Archive for April, 2017

Energized by the resistance, surge of progressives express interest in running for office – Daily Kos

In GA-06, for instance, DemocratJon Ossoff's $8.3 million war chest isn't exactly a product of relentless candidate call times. Sure, Ossoff hasput in a stellar effort. But his candidacy took flight in unimaginable ways both inside the district and among small-dollar donors. (Tune in on April 18!)

But it's not just Georgia. In Montana, Rob Quist has raised $1.3 million for his congressional bid without accepting any money from lobbyists for corporate PACs. Republicans are so unnerved by Democratic traction in deep red states that a GOPSuper PAC was already taking aim at Quist last month in advance of the May 25 special election.

And did you catch that Kansas special election Tuesday where the Democratic candidate came out of nowhere to narrow the usual 30-plus point gap down to single digits?

So yeah, running for Congress isn't easy. But this upcoming cycle could be like no other for Democrats,for decadesto come.

The good news isheightened interest will make it much harder for the Democraticconsultant class to christen their preferred candidates to the exclusion of everyone else.

Bustos and her colleagues in the Illinois delegation gathered for dinner earlier this month to discuss how, with so many potential candidates, theyd land the best candidates in tough districts. Theyve decided to take a wait-and-see approach to watch who puts in the time and surrounds themselves with good teams.

Clearing the field is going to be a more difficult endeavor, said Balaban, the Pennsylvania consultant.

Finally, keep the option of running for state office in mind.

EMILYs List knows that many of the 10,000 women who have approached them this winter wont run for Congress or even for any office this cycle. But the abortion rights group is excited about building a bench for the future.

And with redistricting at play soon, some liberals believe its even more important to channel Democratic enthusiasm toward the state level.

Here is the original post:
Energized by the resistance, surge of progressives express interest in running for office - Daily Kos

Midday open thread: Red-state progressives push on abortion; Sanders’ show connects on social media – Daily Kos

Todays comic by Ruben Bolling isWar Beat, the mag for journalists with missile-crushes:

United Air Lines cant catch a break. Scorpion falls from overhead bin, stings passenger.

The interview with Bill Nye on the Bernie Sanders show was viewed 4.5 million times:

The Bernie Sanders show, which is filmed in the Democratic partys DC-based studio, is atypical in ways beyond just presentation. Sanders has decided to bypass traditional media and broadcast exclusively onFacebook. And it is attracting to borrow a Sandersism a huge audience.

The first episode of the show featuredthe Rev William Barber, a protestant minister and activist who is a national board member of the NAACP. The conversation, aired on 16 February, focussed on grassroots mobilizing, and has been viewed more than 950,000 times. [...]

But it was the Nye broadcast that really got the Sanders team excited.

Texas A.G. Ken Paxtons trial begins Sept. 12: The trial was originally meant to begin May 1, but a change of venue also changed its start date. From the time before he was attorney general,Paxton has beenaccused of misleading investors in a company.If convicted, he could face up to 99 years in prison.But the trial beginning inSeptemberdeals with the lesser charge that hefailed to register with the state securities board. Prosecutors want to get that over withbefore taking up the more serious allegations against Paxton.

6 3 newborn the star at Houston Zoo:

Red-state progressives turn tables on forced-birther activists in fight to make Supreme Court abortion ruling effective across the states:

In June 2016 the Supreme Court ruled on the biggest abortion case since Roe v. Wade,Whole Womans Health v. Hellerstedt. In ruling that regulations for abortion clinics must be rooted in medical necessity and scientific evidence, the court not only struck down two egregious abortion restrictions in Texas; it struck a major blow against the entire anti-choice movement. [...]

The Supreme Court decision doesnt automatically strike all the laws across the country that restrict abortion access by other means, said Sarah Gillooly, policy director ofthe American Civil Liberties Union in North Carolina, over the phone. So in order for the decision in Whole Womans Health v. Hellerstedt to be real and enacted across the country, its going to require a two-part approach. In practice, she said, that means litigating every individual law that is in conflict with the Whole Womans Health decision, or state legislatures repealing those laws and codifying that decision.

Chicago vows to make public buildings 100% renewably powered by 2025:

That's no small feat: With more than900 city-owned buildingsincluding public schools and colleges, park district fieldhouses and buildings owned by the Chicago Housing AuthorityChicago has the country's largest fleet of public buildings. Last year, they accounted for eight percent of all electricity use in Chicago.

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said the city willmeet its goalby acquiring renewable energy credits, purchasing utility-supplied renewable energy through the state's renewable portfolio standard and increasing on-site generation by installing morewindturbines andsolarpanels.

On todays Kagro in the Morning show, Greg Dworkin & Armando round up top headlines. KS-04 fallout. HuffPo allows that Daily Kos is back. Gop contracts Hitlerrhea. Trump flips on currency manipulation, NATO; learns N. Koreas complex & the Easter Egg Roll has nothing to do with China.

YouTube | iTunes | LibSyn | Support the show via Patreon or Square Cash

Read the original:
Midday open thread: Red-state progressives push on abortion; Sanders' show connects on social media - Daily Kos

Church revival? More liberals are filling Protestant pews. – Christian Science Monitor

April 14, 2017 GREENPOINT, BROOKLYNA year ago, Tammy Rose never imagined shed be active again in church, holding a palm branch with a community of Christians marking the beginning of Holy Week.

For nearly two decades, in fact, she had more or less abandoned the faith, disillusioned by what she saw as a constant focus on conservative social issues and pressing needs for more donations.

But if politics helped drive her away, it is politics that, in some ways, is drawing her back to the fold. And on this sunny Sunday morning at Greenpoint Reformed Church, not too far from the Brooklyn artists collective where she lives, Ms. Rose is beaming as she joins the responsive call to prayer:

Who are we? intones the Rev. Jennifer Aull, the congregations minister for community service. Responding, the congregation says together: We are young and old, gay and straight and in between. We are single and partnered, happy and sad, confused and inspired. We are street smart and college-educated. Some of us cant pay our bills and others have more than enough to share.... We are Gods people. We are the body of Christ.

Like a number of progressive congregations across the country, Greenpoint Reformed has seen both a surge in attendance and a newfound energy within its pews over the past year. Since the rise of Donald Trump to the US presidency, in fact, liberal enclaves have reported something of an awakening.

Hundreds of churches have joined the sanctuary movement to protest the administration's immigration policies since the election, and thousands have begun donating more money to religious groups supporting social justice issues, many report. At liberal seminaries like Union Theological in New York, students and community members have packed into public lectures on the social gospel, standing-room-only crowds that have left administrators stunned.

The call to worship on this Palm Sunday embodied some of the reasons Rose decided to return to church last year. When I visited for the first time last Easter Sunday, I was like, oh my God, these are my people! she says, noting she had been drawn by the rainbow flag and Black Lives Matter banner draping Greenpoint Reformeds front facade. I suddenly felt comfortable in this gang of how can I put it? Everyones a little quirky. I was really happy that there was a place where that diversity could be celebrated.

Yet the congregation also offered something a bit more intangible, says Rose, a playwright and artist with a day job in Manhattans tech industry. Already part of a community of politically-active artists, she is a regular presence at street protests.

But here in a community sharing prayer concerns together, or celebrating a gay couples renewal of their marriage vows, or including children coloring their Easter eggs I come here and I just feel replenished, she says.

The current Trump bump now energizing many progressive congregations, however, may only be a blip on what has been a decades-long decline of liberal Christianity and some of the mainline Protestant denominations that have carried its torch since the early 20th century, many scholars caution.

The social gospel has found its biggest moment of relevance since the Reagan years, says Brett Grainger, professor of theology and religious studies at Villanova University near Philadelphia. The energy is feeding directly off the current administration's proposed budget cuts, which target the most vulnerable members of society, and its policies on immigration, which rub against the belief that love of the stranger is central to Christian teaching.

But if there is a revival, it's most likely to be temporary, in that it thrives on its antagonism to Trump, Professor Grainger continues.

Liberal Christianity and mainline Protestantism have been contracting for decades, in fact, losing millions of members and the cultural influence it once was able to wield. Mainline Protestant churches, including those in Presbyterian, Lutheran, and Methodist denominations, have lost roughly 5 million adult members since 2007, and now comprise about 15 percent of the US population, according to Pew Research.

Formed in the modernist controversies of the 1920s, liberal Christianity began to demythologize certain teachings like the virgin birth, the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth, and the literal meaning of Scripture. In response, conservatives emphasized the traditional fundamentals of Christian doctrine, which eventually gave rise to the term fundamentalism.

At the same time, many liberal congregations began to emphasize the social gospel, which focuses on Jesus ministry to the outcast and poor and the call to Christian service. Indeed, Christian congregations on the left were major players in the Civil Rights movement and the rise of the sanctuary churches movement that supported Central American refugees in the 1980s. Many were also part of the spread of liberation theology, first preached by Central American Catholics in the 1960s, who proclaimed that God primarily identifies with the oppressed and marginalized.

Churches that are channeling this new anti-Trump energy into justice and caregiving issues, theyre not leaving their understanding of the Christian gospel behind, says Bill Leonard, professor of Baptist studies and church history at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C. They are saying: This is who we are, we have a history of this, and we cant be silent.

Rev. Ann Kansfield, the minister of proclamation at Greenpoint Reformed, isnt sure how much the congregations recent surge can be attributed to a Trump bump. More people voted for Bernie Sanders in Greenpoint, after all, than any other area of New York City in the Democratic primary last year, and Reverend Kansfield noticed a simmering political energy going back to 2015.

Up to then, the church had plateaued with about 35 adult members. On Sunday, there were more than 60, including children. We were already established as the progressive church in the neighborhood, she says, noting that LGBT inclusion and its soup kitchen and food pantry were its primary ministries. But with this new energy, weve been doing some deciding over who we are and what we do, and what following Jesus should look like in our context.

After many members were abuzz following the Womens March on Washington in January, the congregation put together a social justice task force. Kansfield has been making contacts with consortiums of faith groups mobilizing for progressive causes.

But this is a marathon, not a sprint, says Kansfield, who is also one of the chaplains serving the Fire Department of New York. It would be really easy for us to tire ourselves out with all our spreading and fretting. But how do we actually invest our energy and time and resources to where it will strategically matter?

Attending church is most effective when it is the spiritual engine that drives the rest of the week, she says, the way were going to recharge and refuel for the rest of the week. And that isnt going to be ginormous, but church and the spiritual practices that we share together can provide sustainable, ongoing energy thatll keep you capable of the work of the long game.

Sustaining the current spike in attendance at liberal churches may be difficult, however, given the long-term trend of decline, scholars say.

If we do in fact see an uptick in attendance, it will reflect the fact that liberal Christians are searching for spiritual resources to speak to the sense of despair they feel about the current political direction of the country, says Grainger. What organized religion offers is not only that broader network of support but also the theological reassurance that, even if things aren't going well in the short term, in the longer arc of history, God is in control.

Yet with the religious landscape in the US still in the midst of seismic changes, including the decline of church attendance and the rise of the so-called nones, those who do not affiliate with a religious tradition, a liberal de-emphasis of traditional doctrines and a focus on a social gospel might be attractive.

Professor Leonard at Wake Forest notes that many liberal churches have already developed outreach programs to engage nones in public theology discussions, home study groups, and dinner conversation groups. These endeavors are drawing many individuals back to church, or to church for the first time, he says.

For her part, Rose says she wants to become more involved in Greenpoints ministries.

I usually just go the Sunday services now, she says. But Im thinking more and more about volunteering in the soup kitchen every week. I dont want to come here just to participate in the family Ive found. Now I want to give back to the family.

See the rest here:
Church revival? More liberals are filling Protestant pews. - Christian Science Monitor

Vaughn Palmer: Smarting Liberals try to discredit NDP spending plans – Vancouver Sun

BC Liberal candidate Michael de Jong tried, but not very successfully, to discredit NDP spending plans, writes columnist Vaughn Palmer, who considers the plans more a change in priorities than a massive increase in spending. JONATHAN HAYWARD / THE CANADIAN PRESS

VICTORIA When the New Democrats one-upped the B.C. Liberals by announcing they would phase out bridge tolls this week, the governing party responded with a predictable how are you going to pay for that?

Never mind that the Liberals, through 16 years in office, routinely tapped contingency funds and other discretionary sources to pay for their schemes, half-baked and otherwise.

The Liberals were stung by the New Democrats having upstaging news coverage for their own promise of $30 million worth of relief for commuters in the form of a $500 cap on annual tolling payments.

If the New Democrats were going to eliminate a $200-million-a-year source of revenue for the Port Mann and Golden Ears Bridges, they need to provide a full accounting immediately.

Turned out NDP Leader John Horgan and crew were happy to oblige. And the answer, when it came with the release of the party election platform on Thursday, was diabolically clever.

Horgan would finance the elimination of tolls by liquidating the Liberals vaunted prosperity fund.

Or Christy Clarks LNG Fantasy Fund, as the New Democrats put it, not missing an opportunity to stick in the knife over the Liberal failure to deliver on the biggest promise of the last election campaign.

The fund was the intended repository of the proceeds from the three count em three terminals for exporting liquefied natural gas that Clark promised would be running by the end of this decade.

None have got beyond the promise-making stage to date. But that didnt stop the Liberals from cobbling together $500 million worth of discretionary funds from elsewhere in the budget and booking the total to the prosperity fund as if LNG were already a going concern.

Having contrived the LNG version of a Potemkin Village in the government accounts, the Liberals could scarcely deny the money was there to be used for other purposes if a successor government chose to do so.

Thus the Liberal stunt with the prosperity fund would help the New Democrats pay for a populist gesture to commuters angered by the arbitrary application of bridge tolling in B.C.

The New Democrats did not disclose a permanent financing scheme for the elimination of tolls once the prosperity fund is exhausted, as it would be in a few years.

Nor did their platform fully account for other promises like eliminating medical service plan premiums altogether over four years, stopping a projected 42-per-cent increase in auto insurance rates, and freezing B.C. Hydro rates for a year.

Also notable were a couple of dogs that did not bark in the capital plan. The New Democrats are proposing a five-year $7-billion increase in capital spending, on top of projects already announced, as the platform said.

On that basis, Horgan made no move to defund two of the most controversial projects in the existing capital plan, namely the $9-billion Site C dam or the $3.5-billion replacement bridge for the Massey Tunnel.

The gaps, real and perceived, in the NDP budget plan drew protests from Finance Minister Mike de Jong in a briefing for reporters shortly before noon. The usually-on-top-of-his-game de Jong started late and struggled with the numbers. A sign perhaps of having to rely on Liberal campaign staff as opposed to the able public servants in the Ministry of Finance.

He levelled a broad-brush accusation that NDP spending promises would mean massive increases in taxes and deficits and a downgrade in the provinces Triple A credit rating.

Maybe. But at first read the NDP plan did not represent all that massive a shift from the three-year budget the Liberals themselves tabled in February.

Horgan would increase program spending by 1.4 per cent above what the Liberals were projecting for the current financial year, by 2.5 per cent in fiscal 2018 and threeper cent the next year.

Those increases, for the most part, would finance readily defensible priorities including a long overdue increase in social assistance, elimination of interest on student loans, hiring more park rangers and conservation officers, androlling back ferry fares on the smaller routes.

On the paying-for-it side of the ledger, the New Democrats would restore a higher bracket for folks with taxable income in excess of $150,000 a year, boost the corporate tax by a point and impose a special tax on homes deliberately left vacant for speculative purposes.

Their platform also projects returns of almost $700 million over three years from unspecified elimination of government waste and hoped-for economic growth. On the strength of those numbers, the NDP claims the budget would over the three years havesurpluses in the $100-million range, about half the size of what is projected by the Liberals.

But as noted here Thursday, B.C. budgets include significant contingency funds and allowances against downturns in the economic forecast. Those measures of prudence total almost $2 billion over three years in the Liberal budget and fiscal plan and they are retained in the NDP plan as a hedge against the unexpected.

For all the unanswered questions and potential controversies to come, the NDP passed the first test of building an election platform.

To govern is to choose, as saying goes. On Thursday, John Horgan signalled that it is time for some different choices than the ones the B.C. Liberals have been making for the last 16 years.

vpalmer@postmedia.com

Follow this link:
Vaughn Palmer: Smarting Liberals try to discredit NDP spending plans - Vancouver Sun

Scowly Liberals legalize the demon weed – Macleans.ca

Minister of National Revenue Diane Lebouthillier, Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Jane Philpott, Minister of Health listen as Parliamentary Secretary Bill Blair responds to a question after announcing the legalization of marijuana during a news conference in Ottawa, Thursday April 13, 2017. (Adrian Wyld/CP)

And now, an edited but faithful reproduction of the background documents the Liberals released with their marijuana bill on Thursday:

strictly strictly restrict strict significant penalties strictly zero tolerance dangers restrict strictly restrict stop criminals strictly restrict punish more severely tougher deaths and accidents risk every day dangers punish more severely oral fluid.

This sets a certain tone.

After reporters were given a few minutes to read the bill, federal officials from, mostly, the Health department were ushered into the National Press Theatre to brief us. One began talking. Whats your name? a few reporters asked. The officials eyes bugged out in terror.

My colleagues reassured him that we would not quote him in print, an assurance that is standard practice in these so-called technical briefings. Weve done this before, one said.

Thus reassured, the official and his colleagues began laying out the details of the pot law, which sets a minimum age for marijuana sales (18 years) and allows for provinces to increase that minimum; caps the number of plants per household at four and the legal height at one metre; and radically increase criminal penalties for providing cannabis to children and for driving while impaired.

Then the nameless officials filed out and the cabinet ministers, whom we could feel free to quote, filed in. Jane Philpott from Health, Jody Wilson-Raybould from Justice, Ralph Goodale fromCentral Casting, and Diane Lebouthillier from Unilingual Francophones.

Perhaps you will find that last joke a little harsh, but Lebouthillier was quick to correct anyone who thought she might be there as Minister of Revenue: the bill does not provide for any tax on the sale of cannabis. She was there as a social worker by training, and as a former secondary-school teacher from the Gasp, where, she informed us sadly, it was easier for too many of her students to get their hands on a reefer of the marihuana than on a cigarette.

The ministers proceeded to lament the scourge of pot. They were led by their not-quite-ministerial colleague Bill Blair, the former Toronto Police Chief who has, in his capacity as a parliamentary secretary with special responsibility for not even remotely messing around, criss-crossed the country looking increasingly stern about this whole pot business. Today is an important day, Blair said. All of his career, hes been trying to protect children. Today was another child-protecting day. It is not our intent to promote the use of this drug, he said, sternly. No kidding.

Goodale at one point sputtered as he tried to find a word for cannabis in the context of its potential transport across international borders: This this this he said, making helpless massing gestures with his hands in front of his face. This product, he managed at last.

Blair said the goal of the legislation was to ensure that henceforth, nobody could get marijuana from some gangster in a stairwell. This suggested that the situation has indeed deteriorated since my high-school days, when my more louche classmates were unable to locate a gangster in any stairwell and had to resort to getting their weed from so-and-sos big brother.

The news conference was well-attended and the ministers time finite, so the event ended before I was able to ask my question. It would have been this: If marijuana is so dangerous to children, to road safety, at the border and as a driver of organized crime why is the government seeking to make its recreational use by adults easier?

Put another way: Given the Liberals body language, the plain meaning of their bill, and every single element of their discourse since 2016, the only part of this bill that makes no senseis the legalization part. They could strictly crack down on all the other dangers and everyday risks, with zero tolerance and harsh penalties up the wazoo, without legalizing anything. And since not one of them said anything resembling this is a great day for personal freedom and the right of adults to exercise choice responsibly, I honestly do not understand why they are legalizing anything.

Lets take it a step further. I believe the only reason the Liberals have tabled this bill is that they promised to, and that they are getting a little heavily-subscribed on broken campaign promises in other domains. I believe everything from Blairs appointment on forward is an expression of contrition for ever opening up this mess. I believe this bill, once passed, will radically increase the amount of police time devoted to measuring the height of plants, policing stairwells for gangsters, administering saliva tests at roadsides, and otherwise fretting over the demon weed. And proportionately less time doing other police work.

Which means this is the first time Ive ever seen a government deliver on a campaign promise while flip-flopping on the policy question at hand.

Its usually at about this point that Liberals get all huffy and say, We always campaigned on tighter regulation. We never meant to make it easier for kids to get marijuana. Well, sort of. Heres the policy resolution that made pot legalization Liberal policy in 2013. And indeed it says regulation blah blah blah children blah blah. But it also proposes an amnesty for people previously convicted of simple possessiona sure sign that the goal of the original proposal was to increase freedom, not further limit it.

I think this bill spends so much time apologizing for its own existence that it is not at all clear why anyone wouldseek to operate within its regime of hard-to-procure, weak product, served with a scowl, instead of continuing to operate within the black market. If this bill becomes law, the overwhelming majority of marijuana sold and consumed in Canada will continue to be sold and consumed illegally. Not a great day at the office for rooms full of ministers and public servants. Campaign promises arent cheap, as those who make them eventually figure out.

See the original post here:
Scowly Liberals legalize the demon weed - Macleans.ca