Archive for April, 2017

Eurovision 2017: Why Ukraine and Russia are facing off – BBC News


BBC News
Eurovision 2017: Why Ukraine and Russia are facing off
BBC News
Until recent years, though, there was little about the competition that would give politicians sleepless nights. But now a fierce row between Russia and this year's hosts - Ukraine - has seen a warning letter from Eurovision's organisers land on the ...
Eurovision threatens to ban Ukraine over Russian singer row ...The Guardian
Eurovision threatens to ban Ukraine in row over Russian singerTelegraph.co.uk
Eurovision Organizer Must Decide Whether to Hold Contest in Ukraine - SenatorSputnik International
RT -PinkNews -Stck Nws US
all 89 news articles »

Continued here:
Eurovision 2017: Why Ukraine and Russia are facing off - BBC News

Ukraine slams Eurovision amid feud with Russia over contest … – Deutsche Welle

Following calls from Eurovision Song Contest organizers for Ukraine to lift anentry ban on Russian contestant Yulia Samoilova, Kyiv complained on Saturday of "unprecedented and unacceptable" demands.

The weeks-long row ahead of the Eurovision song contest scheduled for May kicked off in March after Ukraine - this year's ESC host -barred 27-year-old Russian singer Yulia Samoilova over illegally entering Moscow-annexed Crimea for a 2015 performance.

Search for a compromise

Eurovision organizers, the Geneva-based European Broadcasting Union (EBU), have sought to find a compromise but have so far been rebuffed by both sides.

"It is unprecedented and unacceptable to demand such extraordinary decisions from Ukraine for the sake of Russia," Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Vyacheslav Kyrylenko said in comments released by his office on Saturday.

'Unacceptable' ban

Kyrylenko's comments came in light of a leaked letter on Friday in which EBU Director-General Ingrid Deltenre urged Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman to lift the "unacceptable" ban on the Russian singer.

Read more:Opinion - Russia makes smart move for Eurovision

"I think that France, Germany, Britain, Poland would have made the same decision, as well as any other country that is a member of the EBU," Kyrylenko said in an interview with a Ukrainian radio station.

The EBU suggested last Thursday that Samoilova could perform via satellite link.Channel One Russia rejected the idea, however, claiming that Samoylova performing via a remote link would be strange, given thatlive performances are a prerequisite for entrants.

The Eurovision semifinals will be held in Kiev on May 9 and 11, while the final will be on May 13.

On-going conflict

The Eurovision spat is just the latest row to come between Moscow and Kyiv. The nations have been at political loggerheads since Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and over Russia's subsequent involvement in a conflict pitting Ukraine troops against pro-Russian rebels in the east of the country.

Almost 10,000 people have been killed since the start of the pro-Russian insurgency that Kyiv and the West accuse Moscow of masterminding. Russia has repeatedlydenied the claims.

ksb/gsw (AFP, Reuters)

Here is the original post:
Ukraine slams Eurovision amid feud with Russia over contest ... - Deutsche Welle

Tillerson: US to maintain Ukraine-related sanctions on Russia until Crimea is returned – The Missoulian

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Friday that US sanctions against Russia will remain in place until Moscow "reverses the actions" it has taken in Ukraine.

The comments are notable given President Donald Trump's at-times reluctance to criticize Russia over its actions in Crimea, though he did declare last month that the territory was "taken" by Russia. As a candidate, Trump hinted he might recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea, and sources have previously told CNN that Ukraine-related sanctions were on the table for review as part of Trump's interest in pursuing warmer ties with Moscow.

"American and NATO support for Ukraine remains steadfast. As we have repeated at every ministerial and summit since Russia launched its campaign of aggression against Ukraine, NATO allies stand firm in our support of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity," Tillerson said at a NATO meeting at the organization's headquarters in Brussels. "We do not, and will not, accept Russian efforts to change the borders of territory of Ukraine."

He added, "We will continue to hold Russia accountable to its Minsk commitments. The United States sanctions will remain until Moscow reverses the actions that triggered our sanctions."

At his confirmation hearings in January, Tillerson called Russia's claims on Crimea "illegitimate." His comments on Friday also echo those made by US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, when she told the UN Security Council last month that US sanctions against Russia would remain in place until it withdraws from Crimea.

Earlier Friday, Tillerson and Defense Secretary James Mattis criticized Russian actions in overseas comments aimed at reassuring US allies.

Mattis, appearing with his British counterpart in London, also called out the Putin regime for "mucking around" in other people's elections -- a particularly notable claim coming at a time when federal and congressional investigators are probing alleged Russian meddling in the US elections last November.

"We look to engaging with Russia on a political or diplomatic level, but right now, Russia is choosing to be a strategic competitor," Mattis said during a news conference with Michael Fallon, the UK defense secretary. "We are going to have to carve out diplomatically some kind of maneuver room here, assuming Russia can change its behavior and act in accordance with international norms and international law."

He also said "Russian activity" in Afghanistan "gives us concern," though he stopped short of saying the Putin government was arming the Taliban.

In response to Mattis, Alexey Pushkov, a senior Russian lawmaker, tweeted, "New US administration sounds just like the old one Mattis is indistinguishable from (former Defense Secretary Ash) Carter, Tillerson is talking about 'Russian aggression.' (Barack) Obama and (Hillary) Clinton must be happy."

Tillerson is in Brussels to reinforce US commitment to NATO -- an organization Trump has repeatedly criticized -- and referred to the alliance as "the bedrock for transatlantic security."

"We understand that a threat against one of us is a threat against all of us, and we will respond accordingly. We will uphold the agreements we have made to defend our allies," he added.

The Trump administration's top diplomat, however, reiterated on Friday Trump's call for members to increase their financial contributions to the organization.

"Our goal should be to agree at the May leaders meeting that by the end of the year, all allies will have either met the pledge guidelines or will have developed plans that clearly articulate how, with annual milestone progress commitments, the pledge will be fulfilled," Tillerson told the ministers.

But Trump's hopes of striking a grand bargain with Russia are fading, two administration officials told CNN Thursday.

According to one senior administration official, this isn't necessarily because Trump's view of Putin has evolved. But Trump believes in the current atmosphere -- with so much media scrutiny and ongoing probes into Trump-Russia ties and election meddling -- that it won't be possible to "make a deal," as the President himself has framed it, the officials said.

One of the White House officials said the President was particularly "frustrated" in a meeting in the Oval Office with newly minted national security adviser H.R. McMaster and other top officials in the wake of Russia's February cruise missile deployment -- an apparent treaty violation.

This official said that with each violation from Russia, the President views it as that much harder to make amends. The President is not closing the door on engaging with Russia on a variety of issues -- including Syria, Ukraine and combating ISIS -- but the administration is not optimistic at the moment.

CNN's Nicole Gaouette, Sara Murray, Elizabeth Landers, Eugene Scott, Mary Ilyushina and Matthew Chance contributed to this report.

See the original post:
Tillerson: US to maintain Ukraine-related sanctions on Russia until Crimea is returned - The Missoulian

‘Powerless Senility’: Poland Unwilling to Heed Ukraine’s Nationalist Threat – Sputnik International

Europe

11:55 02.04.2017(updated 12:03 02.04.2017) Get short URL

He called Polish authorities' reaction tothe shelling "a condition ofpowerless senility."

On Wednesday, unidentified attackers shelled the Polish Consulate General inLutsk using a grenade launcher; no one was hurt inthe incident, butthe consulate building was damaged, according tothe diplomatic mission.

Commenting onthe matter, Pietka recalled that onMarch 16, an array ofleading Ukrainian nationalist organizations such asFreedom, the Convention ofUkrainian Nationalists and the Right Sector adopted a so-called National Manifesto.

In particular, the document stipulates the ouster ofcurrent Ukrainian authorities, that Ukraine must have access tonuclear weapons, and the creation ofthe Baltic-Black Sea Union.

"This was ignored bysenior Polish officials, who immediately call all the negative incidents, especially those inWestern Ukraine, Russian provocations," Pietka said.

"I would call these officials' reaction tothe threatening incident inLutsk a condition akin toimpotent senility," he added.

"These people do not want topay attention tothe anti-Polish nature ofUkrainian nationalism and chauvinism, which developed and gained strength afterthe Maidan coup inUkraine. They do not see the processes going ina very dangerous direction because Kiev does not control the political situation not only inWestern Ukraine, butelsewhere inthe country," according to Pietka.

Sputnik/ Alexey Vitvitsky

In this vein, he referred toa recent spate ofincidents acrossUkraine, including the one inKiev, where a Polish military cemetery was desecrated.Another incident saw an attack onthe Polish Embassy, where a huge portrait of Bandera was installed.

"Regrettably, both Polish authorities and the opposition, including the former Solidarity labor union], prefer toignore the danger emanating fromgrowing Ukrainian nationalism. They refuse tounderstand the fact that Ukrainian nationalists are absolutely irrelevant partners forpolitical cooperation," Pietka pointed out.

Sputnik/ Grigoriy Vasilenko

A man carrying a picture of Stepan Bandera during a torchlight procession of Ukrainian nationalists in downtown Kiev. File photo

Earlier, the Polish Press Agency reported that representatives fromPoland's Democratic Left Alliance (SLD) consider the Ukrainian parliament's recognition ofthe Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) asfighters forindependence a "slap inthe face" tothe people ofPoland and toits President.

The Ukrainian Insurgent Army is being glorified, and a law has been passed recognizing the special role played bythe UPA inUkrainian history." Based onthe law, "anyone who asserts the fact that the UPA is a criminal organization involved inthe genocide [of Poles] can be punished; this is a disgrace. It is a slap inthe face tothe Polish people and President Komorowski," SLD deputy Tomasz Kalita stated.

Sputnik/ Alexey Vitvitsky

Polish historians blame the killing ofbetween 100,000 and 130,000 Polish civilians and 5,000-10,000 Ukrainian civilians inVolhynia and Eastern Galicia onthe UPA, claims which Ukrainian historians have downplayed or denied outright.

Never miss a story again sign upto our Telegram channel and we'll keep you upto speed!

Read the original:
'Powerless Senility': Poland Unwilling to Heed Ukraine's Nationalist Threat - Sputnik International

The photography of Trump’s presidency is a huge break from Obama’s – The Verge

Many of the most iconic photos of Barack Obamas presidency came from Pete Souza, the official White House photographer. Granted extensive access to Obama, he shot the Osama Bin Laden war room photo, moments the president shared with Michelle Obama, the many famous images of the president interacting with kids, and countless more. These carefully composed photos so defined the public image of Obama that it nearly made Souza a household name.

In its visual representation, as in so many other respects, the Trump administration has made a break with the past. Most of what we see of Trump comes from either the traveling pool of press photographers or the smartphones of his staff. On the one hand there are Getty Images or Reuters shots of Trump standing at podiums (or pretending to drive a truck). And on the other, we get unusually informal images of him posing with world leaders or appearing to be caught off guard. In the meantime, the White Houses Flickr account was purged, and the Photos section was removed from the official website.

Trump has a staff photographer, but we havent seen much of her work

The new administration does have an official photographer in Shealah Craighead, who was hired in late January. She was the personal photographer for first lady Laura Bush, as well as the photo editor for Vice President Dick Cheney. So far very few of her photos have been published. The majority exist in one 50-image gallery on the presidents official Facebook page or are scattered around Instagram. A few others seem to show up in the graphics created for the official @POTUS Twitter account. Wherever they can be found, the pictures we see appear to show Craighead has little in the way of special access to Trump.

If you look at the archive of the White Houses Flickr account under Barack Obama, Souza was already taking a wider variety of photos of Obama, from loosening his tie on Inauguration Night to stressing during a budget meeting two weeks later.

Craigheads photos are instead mostly taken from a distance. She appears to be situated with, or even behind the White House press pool. Even the few photos of Trump or his daughter Ivanka that you could consider behind the scenes are still taken from far away. If anyone has the access that Souza had, its people like Sean Spicer or Kellyanne Conway, who are only armed with smartphones.

Considering Trumps desire to circumvent the traditional media, its surprising that he has not taken advantage of the position of official White House photographer, which gives the president a powerful way of controlling his image directly.

Some of the changes in the role of White House photographer can likely be attributed to organizational chaos in the administration. Outgoing Obama White House photo editor Al Anderson told the National Press Photographers Association that the Trump administration didnt take the time to build a team before Inauguration Day, and that Craighead asked him to stay at the White House while the photo department was restaffed. Anderson says that military photographers had to be brought in to help cover the inauguration, while Craighead tried to both organize coverage and take photos herself. Craighead declined to comment and the White House did not respond to inquiries.

Seeing fewer images from the White House might be better from a photojournalistic perspective

If the administration continues to downplay the official photographer role, it might not necessarily be a bad thing, according to Liz Losh, an associate professor at William and Mary who has written extensively about the visual culture of government.

From the standpoint of photojournalism, a lot of people would argue this is better, Losh tells The Verge. The control that the Pete Souza image had, it created an image of surplus and abundance of images of the president, but it became invisible how much those images were controlled.

John Bredar wrote the book about the history of White House photographers, and he agrees with Losh to an extent. I remember from interviewing [Pete Souza] back in 2010, that he was saying something like 90% of their selects, 90 to 95% of their selects, meaning his and his picture editor, were being uploaded to Flickr, and that maybe 5% were being filtered out for a variety of different reasons by [Obamas press secretary] Josh Earnest at the time.

In 2013, Obama came under fire when photojournalists from mainstream outlets noticed that Souza was uploading large numbers of photos from events and engagements to which they hadnt been invited. The White House Correspondents association and 37 news outlets sent a letter to then press secretary Jay Carney that compared the behavior to that of Soviet Russia. The New York Times described the protest as a mutiny.

Instead of leveraging the White House photographer, Trumps team has published large numbers of photos taken by phone-wielding staffers. We often see the same pic collages, thumbs-up photo ops, and phone conversation photos. This is in keeping with Trumps campaign. Trump kept the campaign press pool on a different plane, so the only behind-the-scenes looks we got of him were informal, often taken casually and at a distance. The photos were typically blurry, underexposed, and poorly composed. The campaign appeared to prioritize graphics, screenshots of tweets, and videos over high-quality photography.

Some of the most iconic images of the administration have also come from bystanders taking photos with their phones, like when a Mar-A-Lago guest snapped a photo of Trump using his cell phones flashlight to look at what appeared to be sensitive documents.

Losh argues that viewing Trump mainly through spur-of-the-moment cellphone snaps and the editorially independent photojournalists means were getting a more accurate portrayal of the president than we would if the official photographer was more active. Often these offhand photos can drive small news cycles of their own.

Bredar says hes holding his judgement on Craigheads role until he sees more of her work. Whats more, he says its hard to define the role of a White House photographer, because its not a position thats prescribed its more of a kept tradition. Bredar says it wasnt until the Johnson or Ford administrations that we really knew what kind of access the photographer had.

There was no Flickr stream, there was no kind of way to put photos out, and to some extent, the official White House photographers work was kept under wraps except for under some rare circumstances, he says.

As for the smartphone photos, Bredar says hes a bit wary about how theyre being handled since its unclear if theyre being managed or archived by the White House picture editor. Its also not clear if ones been hired after being asked last minute to stay on, Al Anderson left the post after two weeks.

Its not clear if any of these smartphone photos are being properly managed or archived

From the perspective of someone who looks at history kind of with a students eye, those are valuable documents to understand what was going on, Bredar says. And if nobodys kind of avidly collecting or managing that, thats one issue, and potentially a significant loss to the country.

Bredar and Losh both agree that the Trump administration is off to a bizarre start visually. Usually when a new president comes in, theres a huge amount of buzz ahead of time about who the photographers going to be within that photo community, Bredar says. And you didnt really hear that kind of conversation through this campaign.

The Trump team could settle in, and Craigheads role could evolve. But sometimes, Bredar says, that takes a very long time to happen.

If you look at Ollie Atkins, who was Nixons photographer, he reported to [press secretary] Ron Ziegler, and they had total control over him. He wasnt allowed to go in [the Oval Office] without Zieglers approval, Bredar says. Thats why Nixons presidency is often remembered for stiffly posed photos with people like Elvis Presley. Sound familiar?

It wasnt until Atkins learned that Nixon was telling his family about his decision to resign in 1974, Bredar says, that the photographer protested enough to get access to a truly intimate moment. He was rewarded with a set of iconic, if awkward, photos of the Nixon familys darkest hour. Those are the best photos that Ive seen from Ollies work.

View original post here:
The photography of Trump's presidency is a huge break from Obama's - The Verge