Wikipedia–But For Books?
The red pencil is feared by rookie writers and well-established authors alike--the editing process is, by design, adversarial. I can name you at least one restaurant critic who has fired off a coruscating email to an editor who dared change one word in a review (he got a civil yet also coruscating reply from the editors colleagues).
And now it's about to be crowdsourced, by a new publishing firm that's led by thriller writer Hector Macdonald.
Macdonald, who studied zoology at Oxford under Richard Dawkins, has also worked as a strategic communications consultant in both the private and public sector--a job with striking parallels to that of the crowdsourced editor-had three novels published by Penguin in the past decade. And his fourth, Rogue Elements, is about to be published by Advance Editions, Macdonald's own publishing firm, which Macdonald hopes will use the not inconsiderable resources of book lovers that hang out on literary discussion forums. Is he really comfortable with the idea of a bunch of website Johnnies fiddling around with his oeuvre?
"I've witnessed the power and energy of 'the crowd' previously on a website called Book Drum where book lovers can post extra content around their favorite books," he told me. "And I've been impressed by the sheer mass of book reviewers and bloggers on the web, all eager to discuss what they like and don't like about a book. It seemed the perfect time to harness some of that energy to help authors make their books even better." Macdonald's consultancy career has clearly given him invaluable insight, too--"how to test quickly the assumptions implicit in the model about demand and social media dynamics, etc."
The platform is a simple one: There is no going into the manuscript and fiddling, a la Wikipedia, here. Instead, it's built on a forum system that "allows contributors to post suggestions online, tagged with a section number for the relevant passage of the book," says Macdonald. "They can also categorize their suggestion as, for example, 'Error' or 'Bright Idea'."
Crowdsourcing creativity is nothing new--from casting movies to remakes of RoboCop to Off-Broadway plays--yet it's hard to imagine the editing process being thrown open to any old Joe. But one of Advance Editions' authors, Heidi Kingstone, whose book Dispatches From the Kabul Cafe chronicles her years as a foreign correspondent in Afghanistan, sees it differently.
"There is so much history and so many different perspectives in Afghanistan," she told me. "So many experts and people with incredible experience that... might help make the book richer." In her estimation, the book is an "extra layer of research."
It's easy to see how the idea works for a non-fiction book, but fiction is a very different kettle of fish, surely. Macdonald agrees. "These aren't first drafts--the author has worked for months or years on their book by this stage, and has collaborated with a professional structural/story editor to get it just right. By the time suggestions start coming in from the rest of the world, the book is already as 'finished' as anything you'll find in the bookstore," he says, "But we think this new age of digital connectivity affords us an opportunity to take good books to another level."
Advance's idea isn't to reduce the expertise of its edits, but rather to introduce an extra layer of editing between first edit and last edit. Is Macdonald aiming a blow at the publishing industry? "Advance Editions is certainly no threat to regular publishers--we're tiny, and will remain so for the foreseeable future," he says. Early readers get to download the first half of a book for free onto their e-readers after signing up to Advance and creating a profile, to which they can link their social media pages--an important part of the process for Macdonald, who has created a YouTube trailer for his book--"a powerful force in social media these days, so it makes sense to have a presence there." If they like what they've read when the words stop, they can get the whole book downloaded for a 60% advance discount--around $3 from either Barnes & Noble, Kobo, or Amazon. The authors engage with the early readers, and anyone behind a particularly useful or clever suggestion gets an acknowledgement in the print edition when it comes out. The editing process is open for just three months, then the book is closed and off it goes to be printed.
But what about fact-checking? Or potential editorial sabotage? " If someone states a fact, check it with another source," he says. "So, for example, one contributor has just written that it's impossible to drill through masonry quietly, however specialist your drill. I'm not sure he's right about that, but as a key plot point in Rogue Elements depends upon it I will certainly be checking it out."
Original post:
Wikipedia--But For Books?
- Europe caves to bullies on speech, Yes, Wikipedia can be fixed and other commentary - New York Post - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder says site has liberal bias heres his plan to fix that - Straight Arrow News - SAN - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Elon Musk decided to create his alternative to Wikipedia: xAI is already developing it - - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- I Founded Wikipedia. Heres How to Fix It. - The Free Press - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel has nothing on Wikipedia when it comes to misinforming people - New York Post - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- The 3 building blocks of trustworthy information: Lessons from Wikipedia - Wikimedia Foundation - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Tilly Norwood already has a Wikipedia page, and not even the editors are sure what to call it - Fast Company - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- TUCKER CARLSON: WIKIPEDIA'S ANONYMOUS, UNTOUCHABLES ARE SHAPING AMERICANS' UNDERSTANDING Larry Sanger(Co-Founder of Wikipedia): "85% of the most... - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- MAGA Melts Down Over Wikipedia Blacklist - The Daily Beast - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk announces Grokipedia as Wikipedia alternative from xAI - Teslarati - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Grokipedia will be Elon Musks version of Wikipedia - Notebookcheck - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Transcript: Wikipedia Co-Creator Larry Sangers Interview on The Tucker Carlson Show - The Singju Post - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Says xAI Is Building 'Grokipedia' To Replace Wikipedia: 'Will Be A Massive Improvement' - Benzinga - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musks Wikipedia Competitor Is Going to Be a Disaster - Gizmodo - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk slams Wikipedia over bias, vows new alternative| RISING - The Hill - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk unveils Grokipedia, a new alternative to Wikipedia - Berawang News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Plans to Take on Wikipedia With 'Grokipedia' PCMag - Berawang News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk announces Grokipedia as Wikipedia alternative from xAI - Berawang News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- A New Encyclopedia in the Making? Musk Thinks Grok Can Replace Wikipedia Editors - Digital Information World - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Says xAI Is Building 'Grokipedia' To Replace Wikipedia: 'Will Be A Massive Improvement' - Berawang News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk is creating his own alternative to Wikipedia based on Grok - Mezha.Media - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Move over Wikipedia, Elons coming with Grokipedia - The Economic Times - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Launches Grokipedia by xAI as Wikipedia Alternative - - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia could be included in the teen social media ban. Australian users are worried - Crikey - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- 'Grokipedia': Elon Musk says xAI is working on a Wikipedia rival powered by AI - Mint - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk announced the Grokipedia project as a replacement for Wikipedia - Zamin.uz - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- 2 yrs into failed takeover, Elon Musk announces own Wikipedia - ummid.com - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- What is Grokipedia that Elon Musk is launching to take on rival Wikipedia - Tribune India - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Fears Of Wikipedia's End Overblown, But Challenges Remain Warn Researchers - Mirage News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Enver Hasani: Ibrahim Rugova an extraordinary intellectual, Kurti with Wikipedia knowledge to impress others - Gazeta Express - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- How AI and Wikipedia have sent vulnerable languages into a doom spiral - MIT Technology Review - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- How AI and Wikipedia have sent vulnerable languages into a doom spiral - StartupNews.fyi - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- Hone your Wikipedia editing and contributing skills at this monthly Brixton meetup - Brixton Buzz - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel Live(s On), No Thanks To Brands; The Case For Ad-Supported Wikipedia - AdExchanger - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia Can Save the Internet With Advertising - Tech Policy Press - September 23rd, 2025 [September 23rd, 2025]
- The right wing is coming for Wikipedia | On Point - WBUR - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Keeping information reliable in the digital age: Lessons from Wikipedia - Wikimedia Foundation - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Recent attacks on Wikipedia may have more to do with politics than accuracy - NPR - September 15th, 2025 [September 15th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is planning to take down Erika Kirk's page - and the reason why is shockingly brutal - The Tab - September 15th, 2025 [September 15th, 2025]
- In Neurocracy, it's up to you to solve a murder mystery through the internet's greatest resource, Wikipedia - Rock Paper Shotgun - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Editors Are Trying To Downplay Details Of Iryna Zarutska's Murder - OutKick - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Editors Are Trying To Downplay Details Of Iryna Zarutska's Murder - OutKick - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Recent attacks on Wikipedia may have more to do with politics than accuracy - KUOW - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Vs The Bengal Files: How politically motivated editors are distorting public perception of the movie - OpIndia - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- The 10 Giveaway Signs Of AI Writing, Wikipedia Reveals - Forbes - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- A Woman Was Stabbed to Death on a Train. Wikipedia Might Pretend It Never Happened. - The Free Press - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- The Terrifying Reality of Wikipedia Bias in an AI World - National Review - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Biased Wikipedia Hurls Brickbats at Fox and Newsmax, Bouquets at CNN and MSNBC - The Daily Signal - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- This self-hosted Wikipedia is wrong about everything, and it's hilarious - xda-developers.com - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is under attack and how it can survive - The Verge - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- The Silent Architects of Wikipedia: How a Tiny Elite Shapes What We Know - Vocal - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- GOP Investigation Pressures Wikipedia to Reveal Identities of Editors Accused of 'Bias' Against Israel - Common Dreams - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- With just a Raspberry Pi, you can host your own offline Wikipedia: here's how I did it - xda-developers.com - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- African science and tech missing from Wikipedia - SciDev.Net - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- US Lawmakers Launch Investigation Into Wikipedia Over Claims of Systemic Anti-Israel Bias - Algemeiner.com - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- House Republicans investigate Wikipedia over allegations of bias - Straight Arrow News - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- House panel probing organized efforts to distort Wikipedia, including entries on Israel - JNS.org - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- 'We seek your assistance...': US lawmakers wants to investigate Wikipedia over alleged biased entries; se - The Times of India - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- Republican quest to meddle with all informational institutions arrives at Wikipedia - AV Club - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- A mysterious Wikipedia editor is scrubbing Daniel Luries page of controversy - The San Francisco Standard - August 27th, 2025 [August 27th, 2025]
- Congress opens investigation into Wikipedia over foreign efforts to manipulate information - Washington Examiner - August 27th, 2025 [August 27th, 2025]
- Re: Response To Inaccuracies In The Wikipedia Article On Naa Gbewaa And The Origins Of The Mole-Dagbamba Kingdoms - Modern Ghana - August 26th, 2025 [August 26th, 2025]
- The subtle signs that give away chatbot writing, according to Wikipedia - TechSpot - August 26th, 2025 [August 26th, 2025]
- The most Wikipedia-searched people from Haverfordwest and Pembrokeshire towns - Yahoo News UK - August 26th, 2025 [August 26th, 2025]
- Jimmy Wales Says Wikipedia Could Use AI. Editors Call It the 'Antithesis of Wikipedia' - 404 Media - August 22nd, 2025 [August 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia and the Challenges of Open Editing Amid Crises - - August 22nd, 2025 [August 22nd, 2025]
- Weapons (2025) Wikipedia Plot Summary Review (Guest Column By Guy Too Scared to Watch It) - hard-drive.net - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- Why Wikipedia might be the last good place on the internet - The Globe and Mail - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- Bots flood Wikipedia prompting creators to set up other platform - The EastAfrican - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Wikipedia loses a round to the UK - Politico - August 14th, 2025 [August 14th, 2025]
- Wikipedia loses a round to the UK - R Street Institute - August 14th, 2025 [August 14th, 2025]
- Wikipedia loses UK Safety Act challenge, worries it will have to verify user IDs - Ars Technica - August 14th, 2025 [August 14th, 2025]
- UK Court Refuses to Exempt Wikipedia from Online Safety Act, Treats it on Par With Social Media - MediaNama - August 14th, 2025 [August 14th, 2025]
- Wikipedia May Have To Impose Identity Verification On Readers - Forbes - August 12th, 2025 [August 12th, 2025]
- Heres how to spot AI writing, according to Wikipedia editors - the-decoder.com - August 12th, 2025 [August 12th, 2025]
- Volunteers fight to keep AI slop off Wikipedia - The Washington Post - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- Reddit tops AI information top sources list in 2025, outpacing Google and Wikipedia - Storyboard18 - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia is fighting AI slop content - The Verge - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- Read this: How Wikipedia identifies and removes AI slop - AV Club - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Agrees to Ban Wikipedia from X Community Notes Over Bias Concerns - WebProNews - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]