Why Wikipedia’s highway editors took the exit ramp. – Slate
Welcome to Source Notes, a Future Tense column about the internets information ecosystem.
Wikipedia, road infrastructure, and dramaone of these things doesnt sound like the other. But when Ben, also known as bmacs001, posted a TikTok video promising to spill the tea on how the site treats road and highway articles, the Wikipedia contributor suspected that people would find the topic intriguing: Forty of Wikipedias most prolific editors have seceded and made their own wiki, and Im among them.
Ben was part of the contingent of Wikipedia editors who contributed to the sites pages covering road and highway infrastructureeverything from Interstate 80 and Route 66 to tinier highways on the side of the Jersey Shore. Weve been chugging along doing our own thing on the pedia for the past two decades now, but in the past couple of years, our little corner of the site has come under attack, Ben said. Faced with so much hostility, Wikipedias highway enthusiasts felt they had no choice but to break away and form a separate project: AARoads Wiki.
With over 800,000 views and counting, the nearly four-minute TikTok video is a testament to how even extremely niche topics gain visibility on the platform. As the posts top comment put it, Im so here for interstate Wikipedia drama. But behind this seemingly amusing clash of nerds is a far more pressing issue: how to reconcile 20 years of Wikipedias core principles and values with the practical demands of present circumstances.
Before diving into the nuances of the Wiki-policies, its worth pointing out a distinction among the Wiki-people. There are railfanstrain enthusiasts whose (at times) obsessive interest has been highlighted in TV shows and documentaries. On Wikipedia these railfans tend to improve the sites articles on freight and high-speed rail lines, or public transportation options like the subway. But there is another subspecies: so-called roadgeeks. Ben (who uses they/them pronouns and requested that their surname not be published) pointed out that these two types of users have somewhat different motivations. Roadgeeks are drawn toward the immediacy of the subject mattersince many users drive on roads every daywhile railfans gravitate toward the historical aspect, since locomotives arent nearly as common as they once were. Then again, whats true in the United States does not necessarily hold true for countries where rail travel is more prevalent. Ben suspected that many European and U.K. Wikipedians who are railfans would likely be more drawn to roads if they lived in the U.S., suggesting that the railfan-roadgeek spectrum is in part a function of culture.
One flashpoint that inspired the recent revolt was a strict interpretation of the sites reliable sourcing policy. Take the example of an article about West Virginia Route 891, a short eastwest highway that ends on the Pennsylvania state line. A volunteer editor seeking to contribute content to the page might use information found on the West Virginia Department of Transportations website as a reference source. However, policy sticklers are likely to deny this usage because DOT is a primary source for highways (directly involved in the subject matter). According to the sites policies, Wikipedia should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources, such as newspapers.
Angry road editors like Ben are up in arms, claiming that this hard-line interpretation of the guideline does not reflect the realities of the situation. With local newspapers going out of business left and right, there are rarely any other sources to draw from for these kinds of articles. Why not allow Wikipedians to cite from DOT, which is responsible for publishing highway routes?
Then again, its worth remembering that most of the time Wikipedia has good reasons for the prohibition against primary sources, especially with government entities. A states DOT content might generally be reliablebut allowing Wikipedians to cite from other primary sources, such as Chinas Central Propaganda Department, is not a risk worth taking. The question is whether there is some way to recognize an exemption, granting that some types of primary sources may be reliable while still protecting the integrity of the rule.
Wikipedias road editors have also struggled with the sites prohibition against original research. Returning to the example of West Virginia Route 891: An easy way to support the statement that this highway runs eastwest is to reference a map that shows it going that direction; however, citing such a map is considered original research by some of Wikipedias most hardcore policy enforcers.
Again, Wikipedia has good reasons for prohibiting true original researchthe policy has helped stop users from adding pseudoscience about Bigfoot excursions to the site, for example. But road editors are understandably frustrated when no original research is applied to exclude maps. Why should someone have to search out a second source to confirm in words what the map communicates in visual form?
Finally, theres the issue of Wikipedias notability guidelinethe principle that only topics that are truly worthy of notice should be included on the encyclopedia. Lack of notability is the reason why the proposed articles about many aspiring influencers get deleted every day. Roadgeeks tend to argue that highways are generally notable, and hence should not be screened for lack of encyclopedic importance, or at least not to the same extent as minor celebrities.
So far, general notability has not stopped a few Wikipedia editors from trying to delete the articles for lesser-known highways like West Virginia Route 891. In their TikTok video, Ben talked about how one particularly censorious editor tried to destroy our entire side of Wikipedia by tagging countless articles about roads and highways as non-notable topics that should be purged. The people who want to destroy, the only work that they need to do is destroy. Creating involves a lot more work, so were trying to fight back against people who have more time for deleting stuff, Ben told me in an interview.
Its possible that younger Wikipedia editors like Ben, whos in their 20s, have a different understanding of notability than did their predecessors. Where an entry on West Virginia Route 891 would have been too obscure to meet the criteria for print encyclopedias, those limitations do not apply to the digital platformand havent for decades. Understandably, the rising generation feels less nostalgia for the prior model or its gatekeeping. Theres this Encyclopedia Britannica-fication of the site that some people want to make happen, Ben said. Its bureaucracy for the sake of bureaucracy.
When I first heard that Ben and the team of 40 Wikipedia editors split from the site to create the separate AARoads Wiki, I couldnt help but feel a little sad. The new project has accrued more than 15,000 articles about North American highways since it beganalthough most of them are just forks from existing Wikipedia content. Sure, separate wikis have sometimes been entertaining, like Wookiepedia for Star Warsbut rivals to Wikipedia typically fizzle out into obscurity. In the near term, the secession harms not just Wikipedia itself, which needs robust road information, but also generative A.I. tools that rely on Wikipedia as training data. Maybe theres room to interpret existing Wiki policiessourcing, notability, no original researchin a more practical way that can keep other Wikipedia road editors from jumping truck.
While the new AARoads Wiki is making progress, disputes have broken out among the rebel forces. Some users argued that the project should focus solely on highways, while others advocated for a broader scope. A recent decision not to port over Wikipedias existing articles about city streets remains contentious. And some users have taken to participating in both projects simultaneouslyAARoads Wiki and Wikipediaand not maintain a clean divorce.
The pavement isnt always smoother on the other side.
Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, New America, and Arizona State University that examines emerging technologies, public policy, and society.
See original here:
Why Wikipedia's highway editors took the exit ramp. - Slate
- Made J. Cole look like he died in the war: Drake vs Kendrick Lamar Rap Battle Gets a World War 2 Styled Wikipedia ... - FandomWire - May 7th, 2024 [May 7th, 2024]
- Five Jokes from the First Season of The Simpsons You Now Need Wikipedia to Understand - Cracked.com - May 7th, 2024 [May 7th, 2024]
- Mastodon Play 'Wikipedia: Fact or Fiction?' - Loudwire - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- Wolff contacted Verstappen to explain Wikipedia statement - GPblog - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- Tulu Wikipedia more than doubles in size in seven years - The Hindu - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- File:Tony Gwynn Hall of Fame exhibit.jpg - Wikipedia - Rethnea.gr - January 24th, 2024 [January 24th, 2024]
- George Washington Masonic Memorial photo honored in Wikipedia photo competition - ALXnow - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Ruwiki, the Russian Wikipedia to launch on Monday - New York Post - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- In the War for Narratives Iran's Regime Takes to Wikipedia - NCRI - National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- We need to embrace AI, says Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales - CNBCAfrica.com - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- People are only just realising what the Wiki in Wikipedia actually means - The Mirror - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Kayla Braxton furious over wrong Wikipedia update, shares reaction - Sportskeeda - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Chicago Bears offensive coordinator Luke Getsy given hilarious nickname on Wikipedia page - On Tap Sports Net - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Is Wikipedia struggling to maintain neutrality in times of political unrest? - The Spectator Australia - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Top 25: Here are the most-read Wikipedia articles of the year - NewsNation Now - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- India's Jawan, Pathaan, IPL among Wikipedia's most read articles; ChatGPT tops the chart! Here's the full list | Mint - Mint - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Victoria Atkins' Wikipedia page edited after 'doctors in training' remark - indy100 - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Top 25: Here are the most-read Wikipedia articles of the year - KXAN.com - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedia, wrapped. From ChatGPT to Cricket World Cup, here are 2023's most-viewed articles on the internet's encyclopedia - WPVI-TV - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedia, wrapped. From ChatGPT to Cricket World Cup, here are 2023's most-viewed articles on the internet's encyclopedia - KGO-TV - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedia asks: Have you gotten $2.75 worth of info? Consider donating - The Ledger - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Dive into the weird and wonderful Depths of Wikipedia - WBUR News - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- ChatGPT, Taylor Swift: The top 25 most viewed Wikipedia pages of 2023 - USA TODAY - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- The 25 Most Popular Wikipedia Pages of 2023 - Mentalfloss - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- ChatGPT is Wikipedia's most-viewed article in 2023 - CoinGeek - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- These are the most read entries on Wikipedia in 2023: atomic bombs and much more. - Softonic EN - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Oppenheimer and Matthew Perry rank as two of the most viewed Wikipedia pages in 2023 - Gamereactor UK - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedias Most-Viewed Articles of 2023 Revealed - Greek Reporter - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Watching the Napoleon Movie? Don't Forget to Read His Wikipedia Page. - Slate - November 24th, 2023 [November 24th, 2023]
- Crowdsourced fact-checking fights misinformation in Taiwan ... - Cornell Chronicle - November 24th, 2023 [November 24th, 2023]
- The Sunday Read: 'Wikipedia's Moment of Truth' - The New York Times - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- 'The more vibrant the society, the more actors seek to influence Wikipedia' - Ynetnews - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- SOMEONE Keeps Editing Joshua Wright's Wikipedia Page To Downplay The Whole 'Sleeping With 1Ls' Thing - Above the Law - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Why Wikipedia is so imperative for public relations - PR Daily - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- More Wikipedia taunts as Max Verstappen erases a Lewis Hamilton World title - Yahoo Eurosport UK - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Local Teacher Becomes First Malaysian To Win Wikimedian Award ... - The Rakyat Post - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Wikipedia's Moment of Truth - The New York Times - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- The shocking truth about Wikipedias Holocaust disinformation - Forward - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- New Mall-Based Minnesota Kohls Store Coming in 2024 | Joel ... - NewsBreak Original - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- Open Access Makes Research More Widely Cited, Helping Spread ... - Techdirt - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- Russia fines Wikipedia owner for failing to delete Azov battalion content - Ifax - Yahoo News - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- Interviewing Jimmy Wales, Cofounder of Wikipedia - Reason - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- Purple Speedy Boyfriend Wikipedia: Who Is Purplespeedy Dating? - PKBnews.in - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- How Conflicts and Population Loss Led to the Rise of English ... - Political Science Now - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Research Article: Wikipedia and Open Access (preprint) - LJ INFOdocket - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Who Was Kuaron Harvey Cousin Paris Harvey? Wikipedia And Age - PKBnews.in - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Opinion | The Impossible Math of the Debt Deal's Detractors - The New York Times - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Wikipedia Grapples With Chatbots: Should It Allow Their Use For ... - Techdirt - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Stephen Joness deleted rugby 7s article leads to hilarious wikipedia update | RugbyDump - RugbyDump - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Bradley Dack is the kind of football hero that cannot be judged on a ... - Football365 - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Who is Roxy Horner? Jack Whitehall's Girlfriend Age, Wikipedia And ... - PKBnews.in - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- The Unspeakable Death of the 'Almighty Dollar' - Resilience - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- WikiBias: How Wikipedia erases fringe theories and enforces conformity - Minding The Campus - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Online Safety Bill age checks? We won't do 'em, says Wikipedia - The Register - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Russian court fines Wikipedia over Ukraine invasion article - Verdict - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Wikipedia names Howie Roseman 'master of all the draft' - Yardbarker - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Don't rely on sites like Wikipedia to write verdicts: Madras HC - Times of India - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Amazon, Bing, Wikipedia make EU's list of 'Very Large' platforms - The Register - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Who Is Patty Raynes? Net Worth 2023, Wikipedia And Age Details ... - PKBnews.in - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- What After Xi Jinpings Overture to Zelensky? - IDN InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- New study rejects research suggestions that Wikipedia content shapes High Court judgments - The Irish Times - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- The Wikipedia fight over Poland's role in the Holocaust sparks death threats against an Ottawa professor - The Canadian Jewish News - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Who were March's most newsworthy celebrities, according to the ... - KTVZ - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Twitter using Wikipedia to decide what is 'government-funded media' - Business Insider - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Practical Apps: Wikipedia Looking Smart To Go | Spotlight ... - highcountryshopper.com - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Rob Kearney receives Wikipedia edit after Joe Biden's All Blacks blunder - Rugby OnSlaught - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Editor's notes: Nut drivers - Bryan County News - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Top 5 Kart Games of the 90's - Twin Galaxies - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Things to do in the UAE this week: Ramadan shopping festival ... - The National - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Wikipedia had the wrong Vatican City flag for years. Now incorrect flags are everywhere - Catholic News Agency - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Texas ruling to ban abortion pills nationwide gets basic facts wrong: experts - Business Insider - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Hashtag Trending Apr.5th- Wikipedias new logo, $20 billion to revive Intel, Fake ransomware attacks - IT World Canada - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- ChatGPT and GPT4: Wikipedia 2.0 or a fresh starting point for society? - IT-Online - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Letters for April | Letters to the Editor - The Critic - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Sprouts Permanently Closing Major California Location at the End of ... - NewsBreak Original - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Who owns the Water? The Tragedy of Commons! BigWire - Big Wire, news that matters - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Wikipedia's new sound logo had a seriously ambitious design brief - Creative Bloq - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
- Will Wikipedia be written by AI? Founder Jimmy Wales is thinking about it - Evening Standard - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
- Rodri suffers brutal Wikipedia takedown as Scotland tantrum leaves Spaniard 'crying into his haggis bon bons' - Daily Record - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
- This is Wikipedia's new audio logo, which is designed to be 'The Sound of All Human Knowledge' - MusicRadar - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
Tags: