Archive for April, 2017

Democrats seeking to raise money off Trump’s planned Georgia fundraiser – Washington Post

Democrats wasted little time Wednesday in seeking to capitalize on President Trumps plans to attend a fundraiser Friday in Georgia for the Republican candidate in a special congressional election.

Trumps SO scared of losing that hes leaving work early to crush our historic momentum, said an email solicitation sent out by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

The organization said it had created an Emergency Response Fund to match the piles of cash Trump will rake in for Republican Karen Handel.

[Trump to appear at fundraiser for GOP congressional candidate in Georgia]

Handel finished second in the April 18 special election to Democrat Jon Ossoff, and the two will face each other in a runoff June 20. The race is being closely watched nationally as a test of how Trump is affecting down-ballot races.

Democrats have sought to parlay anti-Trump sentiment nationally into an upset in a Republican-tilting district previously represented by Tom Price, now Trumps health and human services secretary.

Trump is traveling to Atlanta on Friday to address a conference of the National Rifle Association and will appear at the fundraiser afterward, according to a copy of the invitation. Tickets start at $2,700 apiece, while hosts are asked to contribute or raise $25,000 per couple.

The Democratic solicitation seeks contributions of $1 to help elect Jon and Democrats like him.

Originally posted here:
Democrats seeking to raise money off Trump's planned Georgia fundraiser - Washington Post

Cruz: ‘Schumer and the Democrats want a shutdown’ – The Hill

Sen. Ted CruzTed CruzCruz looks to boost space industry GOP super PAC pours millions into Ga. special election Cruz: 'Schumer and the Democrats want a shutdown' MORE (R-Texas) on Wednesday accused Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles SchumerCruz: 'Schumer and the Democrats want a shutdown' GOP fundraiser enters crowded primary for Pa. Senate seat Dems: Trump risks government shutdown over border wall MORE (D-N.Y.) and other Democrats of trying to force a government shutdown in order to satisfy a "left-wing radical base."

"I think Chuck SchumerCharles SchumerCruz: 'Schumer and the Democrats want a shutdown' GOP fundraiser enters crowded primary for Pa. Senate seat Dems: Trump risks government shutdown over border wall MORE and the Democrats want a shutdown," Cruz said on "Fox & Friends." "I think they're trying to provoke a fight, and Schumer is just trying to put more and more unreasonable demands, trying to force a shutdown to appease those who want total resistance, total opposition who don't want the Trump administration to succeed."

Cruz also blamed the left-wing base for encouraging the party to adopt a sweeping agenda of opposition that led Senate Democrats to filibuster Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch's nomination earlier this month. In response, Republicans voted to change Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.

ADVERTISEMENT

Onepossible spending billwould see Republicans agreeing to fund the cost-sharing program in exchange for Democrats agreeing to an additional $15 billion in defense spending.

Democrats also vowed to block a spending bill that included funding for President Trump's proposed wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. Trump seemed to back away from his demands to include such funding in the measure, saying on Tuesday that "the wall will get built" but not specifying when.

In 2013, Cruz was instrumental in shutting down the government in an attempt to defund ObamaCare.

Originally posted here:
Cruz: 'Schumer and the Democrats want a shutdown' - The Hill

Democrats Must Investigate Every Trump Scandal, Even if It Takes Decades – Slate Magazine

Adam Schiff and Donald Trump.

Photo illustration by Slate. Photos by Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images and Molly Riley/Getty Images.

Because I was sentient 100 days ago, Im old enough to remember a time when American presidents were expected, as a matter of course, not to have paid foreign agents among their senior staff. Its hard to imagine what would have happened if Barack Obamas national security adviser were revealed to have recently been on the payroll of Turkeys Islamist government, as Donald Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was. And what if wed learned that a onetime campaign manager of Obama was a foreign agent of pro-Russian political interests in Ukraine, like Trumps former campaign manager Paul Manafort? And that he appeared to have kept this entanglement secret, in violation of the law? How about if one of Obamas foreign policy advisers had admitted to passing documents to a Russian spy, like Trump campaign adviser Carter Page? Wed either have an impeachment, armed right-wing militias marching on the capital, or both. Quotidian political life would, at the very least, have ground to a halt.

Michelle Goldberg is a columnist for Slate and the author, most recently, of The Goddess Pose.

It should be grinding to a halt now. But instead, 100 days into Donald Trumps terrible presidency, a strange miasma has settled over American politics. Its like a nightmare where you know something hideous is happening, but your legs are leaden and you cant scream. Certainly, the anti-Trump resistance is working its heart out, but few talk about avoiding the normalization of Trump anymore. The presidents main 100-day accomplishmentbesides sticking a reactionary on the Supreme Courthas been to make previously inconceivable levels of corruption and staggering breaches of national security appear normal.

On both the left and the right, people discuss the Russia scandal as something that may or may not be proved. Speaking for many left-leaning skeptics, Rolling Stones Matt Taibbi writes, [I]t might be a good idea to wait for evidence of collusion before those of us in the media jump in the story with both feet. This attitude shows how dramatically political standards have changed since Trumps election. Certainly, its true that we dont know if the Kremlin is blackmailing Trump with a tape of a peeing prostitute. Were also far from understanding exactly how many millions of dollars various Russian oligarchs may have funneled to Trump, and what they might have expected in return. We know that Trump publicly urged Russia to hack his opponent, but we dont know if he also did so privately.

But even if we never get to the bottom of the mysteries surrounding Trump and Russiamysteries that will haunt American culture, like JFKs assassination, for the rest of our liveswe already know enough to conclude that the Russia scandal is big. Lets look at what weve learned, over these past three months, about Manafort. We now know, thanks to an April New York Times story, that he went out of his way to insinuate himself into the Trump campaign, offering, for reasons that have never been explained, to work without pay. (Trump, a famous cheapskate, accepted.) And we know that earlier this month, Manaforts spokesman said he would retroactively register with the Justice Department as a foreign agent of proRussian Ukrainian political interests, a tacit admission that hed improperly failed to disclose this connection earlier. Whatever Trumps other ties to Russia, whatever aid he accepted from the Kremlin, he let a paid agent of an unfriendly country run his campaign. That alone should threaten to end his presidency.

Flynn, we learned on Tuesday, may have violated the law in accepting payments from Turkey as well as from Russia. The White Houses failure to properly vet Flynn before giving him one of the countrys most sensitive national-security jobs should, again, be treated as a massive dereliction, and investigated thoroughly.

SLATE STAFF

These 80 People and Institutions Have Kept Trump in Checkfor Now

WILLIAM SALETAN

You Dont Have to Hate Donald Trump to See He Is Bad at His Job

BEN MATHIS-LILLEY

Who Had the Better First 100 Days: William Henry Harrison, Who Died on Day 31, or Donald Trump?

SETH STEVENSON

Donald Trump Is a Terrible Negotiator

MICHELLE GOLDBERG

Democrats Must Investigate Every Trump Scandal, Even if It Takes Decades

SETH STEVENSON

Our Panel of Frustrated Republican Voters on Trumps First 100 Days

AYMANN ISMAIL

As a Muslim American, I Never Felt Accepted in My Own CountryUntil Trumps Presidency

ANDREW KAHN

Trumps First 100 Days, in His Own Words

We also now know that one of Trumps foreign-policy advisers, Carter Page, has been suspected by American intelligence of being a Russian intelligence asset, and admitted to BuzzFeed that hed given documents about the energy business to a Russian intelligence operative. Yes, Pages influence in the campaign appears to have been minor, but he was privy to internal meetings. A hundred days ago, there was an expectation that American presidents would keep people who might be compromised by Russian spies off their foreign-policy teams. If one managed to slip through, there would be urgent calls to find out who was responsible.

One could list 100 things that Trump has doneone for each debased day of his wretched presidencythat would be enough to impeach a Democrat. (Not all of Trumps violations involve Russia, of course, though a bizarre number of them do.) Bill Clintons entire presidency was haunted by multiple investigations into Whitewater, a 1978 Arkansas real estate deal in which he and his wife lost money, and no wrongdoing was ever uncovered. In 2008, a Russian oligarch massively overpaid for a Palm Beach mansion owned by Trump, and its at best a political footnote.

Thats because Trumps presidency, like his campaign, is a lowlife carnival; there are so many macabre sideshows and freakish violations of normal political behavior that were left stunned and dazed. Much of the mainstream media, and almost all elected Republicans, act as if the horror of this presidency were less than the sum of its parts. The outrages cancel each other out rather than accumulating. This massive inflation in what constitutes a scandal has the potential to be permanently corrupting.

Trump has not created this dynamic on his own. The Republican Party, convinced of its right to rule, has been ethically unbound since Richard Nixon. There is no Democratic equivalent of Watergate, or IranContra, or the deceit of George W. Bushs administration in selling the Iraq war. (The closest proximate thing was Bill Clintons lies about sexual relations with an intern in the Oval Office.) Over the past 50 years, Republican presidencies have been consistently more corrupt than Democratic ones. Yet Republicans have also treated our past two Democratic administrations as illegitimate and have undermined them with endless investigations into phony scandals like Whitewater and Benghazi. The result is that Democrats and Republicans operate under entirely different standards of appropriate political behavior.

Every day, Trump shows us what politics look like when the rules only apply to one party.

This double standard was determinative in electing Trump. On April 22, the New York Times published a long look into FBI Director James Comeys pivotal role in the 2016 election. It explains why Comey broke protocol to go public, just days before the election, with the FBIs decision to reopen its investigation into Hillary Clintons email server, even as he kept the FBIs investigation into the Trump campaigns Russia ties secret. Essentially, Comey bent over backward to avoid any hint of covering for Clinton, because he feared Republicans capacity to create a political uproar. Congressional Republicans were preparing for years of hearings during a Clinton presidency, said the Times. If Mr. Comey became the subject of those hearings, F.B.I. officials feared, it would hobble the agency and harm its reputation. Comey apparently had no similar fear of Democrats, even when he thought that they might control the White House.

Every day, Trump shows us what politics look like when the rules only apply to one party. Already, because of Trump, America is a more cynical, corrupt, lawless place than it was 100 days ago. There is only one way back from this, and that is to make sure that someday, when Democrats retake at least one chamber of Congress, they investigate every shady thing that Trump, his cronies, and his relatives have done either in achieving or using public power, even if it takes decades. We dont need Democrats chanting lock them up at rallies, but progressive activists should demand that politicians hoping to represent them promise to end Republican impunity. And then, when and if Democrats wrest back some measure of power from Republicans, activists should hold these politicians to their promises.

Were going to need a subcommitteemaybe more than oneon foreign emoluments. We should have one specifically devoted to Ivanka Trumps foreign businesses, as well as to the fund shes starting to invest in female entrepreneurs, since unlike her father, shes not exempt from federal conflict of interest statutes. (According to Axios, Ivanka already started soliciting foreign contributions to her funda move thats almost comically hypocritical, given the Trump campaigns attacks on foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation.) Were going to have to understand everything that went on at Mar-a-Lagohow Trump sold access to himself, and to whom, and what sort of security protocols were in place while he did so. Not only do we need a full, comprehensive airing of Flynns ties to Turkey and Russia, we also need to examine what the administration knew about the ways he might have been compromised. Comey should become the subject of protracted hearings over the political calculus that went into his decision-making during the campaign, just like he feared. The Russia investigation alone should dog Trump for the rest of his days.

One hundred days has not been enough time to fully grapple with how much damage Trump is doing to this country, and to figure out how handsomely he and his family are profiting from their rule. It is enough time to know that the project of holding him and his enablers accountable should stretch far into the American future, assuming that, after Trump, there is one.

Visit link:
Democrats Must Investigate Every Trump Scandal, Even if It Takes Decades - Slate Magazine

Board Ed: Global citizens in the age of immigration reform – Los Angeles Loyolan (subscription)

U.S. District Court Judge William H. Orrick blocked President Trumps attempt to defund sanctuary cities on Tuesday, setting a precedent for actions in response to the current administrations conservative platform. The nationwide ruling comes months after Trumps January executive order on immigration, which demanded that the Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security block cities from receiving funds if they refused to cooperate with the controversial order. Orricks ruling further reminds us of the courts rejection of Trumps previous executive order for a seven-nation Muslim travel ban back in February.

According to theNew York Times, thecourt ruled that Trumps move to tie billions of dollars in federal funding to immigration enforcement overstepped his executive powers, since the powers of spending are placed within the responsibilities of Congress. Orricks decision is a temporary one, until the constitutional backing of Trumps executive order is further checked and digested, but it is valid nationwide.

The U.S. courts progress is living proof that the Trump administrations often racist and ignorant plans are supported neither by a large percentage of the American public nor by the Constitution. Many times, the judiciary fails in upholding equality and justice, regarding the loophole-filled lobbying process as well as systemic issues such as racial profiling and mass incarceration. In this case, however, District Judge Orrick of San Francisco blocked a large part of the administrations conservative immigration policy before it had been brought to fruition.

This is win for many proponents of immigration and immigration reform, and may signify a growing understanding among the public through a constitutional and social lens. No longer is immigration reform a debate between the left and the right. The San Francisco case ruled that the federal command of the city to work with immigration agents broke the trust between local authorities and immigrants, who the city argued would become less likely to report crimes or serve as witnesses," The New York Times reported.

According to CNN, White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus claimed on Tuesday that the administration would take action to appeal Orricks ruling. In a late night statement, the White House called Orricks ruling, an egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge.

Despite the backlash from the White House over Orricks ruling, the judge explained that the ruling does not take the power away from the White House to create its own definition of a sanctuary city, nor deny the government the ability to enforce conditions on federal grants. Additionally, the Justice Department vowed it would continue to uphold requirements for grants and further comply with the legal system.

As LMU students, we are all called to be global citizens, to uphold Jesuit values and fight for the integrity of humanity in the face of adversaries who threaten to demoralize those around us. With Sacred Heart Chapel named as a safe space for undocumented individuals, it is important to recognize the significance of this court ruling and understand the implications that may have occurred on our own campus had Trumps intentions been realized. While it is comforting to know that our legal system prevented racist and extremist values from informing national monetary policy, we must be weary of future legislation that could threaten the integrity of all Americans regardless of citizenship or documentation and actively fight to prevent it from coming to fruition.

More:
Board Ed: Global citizens in the age of immigration reform - Los Angeles Loyolan (subscription)

Local officials talk immigration reform – Ceres Courier

Following a raucous town hall meeting in Denair on April 17, Congressman Jeff Denham met a much more subdued crowd Wednesday morning, April 19 as he, state Assemblyman Heath Flora and county Supervisor Kristin Olsen highlighted the need for commonsense immigration reform at a roundtable discussion, addressing the critical role that immigrants play in small business, agriculture and other industries here in the Central Valley.

At the panel hosted by immigration reform group FWD.us and the Central Valley Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, the three politicians were also joined by Congregations Building Community Executive Director Homero Mejia and Alexis Angulo, Senior Class President at Gustine High School and DACA recipient.

Angulo is a recipient of former President Barack Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) 2012 immigration policy, which allows some undocumented immigrants, known as "dreamers," who were brought to the United States as children to receive deferred action from deportation and eligibility for work permits.

Angulo currently boasts a 4.2 GPA, which has earned him a full-ride scholarship to Dartmouth University where he hopes to study electrical engineering before eventually working for NASA.

"Your story is absolutely incredible," Flora told Angulo. "I'm proud that you're on this panel because you have lived this and you are the expert in this because this is your life."

Dreamers like Angulo have lived in fear of deportation since President Donald Trump took office. He has promised to crack down on illegal immigration and deport those who skirted immigration law. Although Trump has promised to protect dreamers, the recent deportation of a dreamer in Southern California has sparked concern among those protected by DACA. Maria Harrington, a teacher in the audience at the panel, expressed the fear that not only her immigrant students feel under the new administration, but the uncertainty she feels as well.

"I feel that my voice needs to be heard," she said, standing from her chair after both Denham and Olsen stated the climate surrounding immigration and deportations has not changed from the Obama era. "I have a lot of students that are flat-out afraid...It already happened that a DACA student got deported and you're saying don't be scared? Even me, as a teacher...I'm shaking in my boots."

There are around 11,000 DACA-eligible individuals in Stanislaus and Merced counties, and nearly 800,000 dreamers are currently protected nationwide under DACA. Removing them from the workforce would cost the United States $433.4 billion in GDP loss over a decade.

During the panel, Denham highlighted the need to pass bipartisan legislation, rather than an executive order like DACA, which can be eliminated by a new president, in order to protect dreamers from deportation. Comprehensive immigration reform has not emerged from Congress in over 30 years, he said.

"Congress must lead in fixing our broken immigration system, with an important part of the plan being a path to legal status for Dreamers who were brought here as children," said Denham. "These hardworking young people are already part of our communities, and they deserve a fair and thoughtful solution that will bring certainty to their lives."

One such way Denham is trying to help, he explained, is through his ENLIST Act, which promises legal permanent residence to Dreamers who serve in the military, as well as through co-sponsoring the BRIDGE Act and helping to design the RAC Act - both of which aim to provide protection for Dreamers.

"(The ENLIST Act) doesn't solve all of our problems, but it is one small piece of the overall immigration reform that not only needs to get resolved but allows us to start the conversation," said Denham. "If you can agree that Dreamers should be able to serve in the military, that allows you to start the conversation with, Okay, well what else?'"

Dreamers that obey the law and continue to be contributing members of society should be granted legal status through immigration reform, said Flora.

"The immigrants, the folks that come here to better their lives - we want them here. We need them to understand we want them here," said Flora. "We want them to stay here, we want them to be successful as Americans and it is our job to make sure we set up a system that works for everyone."

Real reform happens during discussions like Wednesday's, said Flora, not in Sacramento or Washington, D.C., but in the communities where those who are affected can make their voices heard. Olsen underscored the positive impact that immigrants have on the local economy. Immigrant residents in the Modesto area are 20 percent more likely to be entrepreneurs than native-born residents, and in 2014 paid more than $296 million in state and local taxes.

"Our economic success in the Valley is very closely connected to having an immigration system that works," said Olsen. "There have been numerous studies done showing that if immigration was cut off, how our agriculture communities in particular would survive and it's not a pretty picture."

View post:
Local officials talk immigration reform - Ceres Courier