused on Hispanic community outreach) to promote school choice and education savings accounts (ESAs), currently offered in 5 states. ESAs give tax dollars directly to parents for private education, diverting money from public schools.

Colorado Legislative and Judicial Preemptions of Local Government

State Preemption of Community Broadband Telecommunication companies, i.e., Qwest and Comcast, lobbied the 2005 state legislature to pass state preemption of municipal broadband. The law provides for local Colorado community broadband pending success of a voter referendum, with restrictions applied.

State Preemption of Local Gun Laws In 2003 an ALEC model state preemption of local gun safety laws (SB-03-25) was signed by Governor Bill Owens, rendering local gun ordinances unenforceable. Denver challenged the preemption law in court & got to keep bans on assault weapons and open firearms carry only after a tie vote when a Colorado Supreme Court justice recused herself.

AgGag Laws - Factory Farming ALEC bill, The Animal and Ecological Terrorism Act seeks to criminalize as terrorists whistle blowers who reveal abusive/dangerous conditions at animal facilities. The Colorado Agricultural Protection Act of 1981 C.R.S. 35-3.5-102 voids any local ordinance that makes operation of any agricultural operation a nuisance, with few exceptions.

Minimum Wage Preemption Colorado law SB99-014 passed in 1999 prohibits enactment of a minimum wage by any local governing body, initiative, referendum, or any other process.

Preemption of Bans on Mining with Acidic Chemicals, e.g., Cyanides Acidic wastewater from cyanide heap leach gold mining at the Summitville Mine in the San Juan Mountains killed off 17 miles of the Alamosa River. Five counties that banned use of toxic chemicals/cyanide for mining, saw their bans overturned by the Colorado Supreme Court in 2009 on the basis of state/mining industry preemption of local law.

Preemption of Ban on Fracking A Greeley ban on oil and gas extraction enacted as a local ordinance in 1985, both by ballot initiative in a home rule city, and by city council action, was overturned by two 1992 Colorado Supreme Court cases, Voss v. Lundvall Bros. Inc and Bowen/Edwards Assoc. Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of La Plata County, holding that the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Act (O&GCA) preempts any outright ban as well as any local regulation that creates an operational conflict with the O&GCA. Fracking bans and moratoriums in Longmont, Lafayette, Fort Collins and Broomfield have all been challenged in court by the Oil & Gas industry.

Preemption of Rent Control A 1981 Colorado law prohibiting control of rents by counties and municipalities was enacted as a reaction against a Boulder citizen initiative to impose rent controls. A 2000 Colorado Supreme Court decision held that the state statute prohibiting local communities from enacting rent control preempted a local ordinance enacted by the City Council of the home rule city of Telluride that would have required a percentage of affordable housing in a new development.

Preemption of Plastic Bag Ban A 1989 Colorado state law, HB 89-1300, prohibits a ban of the use or sale of plastic materials or products in Colorado. A bill to overturn that law in 2014 failed. To work around the prohibition of a ban on plastic bags and to reduce waste, a number of communities have imposed fees on plastic and paper bags.

Learn more: ALECinDenver.com

An earlier version was previously posted on Common Dreams.

The Morning Email

Wake up to the day's most important news.

Original post:
ALEC's Covert War on Democracy - HuffPost

Letter: Assault on Trump is assault on Democracy – Greenwood Democrat

The attacks on President Trump, his family and his cabinet are the results of years of internal communism and socialism in America.

Socialism is a lower form of communism. Both have the identical goal economic control of the people and each is a deadly enemy of freedom.

Some of the weapons and techniques of communism are as follows. Destroy the morals of the people and you destroy that nation. Another being used on President Trump is, tell a lie, tell it long enough, and many citizens will believe it.

This is what is going on regarding the "Russian question," that the Marxist influenced left wing media is using against our president to force him out of office. In addition to the media, many in the Democrat party and their socialist leaders, are attacking President Trump and cannot get over the fact, that they lost the presidential race.

The Democrat Party has been infiltrated by communism, and are dupes to their own programs, to take over America and destroy our Constitution and our freedoms.

A good book to read on the infiltration of communism in our government is: THE ENEMIES WITHIN: Communist, Socialist, and Progressives in the U.S. Congress, by Trevor Loudon. In addition, the author has a revealing DVD, ENEMIES WITHIN: Could your Congressman Pass an FBI Security Check? It is available online at amazon.com.

The problem is that many in congress are not obeying their oath to the Constitution. They have been brainwashed, and are supporting socialist programs that could lead our nation to bankruptcy. This has to be stopped, if our America is to remain free! We Christians, who voted for Donald Trump, must stand up and defend our president, and pray for him, and that our America will return to the biblical principles that we were founded upon.

Fred Coleman,

Americans for Constitutional Government

The rest is here:
Letter: Assault on Trump is assault on Democracy - Greenwood Democrat

Psychedelic Chile: Youth, Counterculture, and Politics on the Road to Socialism and Dictatorship by Patrick Barr-Melej – Pressenza International Press…

As in other aspects of socio-political culture, Chiles experience of the late 1960s and early 1970s diverged significantly from other countries in Latin America.

On the one hand, hippismo (the hippies) and similar countercultural movements that captured the imagination of young people did so in a democratic, moderately plural society albeit one whose days were numbered as polarisation and the success of Marxism ushered in the 1973 coup.

On the other hand, the divided politics of the era and the strong grip of social conservatism on both right and left in Chile meant that countercultural experimentation was often caught in the crossfire of class warfare, while also coming under fire from both sides.

Readers will take away different message from Patrick Barr-Melejs excellent and finely researched Psychedelic Chile, timely in the 50th anniversary year of the Summer of Love, but by far the most interesting dimension of this book is the relationship between the Hippies and the Left.

Focusing on the period from 196873, which was characterised globally as one in which the rise of the counterculture and youthful activism was at its peak, this book explores two currents at the heart of this phenomenon in Chile: hippismo, the loosely defined culture of long-haired dropouts with headbands and bell-bottoms who smoked pot and disregarded sexual conventions; and Siloism, a more structured movement organised mainly in Santiago around the teaching of an Argentine guru known as Silo (Mario Luis Rodrguez Cobos) and its associated group called Poder Joven that combined various political and personal philosophies in the quest for a defined path to self-enlightenment.

In a country such as Chile, both tendencies offer potent opportunities for research, but the author has confined his focus to explore three key propositions. First, entering Chilean history by way of the counterculture can tell us as much about the phenomenons foes as it can about these youths themselves. Second, as counterculture began to percolate through the youth scene, some of the values and attitudes it embodied began to seep into mainstream sectors of a younger generation that otherwise rejected what it embraced. Third, the media were critical in both influencing public opinion towards the counterculture mostly in an ill-informed and prejudicial sense but also reflecting it.

It is the first of these propositions that offers the most fleshy material for the political historian, mainly because of Chiles unique circumstances in this period and their tragic consequences.

This was a time of intense polarisation in which both left and right defended mainstream cultural assumptions that were instinctively critical of the counterculture, albeit for different reasons.

It went without saying that the conservative credentials of the right and its links to the Church made it hostile to hippies and everything they stood for. Even the more moderate and progressive Christian Democrats, who played an important role in Chilean politics at this time, saw in the counterculture threats to the nation, culture and family.

It was on the left however, that hostility to the counterculture is perhaps less easy to understand and explain. In this period, the Left itself was going through something of its own revolution, ideologically and organisationally speaking, with the intensification of the Cold War, Che Guevaras guerrilla (which undoubtedly resonated within the US and European counterculture), and the emergence in Chile of a new left subscribing to revolutionary vanguardism as opposed to an old left committed to traditional democratic incrementalism.

The tensions that these developments gave rise to resulted in Chiles old left coming to power under new left banners a democratic-revolutionary agenda that incorporated many young people with their own ideas about what this meant in terms of behaviour, liberation and cultural transformation.

In short, the Left confronted countercultures while riven by disagreements about the nature of the social order that would eventually replace capitalism.

While some on the left advocated pluralism, anti-counterculture discourses provided Marxists a position of relative unity about the characteristics of the new model citizen, even if there were still generational differences among them.

As Barr-Melej writes: governing Marxists and UP nevertheless preserved certain mainstream and bourgeois cultural outlooks and impressions that fell under the rubric of family values, existing in conjunction with an otherwise antibourgeois, antiimperialist, and anticapitalist revolutionary cultural-political project that saw public murals by young Communist artists, the massive publishing campaign of the state-owned publishing house (Editora Nacional Quimant), the songs of Nueva Cancin, expansive volunteer and revolutionary pro-literacy efforts on the part of young activists, and other pursuits. [p10]

By exploring this fascinating clash of cultures the political versus the socio-psychological Psychedelic Chile offers a novel and absorbing way in to this period of Chilean history. It is an important introduction to a phenomenon that is little considered by political scientists the social conservatism of the Left while also making up somewhat for an absence of literature that does not solely prioritise the participation of young people in class-based politics.

For many young people in that era, a culture of rejection of the old in which personal and socio-political liberation were largely indivisible themes anticipated by the guru of the New Left, Herbert Marcuse were at the heart of a vision of a new Chile.

In its own way, that was just as revolutionary as the failed experiment that Salvador Allende would embark upon.

View post:
Psychedelic Chile: Youth, Counterculture, and Politics on the Road to Socialism and Dictatorship by Patrick Barr-Melej - Pressenza International Press...

Happy Birthday, Harper! David Beckham Celebrates with Sweet Photos from a Palace Tea Party (with Princess Eugenie!) – PEOPLE.com

Harper Seven may be a descendant of music, fashion and sports royalty, but she was recently in the company ofactualroyalty.

The only daughter of David and Victoria Beckham turns 6 on Monday, but enjoyed a bit of an early birthday treat when she was invited alongside her dad and grandmother to attend a tea party at Buckingham Palace where she and some friends even posed with Princess Eugenie of York.

Lucky Harper meeting a real life princess at the Palace x , David, 42, captioned the group shot, in which his daughter is outfitted for the occasion in Cinderellas sparkly blue gown.

Want all the latest pregnancy and birth announcements, plus celebrity mom blogs? Click here to get those and more in the PEOPLE Babies newsletter.

RELATED VIDEO:Victoria and David Beckham Celebrate Son Brooklyns 18th Birthday

In another photo this time of himself alongside Harper and his mother David clarifies, This wasnt the palace opening the gates for Harpers birthday party , this was a tea party where us and other guests were invited so it was a beautiful thing to do with My mum , Harper plus a few school friends

We were honored to be able to there Beautiful tea party. he added.

Chimed in mom Victoria, 43, with a solo photo of Harper on the palace grounds, holding a single red balloon, Our little birthday princess x Kisses .

RELATED GALLERY: Penelope! Samuel! Harper! See Which Celeb Babies Celebrate Their Birthdays in July

Harpers three big brothers Cruz David, 12, Romeo James, 14, and Brooklyn Joseph, 18 all used the social media app to send love to the youngest member of the family.

Dear Harper I cant believe it has been already 6 years you are such a big girl so to the best sister in the world I love you so much have a amazing day , Cruz captioned a photo of himself with Harper on his shoulders.

FROM PEN:Raising a Little Princess: All About Charlottes Amazing Childhood

RELATED: The Newest Spice? Harper Sings Mom Victoria Beckham Happy Birthday See the Sweet Clip

On a super-smiley palace snap posted to Davids account, the retired soccer star got a little sentimental about his only daughters newest milestone.

Happy Birthday to our special little young lady Such a special girl who brings so much joy and happiness into our lives, he wrote. Happy 6th birthday ( I cant believe your 6 already ) have the most amazing day we love you pretty lady x

See the rest here:
Happy Birthday, Harper! David Beckham Celebrates with Sweet Photos from a Palace Tea Party (with Princess Eugenie!) - PEOPLE.com

Ukraine Recommits To NATO Membership Over Moscow’s Objections – NPR

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, right, and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg attend a joint news conference in Kiev on Monday. Efrem Lukatsky/AP hide caption

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, right, and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg attend a joint news conference in Kiev on Monday.

Ukraine is set to begin talks with NATO about eventual membership in the western alliance a move that has long raised the ire of Russia.

Petro Poroshenko, Ukraine's president, met with NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg in Kiev on Monday.

After their meeting, Poroshenko said he had "clearly stated that we would begin discussion about a membership action plan and our proposals for such a discussion were accepted with pleasure."

Since 2014, Ukraine has been battling a Russian-backed insurgency sparked by Moscow's forced annexation of the Crimean Peninsula. The chain of events was set in motion by Poroshenko's election defeat of then-President Viktor Yanukovych, who had been publicly pro-Russia.

As far back as 2008, Ukraine, an integral part of the old Soviet Union, agreed with NATO's leadership that it would work toward eventual membership in the alliance. But moves in that direction were ignored by Yanukovych.

During a joint news conference with Poroshenko on Monday, the NATO secretary-general also called on Russia to withdraw its troops from Ukraine and said that the alliance would be supplying hardware to protect Ukraine's computers from cyberattacks. Kiev has accused Moscow of being behind a massive ransomware attack last month that quickly spilled across Ukraine's borders and infected computers worldwide.

And as Reuters reports following the meeting: "Russia, deeply opposed to enlargement of NATO towards its borders, weighed in quickly, saying the prospect of NATO membership for Ukraine would not promote stability and security in Europe."

According to Reuters, 69 percent of Ukrainians who were surveyed in a June poll supported joining NATO a sharp increase from before Moscow's forced annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in 2014.

Poroshenko has pledged that Ukraine will undertake a series of reforms aimed at qualifying the country for NATO membership by 2020. Those reforms, according to a NATO spokesman quoted by Reuters, would occur in the areas of defense, anti-corruption, governance and law enforcement.

The meeting with NATO's top official comes after Washington appointed Kurt Volker, a former U.S. representative to NATO, as a special representative to Ukraine. It also follows President Trump's public reluctance to commit to NATO's charter, which calls for mutual defense of its members.

Read this article:
Ukraine Recommits To NATO Membership Over Moscow's Objections - NPR