Archive for April, 2017

Japanese internment vs. illegal immigration – Valdosta Daily Times

Its started already. Twice in the last week, I have read about the Japanese internment during World War II. Its clear where this is going. The liberal Fake News outlets are going to attempt to use history to make everyone feel guilty and tie it in with the deportation of illegal immigrants. However, there is nothing to tie in.

This is a subject I am qualified to write about because I was alive at that time. I was 9 years old when WWII ended. The Japanese internment is totally different from what is going on now, as I will explain.

First, some background, when America was attacked on Dec. 7, 1941, we were an economic power, not a military power. There was real fear that we would be defeated and overrun by Germany, Japan or both. Each nation had a very powerful military.

There was a fear that Japanese on American soil might be loyal to their homeland, and they were largely concentrated on the West Coast. The fear was, in the event of an invasion, they might fight against us. Also, there was a fear they would spy and sabotage.

Because of the dastardly and deadly surprise attack at Pearl Harbor, it was a time of extreme paranoia and hatred of the Japanese.

When I was 7 years old, and the war had been raging for almost two years, I remember asking my grandmother, Will we win the war? She replied, I dont know, honey. I then asked, When I grow up, will I have to go fight? Again she answered, I dont know.

Those were sincere and serious questions asked by a scared little 7-year-old boy. For you who didnt live during that time and have gotten your information from books, it may be hard to understand the fear and hardships we had. Fear was the mood of the whole country.

Liberals are using this shameful part of American history by trying to correlate it to the deportation of illegal immigrants; however, there is no correlation! Theyre using half-truths to stir up dissension against President Trump, and a half-truth is a whole lie.

To compare the Japanese internment with present-day events is like comparing apples to oranges. Its the illegal immigrants that President Trump is talking about deporting, especially the felons. Hes not talking about legal immigrants, nor stopping legal immigration.

No matter how much sympathy you have for them, or how long theyve been here, all illegal immigrants are criminals. Its a difficult problem that must be dealt with. You can rest assured that families are not going to be unreasonably torn apart with mass deportations.

Some may have to pay a fine or leave temporarily and come back through a legal process. Either were a nation of laws, or were not. Its the thread that holds society together. All the mass hysteria needs to stop.

Remember, were Americans and well find a way to make the illegals, legal. At this time in our history, great wisdom is needed. The media needs to stop with the lies and half truths which cause dissension.

Hoot Gibson is a resident of Valdosta. He is the author of Hoots Wisdom Nuggets to Help You Become a Super Salesman. He may be reached at 36hoot@gmail.com.

More:
Japanese internment vs. illegal immigration - Valdosta Daily Times

Sessions seeks to speed up deportation of illegal immigrants in federal facilities – Fox News

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Thursday a plan to speed up the deportation of illegal immigrants housed in federal correctional facilities.

Sessions said the Justice Department will expand the Institutional Hearing Program, which identifies removable illegal immigrants who are inmates in federal correctional facilities, provides in-person and video teleconference immigration removal proceedings, and removes them upon completion of sentence.

This is done instead of rather than releasing them to an ICE detention facility or into the community for adjudication of status in an effort to speed up the process.

The expansion of the program will expand the number of active facilities with the program to a total of 14 federal prisons and six contract facilities.

As part of the expansion, each of the facilities will have their video teleconference abilities increased, and have a new uniform intake policy by April 6.

We owe it to the American people to ensure that illegal aliens who have been convicted of crimes and are serving time in our federal prisons are expeditiously removed from our country as the law requires, said Sessions said in a statement. This expansion and modernization of the Institutional Hearing Program gives us the tools to continue making Americans safe again in their communities.

The Justice Department believes these improvements will speed the process of deporting incarcerated illegal immigrants, and reduce costs to taxpayers.

Original post:
Sessions seeks to speed up deportation of illegal immigrants in federal facilities - Fox News

Beyond The Mike Pence Misogyny Debate, The 3 ‘Billy Graham … – NPR

Graham set out strict rules to keep his ministry from having any whiff of impropriety. That broad philosophy could be useful to White Houses. Stephen Chernin/Getty Images hide caption

Graham set out strict rules to keep his ministry from having any whiff of impropriety. That broad philosophy could be useful to White Houses.

The nation learned this week that Vice President Mike Pence and his wife, Karen, have had some unusually strict boundaries around their marriage.

That's something The Washington Post's Ashley Parker dug up in writing a profile of Karen Pence this week. As Parker tweeted on Wednesday, "Mike Pence never dines alone [with] a woman not his wife, nor does he attends events [with] alcohol, w/o her by his side."

This practice, of avoiding alone time with another woman, is what some Christians call the "Billy Graham Rule," after the famous evangelist. And the revelation that the vice president has practiced it made for a fiery (and important) debate about the function of gender in the halls of power.

Perhaps the rule is purely a couple's private decision for protecting their marriage, some said. But then, others countered, it could easily enable discrimination. After all, it was created by men, in a male-dominated profession. (And virtually all references to the rule refer to men, not women, practicing it.) And it's easier to practice in a profession that's male-dominated like, for example, Washington politics. Were a woman to act similarly, it would probably be tougher, perhaps even impracticable, in a heavily male Congress or White House. Congress, after all, has about the same share of women right now as the clergy.

Fortunately, the Internet is hard at work debating all that, so we can get to something different here: the other rules that Graham set for his ministry.

Graham knew something about leadership; during his career, he was one of the most (if not the most) influential evangelists in America. Indeed, he has been close with presidents of both parties, and met with all the presidents from Truman to Obama (President Trump has met him, but before Trump was president). Trump won four-in-five evangelicals in November, but his actions have, to a remarkable degree, run counter to the strictures Graham set out, in part to keep his ministry running smoothly.

At a 1948 meeting, Graham and his ministry team came up with what was called the Modesto Manifesto, a set of four guidelines (including the no-alone-time-with-women rule many evangelical men follow).

Here's an abridged rundown of the rules, as Graham described them in his autobiography (emphasis ours):

"The first point on our combined list was money. ... [T]here was little or no accountability for finances. In Modesto we determined to do all we could to avoid financial abuses and to downplay the offering and depend as much as possible on money raised by the local committee in advance.

"The second item on the list was the danger of sexual immorality. We all knew of evangelists who had fallen into immorality while separated from their families by travel. We pledged among ourselves to avoid any situation that would have even the appearance of compromise or suspicion. From that day on, I did not travel, meet or eat alone with a woman other than my wife. ...

"Our third concern was the tendency of many evangelists to carry on their work apart from the local church, even to criticize local pastors and churches openly and scathingly. We were convinced, however, that this was not only counterproductive but also wrong from the Bible's standpoint. ...

"The fourth and final issue was publicity. The tendency among some evangelists was to exaggerate their successes or to claim higher attendance numbers than they really had. ... In Modesto we committed ourselves to integrity in our publicity and our reporting."

Ironically, the current president's actions have at times quite brazenly run counter to these rules that Graham set out for himself, and that the vice president at least partially seems to follow closely.

That first guideline, about money, Graham described as being about "accountability."

Money and accountability is one area where the Trump White House has run into heavy criticism; all presidents since Nixon have either released their tax returns or summaries of those returns. Trump, however, has not. In addition, big questions still loom about the degree to which he has separated himself from his businesses, as well as how much those businesses benefit from his presidency.

On the sexuality rule, as many pointed out this week, Pence follows a rule designed to help men serve their God by avoiding temptation, while the president he serves has in the past spoken quite explicitly about embracing that temptation ("I'm automatically attracted to beautiful I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. ... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."). Trump later apologized for the remarks.

As far as Graham's third item, Trump has no "local churches" to speak of. Still, there are echoes here of the Republican "11th commandment," which is heavily associated with Ronald Reagan, whom the GOP has all but canonized. This week, Trump vowed to "fight" Freedom Caucus members.

And then there is the rule about inflating attendance numbers. The White House ran into trouble on this from Day One, literally.

Of course, the White House is not a religious organization and does not have to (and, plenty would argue, should not) follow the exact rules of an evangelical preacher.

However, much about Graham's rules isn't strictly biblical. Yes, the ideas are tied to the Christian idea that people are fundamentally sinful and therefore easily tempted. But many people who aren't Christians can still get behind ideas like financial accountability and honesty, for example.

After all, a lot of what Graham was aiming for here was not only keeping himself spiritually pure, but also keeping his organization from being derailed by scandal.

The degree to which Graham's sexuality rule could reinforce gender discrimination is troubling and important to examine. But that one bigger aim of Graham's rules helping keep an office beyond reproach could be applied to White Houses, too.

(Of course, even some presidents who relied on Graham for advice didn't always live up to his standards.)

For Graham, those close to him say that strategy paid off.

"In hindsight, Billy Graham and people close to him would say, 'Whatever inconvenience these practices might have involved, it was worth it to protect his reputation and the reputation of the ministry, and that for 60-some years, there was no hint of scandal surrounding him,'" said Mark DeMoss, Graham's spokesman. "So I think it paid good dividends.'"

Read the original post:
Beyond The Mike Pence Misogyny Debate, The 3 'Billy Graham ... - NPR

I’m a Woman Who Benefitted Greatly From Working For Mike Pence – National Review

In the Washington Post this weekend, my former colleague Mary Vought wrote an importantpiece about working for our former boss, Vice-President Mike Pence. Mary and I worked together for Pence when he was chairman of the House Republican Conference, so I resonated with what she wrote.

When the media went crazy last weekabout the2002 comment Pence made about never dining alone with women, I wasnt sure what all the fuss was about. I had heard of Pences rule when I started worked for him in 2009 and thought nothing of it. It seemed like a great way to avoid the perception of inappropriateness. With gossip and reporters floating around every corner of Capitol Hill (and elsewhere), extra precaution seemed prudent.

As Mary so eloquently wrote in her piece, being a woman didnt hold her back at all while working for Pence and I can confidently say the same. From the piece:

Pences personal decision to not dine alone with female staffers was never a hindrance to my ability to do my job well, and never kept me from reaping the rewards of my work. In fact, I excelled at my job because of the work environment created from the top down, and my personal determination to succeed.

The Vice-President never treated me with anything but respect and I found him to be a warm, genuine man who truly valued his staff and more importantly, his family. From my vantage point, he madedecisions thoughtfully and prayerfully in a way that should make you glad hes now sitting in such an influential role with President Trump.

The many strange reactionsto the Pences personal boundaries on and respect for his own marriage are unwarranted. As Mary wrote:

This is by no means a partisan issue. Whether youre a Democrat, Republican, Independent, or couldnt care less, if you choose to prioritize your marriage and esteem your family while faithfully carrying out public service, you should be praised. If the only woman you want to dine alone with is your spouse, you should be commended. With his choice about how to divide up his time, Pence made a strong statement about work-life balance, the importance of family time, and respect in the workplace: values we can all get behind.

Im glad I got the opportunity to work for Mike Pence. Its done nothing but great things for my career.

Read more:
I'm a Woman Who Benefitted Greatly From Working For Mike Pence - National Review

Mike Pence Cast a Tie-Breaking Vote on Bill That Could Hurt Planned Parenthood – TIME

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 16: U.S. Vice President Mike Pence speaks to reporters during a swearing-in ceremony for National Security Director Dan Coats at the U.S. Capitol on March 16, 2017 in Washington, DC. The U.S. Senate confirmed Coats 85-12 yesterday. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)Justin SullivanGetty Images

(WASHINGTON) Republican legislation letting states deny federal family planning money to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers advanced toward Senate passage Thursday, rescued by an ailing GOP senator who returned to the Capitol after back surgery and a tie-breaking vote by Vice President Mike Pence.

Republican leaders kept a procedural vote open for over an hour after two GOP senators, Alaska's Lisa Murkowski and Maine's Susan Collins, joined Democrats trying to block the measure. Pence then journeyed to the Capitol to break a 50-50 tie and cast the deciding vote in Congress' latest clash that mixed abortion, women's health and states' rights.

Senate approval was planned later Thursday and would send the measure to President Donald Trump, who was expected to sign it. The House voted its consent last month.

Passage would give Republicans and anti-abortion groups a needed victory just six days after the party's highly touted health care overhaul disintegrated in the House due to GOP divisions. Besides erasing much of former President Barack Obama's 2010 health care law, the abandoned House bill would have blocked federal funds for Planned Parenthood for a year.

The Senate measure would roll back a regulation Obama issued shortly before leaving office. It bars state and local governments from denying federal family planning funds to organizations unless they are unable to provide those services. Some states have passed laws preventing abortion providers from receiving the funds.

There is already a ban on using federal funds for abortion except for rare instances.

Democrats assailed the legislation as an attack on women, two months after Trump's inauguration prompted a women's march on Washington that mushroomed into anti-Trump demonstrations around the nation.

"While Trumpcare was dealt a significant blow last week, it is clear that the terrible ideas that underpin it live on with Republicans in Congress," said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., using a nickname for the failed House health care bill. Murray, among a stream of Democratic women senators who spoke, called the Senate measure "shameful" and "dangerous."

Republicans said the measure would give states more freedom to decide how to spend family planning funds. States would be free to divert money now going to groups that provide abortion to other organizations that don't, like community health centers.

"It substituted Washington's judgment for the needs of real people," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said of Obama's rule.

With Republicans holding 52-48 control of the Senate, the Collins and Murkowski defections could have derailed the bill because Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., has been absent since Feb. 20, when he had spinal surgery.

He had a second operation March 15 and has been recuperating in Georgia under doctor's orders. But he got permission to return to Washington for one day, his office said, and he did so using a walker.

"We didn't know at the time what it would be but it turned out to be the vice president's tie-breaker," Isakson told reporters after the procedural vote.

The federal family planning program was created 1970 and in 2015 served 4 million clients at nearly 4,000 clinics. Most of the money is for providing services like contraceptives, family planning counseling, breast and cervical cancer screening and sexually transmitted disease prevention. It has a $286 million federal budget this year.

Most recipients are women, and two-thirds have incomes at or below the federal poverty level, around $12,000 for an individual. Six in 10 say the program's services are their only or most frequent source of health care.

Dawn Laguens, executive vice president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, mocked Pence.

"Mike Pence went from yesterday's forum on empowering women to today leading a group of male politicians in a vote to take away access to birth control and cancer screenings," she said.

The Congressional Review Act lets lawmakers undo regulations enacted in the last months of the Obama administration with a majority vote. Congress has already used the law to eliminate Obama regulations that strengthened protections for streams near coal-mining operations and prevented some people with mental disorders from purchasing guns.

Under the Constitution, the vice president casts tie breaking votes. Pence broke his first tie on the nomination of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.

Link:
Mike Pence Cast a Tie-Breaking Vote on Bill That Could Hurt Planned Parenthood - TIME