Archive for April, 2017

Ukraine may lose support of Western partners if it withdraws from negotiation process in Minsk US . ambassador – Interfax

2017-04-06T15:28+02:00 15:28 06.04.2017

U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch has said that if Ukraine refuses the Minsk accords and withdraws from the negotiation process, it may lose the support of Western partners.

"If we deviate from 'Minsk', when I say "we", I think, it is important that the international community has united around Ukraine [...] there are very good partners in this negotiation process. I think that Ukraine will remain without the support of Western partners if it withdraws from this negotiation process," Yovanovitch said on Thursday during her speech in the framework of the panel discussion "US Foreign Policy: What role will Ukraine play?" at the Kyiv Security Forum on Thursday.

She also noted that the Minsk agreements are very unpopular in Ukraine, however, they contain all the necessary aspects of the conflict settlement, both the political part and the part that concerns security. And if an agreement is abandoned, it will be necessary to look for an alternative process.

View post:
Ukraine may lose support of Western partners if it withdraws from negotiation process in Minsk US . ambassador - Interfax

America Is Still Training Ukrainian Troops to Fly a Drone They Hate – The Drive

New video footage shows soldiers from the U.S. Army National Guard are still training their Ukrainian counterparts to fly the controversial RQ-11B Raven. This latest practice session occurred more than three months after Kiev's forces complained bitterly to the international press about the tiny, pilotless planes.

On March 29, 2017, members of the Oklahoma National Guards 45th Infantry Brigade Combat Team flew at least one RQ-11B over the Yavoriv Combat Training Center in western Ukraine. Approximately 250 guardsmen from the brigade arrived almost three months earlier, becoming a major component of the American-led Joint Multinational Training Group-Ukraine (JMTG-U).

On April 2, 2017, the guardsmen posted footage taken from the unmanned aircrafts camera on the Pentagons main online media hub, the Defense Video Imagery Distribution System. The citizen soldiers were mentoring Ukrainians conducting reconnaissance and observing fires with a RQ-11 Raven unmanned aerial vehicle during a combined-arms battalion live-fire exercise, the official caption explained.

The RQ-11B is a small, hand-launched pilotless aircraft with color a daytime video camera or an infrared night-vision type. Weight just over 4 pounds, the drone can stay aloft for between one and one and half hours, before it lands at a pre-programmed point. This gives the Raven an effective operational radius of just more than 6 miles. Troops on the ground can control the aircraft and watch the feed using hand-held controls.

The video from Ukraine shows one of Yavorivs training areas, full of shell craters and trenches, as well as other emplacements, roads and the surrounding forests. With the exception of the operators hand briefly appearing at the beginning before the drone takes to the air, no troops or vehicles are visible.

In service across the Pentagon since 2001, drone maker AeroVironment has made 1,000s of Ravens and sold them around the world. The United States itself has included them in aid packages to various allies. In July 2016, the Pentagon sent 72 to Ukraine as part of series of military assistance deals following's Russia's increasingly aggressive actions in the country. More than two years earlier, Moscow's troops forcibly annexed the Crimean Peninsula and subsequent began support insurgents in Ukraine's eastern Donbass region.

The small unmanned planes were supposed to help Ukrainian troops better monitor their surroundings, track enemy troop movements, surveil their borders and other similar missions. Kremlin-backed armed groups and Russian volunteers had access to their own drones, as well as armored vehicles and heavy artillery, all of which put Kievs security forces at a distinct disadvantage. In principle the Ravens would have been a step, if a small one, toward a fair fight.

But in December 2016, Reuters dropped its bombshell report. According to their sources, the RQ-11s were not only under-performing in the Eastern European country, they might actually have been putting Ukrainian troops in danger. At issue was the Ravens analog control system, which had not been a major factor for American troops fighting terrorists and insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan.

From the beginning, it was the wrong decision to use these drones," Natan Chazin, a military advisor working for Ukraine's Chief of the General Staff, told Reuters. The complex is analog, therefore command channels and data are not protected from interception and suppression by modern means of electronic warfare," the countrys Air Force Command said in an Email to the news organization.

Early in the conflict, the fighting in eastern Ukraine provided a perfect opportunity for Russian forces to test out their extensive arsenal of electronic warfare equipment. These included powerful, mobile jammers and other gear that could potentially spoof or intercept drone control systems.

US Army

Ukrainian troops train with their American counterparts at Yavoriv in 2016.

When it came to the Raven, there was immediate evidence it was vulnerable to these state-of-the-art jamming systems. In November 2016, a militia fighting for the breakaway Luhansk Peoples Republic showed off a Ukrainian RQ-11 its troops had reportedly forced down.

But far more worrisome was that insurgents or their Russian partners might have the ability to intercept and view the Ravens camera feed. Depending on the drones route, the camera might end up showing Ukrainian positions to the enemy, becoming a sort of flying double agent.

On top of that, the unmanned aircrafts relatively short range meant it could not reach enemy artillery emplacements, a major point of interest, either. Both sides in the conflict have relied heavily on howitzers and rocket batteries to uproot troops from dug-in positions. For Kiev's military, effective counter-battery operations have long been a major problem. An unnamed Ukrainian official had told Reuters troops were no longer using the RQ-11s on the front lines.

The recent video doesnt necessarily contradict these reports and may actually offer some confirmation. Less than 50 miles from the Polish border, Yavoriv is on the complete opposite side of the country from the hot spots in Crimea and Donbass. Ukraines western allies continue to use the site in no small part because there is no risk of becoming directly embroiled in the countrys conflicts or getting caught in the crossfire. The JMTG-Us activities are no where near the front lines and officially are not supposed to be related the fighting further east.

Ukraine MoD

A Ukrainian BM-27 Uragan rocket launcher.

But it is impossible not to see a connection between the increased US-Ukrainian military cooperation and Kiev's desperate need for more troops, better training, and improved equipment to combat well-armed separatists and their Russian allies. And its hardly the first time Ukrainian authorities have spared with their counterparts in Washington over military assistance programs. Though the United States has sent more than $600 million worth of gear, a major point of contention immediately was that most of those deliveries were non-lethal or defensive in nature.

Blankets and night vision goggles are important, Poroshenko quipped before a joint session of the U.S. Congress on Sept. 18, 2014. But one cannot win a war with blankets.

Then, in November 2015, The Washington Post reported that a batch of Humvees sent to Ukraine was practically falling apart when it arrived. The dated models had been languishing in warehouses and quickly became a logistical nightmare for local troops. Why would I pay to keep replacing tires when I could just buy a car? a special operations forces soldier who identified himself only as Lieutenant Colonel Andrei told the Post.

President Barack Obama and his administration had always favored sending batched of clearly defensive or protective supplies, focusing instead on sanctions and diplomatic initiatives to actually force a change in Russias policies toward Ukraine. The Pentagons apparent insistence on continuing to train with the Ravensperhaps useful for helping Kiev's troops on their path to modernization, but ill-suited to the countrys actual conflictseems to be in line with this strategy.

OK ARNG

Members of the 45th Infantry Brigade Combat Team stand in sub-zero temperatures after arriving in Yavoriv in January 2017.

Many legislators, including outspoken Republican Senator John McCain from Arizona had wanted to send better equipment and powerful weapons to Kievs forces and might've hoped a president from their party would be more amendable to the situation. However, while President Donald Trump has been rapidly expanding American military involvement in the Middle East and Africa since he took office in January 2017, he has repeatedly suggested it might be possible to work with Russian President Vladimir Putin and has been noncommittal on the situation in Ukraine.

"We will work with Ukraine, Russia, and all other parties involved to help them restore peace along the border," Trump told Poroshenko over the phone on Feb. 4, 2017, according to a White House statement. The call came amid a significant spike in fighting in the Donbass. There was no detail about what variation on Ukraines severely disputed borders he was referring to in this conversation.

It seems like that the new administration will continue to defer proposals to send Javelin anti-tank missiles or other weapons to Ukraine for the foreseeable future. In addition, Trump will eventually have to decide whether or not to extend the JMTG-Us mission, which is slated to end in 2020.

In the meantime, the troops assigned to the unit in Yavoriv will have no choice but to practice alongside their Ukrainian counterparts using whatever equipment is on hand. At the moment, this apparently includes the Ravens, which may not ultimately play a significant role in the countrys conflicts.

Contact the author: jtrevithickpr@gmail.com

Original post:
America Is Still Training Ukrainian Troops to Fly a Drone They Hate - The Drive

Barack Obama to visit Edinburgh for charity fundraiser – BBC News


BBC News
Barack Obama to visit Edinburgh for charity fundraiser
BBC News
Former US president Barack Obama is to make his first visit to Scotland when he addresses business leaders in the capital next month. He will also answer questions from the audience at the event, which is being held to raise money for charity. The ...
Barack Obama to visit Scotland for charity fundraiserCNN
When is Obama visiting Edinburgh, what is the Hunter Foundation and where will he be staying?The Sun
Former US President Barack Obama to visit Scotland - STVSTV News
Sky News -The Scottish Sun -ITV News
all 28 news articles »

Go here to read the rest:
Barack Obama to visit Edinburgh for charity fundraiser - BBC News

Analysis: Trump gets his blame game on, targets Obama for just about everything – USA TODAY

President Donald Trump blamed Barack Obama for the crisis in Syria in the aftermath of a chemical attack on civilians. USA TODAY

Donald Trump and Barack Obama arrive for Trump's inauguration ceremony at the Capitol on Jan. 20, 2017.(Photo: Scott Applewhite, Pool/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON President Trump seems to have a pretty clear idea who to blame for many of the problems that cross his desk in the Oval Office.

It's President Obama.

From the civil war in Syria and the nuclear showdown with North Korea to the loss of manufacturing jobs in the Rust Belt and problems with health care, the 45th president has blasted the 44th for misguided policies and weak leadership that have left him with a multitude of troubles to fix. He's even accused Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower during the campaign and his team of breaking the law in the Russia investigation.

"I have to just say that the world is a mess," Trump lamented at a Rose Garden news conference Wednesday with Jordan's King Abdullah II, words he repeatedly has used since taking office. "Whether it's the Middle East, whether it's North Korea, whether it's so many other things, whether it's in our country horrible trade deals I inherited a mess."

Just about every president is elected after campaigns that promise a change in direction, and many previouspresidents have criticized their predecessors. That includes Obama, who faulted George W. Bush's administration for what he saw as a misguided invasion of Iraq that undermined U.S. credibility around the globe, and for failing to take adequate steps to avert the financial meltdown that greeted Obama when he took office.

That said, Trump's critique of Obama has been more sweeping and more personal than other presidents in modern times, and he has been less inclined to temper his words after being inaugurated. Some presidents become less critical of their predecessors once they are in the Oval Office themselves and find themselves facing the same tough trade-offs and difficult issues.

It comes amid Trump's frustration about scoring record-low approval ratings and heading toward the end of his first 100 days without a major legislative achievement to tout.

"Trump is unusual in placing frequent blame on his predecessor so early in his term," said Steven Schier, a political scientist at Carleton College and co-author of The Trump Presidency: Initial Assessments,being published this fall. "It's a big contrast to his extravagant promises of quick solutions to major problems."

President Trump boards Air Force One under heavy rain at Andrews Air Force Base on April 6, 2017.(Photo: Jim Watson, AFP/Getty Images)

During the 25-minute news conference, Trump volunteered criticism of Obama and his team on:

A few hours earlier, the president suggested in an interview withThe New York Times thatObamanational security adviserSusan Ricemay have broken the law with actions related to Russian surveillance, although he didn't say how or provide any evidence. "A massive, massive story," Trump said, while calling the controversy over Moscow's meddling in America's election and possible collusion by his associates "a total hoax."

White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said Trump isn't blaming Obama for his problems, he's blaming him for America's problems among them Syria, North Korea and overbearing government regulations. The president is "busy and focused on fixing a lot of things," she said, "challenges that are the result of Obama failures."

Several former senior officials in the Obama administration said Trump's litany of criticism, especially his allegations of criminal wrongdoing,has angered and energized them.

"We saw President Obama welcome President Trump into the White House after we were heartbroken about Hillary (Clinton) losing," said Alyssa Mastromonaco, a former deputy White House chief of staff. "For Donald Trump to sort of hit a tough spot and decide he's going to deflect by blaming the former president ... of wiretapping it was laughable but it was also devastating."

Read more:

Back at the White House, this time to protest: ex Obama aide has some advice

The first 100 days of the Trump presidency

Fact check: Trumps line on Syria

Another former senior administration official said Obama himself has had a more measured reaction to Trump's jibes than many of those close to him. The former president generally has declined to respond publicly to Trump, although he has said he might do so down the road on issues he considers critical.

The two have what might charitably be described as a complicated relationship. Obama famously mocked Trump as he satin the audience, stone-faced,at the White House Correspondents Dinner in 2011. At the time, Trump was a leader in promoting the debunked allegation that Obama wasn't born in the United States. During last year's campaign, Barack and Michelle Obama stumped for Clinton in speeches that questioned Trump's character and qualifications for the White House.

Still, Obama and Trump held a cordial meeting at the White House two days after the election,then spoke by phone several times. Obama attended Trump's inauguration, but Sanders says they haven't spoken since then.

In this Nov. 10, 2016, file photo, President Obama and President-elect Donald Trump shake hands following their meeting in the Oval Office.(Photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais, AP)

Trump's attacks on Obama, including his denunciation of his signature Affordable Care Act as a catastrophic failure,have helped unite Democratsagainst him. Not a single congressional Democrat endorsed the White House-backedhealth care proposal. And Trump's jibes at Obama may well complicatehis efforts to reach across the aisle on a proposed tax overhaul and an infrastructure bill.

It's also an argument that is likely to work less well as more time passes. In relatively short order, voters tend to hold the current resident of the White House accountable for the state of the nation's economy and security. "The blame game becomes steadily less credible the longer he is in office," Schier says.

Even Trump seems to recognize that.

"I now have responsibility," Trump acknowledged in response to a question about the chemical-weapon attack on Syria. "I will have that responsibility and carry it very proudly. I will tell you that. It is now my responsibility."

Contributing: David Jackson

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/2oOu5o2

More here:
Analysis: Trump gets his blame game on, targets Obama for just about everything - USA TODAY

Sean Hannity: Media’s blindness to Obama spy scandal shameful – Fox News

A scandal of historic and monumental proportions began with a tweet just over one month ago.

"Terrible, President Trump wrote on March 4. Just found out that Obama had (ph) 'wires tapped' in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

That tweet sent the mainstream, alt-left, hate-Trump media into an all- out frenzy. For the next several days, instead of investigating the president's serious claim, they mocked, ridiculed and bashed the president.

Here are some examples of propaganda masquerading as journalism:

Our conspiracy theory president is at it again, CNNs Brian Stelter said the day of the tweet. And whenever something like this happens, I wonder what are the president's sources of information? Where is he getting these ideas?

The next day, over at ABC, Martha Raddatz pretended to interview White House Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

The president of the United States is accusing the former president of wiretapping him, said Raddatz, who you will remember cried on election night when Hillary Clinton lost.

I think that this is again something that if this happened, Martha -- , Sanders began.

If, if, if, if! Raddatz snapped.

It went on and on.

CNNs Anderson Cooper threw objectivity aside and determined the president was a liar.

We know the president of the United States has no facts, no facts to back up his startling allegation that the former president of the United States, President Obama, wiretapped him at Trump Tower during the campaign, Cooper said on March 16.

It's amazing to watch the White House continue to argue that the Earth is flat, Coopers colleague, Jake Tapper, said.

When the fact-challenged, destroy-Trump media finally got bored scolding President Trump over his tweet, they went right back to the same old, tired conspiracy. The one that claims Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election, a baseless assertion the mainstream media has hung onto for months without one single shred of evidence.

This Russian connection just keeps building, and every time it builds and expands, you have to wonder if Trump himself isn't worried about what's swirling around under the covers, said MSNBCs Chris Matthews.

Cooper and his pals agreed. The evil Russians and the evil Team Trump worked together to steal the election!

Then, on March 22, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes announced that he had credible evidence that President Trump and members of his transition team had been caught up in "incidental surveillance," after which their names were unmasked. Nunes also revealed this intelligence had nothing to do with Russia and was shared among high-level Obama administration officials, apparently for political purposes.

The media swung into action to investigate the serious claim and accurately reported these shocking new revelations. Oh, wait! No they didnt. They decided to destroy Nunes.

Who decided that Devin Nunes was qualified to be the House Intel chair? Because from everybody that I've spoken to who have worked with him, Republicans, Democrats, they say he is not up to that task, said MSNBCs Joe Scarborough, a former Republican congressman who now earns a bigger paycheck as a member of the alt-left media.

Nunes, who stepped aside in the committees investigation Thursday amid a barrage of bogus claims from the media and fellow House members, put his reputation on the line to try to get to the truth.

While the alt-left, destroy-Trump-propaganda-media was busy smearing anyone and everyone who didn't echo their biased agenda, real journalists from Fox News, Circa News and Bloomberg were actually doing their jobs. And they reported that it was President Obamas national security adviser, Susan Rice, who called for the unmasking of members of the Trump transition team.

Rice didn't even deny it. But the CNN wants us to think these developments are all just a big distraction. They're back to the Russia conspiracy.

You think that this is a diversion from this Russia story? Don Lemon asked earlier this week. Because so far, we've seen no evidence that she's done anything improper, and it seems like an effort to tar and feather her to try to make a lie the truth, the original tweet by the president.

Listen, Susan Rice is being tarred, feathered and burned alive for doing her job in a good way, Van Jones replied.

Unmasking Americans just because they are her political opponents was not her job. Over at MSNBC, Chris Matthews, who once gushed that Obama sent a thrill up my leg, accused Republicans of being racist and sexist for targeting Susan Rice.

If they don't like the facts, they just claim racism and sexism. But President Trump is not letting the media define this narrative.

"It's such an important story for our country and the world. It's one of the big stories of our time," Trump said of the Obama administrations apparent use of national intelligence agencies for political opposition research.

ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and all of their friends in the print media especially The New York Times and Washington Post need to realize their partisanship and hatred for the president has clouded their judgment in what is now one of the biggest scandals in American history.

Admit your bias. Do your job. And apologize to America for taking so long.

Adapted from Sean Hannity's monologue on "Hannity," April 4, 2017

Sean Hannity currently serves as host of FOX News Channel's (FNC) Hannity (weekdays 10-11PM/ET). He joined the network in 1996 and is based in New York. Click here for more information on Sean Hannity.

More here:
Sean Hannity: Media's blindness to Obama spy scandal shameful - Fox News