Mediaboss Marketing

Alexandria shooter James Hodgkinson seen in an image protesting with a sign that features a tweet by Kentucky Senator Rand Paul is a fake.

The doctored image attempts to show Hodgkinson holding a sign with a tweet about the Second Amendment or the right to bear arms. The fake image clearly intends to draw a line between the gun control debate and Hodgkinsons recent attack.

Hodgkinson opened fire on a group of Republican lawmakers at a baseball field in Alexandria, Va., on June 14, 2017, leaving five people injured. Those injured included House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, who was left in critical condition.

Shortly after, social media users circulated a photograph that appeared to show the gunman, Hodgkinson, holding a sign with an image of a Paul tweet about the Second Amendment.

The Paul tweet is actually quoting author and commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano saying that the Second Amendment was written to allow people to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical. The photograph, however, has been doctored.

Associated Press photographer Derik Holtmann took the real photograph in 2012.

In it, Hodgkinson stands outside a post office in Belleville, Ill., holding a sign that reads Tax the rich like congress did for 70 years til Reagans Trickle Down We Need 20 Brackets $20 million. You can see the side by side comparison of the two images below.

The tweet itself from Paul has served as a bit of controversy on social media.

Some claimed that Pauls tweet incited violence and actually encouraged people to use the Second Amendment to harm a tyrannical government. Many failed to acknowledge, however, that the tweet was simply quoting Judge Napolitano, not prompting people to use it for any nefarious purpose.

Webcast, June 21st: 5 Keys to Operational Excellence

The suspects brother said Hodgkinson was a critic President Donald Trump, upset over last falls election and intent on bringing his protest to Washington. But his more immediate motive for the attack remained unclear late Wednesday, even as investigators surrounded Hodgkinsons home on the outskirts of Belleville, a town of 40,000 across the Mississippi River from St. Louis.

What did you think of the fake image involving Hodgkinson holding a sign with Pauls tweet? And, what did you think of Pauls tweet with regards to the Second Amendments purpose? Let us know in the comments section.

See the original post here:
Alexandria Shooter Holding Sign With Rand Paul Tweet About Right To Bear Arms Is A Fake Image - Business 2 Community

THE MORNING PLUM:

Republican senators are now making a great show of expressing their disapproval with the scandalously opaque and secretive process that the GOP Senate leadership is employing in the quest to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. The complaints have grown so loud that the New York Times hasdevoted a prominent article to them.

But its very likely that all of this will end up amounting to just another ruse and that, in retrospect, we will see this as yet another layer of fraudulence among many that have encrusted this whole process throughout.

To be sure, the GOP senators expressing dissatisfaction with the process may well be sincere, at least to some extent.The process is better if you do it in public, and that people get buy-in along the way and understand whats going on,groused Bob Corker of Tennessee. Seems like around here, the last step is getting information, which doesnt seem to be necessarily the most effective process, griped Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. None, barked John McCain of Arizona, when asked to describe his comfort level with the process.Numerous other GOP senators have complained they dont know whats in the bill theyre going to be voting on within days or weeks.

But heres the rub: If these senators really wanted to improve this process, they could be doing more to make that happen than they actually appear to be, and its within the realm of the plausible that they would succeed, at least to some degree.

The most forceful and obvious way they could do this is to go to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell(R-Ky.) and insist on it. If a handful of GOP senators said they cant vote for the bill under these conditions, McConnell might have to relent, because he can afford to lose only a few.

In fairness, that is a lot to expect from a GOP senator. But there is something else any individual GOP senator or a small group of them could do to try to improve the process: They could go to McConnell and privately say that a slower and more transparent process is actually very important to them.

In this scenario, individual senators would do something that lies somewhere between (on the one hand) merely griping to reporters, which is mainly targeted toward getting good quotes into the media coverage and making elites happy, and (on the other hand) threatening a No vote, which would be pretty dramatic. Instead, the middle ground would be that a given GOP senator would tell McConnell directly that this is something he or she either needs (for political reasons) or really wants (for substantive reasons).

A private conversation with McConnell in which a senator says, This is really troubling to me and I hope you can find your way clear to do it some other way, would be more effective than public complaints, congressional expert Norman Ornstein told me this morning. McConnells top priority is maintaining his majority, so hes going to be very sensitive to these senators own sense of whats damaging to them. Leaders have to listen to individual senators.

That is, leaders have to listen ifindividual senators really mean what they say. The Senate is a murky place, where things mysteriously tend to end up happening if individual senators actually want them to, and dont end up happening if they dont. The crux of the matter is that, if any GOP senators actually did think of the process as a problem, they could convey that to McConnell, and he would feel a measure of actual pressure to respond to their concerns.

The job of congressional leaders is to meet the demands of the rank and file, another expert on Congress, Sarah Binder of George Washington University, told me. Thats the leverage the rank and file has.

Both Ornstein and Binder cautioned that such a move very well might not work on McConnell. Thats because he is under tremendous pressure to get some sort of repeal-and-replace bill passed, and that need might end up outweighing any need or demand from individual senators for a slower, more open process. But this only underscores another truth about this whole saga: Ultimately, what it would mean is that McConnell knows he cannot actually get the bill through the Senate unless it is rushed through with little time for public debate on it.

In other words, if these senators told McConnell that they genuinely want or need an improved process, that would put him in a meaningful bind. Hed have to prioritize the need to get the bill through over his members genuine needs or demands, precisely because the bill cant survive too much public scrutiny, as its so toxic. As Ornstein put it, the fact that the process is likely to remain as it is underscores that McConnells one goal is to get 50 votes and the only way he will get that 50 votes is to keep this process as tightly secret as possible.

Its possible these senators are meaningfully prodding McConnell behind the scenes, of course. But there is no real indication that this is happening.And this will have actual consequences. In a remarkable bit of journalism, Vox interviewed a number of GOP senators and asked themto make a comprehensive, affirmative case for why the GOP bill will lead to good outcomes for the health-care system and the country. They wouldnt, or couldnt, provide meaningful answers. Whether this is the result of bad underlying ideas, or the level of secrecy depriving them of information on it, or some combination of the two, is up for debate. But obviously, the process isnt helping lead to good legislating or a good outcome and will likely make the outcome worse.

Meanwhile, until we learn otherwise, we should assume that the only thing individual senators are accomplishing with their complaints is getting good quotes for themselves in the media without creating any meaningful discomfort for GOP leaders that might induce them to change any of this. Indeed, those good quotes may make it easier for rank-and-file senators to vote for the bill in the end they may argue they are voting for it only reluctantly, after doing all they could to give the public more transparency and input, as their own objections throughout (they will claim) prove they did.

* ANOTHER POLL PUTS TRUMPS APPROVAL IN THE TOILET: A new Associated Press finds that 35 percent of Americans approve of Trumps performance, while 64 percent disapprove. And:

Two-thirds of Americans, or 65 percent, think Trump doesnt have much respect for the countrys democratic institutions and traditions or has none at all. Just a third of Americans, or 34 percent, thinks he has a great deal or even a fair amount of respect for them.

Among even Republicans and GOP-leaners, nearly a third say Trump doesnt respect our institutions, and a quarter disapprove of his performance. Yet we keep hearing hell never lose his base

* REPUBLICANS IN PANIC ABOUT GEORGIA ELECTION: Alex Isenstadt reports that GOP strategists see a real possibility of a loss in next weeks special House election:

Interviews with nearly two dozen Republican operatives and officials reveal that they are preparing for the possibility of an unnerving defeat that could spur lawmakers to distance themselves from Trump . several private surveys taken over the last few weeks show Republican nominee Karen Handel trending downward, with one private party poll showing 30-year-old Democrat Jon Ossoff opening up a more than five-point lead in the Republican-oriented, suburban Atlanta seat.

Again, Republican Tom Price won this seat in 2016 by 23 points. But if Democrats do somehow win, it could weaken the GOP protective wall around Trump and spur more House GOP retirements.

* HEALTH CARE IS A KEY ISSUE IN GEORGIA: NBCs First Read crew makes a good point: The Ossoff-Handel outcome turns in part on the politics of health care:

According to the recent Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll of this race, more than 80% of likely voters said health care is an extremely important or very important issue regarding their vote, and just 1-in-4 voters said they approved of the House health-care plan. And remember, this is the race to fill the seat vacated by Republican Tom Price, who is now Trumps HHS secretary.

One in four! I would strongly urge you not to over-read the meaning of this outcome either way. But if Democrats somehow win, Republicans might be a lot less inclined to go forward withtheir awful bill.

* TRUMP OFFICIALS ORDERED TO PRESERVE DOCUMENTS: The New York Times reports that a memo from the Trump transition teams general counsel calls ontransition members to preserve materials related to the Russia probes:

The memo is the latest indication that the investigations special counsel, the former F.B.I. director Robert S. Mueller III, is casting a wide net in his inquiry into possible collusion between Mr. Trumps campaign and Moscow The document request illustrated the seriousness of the inquiry being conducted by Mr. Mueller and investigators in Congress, and how deeply they are delving into Mr. Trumps activities and those of his associates.

Maybe if Trump keeps tweeting the words witch hunt and fake news with lots of capital letters and exclamation points, he can make all of this disappear.

* DREAMERS ARE SAFE: Politico reports that the Trump administration has quietly decided to leave in place protections from deportation for people brought here illegally as children. They will keep their work permits, too, under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program:

Since Trump took office, renewal of expiring DACA permits appears to have continued as normal. More than 17,000 new approvals took place between January and March and more than 107,000 existing DACA recipients had their work permits renewed for an additional two years.

One wonders whether Trump voters will feel let down by this clear departure from his vow to cancel President Barack Obamas executive actions immediately. Doesnt Trump want to Make America Great Again?

* BUT TRUMP ENDS ANOTHER PROTECTION FROM DEPORTATION: Despite the above news, the Trump administration has also formally ended Obamas effort to expand DACA to protect parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents, otherwise known as Deferred Action for Parents of Americans.

The courts had already blocked the DAPA program, but this move makes it official administration policy. So Trump supporters have a consolation prize: While many young immigrants will be protected from deportation, many older longtime residents with jobs and ties to communities will not be.

* AND DOES TRUMP STILL FEEL VINDICATED? Remember the GOP talking point that Comey vindicated Trump by testifying that hed told Trump he wasnt under investigation? The White House is still clinging to this idea, sort of:

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the principal deputy White House press secretarywas asked whether Trump still felt vindicated by the extraordinary congressional testimony last week by James B. Comey, the FBI director whose firing by Trump has contributed to questions about whether the president obstructed justice.

I believe so, Sanders said, before referring reporters to Marc E. Kasowitz, Trumps private attorney.

Once again, Trumps firing of Comey, which was detailed in that vindicating testimony, is what led directly to the appointment of a special counsel, and to the news that Trump is now being investigated for obstruction.

Original post:
Republicans are employing a new ruse to destroy Obamacare. Don't fall for it. - Washington Post (blog)

President Trump, confirming Friday that he is under federal investigation, continued to wage a pitched battle against the probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, behavior that unsettles even his Republican allies.

Trump in a morning series of Twitter posts called into question the legitimacy of the inquiry, now in the hands of special counsel Robert Mueller, the widely respected former director of the FBI. But it was the last post in that tweet storm that come back to haunt the president.

"I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt," Trump said, in what amounts to an official statement. The president's allies reacted with alarm.

"Not smart at all," a Republican member of Congress who has been a consistent supporter of Trump's said in a text message exchange with the Washington Examiner.

"The president splits his coalition when he complains about Mueller," added a Republican strategist whose clients are among Trump's cheerleaders. "He would hold it together if he'd say that the press is too focused on it and we should instead be talking about the economy and security."

Both Republicans requested anonymity because they did not want to be publicly critical of the president.

Trump since before being inaugurated in January has been troubled by the congressional and federal investigations into Russian meddling, calling them an attempt by Democrats and other opponents to undermine the legitimacy of his victory.

In addition to the possibility of putting himself in legal jeopardy through his tweets, Trump also is diminishing his ability to expand his base of political support.

That is unlikely to matter in solid Republican districts and "Trump Country," regions of the country that have gravitated toward the president.

"Trump supporters are solid for him no matter what he says," Bob Gleason, the former chairman of the Pennsylvania Republican Party who is close to Trump, said.

But it could cause Republicans big headaches in 2018 in the battleground seats upscale suburban enclaves held by Republicans but won by Hillary Clinton that could determine the fate of the House majority.

"That concerns me," Gleason conceded. "We as a party need to do much better in the Philly suburbs." He added: "But the proof at end of day it's not what he said, but what does he do? What are the results?"

The effect of Trump's near daily complaints has been to fire up his uncommonly loyal base, yet drive news coverage away from a legislative agenda that has shown the potential to be quite popular, including among voters who don't support him.

This week was workforce development week, capped by Trump unveiling his new Cuba policy. Last week was infrastructure week. Most of it was overshadowed by Trump's war on the Mueller investigation and carping about probes being conducted the House and Senate intelligence committees.

The president's public spats also could impact the ability of his party to deliver results in Congress.

Upcoming votes on healthcare reform, and presumably an overhaul of the federal tax code, are going to require Republicans to take significant political risks. The American Health Care Act, the GOP bill to partially repeal Obamacare, is unpopular with the broader public

Trump highlighted his 50 percent approval in the Rassumussen poll, the first time he has cracked that level since April in this survey, which tends to show him stronger than other polls.

But overall Trump's approval in the averages is stuck at 40 percent, which could imperil his agenda by making those tough votes that much tougher for Republicans looking ahead to the midterm.

"We have blinders on," a senior Republican House aide said. "We have to stay the course; we have to continue to do our work, we have to continue to move an agenda and not get distracted by leaks in investigations."

Follow this link:
Trump tweets against Russia investigation make even friendly Republicans nervous - Washington Examiner

When winning Democratic manager Rep. Mike Doyle gave the Congressional Baseball Gametrophy to his counterpart, Rep. Joe L. Barton, to put in Rep. Steve Scalises office while he is recovering, it summed up the feeling of the evening.

Its so awesome to show everyone that we actually get along and I want that to be the message that everyone takes away tonight, Illinois Rep. Rodney Davis said after the game.

Texas Rep. Roger Williams, who injured his ankle scrambling for cover after a gunman opened fire on the Republican teams practice on Wednesday said, We needed to play this game. If we hadnt played this game, the bad people would have won. They dont want us to be able to live our lives like were used to, so we had to play the game.

I hope this is a day we can look back and say, we kind of downed the rhetoric a little bit agree to disagree.

The Democrats crushed the Republicans, 11-2, but that wasnt the focus of the post-game chatter. The missing presence of Scalise, who was hit by a bullet in the hip and underwent his third surgery in two days shortly before the game.

Game On: Video Highlights from the 2017 Congressional Baseball Game

We lost the game but we won for Steve Scalise with the showing that turned out and whether it was the fans with the record turnout or the players, Minnesota Rep. Erik Paulsen said. We just really did it for the right reasons.

When news broke that Scalise had come out of surgery and his condition had improved, it quickly reached the Republican dugout.

The best news of the night was that Steve is improving. I saw that in a tweet or something, Rep. Ryan Costello said. Everybody is still trying to deal with what happened as best they can. The fact that hes improving, the fact that no one was killed, is a huge sigh of relief. Hell be back next year, I have all the faith in the world,

[Democrats Reclaim Congressional Baseball Title, Bipartisanship Rules]

Two others who were woundedwere there, though: Williams staffer Zach Barth, and Capitol Police officer David Bailey, who threw out the games first pitch. Barth and his boss walked out on crutches together following the game.

Baseball is a healing sport and thats what we saw here tonight. It was healing, it was unity and you saw that evidence by the Democrats giving us the trophy, giving it to Scalise. Hes fighting for his life, Barth said. Hes the guy who needs the prayers right now. Were getting together and this is step towards healing.

Barth said he never expected to hear an entire stadium cheer for him.

Maybe when I was really young, hesaid. I never thought this was possible, but it was great to see and extremely encouraging.

Another touching moment was when both teams met at second base to pray for Scalise.

It was the prayer out on second base that was pretty moving. I think it hit everybody when you realized that we had this whole thing going and Steve wasnt there, Pennsylvania Rep. Pat Meehan said. He was there in spirit but you just keep waiting for him to turn the corner and be in the dugout.

The prayerful atmosphere at the beginning of the game turned into a positive and patriotic feeling for the rest of it. While staffers cheered for their bosses, they were louder cheering for Bailey and Barth.

One of the games longest-playing veterans, Republican Rep. Kevin Bradyof Texas, has never seen a crowd like Thursdays record attendance of nearly 25,000 in his 21 years on the GOP team.

It was like a dream I mean, the whole place seemed packed and the roar of the crowd and having David Bailey and honoring the Capitol Police, that made this a very good game, Texas Rep. Kevin Brady said. Next year well get them.

[Patriotic and Unified Atmosphere at Congressional Baseball Game]

The somber, yet proud and unified feeling, overcame the Republicans as they walked through the stadium at the end of the game.

Im not so happy about the loss, but Im pretty happy we played the game. I think it was a great experience for everybody to get out and away from all of the tragic trauma of the last day and a half, Meehan said.

For the Democrats, the win was bittersweet.

Rep. Nanette Diaz Barragn, playing in her first game, said Doyle had decided before the game that if the Democrats won, they would give the trophy to the Republicans to put in Scalises office. Doyle didnt ask for the teams consent until the lateinnings, when the Democrats had a comfortable lead.

Mikes very superstitious, Barragn said.

At a news conference before the game, Democratic pitcher Louisiana Rep. Cedric L. Richmond said his wife reminded him that 90 percent of his conversations with Scalise were about the annual game.

Richmond joked that Scalise wanted the Democrats to win because if the Republicans won without him, that would diminish his value.

[Congressional Baseball Game Ticket Sales Skyrocket After Shootings]

While at pastCongressional Baseball Games, members pop in for a few innings or attend parties in the suites, there was an outpouring of members at this game.

Everyone from Reps. Pete Sessions, Joseph P. Kennedy III, Robin Kelly, Debbie Dingell, Brian Fitzpatrick, Dwight Evans, Louie Gohmert to all members of leadership Speaker Paul D. Ryan, Senator Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Minority Leaders Charles E. Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Scalises counterpart, Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer were there.

Members sat together, hugged one another, chatted throughout the game, andpartisanship seemed to not be present.

This is a statement. A statement was made tonight about a lot of things. About violence, about political extremism and hopefully the public views us as regular people who are trying to do the best we can in a very difficult world, Illinois Rep. John Shimkus said.

Freshman GOP Rep. Roger Marshall had ordered Scalises home state Louisiana State Universityjerseys for members of both teams but they didnt arrive in time. But LSU hats did make it before the game, and by the end, several members at the stadium were wearing them.

Obvious, in honor of Steve Scalise, Ohio Rep. Bill Johnson said about hishat. We talked about him the whole game.

[Congressional Baseball Game To Honor British Terror Victims]

Another last minute change was who threw out the first pitch.

Bailey, who along with fellow Capitol Police officer Crystal Griner, who remains hospitalized, was credited withpreventing a massacre by taking the shooter down in an intense gun battle, threw it out while on crutches to Roberto Clemente Jr., son of baseball Hall of Famer Roberto Clemente.

Griner stood next to baseball greatJoe Torre. The crowd cheered Bailey and afterwards members from both teams waited in line to hug him and pray.

Before the shooting, the British ambassador was scheduled to have the honorsto rememberthe victims of the recent terror attacks in England.

Bridget Bowman, Kyle Stewart and Griffin Connolly contributed to this report.

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.

See the rest here:
Democrats Down Republicans, Both Down the Rhetoric - Roll Call

President Trump's new U.S. policy toward Cuba was met with strong opposition from within the Republican Party on Friday.

Trump announced a slew of new restrictions that curtail travel and commercial ties between the U.S. and Cuba, fulfilling one of his campaign promises to roll back Obama-era rules with the communist country.

I am canceling the last administrations completely one-sided deal with Cuba, Trump saidin Miami's Little Havana neighborhood, where he announced the change.

The move was immediately criticized by Republican members in both houses of Congress, including Rep. Justin AmashJustin AmashRepublicans slam Trumps new policy toward Cuba Kids shouldn't be charged as sex offenders Dem: Disrespect for rule of law by Trump administration 'off the charts' MORE (R-Mich.), who accused Trump of "dancing with the Saudis and selling them weapons" while talking about national security.

.@POTUS's Cuba policy is not about human rights or security. If it were, then why is he dancing with the Saudis and selling them weapons?

I hope as we go forward, @POTUS will remember he was elected to challenge the status quo - not to be part of it. #KeepCubaOpen

Emmer also released a statement hitting the Trump administration over the decision.

"Most importantly, todays announcement creates a very real security risk for the American people and our homeland by inviting foreign nations into our backyard to fill a void that todays announcement is creating," Emmer wrote Friday.

Sens. Jeff FlakeJeff FlakeRepublicans slam Trumps new policy toward Cuba Trump draws a harder line on Cuba The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE (R-Ariz.) and Patrick LeahyPatrick LeahyRepublicans slam Trumps new policy toward Cuba Trump draws a harder line on Cuba Top Senate Dem: Trump needs to give up all his 'Twitter equipment' MORE (D-Vt.), who co-sponsored theFreedom to Travel to Cuba Act with 53 other senators, bashed Trump for the abrupt reversal of the Obama administration's policy.

Any policy change that diminishes the ability of Americans to travel freely to Cuba is not in the best interests of the United States or the Cuban people. It is time Senate leadership finally allowed a vote on my bipartisan bill to fully lift these archaic restrictions which do not exist for travel by Americans to any other country in the world," Flake wrote in a statement.

Leahy accused the White House of "re-declaring war" on Cuba with the new policy.

"This is a hollow retreat from normalization that takes a swipe at Americans freedom to travel, at our national interest, and at the people of Cuba who yearn to reconnect with us all just to score a political favor with a small and dwindling faction here at home," Leahy wrote. This White House, by reaffirming the embargo, has re-declared war on the Cuban people."

Leahy and Flake's bill, if passed, would lift the restrictions on U.S. tourism in Cuba. It has 55 total co-sponsors but has not yet been brought to the floor for a vote in the Senate.

See original here:
Republicans slam Trump's new policy toward Cuba - The Hill