Archive for June, 2016

CHIRLA | Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles

Clinton Strikes a Pose on Immigration. Will she Deliver?

CHIRLA calls on Democratic presidential candidate to fix immigration mistakes of the past, including President Bill Clinton's policies that hurt families

Los Angeles -- The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA), an immigrant rights organization based in California, welcomed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's remarks Tuesday on immigration reform delivered in Las Vegas while surrounded by young immigrants who shared their stories with her.

The following are statements for Angelica Salas, CHIRLA executive director.

"Secretary Clinton has set herself apart from the pack of presidential contenders thus far by endorsing immigration reform with a path to citizenship. We agree with Mrs. Clinton that fixing our broken and unjust immigration laws is a family issue, a moral issue, a national identity issue.

We welcome Mrs. Clinton's intent to push immigration reform if elected President and we agree with her our nation cannot wait for a path to citizenship for millions of people who contribute on a daily basis to our nation's growth, economy, and vitality. We commend Mrs. Clinton for firmly stating she will fight for a comprehensive solution, stop attacks against executive action programs such as DAPA and DACA, and to go even further if Congress does not pass legislation.

The question is how much further will she go if she is elected President. We expect Mrs. Clinton to remain bold, committed, and ready to make immigration laws humane, targeted and effective, including fixing past mistakes by President Clinton which have directly contributed to the tearing apart of countless families. Only through actions in the face of inaction will we believe Mrs. Clinton's pose today strikes the tone our nation needs and our community deserves."

Go here to see the original:
CHIRLA | Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles

Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders clash in N.Y. debate – NY …

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Updated: Friday, April 15, 2016, 10:10 AM

Hillary Clinton came to Thursday's Democratic debate armed with the Daily News to take on rival Bernie Sanders over his positions on Wall Street and guns.

The highly contentious and spirited debate at the Brooklyn Navy Yard turned into an old-fashioned donnybrook with each candidate going after the other aggressively as they jockeyed for positioning just days before the state's April 19 primary.

Time and time again, Clinton used Sanders' own words against him, repeatedly pointing to the transcript of his April 1 interview with the New York Daily News editorial board as evidence that he simply wasn't prepared to lead the country, carry out his campaign's central promises, and take on the gun lobby in the U.S.

N.Y. RIPPED OVER ELECTION RULES THAT PREVENT 3 MILLION RESIDENTS FROM VOTING IN PRIMARY

"He voted for the most important NRA priority," Clinton said, referring to Sanders' 2005 vote in Congress in support of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which protects gun manufactures from most lawsuits stemming from illegal use of their products.

"Then he doubled down on that in the New York Daily News interview," she continued, pointing to the transcript of the Vermont senator's sit-down with "New York's Hometown Newspaper.

When asked whether he would support the Sandy Hook parents suing to try to do something to rein in the advertising of the AR-15, which is advertised to young people as being a combat weapon, killing on the battlefield. He said they didn't deserve their day in court a reference to efforts by the families of the 2012 Newtown, Conn., shooting to sue the manufacturer of the weapon used in the massacre.

"I could not disagree more, this is the only industry in America that has this kind of special protection. We hear a lot from Senator Sanders about the greed and recklessness of Wall Street, but what about the greed and recklessness of gun manufacturers and dealers in America," she added in a response punctuated by loud cheering.

GONZALEZ: WHEN VOTING CLINTON OR SANDERS, ACTIONS MATTER, NOT WORDS

"The law that Senator Sanders voted for and that I voted against," Clinton said, pointing to her vote as a U.S. senator from New York, "is an absolute abdication of responsibility on the part of those who voted for it."

When asked by CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer whether he owed the Sandy Hook families an apology, Sanders gruffly responded in the negative.

No, I don't think I owe them an apology, he said, prompting some booing, and another Clinton retort.

"This is a unique gift given to only one industry in the world ... by the U.S. Congress," she said.

The exchange came just hours after a ruling by a Connecticut judge not to dismiss a lawsuit by families of the Newtown massacre victims.

DAILY NEWS EDITORIAL BOARD SAYS VOTE HILLARY CLINTON

Clinton, who has opened up a double-digit lead over Sanders in New York, didn't stop with guns, though. She also ripped into Sanders over his perceived inability to explain how he would break up large financial institutions deemed "too big to fail" one his most prominent campaign promises and she again cited The News in doing so.

"Look, we have disagreements on policy. There's no doubt about it. But if you go and read, which I hope all of you will before Tuesday, Senator Sanders' long interview with the New York Daily News, talk about judgment and talk about the kinds of problems he had answering questions about even his core issue, breaking up the banks. When asked, he could not explain how," Clinton railed after being asked to respond to Sanders' claim that she was unqualified to be President.

"When asked about a number of foreign policy issues, he could not answer about Afghanistan, about Israel, about counterterrorism, except to say if he'd had some paper in front of him, maybe he could. I think you need to have the judgment on day one to be both president and commander-in-chief," Clinton said, prompting more cheering.

As loud as Clinton and Sanders grew at times Thursday night, the excited and divided crowd grew louder, playing a boisterous role over the course of the amped-up event.

TRANSCRIPT: HILLARY CLINTON MEETS WITH THE DAILY NEWS EDITORIAL BOARD

Clinton's vigorous offensive Thursday, however, failed to throw Sanders off his game. He quickly shot back, taking aim at Clinton's acceptance of money from special interests, lucrative speeches to Goldman Sachs and her support for the 2003 Iraq War.

"Let us talk about the worst foreign policy blunder in the modern history of this country," he said. "And do we really feel confident about a candidate saying that she's going to bring change in America when she is so dependent on big money interests?"

Coming just five days before New Yorks primary, Thursday's debate was likely Sanders only remaining opportunity to cut into Clintons growing lead in the Empire State and in the overall Democratic race.

The latest RealClearPolitics average of polling in New York shows Clinton leading Sanders 53%-39% in the state.

Meanwhile, the primary itself could also end up being Sanders last chance to make a substantial dent in Clintons lead in the total delegate count for the nomination.

TRANSCRIPT: BERNIE SANDERS MEETS WITH THE DAILY NEWS EDITORIAL BOARD

As it stands, Clinton has 1,758 delegates to Sanders 1,069, including superdelegates. New Yorks 291 delegates will be allocated proportionally, based on the election results, meaning Sanders would have to win Tuesdays contest by a wide margin to eat into his rivals lead.

Despite the tensions occurring throughout it, Thursdays debate represented a unique common denominator for both candidates: Brooklyn.

Sanders, who was born in Brooklyn, and Clinton, who represented New York in the U.S. Senate from 2001-2008 and resides in Chappaqua, and whose campaign headquarters are based in the borough of kings and churches, have both emphasized their years-long ties to the area.

With Alfred Ng

See the original post here:
Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders clash in N.Y. debate - NY ...

SEO Career Opportunities at WebiMax in Mount Laurel, NJ

Home About WebiMax Careers

Since then we have grown to a team of 100 personnel! Being the international leader in search engine marketing takes more than strategic planning from our Management Team. WebiMaxs success is due, in large part, to the highly talented and skilled employees that execute the day-to-day tasks.

As fast as we are growing, we require dedicated and motivated candidates to fill our job openings in SEO, PPC and Social Media. Whether youre an industry veteran with years of experience or a recent college graduate who possesses the intelligence, energy and motivation to join a winning team, career development at WebiMax is a win-win. WebiMax was selected as a Best Places to Work 2011 recipient by the Philadelphia Business Journal and has been recognized in other media as promoting a healthy and thriving work environment.

If you are looking to join a growing company where you are valued for your commitment, effort and results, consider the following opportunities:

See more here:
SEO Career Opportunities at WebiMax in Mount Laurel, NJ

Can You Stand Your Ground in North Carolina? – Kirk Kirk Law

Stand your ground laws have taken the spotlight in the news lately, in part due to the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman trial in Florida. As a result, some Carolina residents have begun to question the status of North Carolinas stand your ground law.

As of December 1, 2011, citizens of North Carolina had the legal right to defend themselves with deadly force in their homes, vehicles and workplace without the duty to retreat. Stand your ground laws exist in at least 25 states in addition to Florida and North Carolina.

These laws, sometimes called Make My Day laws or Shoot First, Ask Questions Later laws cover the extent to which a person can legally go to defend himself or others and the exceptions that apply.

North Carolina stand your ground law is addressed in NCGS 14-51.2 and 14-51.3 and are summarized below:

A person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat in any place he or she has the lawful right to be if either of the following applies:

The second scenario is sometimes referred as the Castle Doctrine, recognizing that ones home is ones Castle and that you should be able to legally defend yourself and your family when an intruder or trespasser poses a threat.

There are exceptions to the use of deadly force in self-defense against law enforcement officers and bondsmen. However, both must be acting in the lawful performance of their official duties and must identify themselves to you unless you reasonably should know their identity.

Before the enactment of Stand Your Ground statutes, and in states that dont currently have these laws, a person generally has a duty to retreat before being justified in using deadly force against an attacker. Without such statute, if you can avoid confrontation or get away, you must or you will risk criminal prosecution for assault, or depending on the outcome, manslaughter or murder.

A person is also limited to using reasonable force in the absence of a Stand Your Ground law. This means that a person cannot respond with deadly force when faced with non-deadly force such as a punch with a fist.

Until the enactment of these new statutes, the only justifiable use of force in self-defense was the return of the same level of force used against them; for example, a punch for a punch.

North Carolinas Stand Your Ground law removes the duty to retreat and generally allows the use of deadly force when in ones home, car or workplace, under reasonable circumstances. The law presumes that such an invasion gives the occupant the requisite fear required to use deadly force in defense of themselves or their family.

Should you find yourself in a situation in which you are being accused of a crime when you were acting in self-defense, it is important to consult an attorney about your legal options. I am experienced in this area of law and our Raleigh law firm can assist you in protecting your rights. Call 919-615-2473

Protecting your Privacy ~ Your privacy is our primary concern. At Kirk, Kirk, Howell, Cutler & Thomas, LLP., we understand the importance of protecting your privacy and will never share your contact information with a 3rd party. Contacting our law firm does not imply any form of attorney-client relationship.

Continue reading here:
Can You Stand Your Ground in North Carolina? - Kirk Kirk Law

Self Defense And North Carolina’s Stand Your Ground Law …

Trayvon Martin rapidly became a household name after he was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch volunteer in a gated Florida community. The police did not to arrest the shooter at the time nor charge him with a felony in the shooting death of Martin, based at least in part on the self defense protections of Florida's Stand Your Ground Law.

North Carolina also has a Stand Your Ground law. It is relatively new - lawmakers added it on to the Castle Doctrine just last year and it just became effective in December. Under the Stand Your Ground statute, there is no longer a duty to retreat from a place that you have a legal right to be before using deadly force to protect yourself.

Self defense is considered an affirmative defense - meaning, that what is being accused or charged did happen, but there is a reason why you should not be criminally punished. North Carolina's Stand Your Ground law allows you to defend:

To a certain extent, the law also allows you to defend others who are unrelated to you as well as other property not listed above. If you've been charged with a crime, your Raleigh criminal defense attorney can help determine whether the Stand Your Ground law is a usable defense in your case.

For many throughout North Carolina, Stand Your Ground was a welcome change in protecting would-be victims of crime. But, based on the recent Florida shooting, some North Carolina lawmakers are considering changing the self defense statute again. Whether the Stand Your Ground law is being applied correctly in the Trayvon Martin case remains to be seen.

Source: ABC 11 Eyewitness News, "Lawmakers consider changes to 'Stand Your Ground'," Joel Brown, March 27, 2012

See the original post here:
Self Defense And North Carolina's Stand Your Ground Law ...